簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃瑜華
Huang, Yu-Hua
論文名稱: 相似性、人際信任和師徒功能對於知識傳播能量與知識移轉程度之研究
A study of Similarity, Interpersonal Trust and Mentoring Function on Disseminative Capacity and Degree of Knowledge Transfer
指導教授: 余鑑
Yu, Chien
于俊傑
Yu, Chin-Cheh
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科技應用與人力資源發展學系
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 153
中文關鍵詞: 相似性人際信任師徒功能知識傳播能量知識移轉程度
英文關鍵詞: similarity, interpersonal trust, mentoring function, disseminative capacity, degree of knowledge transfer
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:183下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 一般而言,在師徒制過程中,所探討的大都為師父是否會將自身知曉的知識傳授給徒弟,而鮮少討論徒弟對師父的知識移轉層面。本研究之研究對象天下雜誌2008 年所選出之1000 大製造業、500 大服務業及100 大金融業之人資人員為樣本。以師徒間的相似性與人際信任作為影響師徒互動的因素,探討師徒關係的良與不良,是否會造成知識傳播能量與知識移轉程度上的不同。
    經由問卷進行實證研究,採便利抽樣方式,並以配對形式發放師父問卷250 份及徒弟問卷250 份,共500 份問卷。經問卷刪除無效問卷後,共配對115 份,有效回收率為46%。利用層級迴歸分析,其研究發現:
    1.師父主觀深層相似性對於徒弟角色楷模功能有顯著正向影響。
    2.徒弟主觀深層相似性對於徒弟認知師徒功能有顯著正向影響。3.師父情感基礎上的信任對於徒弟心理支持功能有顯著正向影響。4.徒弟情感基礎上的信任對於徒弟認知心理支持與角色楷模功能有顯著正向影響;徒弟認知情感對於徒弟認知職業發展與角色楷模功能有顯著正向影響。
    5.徒弟角色楷模功能對於徒弟知識傳播意願有顯著正向影響。
    6.徒弟職業發展與角色楷模功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度有顯著正向影響。
    7.徒弟主觀深層相似性對於徒弟知識傳播能量有顯著正向影響。
    8.師父主觀深層相似性對於徒弟知識移轉程度有顯著正向影響。
    9.徒弟主觀深層相似性對於徒弟知識移轉程度有顯著正向影響。
    10.師父認知基礎上的信任對於徒弟知識傳播意願有顯著正向影響。11.徒弟情感基礎上的信任對於徒弟知識傳播意願有顯著正向影響。12.徒弟認知基礎上的信任對於徒弟知識移轉程度有顯著正向影響。13.徒弟主觀相似性透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量有完全顯著正向影響。
    14.徒弟主觀相似性透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度有完全顯著正向影響。
    15.師父人際信任透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量有部分顯著正向影響。
    16.徒弟人際信任透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量有完全顯著正向影響。
    17.師父人際信任透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度有完全顯著正向影響。
    18.徒弟人際信任透過師徒功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度有完全顯著正向影響。

    In general speaking, most studies are discussing about how mentors transfer their knowledge to protégés, but rarely discuss about protégés. Thepresent study involved the collection of data from a convenience sample drawn
    from 2008 Wealth Magazine. Data collected from human resource department which include manufacturing, services and financial industries. Examined the effects of similarity, interpersonal trust and mentoring function on knowledge transfer.
    The study use mentor-protege dyads questionnaires. A total of 500 questionnaires were send out (include 250 metors and 250 protégés). After screening questionnaires with incomplete answers, the study involves 115
    mentor- protégé dyads, our response rate to be 46%. Using analytic hierarchy process, the results are as follows:
    1. Mentor’s subjective deep similarity has significant positive influence on role modeling.
    2. Protégés subjective deep similarity has significant positive influence on all mentoring function.
    3.Mentor’s affect-based trust has significant positive influence on psychosocial function.
    4. Protégés’s affect-based trust has significant positive influence on psychosocial function and role modeling; Protégés’s connition-based trust has significant positive influence on vocational career function and role modeling. 5.Protégés’s cognitive Role modeling has significant positive influence on Protégés’s willing to share knowledge.
    6. Protégés’s cognitive vocational career function has significant positive influence on protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    7. Protégés subjective deep similarity has significant positive influence on protégés’s disseminative capacity. 8. Mentor’s subjective deep similarity has significant positive influence on protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    9.Protégés subjective deep similarity has significant positive influence on protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    10. Mentor’s cognitive Role modeling has significant positive influence on Protégés’s willing to share knowledge.
    11. Protégés’s affect-based trust has significant positive influence on protégés’s willing to share knowledge.
    12. Protégés’s cognitive Role modeling has significant positive influence on protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    13.Mentoring function has a fully mediating effect between protégés subjective similarity and protégés’s disseminative capacity.
    14. Mentoring function has a fully mediating effect between protégés subjective similarity and protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    15. Mentoring function has a partially mediating effect between mentor’s interpersonal trust and protégés’s disseminative capacity.
    16. Mentoring function has a fully mediating effect between protégés’s interpersonal trust and protégés’s disseminative capacity.
    17. Mentoring function has a partially mediating effect between mentor’s interpersonal trust and protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.
    18. Mentoring function has a partially mediating effect between protégés’s interpersonal trust and protégés’s degree of knowledge transfer.

    謝 誌 i 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目 錄 vii 表 錄 ix 圖 次 xv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 重要名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 信任 9 第二節 相似性 15 第三節 師徒制 21 第四節 知識移轉 29 第五節 各變項間相關性探討 37 第三章 研究設計與實施 43 第一節 研究架構與假設 43 第二節 研究方法 47 第三節 研究步驟 49 第四節 研究對象 51 第五節 研究工具 51 第六節 資料分析 57 第四章 研究結果與分析 59 第一節 問卷回收與統計 59 第二節 敘述性統計分析 59 第三節 信效度分析 67 第四節 相關分析 74 第五節 單因子變異數分析 82 第六節 層級迴歸分析 84 第七節 中介變項驗證 104 第五章 結論與建議 119 第一節 研究發現與討論 119 第二節 管理意涵 131 第三節 研究貢獻 133 第四節 研究限制與後續建議 134 參考文獻 135 一、中文部分 135 二、西文部分 137 附 錄 145 附錄一 師徒制對知識移轉影響調查研究問卷─師父問卷 147 附錄二 師徒制對知識移轉影響調查研究問卷─徒弟問卷 149 表 次 表2-1 師徒制之定義 22 表2-2 師徒制類型比較 24 表2-3 師徒功能定義 26 表2-4 知識取得、知識分享和知識移轉之內涵 33 表2-5 知識移轉、知識分享和知識交換的包含層面 34 表3-1 本研究假設 44 表3-1 本研究假設(續) 45 表3-1 本研究假設(續) 46 表3-2 師父信任量表 52 表3-3 徒弟人際信任量表 53 表3-4 師父主觀相似性量表 54 表3-5 徒弟主觀相似性量表 54 表3-6 徒弟師徒功能量表 55 表3-7 徒弟知識傳播能量量表 56 表3-8 徒弟知識移轉程度量表 56 表4-1 師父與徒弟性別分析 60 表4-2 師父與徒弟年齡分析 60 表4-3 師父與徒弟教育程度分析 61 表4-4 師父與徒弟服務年資 61 表4-5 師徒配對問卷產業類別分析 62 表4-6 師徒關係指派方式 63 表4-7 師徒間直屬與非直屬關係 63 表4-8 師徒關係維繫長度 63 表4-9 師徒性別配對情況 64 表4-10 師父各變項與各構面之平均數、標準差 64 表4-11 徒弟各變項與各構面之平均數、標準差 66 表4-12 師父主觀相似性信度分析 67 表4-13 徒弟主觀相似性信度分析 68 表4-14 師父人際信任之信度分析 69 表4-15 徒弟人際信任之信度分析 70 表4-16 徒弟師徒功能信度分析 71 表4-17 徒弟知識傳播能量信度分析 72 表4-18 徒弟之知識移轉信度分析 73 表4-19 師父主觀相似性與徒弟認知師徒功能相關分析 74 表4-20 徒弟主觀相似性與徒弟認知師徒功能相關分析 75 表4-21 師父人際信任與徒弟認知師徒功能相關分析 76 表4-22 徒弟人際信任與徒弟認知師徒功能相關分析 76 表4-23 徒弟認知師徒功能與徒弟知識移轉傳播能量相關分析 77 表4-24 徒弟認知師徒功能與徒弟知識移轉程度相關分析 77 表4-25 師父主觀相似性對於徒弟知識傳播能量相關分析 78 表4-26 師父主觀相似性與徒弟知識移轉程度相關分析 78 表4-27 徒弟主觀相似性與徒弟知識傳播能量相關分析 79 表4-28 徒弟主觀相似性與徒弟知識移轉程度相關分析 79 表4-29 師父人際信任與徒弟知識傳播能量相關分析 80 表4-30 師父人際信任與徒弟知識移轉程度相關分析 80 表4-31 徒弟人際信任與徒弟知識傳播能量相關分析 81 表4-32 徒弟人際信任與徒弟知識移轉程度分析 81 表4-33 師徒特性與職業發展功能單因子變異數分析 82 表4-34 師徒特性與心理支持功能單因子變異數分析 82 表4-35 師徒特性與角色楷模功能單因子變異數分析 83 表4-36 師父主觀相似性對徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析 86 表4-37 徒弟主觀相似性對徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析 88 表4-38 師父人際信任對徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析 90 表4-39 徒弟人際信任對徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析 92 表4-40 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟知識傳播能量之迴歸分析 93 表4-41 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟知識移轉之迴歸分析 94 表4-42 師父主觀相似性對徒弟知識移轉能量之迴歸分析 95 表4-43 徒弟主觀相似性對徒弟知識傳播能量之迴歸分析 96 表4-44 師父主觀相似性對徒弟知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 97 表4-45 徒弟主觀相似性對於徒弟知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 98 表4-46 師父人際信任對徒弟知識傳播能量之迴歸分析 99 表4-47 徒弟人際信任對徒弟知識傳播能量之迴歸分析 101 表4-48 師父人際信任對徒弟知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 102 表4-49 徒弟人際信任對徒弟知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 103 表4-50 師父主觀相似性對於徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析結果 105 表4-51 師父主觀相似性與徒弟認知師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量 之迴歸分析 105 表4-51 師父主觀相似性與徒弟認知師徒功能對于徒弟知識傳播能量 之迴歸分析(續) 106 表4-52 徒弟主觀相似性對於徒弟認知師徒功能之迴歸分析 107 表4-53 徒弟主觀相似性和徒弟認知師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量 之迴歸分析 107 表4-54 師父主觀相似性對於徒弟師徒功能之迴歸分析 109 表4-55 師徒主觀相似性與徒弟師徒功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度之迴 歸分析 109 表4-56 徒弟主觀相似性對於師徒功能影響之迴歸分析結果 110 表4-57 徒弟主觀相似性與師徒功能對於知識移轉程度迴歸分析結 果 110 表4-57 徒弟主觀相似性與師徒功能對於知識移轉程度迴歸分析結果 (續) 111 表4-58 師父人際信任對於徒弟師徒功能之迴歸分析結果 112 表4-59 師父人際信任與徒弟師徒功能對於徒弟知識傳播能量之迴歸 分析結果 112 表4-60 徒弟人際信任對於師徒功能影響之迴歸分析結果 114 表4-61 徒弟人際信任與師徒功能對知識傳播能量之迴歸分析果 114 表4-62 師父人際信任對於徒弟師徒功能之迴歸分析結果 115 表4-63 師父人際信任與徒弟師徒功能對於知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 結果 115 表4-63 師父人際信任與徒弟師徒功能對於知識移轉程度之迴歸分析 結果(續) 116 表4-64 徒弟人際信任對於徒弟師徒功能影響之迴歸分析結果 117 表4-65 徒弟人際信任與徒弟師徒功能對於徒弟知識移轉程度之迴歸 分析結果 117 表5-1 研究假設結果 128 表5-2 研究假設結果(續) 129 表5-3 研究假設結果(續) 130 圖 次 圖2-1 吸引力兩階段模式 17 圖2-2 知識分類的階層 30 圖3-1 本研究之架構圖 44 圖3-2 本研究之流程 50 圖4-1 中介模式圖 104 圖4-2 中介模式圖一 105 圖4-3 徒弟認知師徒功能對師父主觀相似性與徒弟知識傳播能量之中 介效果 106 圖4-4 中介模式圖二 106 圖4-5 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟主觀相似性與徒弟知識傳播能量之中 介效果 108 圖4-6 中介模式圖三 108 圖4-7 徒弟認知師徒功能對師父主觀相似性與徒弟知識移轉程度之中 介效果 109 圖4-8 中介模式圖四 110 圖4-9 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟主觀相似性與徒弟知識移轉程度之中 介效果 111 圖4-10 中介模式圖五 111 圖4-11 徒弟認知師徒功能對師父人際信任與徒弟知識傳播能量之中 介效果 113 圖4-12 中介模式圖六 113 圖4-13 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟人際信任與徒弟知識傳播能量之中 介效果 114 圖4-14 中介模式圖七 115 圖4-15 徒弟認知師徒功能對師父人際信任與徒弟知識移轉程度之中 介效果 116 圖4-16 中介模式圖八 116 圖4-17 徒弟認知師徒功能對徒弟人際信任與徒弟知識移轉程度之中 介效果 117

    一、中文部分
    王宜敏(2000)。影響資訊人員知識分享行為之因—以社會交換理論為基礎來探討。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    在公司推行師徒制— EMBA雜誌(2009)。2009年5月3日,取自
    http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=7276
    伍忠賢(2001)。知識管理:策略與實務。台灣:華泰文化。
    吳行健(2000)。知識管理創造企業新價值。管理誌,315,84-86。
    李宛蓉(譯)(1998)。Francis Fukuyama著。誠信(Trust)。台灣:立緒。
    林國仕、賴景昌(2004)。知識經濟。科學發展,377。
    卓筱淇(2002)。師徒性別配對與師徒功能及其後果變項關聯性之研究。私立中原大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文,未出版,中壢市。
    邱志鑫(2004)。國民中學教師知識管理認知與教師效能相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    許道然(2001)。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學公共行政學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳信宏(2006)。人際吸引對師徒間相似性與師徒功能中介效果之探討。國立台灣科技大學企業企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳雅蒨(2008)。師徒相似性對師徒功能影響之研究—以對偶層次觀點分析。國立台灣科技大學企業企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳念姍(2006)。師徒制對客服人員職業適應之研究。國立台灣師
    範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳麗玉(2007)。企業實施師徒制之個案研究。國立台灣師範大學
    工業科技教育學系在職碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如(2006)。社會心理學。台灣:雙葉書廊。
    黃銘廷(2002)。公務人員知識分享意願、組織信任與組織文化之關係研究。國立台灣科技大學技術及職業教育所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    熊超群(2004)。教育訓練規劃與執行。廣東:廣東經濟出版社。
    詹瑜蕙(2000)。師徒制與員工生涯發展之研究—以壽險業為例。國立台灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    劉鈞慈(2000)。程序公平、組織承諾、信任與組織公民行為關係之研究─以我國產物保險產業為例。銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
    鄭晉昌(2004)。跨組織學習之知識管理活動。游於藝雙月刊,46。
    鄭麗玉、陳秀蓉、危芷芬、留佳莉(2006)。心理學。台灣:五南圖書。

    二、西文部分
    Allen, T.D., & Eby, L.T. (2003). Relationship effectiveness for mentors: Factors associated with learning and quality. Journal of Management, 29, 465-486.
    Aryee, S., Chay, Y.W., & Chew, J. (1996). The motivation to mentor among managerial employees.Group and Organization Management, 21,261-277.
    Barry Sweeny. (2009). The Role of Trust in Building Effective MentoringRelationships. Retrieved November 12, 2009, fromhttp//www.mentoring-association.org
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action; a Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Barber B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ Press.
    Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1969). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
    Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. & Pillutla, M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 33(3),459-472.
    Blake, S. (1999). At the crossroads of race and gender: Lessons from the mentoring experiences of professional black women. In A. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby, & R. J.Ely (Eds.), Mentoring dilemmas: Developing relationships within multicultural organizations (pp. 83-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    Blau, P.M.(1964).Exchange and Power in Social life. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
    Brass, D. J. (1995). A social networks perspective on human resource management. Research in personnel and human resource management,13,39-79.
    Bromiley P, Cummings LL.(1996). Transaction costs in organizations with trust.In R Bies, R Lewicki, B Sheppard (Ed), Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
    Buckley, Maureen A., & Zimmermann Sandra Hundley (2003). Mentoring children and adolescents: A guide to the issues. Greenwood.
    Buss, D.M.(1985).Human mate selection. American scientist, 73, 47-51.
    Burke, R. J. (1984). Mentors in organizations. Group and Organization Studies,9, 253–272.
    Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, Academic Press.
    Byme, D. (1961). Interpersonal Attraction And Attitude Similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715.
    Catalyst (1993). Mentoring: A guide to corporate programs and practices,Author, New York, NY.
    Chowdhury, Sanjib (2005).The Role of Affect- and Cognition-based Trust in Complex Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 310-326.
    Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35,128-52.
    Davenport, Thamos.H.& Prusak,Laurence(2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they know, Client Distribution Services.
    Doney, P., Cannon, J. & Mullen, M. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601-620.
    Edmomdson & Moingeon (1999). Learning, Trust and Organizational Change:Contrasting models of intervention researchin organizational behavior. In Easterby, S,M., Araujo & Burgoyne, J.(1999).Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization:Development in Theory and Practice(pp.157-173).London:SAGE Publications.
    Ensher, E. A. & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational behavior, 50, 460-481.
    Eddy, E., Tannenbaum, S., Alliger, G., D’Abate, C., & Givens, S. (2001).Mentoring in industry: The top 10 issues when building and supporting a mentoring program. Technical report prepared for the Naval Air Warfare Training Systems Division
    Fleck, James (1997). Contingent Knowledge and Technology Development. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(4), 383-393.
    Frambach, Hans (2003). Concepts of Trust: some critical comments, paper presented at international conference .Trust and Entrepreneurial Behaviour in East and West European Economies-concepts, Developments,Comparative Aspects’,26-27 September, University of Bremen.
    Furnham, A. F., Liamb & Ferrari, K.(1999). Personality and work motivation.Personality and individual differences, 26(6), 1035-1043.
    Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). Big Brothers/Sisters: A study of program practices. Philadelphia, PA:Public/Private Ventures.
    Garcia, M. (1992). Mentoring the new graduate at Jet Propulsion Laboratory. In Proceedings of the Diversity in Mentoring Conference (pp. 162–171).Chicago, IL: Western MichiganUniversity.
    Green, S.G., Anderson, S.E., & Shivers, S.L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 66.
    Grant, P. R. (1993). Reactions to intergroup similarity: Examinations of the similarity-differentiation and the similarity-attraction hypotheses. Canadian.
    Journal of Behaviora1 Science, 25, 28-44.
    Groff,Todd R&Jones,Thomas P(2003). Introduction to Knowledge Management:Km in Business. Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Hardin, Russell, (1993).The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society,21(4), 505-529.
    Harrison, A. A. (1976). Individuals and groups:Understanding social behavior.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
    Jones, G. & George, J. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust:Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-548.
    Jonson,Kathleen Feeney(2008). Being an Effective mentor:How to Help Beginning Teachers Succeed.Sage.
    Julie Boyd, Gillian Ragsdell&Charles Oppenheim (2007, September).Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms: A case study from manufacturing. Paper presented at the ECKM 2007 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Spain.
    Kramer RM, Brewer MB, Hanna B. (1996). Collective trust and collective action in organizations: the decision to trust as a social decision. See Kramer & Tyler 1996, pp.357.89
    LaPorte, T. R., & Metlay, D. S.(1996). Hazards and institutional trustworthiness: Facing a deficit of trust. Public Administration Review, 56(4), 341-347.
    Lewicki, R. J. and Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R., (Eds), Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp.114-139). Sage Publications, London.
    Liden, C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology,78, 662-674.
    Mayer, R., Davis, J. & Schoorman, F. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
    Mayer, R.C. & Davis, J.H.(1995).An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
    McAlister DJ. 1995. Affect- and cognitionbased trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad.Manage. J. 38:24.59
    Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate culture:A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journalof Applied Psychology, 74,
    424–432.
    Minbaeva, D. B., & Michailova, S. (2004). Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations: the role of disseminative capacity. Employee Relations, 26(6), 663-679.
    Moorman, C., Deshpamde, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors effecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.
    Morry, M. M. (2007). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of perceived similarity among cross-sex friends: A test of the attraction-similarity model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 117-138.
    Murray-Hicks, M. & Nugent, J. (1971). Positive motivation process for changing human behavior. Paper presented at the National Society for Performance and Instruction Conference, Rochester, N.Y.Naturally Occurring Mentoring Relationships Involving Workplace Employees"
    Published in Book Titled: Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach", (Accepted), Blackwell, 2007.Dougherty,
    T.,Turban, D., Haggard, D. L Nielson, T. R., Pate, L. E., & Eisenbach, R. J. (2000). Not all relationships are
    created equal: Critical factors of productive mentoring relationships. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    Oppat,K.,(2008).Disseminative Capabilities:A Case Study of Collaborative Product Development in the Automotive Industry. Gabler Verlag.
    Ragins, B. R. (1997). Antecedents of diversified mentoring relationships.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 90-109.
    Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. (1990). Perception of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37,957-971.
    Riding,R.J.&Rayner, Stephen G.(2000). Interpersonal Perspectives on Individual Difference:Congnitive Styles.Greenwood
    Robinson, S.L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract.Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-590.
    Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R. & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to special topic forum. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
    Stevenson, M. A., (1997). The Antecedents and Consequences of Interpersonal Trust in Mixed-Motive Dyadic Negotiation, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
    Shina,Jai B P(2009).Culture and Organizational Behaviour.Sage.
    Simpson, J. T., & Mayo, D. T. (1997). Relationship management:A call for fewer influence attempts?Journal of Business Research, 39(3), 209-218.
    Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust.Organization Science, 4, 367-392.
    Sitkin, S. B. (1995). On the positive effects of legalization on trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 5, 185-217.
    Struthers, N. J. (1995). Differences in mentoring: A function of gender or Organizational rank? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,10,265-272.
    Kathleen Feeney Jonson(2008).Being an effective mentor: How to help beginning teachers succeed,THOUSAND Oaks,CA Corwin Press
    Klauss, R.(1981). Formalized mentor relationships for management and development programs in federal government. Public Administration Review, 489-496.
    Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life.:Glenview, IL.: Scott Foresman.
    Kram, K.E. & Isabella, L.(1985). Mentoring alternatives: the role of peer relationships in career development. Academy of management Journal,28(10), 110-132.
    Kerckhoff,A.,&Davi,K.E(1962).Value consensus and need completarity in mate selecton.American Sociological Review,27,295-303.
    Tammy, D.Allen., & Lillian, T.(2010). The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach.Blackwell.
    Thomas, D. A. (1990). The impact of race on managers’ experiences of Developmental relationships (mentoring and sponsorship): An intra-organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1,479-492.
    Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads.
    Academy of Management Journal, 32,402-423.
    Turban, D.B., Dougherty, T.W. & Lee, F.K., (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships:The moderating role of relationship duration.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240-262.
    Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P.(1988). Supervisor–subordinate similarity:Types,effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228–234.
    Tyler TR, Degoey P.(1996). Trust in organizational authorities:The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In Trust in
    organizations Frontiers of theory and research(pp331-357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Van Duijn, Marijtje A. J., Evelien P. H. Zeggelink, Mark Huisman, Frans N.Stokman, and Frans W. Wasseur (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology,27,153-191.
    Wang, S. ,Thomlinson, E.C.,&Noe,R.A.(2010).The role of mentor trust and protege internal locus of control in formal mentoring relationship.Journal of Applied Psychology,95(2),358-365.
    Werner, C.,& Parmelee,P.(1979). Similarity of activity preferences among friends:Those who play together stay together. Social Psychology Quarterly,29. 62-66.
    Zachary,Lois J.,&Daloz, Laurent.A.(2000).The mentor’s guide:Facilitating effective learning relationships.John Wiley&Sons Inc.
    Zachary,Lois J.&Fischler,Lory A.(2009).The mentee’s guide:Making mentoring work for you. John Wiley&Sons Inc.
    Zack,M.H.(1999).Managing codified knowledge.Sloan Management
    Review,4(40),45-48.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE