研究生: |
陳明媚 Min-Mei Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小聽覺障礙學生數學文字題解題歷程之研究 A study of problem-solving of hearing-impaired students |
指導教授: | 張蓓莉 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 90 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 186 |
中文關鍵詞: | 聽覺障礙 、數學文字題 、問題解決 |
英文關鍵詞: | hearing-impaired, word problem, problem-solving |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:169 下載:61 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討國小三年級聽覺障礙學生在一步驟及二步驟文字題的解題歷程,利用Mayer(1992)所提的解題階段分析所得資料。題材為自編之數學測驗,題型包括合併類,改變類及比較類,二步驟題目則是將上述題型擇二加以組合。
研究對象為五位台北縣市三年級啟聰資源班的重度(以上)聽覺障礙學生,其智力正常未伴隨其他障礙,國民小學三年級數學成就測驗在百分等級50以下者,自編前測題答對四題以上,排除無法與研究者溝通的學生,且經家長同意者。利用問題思考法取得受試在文字題的解題資料,再以原案法分析。主要發現如下:
1. 歸納五位受試的解題歷程錯誤有:
(1) 問題轉譯:
a. 依題意理解困難的整體性來區分—整體語意理解困難及部分語意理解困難。
b. 依題意理解困難的句型來區分—對關係句的理解有困難。
(2) 問題整合:加減法概念不清。
(3) 解題計畫及監控:監控能力差,關鍵字策略。
(4) 解題執行:包括對位錯誤,數錯,忘了將借位後的數值放置答案處。
綜合受試的表現,其主要困難發生在問題轉譯階段。
2. 只有一位受試有加減法概念不清的情形;策略運用的情形和一般兒童沒有差異;計算錯誤並不是受試主要的錯誤類型。
3. 以題目類型來看,五位受試在含有比較類的題目表現最差,而在改變類二步驟題表現最好。
根據上述結果,本研究對數學應用題教學及未來研究提出數點建議。
The purpose of this study was to explore the problem-solving process of hearing-impaired students to solve one-step and two-step word problems. And the data was analyzed acccording to the four problem-solving stages proposed by Mayer(1992). The Math Test was designed by the researcher. Semantic stuctures included in the test were combine, change, and compare problems. The two-step problems were made of any two structures of the above.
Five hearing-impaired students of third grade were selected from the four elementary schools in Taipei city and county as participants of the research. They were with severe hearing loss , normal intelligence without any other disorders, the rank under 50 % in the Elementary School Math Achivement Test for the third graders, at least four items correct in the pretest, as well as they could communicate with the researcher, and with the permission of the parents. Clinical interviews and protocol methods were employed to understand the problem-solving process of these five participants. The main findings of this study were as follows:
1. The problem-solving process errors discovered were:
(1) Translation stage:
a. discriminated by the difficulty in comprehension of the problem — the comprehension difficulty of the problem as a whole and in parts.
b. discriminated by the difficulty in comprehension of the sentence — the comprehension difficulty in the relational sentence.
(2) Integration stage: misunderstanding of the concept of addition and subtraction.
(3) Planning and monitoring stage: worse monitering ability, the usage of the keyword strategy.
(4) Excution stage: computation errors.
Main difficulties in problem-solving was in the stage of problem translation for the subjects.
2. Only one participant misunderstood the concept of addition and subtraction; the strategies subjects used were alike as that of the hearing children; the computation errors were not the principal errors for the subjects of the research.
3. Five participants did worse in the compare problems, but did better in the change problems.
Implications for pratice and further research were recommended on the basis of the finding of this study.
中文部分:
王瑋樺(民90):國小三年級數學學習障礙學生加法文字題解題歷程與補救教學之研究。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
古明峰(民86):加減法應問題語文知識對問題難度之影響暨動態評量在應用問題之學習與遷移歷程上研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文(未出版)。
呂玉琴(民86):國小低年級學生對加減文字題的了解。中華民國第13屆科學教育學術研討會會議手冊及短篇論文彙編。
呂淑如(民82):聽覺障礙兒童語言發展能力及相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
李俐麗(民88):探討從基模的層面評估國中小數學資優生的數學解題能力。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
邱上真、王惠川、朱婉艷、沈明錦(民81):國小中年級數解題歷程導向之評量。特殊教育與復建學報,2,235-271。
林淑玲(民88):國小數學學習障礙學生對「比較類」加減應用題解題表徵之研究。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林清山譯(民82):教育心理學—認知取向。台北:遠流。
林清山、張景媛(民82):國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報,26,53-74。
林寶貴、李真賢(民76):聽覺障礙學生國語文能力之研究。教育學院學報,12,1-27。
林寶貴、李如鵬(民79):聽覺障礙學生數學能力測驗之編製及其相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林寶貴、錡寶香(民80):高職階段聽覺障礙學生國語文與數學能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,109-127。
周台傑、詹士宜(民82):國中智能不足學生數學應用問題解題歷程研究。特殊教育與復健學報,3,179-215。
吳德邦、吳順治編譯(民78):解題導向的數學教學策略。台北:五南。
洪美連(民84):國小聽覺障礙學生數學口語應用問題教學效果之實驗研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
施青豐(民88):認知解題策略教學對解題困難聽覺障礙學生解題成效之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
高令秋(民85):歷程導向寫作教學法對國中聽覺障礙學生寫作能力影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
翁素珍(民78a):國小聽覺障礙學生數學學習困難之調查。特教園丁,4(4),36-39。
翁素珍(民78b):國小六年級聽覺障礙學生數學能力之分析。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
翁嘉英(民77):國小兒童解數學應用問題的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
陳立倫(民89):兒童解答數學文字題的認知歷程。國立中正大學心理學研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
教育部(民82):國民小學課程標準。
教育部(民89):國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw(9/18/2001)。
張蓓莉(民70):聽覺障礙學生的智力結構。師大學報,26,333-351。
張蓓莉(民76):回歸主流聽覺障礙學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,3,119-134。
張蓓莉(民77):台北地區聽覺障礙兒童之非語文智力研究。衛生教育集刊,2,203-225。
張蓓莉(民78):聽覺障礙學生之語言能力研究。特殊教育研究學刊,5,165-204。
張蓓莉(民80):國小聽覺障礙學生句型理解能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,7,87-108。
張蓓莉(民83):台灣地區聽覺障礙學生句型理解能力。特殊教育研究學刊,10,209-227。
張蓓莉(民90):國小階段聽覺障礙學生數學學習資料庫及建構式教學效果之研究第一年研究報告。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告(未出版)。
張景媛(民82):國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證及應用:數學文字題的錯誤概念分析及教學策略研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文研究計劃(未出版)。
張景媛(民83):數學文字題錯誤概念分析及學生建構數學概念的研究。教育心理學報,27,175-200。
黃桂君(民84):聽覺障礙學生分數減法演算歷程之診斷分析。特殊教育研究學刊,13,27-44。
黃桂君(民88):聽覺障礙學生數學能力之分析。中華民國特殊教育年刊:
黃桂君(民89):「選擇式分數減法診斷測驗」之建構效度分析。測驗年刊,47(2),63-90。
黃麗珠、張沛雯、黃桂君(民90):聽覺障礙學生數學應用問題動態評量模式之初步建立。特殊教育與復建學報,9,71-100。
葉雪梅(民79):國小兒童對「比較」類應用問題的解題行為。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔣治邦(民82):中年級學童解決加減文字題能力之探討:多餘資訊與兩步驟問題。科學教育學刊,1,189-212。
蔣治邦(民90):中年級學童「部分—全體」運思的發展:文字題選圖與解題作業表現的差異。中華心理學刊,43,239-254。
蔣治邦、鍾思嘉(民80):低年級學童加減概念的發展。教育心理與研究,14,35-68。
鄧少林、蔣治邦(民83):三、五年級學生對比較應用問題的分類。國教學報,6,97-113。
蔡宗玫(民84):國小數學學習障礙學生應用問題解題之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
臺灣省政府教育廳(民88):台灣省國民中小學啟聰班教育概況。台南:台南啟聰學校。
劉錫麟(民82):國小高年級學生數學解題歷程及其相關因素的研究。花蓮師院學報,3,1-90。
鄭昭明(民82):認知心理學。台北:桂冠。
盧台華(民84):身心障礙學生數學能力之比較研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,25-50。
錡寶香(民78):聽覺障礙學生的閱讀教學。特教園丁,11(4),6-11。
閻育蘇譯(民88):怎樣解題。台北:九章。
蕭金土(民85):聽覺障礙學生數學錯誤類型分析與補救教學效果之研究。特殊教育學報,11,1-33。
蘇芳柳、張蓓莉(民86):台灣地區啟聰教育研究之回顧。載於1997年海峽兩岸特殊教育學術研討會論文彙編,(160-186)。台北:國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系。
英文部分:
Carpenter, T. P.(1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving. In E. A. Silver(Ed.)Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cummins, D. D.(1991). Children’s interpretations of arithmetic word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 261-289.
Davis-Dorsey, J., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R.(1991). The role of rewording and context personalization in the solving of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 61-68.
Donahue, G. M.(1982). Problem-solving strategies used by elementary school children in solving routine and nonroutine word problems in mathematics. (Doctoral Dissertation, New York University.)University Microfilms International.
Epstein, K. I., Hillegeist, E. G., & Grafman, J.(1994). Number processing in deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 139, 336-347.
Fan, N., Muller, J.H., & Marini, A.E.(1994). Solving difference problems: Wording primes coordination. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 355-369.
Fridriksson, T., & Stewart, D. A.(1988). From the concrete to the abstract: Mathematics for deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 133,51-55.
Frostad, P.(1999). Deaf children’s use of cognitive in simple arithmetic problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 129-153.
Fuson, K. C., Carroll, W.M., & Landis, J.(1996). Levels in conceptualizing and solving addition and subtraction compare word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 345-371.
Geary, G. C.(1994). Children’s Mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ginsburg, H. P., Kossan, N. E., Schwartz, R., & Swanson, D.(1983). Protocol methods in research on mathematical thinking. In H. P. Ginsburg(Ed.)The development of mathematical thinking. Orlando, F.L.: Academic.
Hayes, P., & Arnold, P.(1992). Is hearing-impaired children’s reading delayed or different? Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 104-116.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., & Green, C.E.(1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 76-84.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., & Monk, C. A.(1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 18-32.
Jitendra, A.K., & Kameenui, E. J.(1996). Experts’ and novices’ error patterns in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 42-52.
Mousley, K., & Kelly, R. R.(1998). Problem solving strategies for teaching Mathematics to deaf students. American Annals of the deaf, 143, 325-336.
Mousley, K., & Kelly, R. R.(1999). Deaf and hearing students’ transfer and application of skill in math problem solving. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 440 501).
Mousley, K., & Kelly, R. R.(2001). Solving word problems: More than reading issues for deaf children. American Annals of the deaf, 146, 251-262.
Kidd, D. H., Madsen, A. L., & Lamb, C. E.(1993). Mathematics vocabulary: Performance of residential deaf students. School Science and Mathematics, 93,418-421.
Kouba, V. L., Brown, C. A., Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O.(1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Number, operations, and word problems. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(8), 14-19.
Lester, F.K.(1978). Mathematical problem solving in the elementary school: Some educational and psychological considerations. In L.A. Hatfield & D.A. Bradbard (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving. Ohio State University.
Lewis, A.B., & Mayer, R.E.(1987). Students’ miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 363-371.
Loeterman, M., Paul, P. V., & Donahue, S.(2002). Reading and deaf children. Available: http://www.ebscohost.com (4/23/2002).
Lucangeli, D., Tressoldi, P.E., & Cendron, M.(1998). Cognitive and metacognitive abilities involved in the solution of mathematical word problems: Validation of a comprehensive model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 257-275.
Mayer, R. E.(1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition.(2nd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Miller, P. F.(2000). Syntactic and semantic processing in Hebrew readers with prelingual deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 436-451.
Muth, K. D.(1984). Solving arithmetic word problems: Role of reading and computational skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 205-210.
Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J.(1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 173-199.
Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E.(1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 329-389.
NCTM(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Available: Http://standards.nctm.org(10/17/2001).
Paul, P. V.(1993). Toward an understanding of deafness and reading. Bulletin of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 3, 117-129.
Paul, P. V.(1998). Reading for students with hearing impairment: Research review and implications. The Volta Review, 99(2), 73-87.
Pau, C. S.(1995). The deaf child and solving problems of arithmetic. Annals of the Deaf, 140, 287-290.
Quigley, S. P., Power, D.. J., & Steinkamp, M.W.(1977). The language structure of deaf children. The Volta Review, 79, 73-84.
Quintero, A. H.(1984). Children’s difficulties with two-step word problems.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 242 535).
Reed, S. K.(1999). Word problems: Research and curriculum reform. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Riley, M. S., Greeno, J.G., & Heller, J.I.(1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg(Ed.)The development of mathematical thinking. Orlando, F.L.: Academic.
Riley, M. S., & Greeno, J.G.(1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and of solving problems. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 49-101.
Sebrechts, M. M., Enright, M., Bennet, R. E., & Martin, K.(1996). Using algera word problems to assess quantitative ability: Attributes, strategies, and errors. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 285-343.
Shalin, V. L., & Bee, N. V.(1985). Structural differences between two-step word prolems.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 259 949).
Schoenfeld, A.H.(1985). Mathematical problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.
Swanson, H.L., Cooney, J.B., & Brock, S.(1993). The influence of working memory and classification ability on children’s word problem solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 374-395.
Titus, J. C.(1995). The concept of fractional number among deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf, 140, 255-262.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E. & Pauwels, A.(1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer’s consistency hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 85-94.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E. & Vierstraete, H.(1999). Upper elementary school pupils’ difficulties in modeling and solving nonstandard additive word problems involving ordinal numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 265-285.