研究生: |
呂佳臻 Lu, Chia-Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
購物網站瀏覽對使用者體驗影響之探討-以產品選單與介面複雜度為實驗因子 Exploring the Impact of Shopping Website Browsing on User Experience: Using Product Menu and Interface Complexity as Experimental Factors |
指導教授: |
董澤平
Dong, Tse-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Management |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 60 |
中文關鍵詞: | 使用者介面 、使用者體驗 、購物網站 、圖標 、網頁複雜度 、選單 |
英文關鍵詞: | User Interface, User Experience, Shopping Website, Icons, Webpage Complexity, Menu |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202001096 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:23 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
現代人的消費型態越來越多樣化,隨著網路購物科技的興起,消費者與網路購物的第一溝通橋梁便是購物網頁平台的介面。本研究將結合網購網站介面與使用者體驗,探討現今充斥大量資訊的購物網站介面對使用者取向的影響,本研究以目前網路常見之購物網站架構,作為此次實驗基礎。
本研究首先了解購物網站首頁介面不同的產品分類方式選單,再以兩階段2⨯2實驗設計,針對不同使用者訪問模式進行探討:(1)目的性瀏覽與(2)無目的性瀏覽。前者以Cogulator建模工具衡量受測目的性使用之步驟時間、工作記憶負荷;後者以使用者體驗問卷量化受測者實驗操作結果。分別以圖標Icons、文標Labels與不同高低複雜度作為實驗因子,模擬四種線上購物網站介面原型。
分析結果發現產品選單確實能夠影響使用者體驗,但發現台灣人普遍對於文標Labels的產品選單給予較高的評價,這可能與台灣常見的線上購物網站環境有關。使用者體驗與網站的後續使用性也呈現正向相關,使用者的感受與網站的回訪有正向的關聯性,但產品選單並不會因為整個體驗而促進網站的使用性,而是局部性的。而網頁介面的複雜度也確實會影響使用者對於網站介面環境的認知、理解產生影響。
本研究認為儘管文標Labels的產品選單有較高的平均數,但圖標Icons產品選單平均數並沒有差太多,還是具有網站的導覽功能,就算未來購物網站形式轉換,使用者對於圖標的選單還是能夠快速學習,能夠成功引導消費者進入到所需的產品頁。
The consumption patterns of modern people are becoming more and more diverse. With the rise of online shopping technology, the first communication bridge between consumers and online shopping is the interface of the shopping website. This research will combine the online shopping platform interface and user experience to explore the impact of the current shopping website interface that is full of information on user orientation. This research uses the current online shopping website architecture as the basis of this experiment.
In this research, we first understand the different product classification menus on the homepage interface of the shopping website, and then uses a two-stage 2⨯2 experimental design to explore different user access patterns: (1) purposeful browsing and (2) purposeless browsing. The former uses the Cogulator modeling tool to measure the step time and working memory load of the tested purposeful use; the latter uses the user experience questionnaire to quantify the experimental operation results of the subjects. Using icons, labels and different levels of complexity as experimental factors, respectively, four online shopping website interface prototypes are simulated.
The analysis results found that the product menu can indeed affect the user experience, but it is found that Taiwanese generally give a higher evaluation to the product menu of the label, which may be related to the environment of common online shopping websites in Taiwan. The user experience and the subsequent usability of the website are also positively correlated. The user’s feelings are positively related to the return visits of the website, but the product menu does not promote the usability of the website because of the entire experience, but is local of. The complexity of the web interface will indeed affect users' cognition and understanding of the environment of the web interface.
This study believes that although the labels menu has a high average number, the average number of icon product menus is not much different, and it still has a website navigation function. Even if the form of the shopping website changes in the future, the user can quickly learn the menu of icons, and can successfully guide consumers to the desired product page.
中文參考文獻
林鉦棽、彭台光(2012)。組織研究的中介檢測: 緣起, 爭議, 研究設計和分析。管理學報, 29(4),頁 333-354。
張紹勳、林秀娟(2018)。多變量統計之線性代數基礎:應用SPSS分析):五南。
彭其捷(2016)。打造成功UI/UX的50個關鍵:用魔鬼的細節創造極致使用者體驗)。 新北市:博碩文化。
黎佩芬、賴建都(2011)。網路重度使用者對網頁訊息認知與瀏覽模式之研究-以台灣購物網站商品訊息呈現為例。電子商務學報, 13(3),頁 517-553。
英文參考文獻
Bennett, J. L. (1986). Tools for building advanced user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal, 25(3.4), 354-368.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Card, S. K. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction: Crc Press.
Cheng, H.-I., & Patterson, P. E. (2007). Iconic hyperlinks on e-commerce websites. Applied Ergonomics, 38(1), 65-69.
Deng, L., & Poole, M. S. (2010). Affect in web interfaces: a study of the impacts of web page visual complexity and order. Mis Quarterly, 711-730.
Egido, C., & Patterson, J. (1988). Pictures and category labels as navigational aids for catalog browsing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Gatsou, C., Politis, A., & Zevgolis, D. (2012). The Importance of Mobile Interface Icons on User Interaction. IJCSA, 9(3), 92-107.
Geissler, G. L., Zinkhan, G. M., & Watson, R. T. (2006). The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 69-80.
Gittins, D. (1986). Icon-based human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(6), 519-543.
Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & information technology, 25(2), 91-97.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate behavioral research, 50(1), 1-22.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications.
ISO-9241-210. (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO.
John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996a). The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: Comparison and contrast. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 3(4), 320-351.
John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996b). Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: Which technique? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 3(4), 287-319.
Kacmar, C. J., & Carey, J. M. (1991). Assessing the usability of icons in user interfaces. Behaviour & information technology, 10(6), 443-457. doi: 10.1080/01449299108924303
King, A. J., Lazard, A. J., & White, S. R. (2019). The influence of visual complexity on initial user impressions: testing the persuasive model of web design. Behaviour & information technology, 1-14.
Kovesdi, C. R., & Joe, J. C. (2019). Exploring The Use of Cognitive Models for Nuclear Power Plant Human-System Interface Evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
Leuthold, S., Schmutz, P., Bargas-Avila, J. A., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2011). Vertical versus dynamic menus on the world wide web: Eye tracking study measuring the influence of menu design and task complexity on user performance and subjective preference. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 459-472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.09.009
Lin, J.-C. (2007). Online stickiness: its antecedents and effect on purchasing intention. Behaviour & information technology, 26(6), 507-516. doi: 10.1080/01449290600740843
Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience. Journal of retailing, 78(1), 31-40.
Menzenski, J. (2018). Enhancing Cognitive Assistants with Low-Cost Computer Vision. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).
Mitchell, P. P. (2007). A Step-by-Step Guide to Usability Testing: iUniverse, Incorporated.
Moran, T. P. (1981). Guest editor's introduction: An applied psychology of the user. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 13(1), 1-11.
Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69(3-4), 269-302.
Nielsen, J., & Loranger, H. (2006). Prioritizing web usability: Pearson Education.
Niemelä, M., & Saarinen, J. (2000). Visual Search for Grouped versus Ungrouped Icons in a Computer Interface. Human Factors, 42(4), 630-635. doi: 10.1518/001872000779697999
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-computer interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 491-516.
Oulasvirta, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2016). Hci research as problem-solving. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Paivio, A., Rogers, T. B., & Smythe, P. C. (1968). Why are pictures easier to recall than words? Psychonomic science, 11(4), 137-138.
Peirce, C. S. (1902). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. Philosophical writings of Peirce, 100.
Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48-60. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.048
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction: John Wiley & Sons.
Rusu, C., Rusu, V., Roncagliolo, S., & González, C. (2015). Usability and user experience: what should we care about? International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach (IJITSA), 8(2), 1-12.
Satzinger, J. W., & Olfman, L. (1998). User interface consistency across end-user applications: the effects on mental models. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 167-193.
Savage-Knepshield, P. (2014, June 10). Cogulator, a Tool for Measuring Cognitive Workload: Interview with Steven Estes. HFES Bulletin, p. 4.
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2014). Applying the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) in different evaluation scenarios. Paper presented at the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability.
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). IJIMAI, 4(4), 40-44.
Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. Mis Quarterly, 695-704.
Walhout, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jarodzka, H., van Dijk, M., de Groot, R., & Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Learning and navigating in hypertext: Navigational support by hierarchical menu or tag cloud? Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 218-227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.025
Wilkins, S. A. (2017). Examination of pilot benefits from cognitive assistance for single-pilot general aviation operations. Paper presented at the 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).
網路參考文獻
Estes, S. (2017). Cogulator, The MITRE Corporation. 2019, from http://cogulator.io/primer.html
Schrepp, M. (2019). User Experience Questionnaire Handbook. from https://www.ueq-online.org/
張筱祺(2019年6月3日)。【網購調查系列一】網購消費占比達16.5% 愛用電商平台大排名,創新應用與智慧服務。 取自 https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=516