研究生: |
王乃立 Wang, Nai-Li |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
莫內花園藝術觀光:景點建構與旅遊實踐分析 Art Tourism in Monet's Garden:An Analysis of Destination-Making and Tourist Practices |
指導教授: |
賴嘉玲
Lai, Chia-Ling |
口試委員: |
賴嘉玲
Lai, Chia-Ling 黃宗儀 HUANG, Tsung-yi 陳泓易 Chen, Hung-Yi |
口試日期: | 2020/12/14 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
歐洲文化與觀光研究所 Graduate Institute of European Cultures and Tourism |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 193 |
中文關鍵詞: | 莫內花園 、藝術觀光 、景點建構 、導覽中介 、旅遊實踐 |
英文關鍵詞: | Claude Monet's Garden, art tourism, destination-making, guide mediation, tourist practices |
研究方法: | 半結構式訪談法 、 田野調查法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200621 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:175 下載:43 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
莫內花園(Claude Monet’s Garden)為知名印象派藝術家克勞德・莫內(Claude Monet)的故居、藝術品以及創作靈感來源地,位於巴黎西北方的吉維尼小鎮(Giverny),如今為法國諾曼第大區最受歡迎的觀光景點之一,每年吸引世界各地超過五十萬觀光客前來朝聖,不論是藝術愛好者或是對於花園有所想像的民眾,都被此地吸引。因此本研究將從兩個面向切入,首先從景點層面分析,探討莫內花園建構出的多重凝視、文藝觀光景點的矛盾性以及導覽中介,而後討論觀光客的行為,了解具備不同文化資本的觀光客獲得了哪些體驗,以及多層次的景點能夠激發觀光客哪些文化消費與實踐方式。
本研究以多重研究方法進行,首先從文宣、報導和相關書籍取得研究資料,分析常見的旅遊網站以及莫內花園發行的實體和電子導覽手冊,以釐清個案的景點建構以及導覽中介。使用半結構式訪談24位不同國籍的觀光客,包括法國、比利時、西班牙、德國、英國、澳洲、美國、中國和臺灣,期望透過訪談交流了解觀光客的觀點與旅遊實踐方式。最後則是研究者於2019年7月中,透過數次的造訪,觀察景點的經營運作以及觀光客們的參與互動模式。
研究結果如下,透過資料分析發現莫內花園為莫內以自然為媒介,展現個人創作風格與理念的場所,可視為獨特的烏托邦,進而形成地方迷思,並透過藝文場館中的作品展示,建構強烈的視覺標誌物,促進觀光行為。經由田野觀察法得知兩個現象。第一,導覽中介的規劃與實際使用情況有所落差,完善的內容無法發揮最大效益。第二,景點標誌物在觀光推廣與旅遊實踐中不斷地被強調,更加強化了圖像循環現象。從訪談分析則發現,此個案因不同文化資本的觀光客湧入以及真實性呈現的落差,產生凝視上的衝突,因而凸顯了藝術與觀光間的矛盾。
Claude Monet’s Garden, located in the small town Giverny northwest to Paris, is the residence of the artist and the source of the inspiration for his works of art and creativity. It is one of the most popular tourist spots in Normandy, France, appealing to more than half a million visitors from all over the world who are either art lovers or have fantasies about the Garden. This study explored the Garden via two perspectives. The first one is from the perspective of scenic spots. It aimed to explore the multiple gazes, paradox in art tourism and guide mediation constructed in the Garden. The second perspective is from opinions and behavior of the visitors. It was hoped to better understand perceptions of visitors of different cultural capitals and how multi-layer scenic spots stimulate visitors to consume and practice.
This study employed multi approaches to collect data. Firstly, the researcher collected and analyzed reports and articles from related magazines, books, poplar travel websites and official pamphlets and electronic tour guide issued by Monet’s Garden. By analyzing all these data, the research came to clarify the destination making and guide mediation of the Garden. Besides, a semi-structural interview was conducted to the 24 visitors from different countries to the Garden. They were from France, Belgium, Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia, China and Taiwan. It was hoped to gain a better understanding of visitors’ perspectives and how they planned, arranged and implemented they visit to the Garden. Finally, the researcher paid several visits to the Garden in person in mid-July, 2019 to gain first-hand experience of touring the site and observe the operation of the institute and how visitors are engaged and interacting during their visit.
The results of the study are as follows. Analysis of documents including printed materials and websites reveals that Monet’s Garden is a venue where Monet manifested his personal style and ideology with the nature as a medium and that it can be regarded as a unique Utopia, which gradually became a place-myth. It was also found that with exhibitions in the gallery in the Garden, a visually-intense landmark was constructed, which has stimulated tourism. From the researcher’s field trip to the Garden, two observations were made. First, there is a gap between the planning of guide mediation and the actual utilization of it. The comprehensive content of the guide mediation was not made the most advantage of. Second, off-site markers have been repeatedly highlighted in tourism promotion and traveling practice, which has reinforced the phenomenon of image cycling. Analysis of the interviews revealed that with visitors of different cultural capitals surging and an authenticity gap, Monet’s Garden has created a gaze clash, which highlighted the paradox between art and tourism.
丁寧(2007)。西方美術史的十五堂課。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。
王雅各(譯)(1998)。文明化的儀式─公共美術館之內(原作者:C. Ducan)。
臺北市:遠流出版。
王國強(譯)(2006)。視覺研究導論:影像的思考(原作者:G. Rose)。新北
市:群學。
石武耕、李沅洳、陳羚芝(譯)(2016)。藝術的法則:文學場域的生成與結構
(原作者:P. Bourdieu)。臺北市:典藏藝術家庭。
江千綺(譯)(2013)。消費場所(原作者:J.Urry)。臺北市:書林。
吳莉君(譯)(2010)。觀看的方式(原作者:J. Berger)。臺北市:麥田。
吳莉君(譯)(2010)。觀看的視界(原作者:J. Berger)。臺北市:麥田。
吳欣曄(2015)。巴黎甜點美食觀光:台灣觀光客的文化消費實踐(碩士論文)。
吳錫德(2010)。法國製造:法國文化關鍵詞100。臺北市:麥田。
沈怡君(1998)。印象花園:莫內。大都會文化事業有限公司。
邱天助(1998)。布爾迪厄文化再製理論。臺北市:桂冠。
周來祥、周紀文(2002)。美學概論。臺北市:文津。
孫智綺(譯)(2002)。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課(原作者:P. Bonnewitz)。臺
北市:麥田。
許嘉猷,2011。藝術之眼—布爾迪厄的藝術社會學理論及其在台灣之量化與質化
研究。臺北市:唐山。
張正霖、陳巨擘(譯)(2008)。藝術社會學—精緻與通俗形式之探索(原作者:
V. D Alexander)。臺北市:巨流圖書公司。
吳莉君、陳品秀(譯)(2009)。觀看的實踐—給所有影像世代的視覺文化導論
(原作者:M. Sturken & L.Cartwright)。臺北市:城邦。
陳貺怡、方美晶(2011)。莫內花園(Monet garden)。臺北市 : 北市美術館。
陳貺怡(譯)(2011)。吉維尼時期的莫內:花園像是最後的作品。莫內花園
(Monet garden)(原作者:M. Draguet)。臺北市 : 北市美術館。
馮悅(譯)(2012)。被展示的文化 當代「可參觀性」的生產(原作者:B. Dicks)。
北京:北京大學出版社。
黃宛瑜(譯)(2016)。觀光客的凝視3.0(原作者:J. Urry)。臺北市:書林出
版有限公司。
劉以德(2011)。印象派之旅:法國文藝觀光與管理。巴黎視野,16期,15-19。
劉維公(2006)。風格社會。臺北市 : 天下雜誌出版 。
鄭治桂、鄭麗卿(2011)。360°愛上莫內。臺北市:原點出版。
賴嘉玲(2014)。當流動科技闖進藝術殿堂:從博物館視聽導覽之使用談其對藝文
消費之介入。新聞學研究,199,121-159。
魏伶容、朱燕翔、謝汝萱(2011)。莫內在吉維尼花園。臺北市 : 藝術家出版。
羅竹茜(譯)(1995)。印象派(原作者:P. Pool)。臺北市:遠流出版 。
Chen, Y.(2019)。美學主義作為問題意識 -閱讀洪席耶2020年最新著作:
《景色時代-美學革命之起源》https://vocus.cc/article/5ee4f0b6fd897800010408ea
Bal, M. (2007). Exhibition as film. Exhibition Experiments, 71-93.
Beeton, S. (2005). Film-Induced Tourism. Channel view publications.
Benfield, R. W. (2013). Garden Tourism. Boston: CAB International.
Benjamin, W. (1973). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction in
illuminations. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations (pp. 211–244). London: Fontana Press.
Bermingham, A. (1986). Landscape and Ideology: The English Rustic Tradition, 1740-
1860. London: Thomas & Hudson Ltd.
Bonafoux, P. (2010). Monet, peintre de l’eau. Éditions du Chêne.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice,
Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bryon, J. (2012). Tour Guides as Storytellers – From Selling to Sharing. Scandinavian
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 12(1), 27-43.
Crang, M. (1997). Picturing Practices: Research through the Tourist Gaze. Progress in
Human Geography 21(3): 359-373.
Crawshaw, C. & Urry, J. (1997). Tourism and the photographic eye. In C. Rojek & J.
Urry (Eds.), Touring Cultures—Transformations of travel and Theory (pp176-
209). Routledge.
Chronis, A. & Hampton, R. D. (2008). Consuming the authentic Gettysburg: How a
tourist landscape becomes an authentic experience. Journal of Consumer
Behaviour, 7, 111-126
Clark, T. J. (1984). The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his
followers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and Commoditization in Tourism. Annals of Tourism
Research, 15:37186.
Connell, J. (2012). Film tourism—Evolution, progress and prospects. Tourism
Management, 33, 1007-1029.
Crouch, D. & Lübbren, N. (2003). Visual culture and tourism. Berg.
Dallen, T. (2014). Contemporary Cultural Heritage and Tourism: Development Issues
and Emerging Trends. Public Archaeology, 13 (1–3): 30-47.
Davis, P. (2009). Ecomuseums and the Representation of Place.
Derbaix, M. & Gombault, A. (2016). Selling the invisible to create an authentic
experience: imagination at work at Cézanne’s studio. Journal of Marketing
Management, 32 (15–16), 1458–1477.
Dicks, B. (2003). Culture on Display, The Production of Contemporary Visitability.
England: Open University Press.
Edensor, T. (1998). Walking, gazing, photographing and remembering at the Taj. In
Tourists at the Taj: Performance and Meaning at a Symbolic Site (pp. 105-148). Routledge.
Edensor, T. (2000). Staging Tourism Tourists as Performers. Annals of Tourism
Research 27(2): 322-344.
Edensor, T. (2017). Seeing with light and landscape: a walk around Stanton Moor.
Landscape Research, DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1316368
Foundation Claude Monet. (2019). Fondation Claude Monet, Giverny. Press Materials.
Goetz, A. (2015). Monet à Giverny. Claude Monet Giverny & Gourcuff Gradenigo.
Herbert, D. T. (2001). Literary places, tourism and the heritage experience. Annals of
Tourism Research, 28, 312-333.
Herbert, D. T. (1996a). Artistic and literary places in France as tourist attractions.
Tourism Management, 17 (2), 77-85.
Herbert, D. T. (1995). Heritage, Tourism and Society. Mansell.
Heinrich, C. (2015). Claude Monet, 1840-1926: capturing the ever-changing face of
reality. Köln: Taschen.
Hughes, G. (1995). Authenticity in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(4), 781-
803.
Hughes, H. (2011). Arts, Entertainment and Tourism. NY: Routledge.
Hume, D. L. (2014). Tourism Art and Souvenirs: The material culture of tourism. NY:
Routledge.
Jenkins, O. (2010). Photography and Travel Brochures: The Circle of Representation.
Tourism Geographies, 5(3): 305-328.
Joliveau, T. (2009). Connecting Real and Imaginary Places through Geospatial
Technologies: Examples from Set-jetting and Art-oriented Tourism. The Cartographic journal, 46 (1): 36-45.
Joyces, C. (1985). Claude Monet et Giverny. Chêne.
Kaplan, F. E. S. (1995). Exhibitions as communicative media. In E. Eilean Hooper-
Greenhill (Eds.), Museum, Media, Message (pp.37-59). Routledge.
Karin Sagner-Duchting, K. (1990). Claude Monet, 1840-1926: a feast for the eyes.
Koln: Benedikt Taschen.
Leavens, I. B. (2009). Van Gogh and Japonisme Indebtedness and Transformation.
Asian Intercultural Contacts, 14(2), 30-37.
LeClercq, A. S. W. (2012). A Grand Tour of Gardens. University of South Carolina
Press.
Lidchi, H. (1997). The Politics and the Poetics of Exhibiting Other Culture.
Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, 153-208.
MacCannell, D. (1976). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. University of
California Press.
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist
settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603.
MacCannell, D. (1989). The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. New York:
Schocken Books.
Mansfield, C. (2015). Researching Literary Tourism. Shadows Books & Media.
Marine-Roig, E. (2011). The image and identity of the Catalan coast as a tourist
destination in twentieth-century tourist guidebooks. Journal of Tourism and
Cultural Change, 9(2), 118–139
McTavish, L. (2006). Visiting the Virtual Museum Art and Experience Online.
Metropolitan Museum of Art. (2012). Monet's Years at Giverny: Beyond Impressionism.
Murray, E. (1994). Monet as a Garden Artist. Monet: Late Paintings of Giverny from
the Musee Marmottan. The Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco.
Miller, M. (1988). The Garden as Significant Form. The Journal of Speculative
Philosophy, New Series, 2(4), 267-287.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2002). Landscape and power. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Rancière, J. (2020). Le temps du paysage : Aux origines de la révolution esthétique. La
Fabrique Editions.
Rodrigues, A. D. (2015). GARDENS AND TOURISM For and beyond economic
profit. CHAIA/CIUHCT.
Smith, S. P. (2019). Landscapes for “likes”: capitalizing on travel with Instagram,
Social Semiotics, DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2019.1664579
Steiner, C. (2006). Reconceptualising Interpretation: The Role of Tour Guides in
Authentic Tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(6), 481-498. doi:
10.2167/cit280.0
Teo, P. & Leong, S. (2006). A Postcolonial Analysis of Backpacking. Annals of
Tourism Research, 33(1): 109–131.
Thomas, R. P., Porteous, G. & Simmons, D. G. (1994). Garden Tourism and its Potential
Organization in Canterbury.
Tucker, P. H. (1994). Passion and Patriotism in Monet's Late Work. Monet: Late
Paintings of Giverny from the Musee Marmottan. The Fine Arts Museums of San
Francisco.
Urry, J. (1995). Consuming Place. Routledge.
Urry, J. & Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze 3.0. London: Sage.
Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism
Research, 26(2), 349-370.
Watson, N. (2006). The Literary Tourist. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Zuelow, E. G. E. (2015). Guidebooks and the importance of seeing the sights. A History
of Modern Tourism. UK: Macmillan Education.