簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 紀佩函
論文名稱: 延伸式擴增實境導入國中自然與生活科技課程之研究
Applying Extend-Augmented Reality in Teaching Fundamental Earth Science in Junior High Schools
指導教授: 王健華
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 圖文傳播學系
Department of Graphic Arts and Communications
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 互動式學習延伸式擴增實境資訊科技能力學習滿意度學習成效
英文關鍵詞: interactive learning, Extend Augmented Reality, information skill, learning satisfaction, learning achievement
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:283下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在科學領域的學習,概念認知的建構很重要,過去常運用模擬的方式來進行教學。擴增實境是一項新的技術,它結合了真實世界與虛擬物件,讓使用者在虛擬與真實之間產生互動。然而,本研究發展一套延伸式擴增實境,並導入國中自然與生活科技課程,進行單次不分組實驗。在該課程之「晝夜與四季變化」單元裡,學習地球公轉與自轉,需要空間概念的想像,若在學習過程中輔以多元、互動方式,能夠增進學習成效並提升學生的學習興趣。
    本實驗對象為12 至14 歲國中學生,共111 位學生參與。為了解學生學習成效,在課程進行前、後,施行前測與後測試卷。再透過科技接受模式設計滿意度問卷,於課程結束後發放問卷,調查學生對於延伸式擴增實境應用於學習上,他們的學習滿意度與後續使用意願。此外,為了瞭解學生原先的資訊科技能力是否影響學習,以及對新科技的滿意度,透過測驗卷方式測驗學生本身的資訊科技能力。在過去研究顯示,科學能力與資訊科技能力上,有明顯的性別差異,普遍男性優於女性,故本研究亦加入性別變項,討論性別差異與學習之關係。
    研究結果發現,學生使用延伸式擴增實境來學習是有學習成效的,而且學生學習滿意度與後續使用意願高,其學習成效也高。其次,本研究探討資訊科技能力與學習之關係,結果顯示學生資訊科技能力高,其學習成效、學習滿意度、後續使用意願也比較高,可見資訊科技能力程度可能影響學習。另外,從性別差異發現,平均男生資訊科技能力高於女生,在學習成效的表現上則無太大差別。本研究發現,並不是所有學生適用於資訊科技融入課程的學習方式。

    The construction of cognitive concepts is very important in the field of science learning. In the past, it was common to use simulation approaches to teach. Currently,
    Augmented Reality is a new technology that combines the real world with virtual objects which allows the users to interact between virtuality and reality. An Extend Augmented Reality system was developed and applied to the science and technology course in junior high schools. A one-group pre-test/post-test experimental design was implemented. While learning the unit of daily and seasonal change, speaking of the relationship of the earth revolving around the sun, students need to have imagination
    relating to the concept of space. In the learning process, students would learn better and become more interested with multiple and interactive enhancement. 111 students
    aged between 12 t0 14 years old participated in this experiment. To assess learning achievement during the course, these students had pre tests prior to it and post tests afterwards, respectively. After the course, a questionnaire of student satisfaction and continuous usage intention on this system was delivered, in which student satisfaction was measured by Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Moreover, to understand whether previous information technology skills of these students had an effect on their
    learning as well as satisfaction with new technology, a test was conducted to examine their information technology skills. In the past, studies showed that there was a
    significant gender difference in science abilities and information technology skills. In general, males were better than females. Thus, in this study, the variable of gender was adopted; the relationship between gender difference and learning was discussed. The results showed that it was helpful to students to use this system. The results showed that with the use of the Extend Augmented Reality system, learning achievement was improved. Also, students who are of high learning satisfaction and
    continuous usage intention, they had higher learning achievement as well. Next, the relationship between information technology skills and learning was explored. It
    showed that students with higher information technology skills would have higher learning achievement, higher learning satisfaction, and higher continuous usage intention. Thus, it is possible that information technology skills might affect student learning. Moreover, from the perspective of gender difference, averagely speaking,
    information technology skills of males were better than those of females; however, there was no significant difference on learning achievement. Lastly, it was discovered that information technology enhanced courses are not for all of the students.

    謝誌.......................................................i 摘要 .....................................................ii Abstract ................................................iii 目錄 ....................................................iv 表目錄....................................................vi 圖目錄...................................................vii 第一章 緒論.................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機........................................1 第二節 研究目的與問題........................................3 第三節 名詞釋義.............................................5 一、互動式學習(Interactive Learing) .......................5 二、延伸式擴增實境(Extended Augmented Reality).............5 三、資訊科技能力(Information Skill)........................5 第四節 研究範圍與限制........................................6 第二章 文獻探討.............................................7 第一節 自然與生活科技課程之發展...............................7 一、自然與生活科技課程之現況..................................7 二、性別在科學能力上的差異....................................8 第二節 互動式學習的發展......................................9 一、互動式學習之意義與應用....................................9 二、互動式學習應用於學習之相關研究........................... 11 第三節 應用擴增實境於學習....................................12 一、擴增實境之意義與應用.....................................12 二、擴增實境應用於學習之相關研究..............................13 第四節 資訊科技能力對學習之影響..............................17 一、資訊科技能力之意義與現況.................................17 二、資訊科技能力之相關研究...................................19 第五節 科技融入學習之滿意度..................................20 一、科技融入學習之意義與現況.................................20 二、科技融入學習之態度......................................22 第三章 研究設計............................................25 第一節 研究架構與流程.......................................25 第二節 研究方法............................................27 第三節 研究對象............................................27 第四節 研究工具............................................28 一、學習工具:延伸式擴增實境.................................28 二、課程內容試卷、問卷與測驗卷...............................31 三、預試資料...............................................32 第五節 研究實施............................................34 第六節 資料分析............................................36 第四章 研究結果與討論.......................................37 第一節 敘述性統計分析.......................................37 第二節 學生使用延伸式擴增實境對學習成效之結果..................41 第三節 學習滿意度與後續使用意願對學習之影響....................42 第四節 不同程度資訊科技能力對學習之影響.......................44 第五節 性別差異對學習之影響..................................47 第五章 結論與建議...........................................49 第一節 研究結論............................................49 第二節 研究建議............................................52 參考文獻...................................................54 一、中文文獻...............................................54 二、英文文獻...............................................56 附錄一 滿意度與意願問卷.....................................62 附錄二 資訊科技能力測驗卷...................................65

    一、中文文獻
    王全世(2000)。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊與教育,82,23-30。
    何榮桂(2002)。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展—兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育,87,22-48。
    何語瑄(2005)。資訊科技融入教學與數位落差。生活科技教育月刊,38(6),58-63。
    吳美美(2004)。資訊素養與媒體素養–數位時代的素養與素養教育。取自
    http://mwu.glis.ntnu.edu.tw/blog/archives/publicatioins/%E5%90%B3%E7%BE%8E%E7%BE%8E2004_%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A%E7%B4%A0%E9%A4%8A%E8%88%87%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E7%B4%A0%E9%A4%8A.p
    df
    李田英(1995)。國小三至五年級自然科學課程學習困難之教材分析。師大學報,40,475-578。
    周書暉、林祐全(2011)。結合情境與緒:人機互動理論沿革發展。傳播與管理研究,11(1),29-68。
    林坤誼(2008)。問題解決導向生活科技活動學習歷程模式之行動研究。科學教育學報,1(1),49-69。
    袁媛、許錦芳(2007)資訊科技融入教學對國中資源班數學低成就學生學習影響之個案研究。教育科學期刊,7(1),1-27。
    區國良、姚美娟、林宗建 (2010)。以手勢為基礎之遊戲式行動學習系統對學習成就及學習保留的影響。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:
    NSC-99-2631-S-008-004),未出版。
    張郁雯、林文瑛、王震武(2013)。科學表現的兩性差異縮小了嗎? -國際科學表現評量資料之探究。教育心理學報,44,459-476。
    張凈怡、張佩芬、林信榕、張琬琳(2008,5 月)。教師使用資訊科技融入教學之困境與因應之道。第十二屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會(GCCCE2008),美國密西根州立大學。
    張崇山(2009)。博物館互動式展示之思與辨。科技博物,13(4),5-16。
    郭其綱、鄭泰昇(2008)。擴增實境定位技術應用於建築與城市戶外導覽之研究-以「古蹟導覽系統」與「隱形招牌」應用為例。中華民國建築學會「建築
    學報」,66,145-166。
    喻平、馬再鳴(2002)。論數學概念學習。數學傳播,26(2),89-96。
    黃美幸(1995)。數理與科學教育的性別差異之探討。婦女與兩性學刊,6,95-135。
    劉俊庚、邱美虹(2012)。我國百年國中科學課程發展回顧與展望。科學教育,347,2-20。
    劉瑞圓(2012)。全球教育中之性別差異。教育科學期刊,11(1),79-104。
    賴阿福、林皎汝、江信瑩(2006)。影響台北市國小自然與生活科技領域教師資訊融入教學頻率暨相關因素之探討。科學教育研究與發展季刊,44,78-114。
    薛雅明、徐玉瓊(2005)。超媒體學習系統中互動性對系統認知態度、滿意度與學習成效之影響。南大學報教育類,39(1),175-192。

    二、英文文獻
    Abate, A. F., Acampora, G., & Ricciardi, S. (2011). An interactive virtual guide fort he AR based visit of archaeological sites. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing,22(6), 415-425.
    Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S. R. (2000). Multimedia for learning:Methods and development(3rd edition). Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
    Andújar, J.M., Mejías, A., & Márquez, M.A.(2011). Augmented Reality for the Improvement of Remote Laboratories: An Augmented Remote Laboratory. IEEE
    Transactions on Education, 54(3), 492-500.
    Azuma, R. T.(1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
    Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6),
    1-15.
    Balog, A., Pribeanu, C., & Iordache, D.(2007). Augmented Reality in Schools: PreliminaryEvaluation Results from a Summer School. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 2(3), 162-165.
    Bickmore, T.W., Vardoulakis, L. M. P., & Schulman, D. (2013). Tinker: a relational agent museum guide. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 27(2), 254-276.
    Billinghurst, M. (2009, Jan. 15).RE:Augmented Reality in Education[New Horizons for Learning]. Retrieved from
    http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/technology/billinghurst.htm
    Bucher, K. T.(2000). The Importance of Information Literacy Skills in the Middle School Curriculum. Clearing House, 73(4), 217-220.
    Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of
    Educational Technology, 44(3), 95-99.
    Chehimi, F., Coulton,P., & Edwards, R.(2007). Augmented Reality 3D Interactive Advertisements on Smartphones. IEEE Computer Society,6,21.
    Chen, C.H., Wu, I.C., & Jen, F.L.(2013). Designing online scaffolds for interactive computer simulation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(3), 229-243.
    Choi, H., & Yang, M. (2011). The effect of problem-based video instruction on student satisfaction, empathy, and learning achievement in the Korean teacher education
    context. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 62(5), 551-561.
    Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T. M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare
    education. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1136-1144.
    Cocciolo, A. & Rabina, D. (2013). Does place affect user engagement and understanding? Mobile learner perceptions on the streets of New York. Journal of Documentation, 69(1), 98-120.
    Coles, T.R., John, N.W., Gould, D.A., & Caldwell, D.G.(2011). Integrating Haptics with Augmented Reality in a Femoral Palpation and Needle Insertion Training
    Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 4(3), 199-209.
    Csapo, N. (2002). Certification of computer literacy. T.H.E. Journal, 30(1), 46-51.
    Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model : three experiments. International Journal
    of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45.
    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8),982-1003.
    Duhaney, D.C.(2000).Technology and the educational process : transforming classroom activities. Int'l J of Instructional Media, 27(1), 67-72.
    Flanagan, R. (2013). Effects of learning from interaction with physical or mediated devices. Cogn Process, 14(2), 213-215.
    Gupta, U. G., & Houtz, L. E. (2000). High school students’ perceptions of information technology skills and careers. Journal of Industrial Technology, 16(4), 2-8.
    Hayes, D.N.A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms.Computers & Education, 49(2), 385-395.
    Herring, J.E., Tarter, A.M., & Naylor, S.(2002). An evaluation of the use of the PLUS model to develop pupils' information skills in a secondary school. School libraries
    worldwide, 8(1), 1-24.
    Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies
    for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
    Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation.Computers & Education, 52(1), 78-82.
    Hsiao, K. F. (2013). Using Augmented Reality for students health – case of combining educational learning with standard fitness. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 64(2),
    407-421.
    Johnson,W.L., Rickel, J.W., & Lester, J.C. (2000). Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.
    Juan, C., Beatrice, F., & Cano, J. (2008). An Augmented Reality System for Learning the Interior of the Human Body. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 8, 186-188.
    Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library &
    Information Science Research, 31(1), 12-17.
    Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and Geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & graphics, 27, 339-345.
    Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A., & Glück, J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in Augmented Reality. Cyber Psychology & Behavior,
    8(4), 330-340.
    Kipnis, D.G., & Frisby, A.J. (2006). Information Literacy and Library Attitudes of Occupational Therapy Students. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 25(4), 11-20.
    Kirner, C., Zorzal, E. R., & Kirner, T.G. (2006). Case Studies on the Development of Games Using Augmented Reality. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on
    Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2, 1636-1641. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Kubiatko, M. (2007). Information and computer literacy of high school students. Variety of education in central and eastern Europe, 2, 31-36.
    Kuhlthau,C.C.(1987). Inforamtion skills for an information society a review of research. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED297740.pdf
    Larsen, Y.C., Buchholz, H., Brosda, C., & Bogner, F.X. (2011). Evaluation of a portable and interactive augmented reality learning system by teachers and students,
    Proceedings of EDEN - 2011 Open Classroom Conference, 47-56, Greece.Canada.
    Lauer, S., Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Christensen, M., & Montplaisir,L. (2013). Stereotyped: Investigating gender in introductory science courses.
    CBE-Life Science Education, 12(1), 20-38.
    Lee, S. H., Choi, J., & Park, J. (2009). Interactive E-Learning system using pattern recognition and Augmented Reality. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics,
    55(2), 883-890.
    Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
    Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2009). Consistencies in sex differences on the cognitive abilities test across countries, grades, test forms, and cohorts. British
    Journal 0/ Educational Psychology, 79, 389-407.
    Martı´n-Gutie´ rrez, J., Saorı´n, J. L., Contero, M., Alcan˜ iz, M., Pe´ rez-Lo´ pez, D. C.,& Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77–91.
    Matsutomo, S., Miyauchi, T., Noguchi, S., & Yamashita, H.(2012). Real-Time Visualization System of Magnetic Field Utilizing Augmented Reality Technology for Education. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics,48(2), 531-534.
    Mayer R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction,13(2), 125–139.
    McClure, C.R. (1994). Network literacy : A role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2), 115-125.
    Merabet1, L. B., Connors1, E. C., Halko, M. A., & Sa´nchez, J. (2012). Teaching the Blind to Find Their Way by Playing Video Games. PLoS ONE, 7(9), 1-6.
    Milgram. P., Takemura. H., Utsumi. A.,& Kishino. F. (1994). Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and elepresence
    Technologies, 23(51), 282-292.
    Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 86-89.
    Mou, W., Biocca, F., Owen, C. B., Tang, A., Xiao, F., & Lim, L. (2004). Frames of reference in mobile Augmented Reality displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
    Applied, 10(4), 238-244.
    Neo, M., Neo, T. K., & Yap, W.L.(2008). Students' perceptions of interactive multimedia mediated web-based learning: A Malaysian perspective. Processing of 25th annual
    ASCILITE conference, 658-666, Melbourne.
    Oberg, A., & Daniels, P.(2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centred mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language
    Learning, 26(2), 177–196.
    Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors' acceptance of electronic courseware : an application of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal
    of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 1-23.
    Parmentier, M.J.C.(2013). Simulating in cyberspace: designing and assessing simple role playing activities for online regional studies courses. International Studies
    Perspectives, 14(2), 121-133.
    Russell, G., Finger, G., & Russell, N. (2000). Information technology skills of Australian teachers: implications for teacher education. Journal of Information Techology for
    Teacher Education, 9(2), 149-166.
    Sayed, N.A.M.E., Zayed, H.H., & Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card An augmented reality solution for the education field. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045-1061.
    Shambare, R., & Mvula, A. (2011). South African students’ perceptions of Facebook: Some implications for instructors. African Journal of Business Management, 5(26), 10567-10564.
    Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Proceedings of The First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, 1-8, Darmstadt, Germany.
    Sheng, Y., Yapo, T. C., Young, C., & Cutler, B. (2011). A spatially Augmented Reality sketching interface for architectural daylighting design. IEEE Transactions on
    Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(1), 38-50.
    Snyder, S.L., & Elinich, K.J. (2010). Augmented Reality for interpretive and experiential learning. In:Museums and the Web 2010, an international conference for culture and heritage online, 87-92, CO, USA.
    Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers.
    Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371-413.
    Su, K.D.(2008). An integrated science course designed with information communication technologies to enhance university students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1365-1374.
    Sun, P.C., Tsai, R.J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.Y., Yeh, D.(2008).What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner
    satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
    Tsai, C-H., Yen, J-C., Yang, J-Z. (2012). The Influence of Employing Augmented Reality in Course Design on the Learning Achievement and Satisfaction of the “Aquatic
    Animals”. Proceedings of Business and Information, 822-832, Sapporo, Japan.
    Tunnicliffe,S.D., Beer, M.L. (2002). An interactive exhibition about animal skeletons:did the visitors learn any zoology?, Journal of Biological Education, 36(3),
    130-134.
    Wang, C.H., Ke, Y.T., Wu, J-T., & Hsu, W-H.(2012). Collaborative Action Research on Technology Integration for Science Learning. Journal of Science Education and
    Technology, 21(1), 125-132.
    Wierinck, E., Puttemans, V., & Steenberghe, D. V., (2006). Effect of reducing frequency of augmented feedback on manual dexterity training and its retention. Journal of Dentistry, 34(9), 641-647.
    Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S.(2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science
    museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4),519-541.
    Yuen, S.; Yaoyuneyong, G.;& Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development
    and Exchange, 4(1), 119-140.
    Yusoff, R.C.M., Zaman, H.B., & Ahmad, A.(2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian journal of educational technology, 27(8),
    1369-1387.
    Zhou, F., Duh, H.-L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in Augmented Reality traching, interaction and display: A review of ten years in ISMAR. Proceeding of ISMAR 7th
    IEE/ACM International Symposium, 193-202. Singapore.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE