簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊岳龍
Yang, Yueh-Long
論文名稱: 對話式批判性思考融入學術寫作教學之研究:大學學術英文情境中論證式文體之教學
An Investigation of Integrating Dialogical Critical Thinking into Academic Writing: Teaching Argumentative Essays in an EAP Context of Tertiary Education
指導教授: 陳秋蘭
Chen, Chiou-Lan
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 267
中文關鍵詞: 對話式批判性思考論證性文章學術寫作
英文關鍵詞: dialogical critical thinking, argumentative essays, EAP writing
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201900856
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:227下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討將對話式批判性思考融入以英語為外語之台灣大學生學術寫作教學中的成效。具體而言,本研究以社會建構理論框架,綜合批判性思維模式和提問教學法,旨在探討實施對話式批判性思考對學生論證性文章的影響,以及學生對於對話式批評性思考的看法。本研究的參與者是台灣某大學語言中心的30名大學生。他們分為兩組:對話式批判性思考組(DCT)和傳統式教師反饋組(TTF)。本研究採用量化及質性混和研究法,收集的資料包括三篇論證文章及其根據兩個評量標準所獲得之評分,學生進行對話式批判性思考時所錄製的對話,對話式批判性思考問卷,及後續追蹤訪談和課室觀察記錄。量化分析包含對論證文章的分數進行統計顯著性之檢測,而質化分析包含將學生的文章、對話內容及訪談內容進行轉錄和編碼。經過一學期的對話式批判性思考訓練,本研究的結果顯示,對話式批判性思考有效地提升台灣大學生論證性文章的品質及批判性思考能力。雖然在進行對話式批判性思考時,學生感到精疲力竭,但學生整體上對於對話式批判性思考維持積極態度。本研究依其結果對教學提出建議,包括教師宜使用理論架構來引導學生進行批判性思考,且於教學時選擇學生熟悉的寫作主題,並在批判性思考過程中擔任協助之角色。

    This study aims to explore the effects of integrating dialogical critical thinking into academic writing instruction in EFL university students in Taiwan. Specifically, based on the theoretical framework of Social Constructivism, a comprehensive critical thinking model, and the pedagogy of questioning, this study aims to investigate the changes in students’ argumentative essays and students’ perceptions of dialogical critical thinking. The participants of this study were 30 university students in a language center in Taiwan. They were divided into two groups: the dialogical critical thinking group (DCT), and the traditional teacher feedback group (TTF). A mixed-methods approach is applied, and the data collected include three argumentative essays and their scores based on two rubrics, dialogues from the dialogical critical thinking sessions, critical thinking perception questionnaires, follow-up interviews, and field notes. Quantitatively, statistical significance of the scores is tested. Qualitatively, the recorded dialogues and the follow-up interview data were transcribed and coded. The results of this study indicated that the dialogical critical thinking had a significantly effect on the quality of argumentative essays and critical thinking at the end of the study. Although feeling exhausted, the students overall had a positive perception of dialogical critical thinking. The pedagogical implications were proposed, which included using a model to guide students in thinking, choosing a writing topic that students were familiar with, and facilitating students’ thinking process.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT i ENGLISH ABSTRACT ii ACKNOWLEGEMENTS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 Motivation and Purpose 1 Definition of Dialogical Critical Thinking 7 Context of the Study 8 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 11 Social Constructivism 11 Definition and Challenges of Argumentative Writing 16 Dialogic Approach to Critical Thinking 21 Elements of Thought and Intellectual Standards 25 Elements of Thought 27 Intellectual Standards 29 Intellectual Traits 31 Critical Thinking in EFL Language Instruction 36 Integrating Dialogical Critical Thinking into Academic Writing 40 Empirical Studies of Critical Thinking in EFL Education 44 Chapter Summary 52 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 54 Research Approach 54 Contexts and Participants 57 Instructional Design 60 Course Design 61 Pedagogical Intervention 65 Data Collection 78 Three Argumentative Essays 78 Dialogical Critical Thinking Sessions 81 Questionnaires for Critical Thinking Perception 83 Follow-up Interviews 84 Field Notes on Classroom Observations 85 Data Analysis 86 Three Argumentative Essays 87 Dialogical Critical Thinking Sessions 89 Questionnaire for Critical Thinking Perception 90 Follow-up Interviews 91 Field Notes on Classroom Observations 92 Chapter Summary 92 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND FINDINGS 93 Writing Performance in Argumentative Essays 93 The Rubrics for the Assessment of the Argumentative Essays 95 The Critical Thinking Grid 106 Dialogic Critical Thinking in Argumentative Essays 111 Purpose 112 Question at Issue 118 Point of View 126 Information 133 Concepts 149 Assumptions 154 Inferences 157 Implications 162 Students’ Perceptions of Dialogical Critical Thinking in Argumentative Essays 168 Students’ Perceptions of Critical Thinking 168 Students’ Perceptions of Argumentative Essays 172 Students’ Perceptions of Integrating Critical Thinking into Academic Writing 176 Chapter Summary 188 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION 190 RQ1: Difference in Argumentative Essays after Dialogical Critical Thinking 190 The Scores from Rubrics Used in Dialogical Critical Thinking 190 The Role of Dialogues in Dialogical Critical Thinking 193 The Role of a Model in Dialogical Critical Thinking 201 The Role of Domain Knowledge in Dialogical Critical Thinking 204 Teaching Strategies for Dialogical Critical Thinking 212 RQ2: Students’ Perceptions of Dialogical Critical Thinking 214 Perceptions of Critical Thinking and Argumentative Essays 214 Students’ Perceptions of Integrating Critical Thinking into Academic Writing 215 Chapter Summary 219 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION 221 Summary of the Key Findings 221 Pedagogical Implications 223 Limitation of the Study 226 Suggestions for Further Research 229 REFERENCES 231 APPENDICES 247

    Alnofaie, H. A. (2013). The implementation of critical thinking as EFL pedagogy: challenges and opportunities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, U.K.

    Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.

    Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71-94.

    Atkinson, D., & Heritage, J. (1999). Transcript notation - Structures of social action: studies in conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13(4), 243-249.

    Bacha, N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 229–241.

    Bailey, F., & Pransky, K. (2005). Are "other people's children" constructivist learners too? Theory into Practice, 44(1), 19-26.

    Beyer, B. K. (2001). What philosophy offers to the teaching of thinking. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed., pp. 87-91). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Benesch, S. (1999). Thinking critically, thinking dialogically, TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 573-580.

    Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Bensley, D. A. (1998). Critical thinking in Psychology: A unified skill approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Bonk, C., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and socialcultural component of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Bonk & K. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Brandon, L. (2012). At a glance: Essays. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 93.

    Bruce, I. (2011). Introduction to EAP: Key issues and concepts. In I. Bruce, Theory and concepts of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 3-14). London: Palgrave.

    Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Butler, J. A., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Investigating instruction for improving revision of argumentative essays. Written Communication, 28(1), 70-96.

    Buranapatana, M. (2006). Enhancing critical thinking of undergraduate Thai students through dialogic inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra, Australia.

    Carrithers, D., Ling, T. & Bing, J. C. (2008). Messy problems and lay audiences: Teaching critical thinking within the finance curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 152-170.

    Carter, R. (2007). Response to special issue of applied linguistics devoted to language creativity in everyday context. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 597-608.

    Chao, C. C., & Lin, Y. Y. (2016). 培養思考力:文學小圈圈在高中英文課堂的應用 [Cultivating thinking skills: The application of literature circle in high school English classes]. In C. L. Chern & Y. S. Cheng, 培養思考力:以高中階段英語文教育為例[Cultivating Thinking Skills: An Example from English Language Education in Senior High Schools] (pp. 83- 104). Taiwan: Crane.

    Chen, M. (2010). Infusing Thinking Skills into an L2 Classroom: A Case Study of an Innovation in a Taiwanese University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University, UK.

    Chern, C. L. (2016). 批判性思考的理念與英語教學應用 [The concept of critical thinking and the application in English teaching and learning.]. In C. L. Chern & Y. S. Cheng, 培養思考力:以高中階段英語文教育為例 [Cultivating Thinking Skills: An Example from English Language Education in Senior High Schools] (pp. 1-16). Taiwan: Crane.

    Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online
    argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 253-277.

    Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Croskerry, P. (2003). Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 41, 110-120.

    Daniel, M. F. (2001). Philosophical dialogue among peers: A study of manifestations of critical thinking in pre-service teachers. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 6, 49-67.

    Davies, W. M. (2008). ‘Not quite right’: helping students to make better arguments. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 327–340.

    Dawson, R. E. (2000). Critical thinking, scientific thinking, and everyday thinking: Metacognition about cognition, Academic Exchange Quarterly, Fall, 76-83.

    Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Diestler, S. (2001). Becoming a critical thinker: A user friendly manual (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Dooey, P. (2010). Students’ perspectives of an EAP pathway program. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 184-197.

    Doolittle, P. E. (1999). Constructivism and online education. Retrieved from http://www.trainingshare.com/resources/doo2.htm

    Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.

    Eisenman, G., & Payne, B. D. (1997). Effects of the higher order thinking skills program on at-risk young adolescents’ self-concept, reading achievement, and thinking skills. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 20(3), 1-25.

    Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, 32, 82-111.

    Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

    Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 4-10.

    Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement and relation to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61-84.

    Facione, P. A. (2009). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Retrieved from http://www.insightassessment.com/9articles%20WW.html.

    Fahim, M., & Mirzaii, M. (2014). Improving EFL argumentative writing: A dialogic critical thinking approach. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(1), 3-20.

    Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows: advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage.

    Flores, K. L., Markin, G. S., Burbach, M. E., Quinn, C. E. & Harding, H. (2012). Deficient critical thinking skills among college graduates: Implications for leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, 212-230.

    Garside, C. (1996). Look who’s talking: a comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45, 212–227.

    Gaskaree, B. L., Mashhady, H. & Dousti, M. (2010). Using critical thinking activities as tools to integrate language skills. Sino-US English Teaching, 7(4), 33-45.

    Gibson, M. (2012). Integrating higher-order thinking skills into the L2 classroom. Retrieved from: https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/27571/1/Gibson.pdf

    Gieve, S. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson’s “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL”: A case for critical thinking in the English language classroom. A reader reacts. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 123-129.

    Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domain: dispositions, skills, structure training and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.

    Hammersley, M. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism. In J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for Psychology and the Social Science (pp. 159-174). Leicester: BPS Books.

    Hashemi, M. R. & Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40(1), 37-47.

    Heijltjes, A., Van Gog, T. & Paas, F. (2014). Improving students’ critical thinking: Empirical support for explicit instructions combined with practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 518-530.

    Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21, 66-78.

    Hyland, K. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.

    Hyland, K. & Shaw, P. (2016). Introduction. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge.

    Inch, E. S., & Warnick, B. (2010). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (6th ed.). Hong Kong: Allyn & Bacon.

    Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

    Jones, M., & Araje, L. (2002). The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 5(3). Retrieved from: https://ac-journal.org/journal/vol5/iss3/special/jones.pdf

    Jordan, R. R. (2002). The growth of EAP in Britain. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 69-78.

    Jenkins, E. W. (2000). Constructivism in school science education: Powerful model or the most dangerous intellectual tendency? Science & Education, 9, 599-610.

    Kalpana, T. (2014). A Constructivist perspective on teaching and learning: A conceptual
    framework. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27-29.
    Lang, D. (2000). Critial thinking in web courses: An oxymoron? Syllabus, 14(2), 20-24.

    Liaw, M. L. (2007). Content-based reading and writing for critical thinking skills in an EFL context. English Teaching and Learning, 31(2), 45-87.

    Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking – what can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.

    Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System, 45, 117-128.

    Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1, 234−250.

    McPeck, F. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: St. Martine’s Press.

    Meiramova, S. (2017). Applications of critical thinking research: Foreign language teaching in an intercultural context. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 7(1), 24-36.

    Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London & New York: Rutledge.

    Mitchell, S., & Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the quality of argument in higher education. Final Report. School of Lifelong Learning and Education: Middlesex University.

    Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge, London and New York.

    Moore, T. J. (2017). On the teaching of critical thinking in English for Academic Purposes. In R. Breeze & C. Sancho Guinda (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching (pp.19-35). Educational Linguistic.

    Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464-479.

    Mvududu, N. H., & Thiel-Burgess J. (2012). Constructivism in practice: The case for English language learners. International Journal of Education, 4(3), 108-118.

    National Academy for Educational Research. (2015). Brief Introduction to 12-year Basic Education Curriculum Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/52/129488083.pdf

    Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: university tutors’ views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds.), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 99–117). London: BAAL/Equinox.

    Niu, L., Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Garvan, C. W. (2013). Do instructional intervention influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 114-128.

    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.

    Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Developments in Sociology, 20, 103-118.

    Papastephanou, M., & Angeli, C. (2007). Critical thinking beyond skill. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(1), 6-20.

    Patchan, M. (2011). Peer review of writing: learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers’ texts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, California: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.

    Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: what, why and how? New Directions for Community Colleges, 77, 3-24.

    Paul, R. (2005). The state of critical thinking today. New Directions for Community Colleges, 130, 27-38.

    Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Learn the tools the best thinkers use. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking. Dillon Beach, CA, Foundation of Critical Thinking Press.

    Paul, R., Elder, L., & Bartell, T. (1997). California teacher preparation for instruction in critical thinking: Research finding and policy recommendations. Sacramento: California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.

    Pelligrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.), (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century, National Academics Press.

    Pica, T. (2000). Tradition and transition in English language teaching methodology. System, 29, 10-18.

    Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38, 444-456.

    Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills, ELT Journal, 61(2), 100-106.

    Ravichandran, S., Kretovics, M., Kirby, K., & Ghosh, A. (2017). Strategies to address English language writing and challenges faced by international graduate students in the US. Journal of International Students, 7(3), 764-785.

    Reed, J. H. (1998). Effect of a Model for Critical Thinking on Student Achievement in Primary Source Document Analysis and Interpretation, Argumentative Reasoning, Critical Thinking Dispositions and History Content in A Community College History Course. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/effect-of-a-model-for-critical-thinking-on-student-achievement/596

    Rezaei, S. (2011). Critical thinking in language education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(4), 769-777.

    Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman Pearson Education.

    Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92, 447-472.

    Schmidt, S. J. (1999). Using writing to develop critical thinking skills. NACTA Journal, 31-38.
    Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2008a). Defining Critical Thinking, Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/definingCT.cfm

    Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2008b). Our Concept of Critical Thinking, Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/aboutCT/ourConceptCT.cfm

    Shirkhani, S. & Fahim, M. (2011). Enhancing critical thinking in foreign language learners. Social and Behavior Sciences, 29, 111-115.

    Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogic method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11-31.

    Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31, 277-289.

    Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 765-774.

    Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12-23.

    Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement, and improvement. National Institute of Education. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED272882.pdf

    Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185.

    Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Tanaka, J. (2014). A dialectical approach to critical thinking in EAP writing. Second Language Studies, 33(1), 53-84.

    Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.

    Van Gelder, T. (2005). Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science, College Teaching, 53, 41-46.

    Vaughn, L. (2005). The power of critical thinking: Effective reasoning about ordinary and extraordinary claims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 25-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Vyncke, M. (2012). The concept and practice of critical thinking in academic writing: An investigation of international students’ perceptions and writing experiences. Unpublished master’s thesis, King’s College, London, U.K.

    Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, Summer, 8-19.

    Wingate, U. (2012). Argument! Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 1-10.

    Wofle, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26, 183-209.

    Wright, I. (2002). Is that right? Critical thinking and the social world of the young learner. Toronto: Pippin Publishing.

    Wu, S. M. (2006). Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: investigating the strategy of problematization in students’ argumentation. RELC Journal, 37(3), 329–353.

    Yang, Y. T., & Gamble, J. (2013). Effective and practical critical thinking-enhanced EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 67(4), 398-412.

    Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Education Psychology, 71(2), 261-282.

    Yuan, H., Williams, B. A., & Fan, L. (2008). A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students’ critical thinking through problem-based learning. Nursing Education Today, 28(6), 657-663.

    Zhu, W. (2001). Performing argumentative writing in English: Difficulties, processes, and strategies. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 34-50.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE