研究生: |
張雅娟 Chang, Ya-Chuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
臺北市特殊教育學校教師對教師助理員工作滿意度之研究 A Study on the Degree of Satisfaction of Teachers about the Paraprofessionals for the Taipei Special Education School |
指導教授: |
杞昭安
Chi, Chao-An |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2015 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 122 |
中文關鍵詞: | 特殊教育學校 、教師助理員 、工作滿意度 |
英文關鍵詞: | Special Education School, Paraprofessionals, Job Satisfaction |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204816 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:202 下載:35 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在瞭解臺北市特殊教育學校教師對教師助理員工作滿意度,並提出結論與建議。本研究採用問卷調查法,以自編「教師對教師助理員工作的滿意度調查問卷」為研究工具,對臺北市特殊教育學校教師為對象,有效問卷183份,可用率為91.5%,分別以次數分配、平均數、百分比、t考驗及單因子變異數分析等統計方法進行分析。
茲將本研究結果分別說明如下:
一、臺北市特殊教育學校教師對教師助理員工作滿意度皆是「滿意」的程
度,且對「生活自理指導」及「工作態度」向度的滿意度較高;在教學
協助方面滿意度較低。
二、不同教師背景變項中,無論教師的性別、特教教學年資、任教學校、任
教教育階段別及特殊教育專業背景,臺北市特殊教育學校教師對教師助
理員工作滿意度都無顯著差異。
三、根據研究結果提出建議,作為教育行政機關、學校行政單位、特殊教育
學校教師、教師助理員及未來研究之參考。
The main purpose of this study was to understand the degree of satisfaction of the special education teachers about the paraprofessionals in Taipei special education schools. This study was based on my self-developing questionnaire. “Questionnaire of The Degree of Satisfaction of the Special Education Teachers about the Paraprofessionals in Taipei Special Education Schools,” was used to collect data. The target of this study at the specia education teachers in Taipei special education schools. There were 183 copies of valid questionnaire and the questionnaire efficiency was 91.5%. Statistical methods, such as frequency distribution, average, percentage, t-test, and one way ANOVA, were used to analyze the data respectively.
The results of this study were explained as follows:
1.The degree of satisfaction of the special education teachers about the paraprofessionals in Taipei special education schools tended to “satisfaction”, and agreed with the dimension of “self-care guidance” and “job attitude,” which scaled in the highest average. Besides, they agreed with the dimension of “teaching assistance,” which scaled in the lowest average.
2.The variables of the teachers’ different background, like the teachers’ gender, years of teaching special education, where they teach, stages of teaching and special education professional background, have no significant difference on the degree of satisfaction of the special education teachers about the paraprofessionals in Taipei special education schools.
3.According to the study outcomes, some suggestions were provided to the official administrations of education, school administrative departments, teachers and paraprofessionals of special education schools, and the research in the future.
一、中文文獻
王惠俐(2002):特殊教育教師助理員工作滿意度之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
王儀嘉(1998):特殊教育助理人員角色功能之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
石典玉(2005):台北縣國小特殊教育班教師助理員工作現況及專業訓練需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。
吳武典(1994):我國身心障礙兒童教育安置之檢討。師大學報,39,134-181。
李姿嫺(2011):新北市國小自閉症兒童之導師對助理人員服務滿意度研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
李家安、郭昭佑(2014):教師工作滿意度的新觀點-從第三域的視角出發。臺灣教育評論月刊,2014,3(2),101-105。
沈慶揚(1993):台灣省國民小學啟智班生活輔導員任用情況調查研究。國立屏東師範學院輔導區特殊班教師特教專題研究成果彙編(二)特殊教育叢書,21,85-124。
周昌柏(2005):桃、竹、苗四縣市教師工作滿意度現況分析。學校行政雙月刊,40,108-123。
周婉琪(2011):國小特教班教師對教師助理員角色期待與角色實踐調查之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學,桃園。
林俊瑩、林玟秀與陳佑任(2013):學前教師特教工作勝任感與工作滿意度的影響機制-學歷、年資與專業訓練的作用。教育研究與發展期刊,9(1),117-142。
林靖芸(2011):特殊教育學校教師助理員角色期望與角色實踐之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
徐淑華、葉弼雯(2010):人格特質、工作特性、工作滿意度之研究-以苗栗地區國小教師為例,台灣首府大學學報,1,1-21。
特殊教育學校設立變更停辦合併及人編制標準(2014年3月12日修正)。檢索日期:2014.8.6。取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx
高級中等以下學校特殊教育班班級及專責單位設置與人員進用辦法(2014年4月10日修正)檢索日期:2014.8.6。取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx
特殊教育法(2014年5月30日修正)檢索日期:2014.8.6。取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx
郭怡妝(2012):高雄市國小特教班教師助理員工作現況與工作滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東大學,臺東縣。
張乃心(2008):國小普通班教師對特殊教育教師助理員入班協助需求及服務滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北。
張春興(1998):張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
張春興、林清山(1992):教育心理學。臺北:東華。
陳佩汝(2002):台北地區托兒所保育人員工作壓力與工作滿意度之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
陳鳳儀(2010):特殊教育教師助理員工作壓力與工作滿意之研究--以台灣北區主要特教學校及特教班為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北。
黃靜怡(2010):教師助理員協助一位多重障礙學生參與融合教育之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。
許原嘉(2002):國民中學身心障礙資源班教師工作滿意度調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
許瑞芳(2001):國民小學啟聰教育教師工作滿意度調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
曾麗禎(2012):新北市幼稚園融合教育班教師對教師助理員的督導策略與督導情形之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育學院,臺北。
楊淳淳(2010):國小特教班教師對教師助理員工作現況及工作滿意度之研究。臺北市立教育大學,臺北。
楊淳淳、張世彗(2012):國小特教班助理人員工作現況及其滿意度之研究。特教論壇,12,72-93。
臺北市103學年度補助各校特殊教育助理員實施計畫。
劉秀枝(2011):私立幼兒園教師職場幸福感與工作滿意度之關係研究。幼兒教保研究期刊 ,6 ,87-114。
劉韋汝(2013):台中市特殊教育學校教師助理員工作滿意度之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
劉春初、洪塾優(2012):工作特性、工作滿意與工作績效關聯性之研究。建國科大理工期刊,31(2),67-88。
蘇振輝(2002):輔助溝通系統訓練對重度智能障礙兒童溝通行為效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
二、英文文獻
Anselmo, Doris (2000). Rhode Island Teacher's Assistant Professional Development Plan. A Report to the General Assembly. Rhode Island State Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education, Providence.
Blalock, B. G. (1991).Paraprofessionals: Critical team members in our special education programs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 26(4),200-214.
Breton,W.(2010). Special education paraprofessionals: Perceptions of preservice preparation, supervision, and ongoing developmental training. International Journal of Special Education, 25 (1), 34-45.
Carnahan, C. R.; Williamson, P., Clarke, L., & Sorensen, R. (2009).A systematic approach for supporting paraeducators in educational settings :a guid for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children. 41(5),34-44.
Davis, J.H.(1995).A training program designed to develop knowledgeable paraprofessionals with improved job performance skills to meet the needs of teachers and special education students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University, Fort lauderdale , Florida.
Etscheidt, S. (2005). Paraprofessional Services for Students with Disabilities: A Legal Analysis of Issues. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30 (2), 60-80.
Ghere, G. & York-Barr, J.(2007).Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28 (1), 21-32.
Giangreco, M.F. (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership ,61,50-53.
Harrison, S. (1997). Career development for non-traditional community college students as special education paraprofessionals. Retrieved September, 2014,from ERIC database. (ED 415647)
Hemmingsson, H., Borell, L., & Gustavsson A. (2003). Participation in school: School assistants creating opportunities and obstacle for pupils with disabilities. Participation and Health, 23 (3), 88-89.
Hipsky, S. (2007). The paraprofessional perspective. Retrieved September, 2014,from ERIC database. (ED495285)
Hughes, M. T., & Valle-Riestra D. M. (2008). Responsibilities, preparedness, and job satisfaction of paraprofessionals: Working with young children with disabilities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(2), 163-173.
Juen, E.D., Dianel L. R., & Denise C. (2000). Paraeducators in Inclusive Classrooms Their Own Perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21 (3).
Kotler,P. (1996). Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. N.J. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 9th ed.
Latour, S. A., & Peat, N.C (1979).Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research. Advances in Consumer Research, l6(14).
Leger. R & Nicole, T. (2010). Paraprofessional preparation and supervision in special education. Retrieved September, 2014,from ERIC database. (ED 520321)
Lewis, S. & McKenzie, A. R. (2010).The competencies, roles, supervision, and training needs of paraeducators working with studnts with visual impairments in local and residential schools. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness. 104(8),464-478.
Lytle, R., Lieberman, L., & Aiello, R. (2007).Motivating paraeducators to be actively involved in physical education programs. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 78(4),26-32.
McKenzie, A. R. & Lewis, S. (2008). Paraprofessionals who work with students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,102(8),459-472.
Michigan Department of Education (2004). Guidelines for the Michigan paraprofessional portfolio assessmen. Retrieved September, 2014, from http://search.michigan.gov/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&sc=0&query=Guidelines+&m=&affiliate=mi-mde
Minondo, S., Meyer, L. H., & Xin, J. F. (2001). The role and responsibilities of teaching assistants in inclusive education:What’s appropriate?The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 114-119.
Nevin,A., Malian, I., & Liston, A. (2008). Paraeducator’s profile in inclusive classrooms :Analysis of national survey data and follow-up case study interviews in California. National Resource Center for paraprofessionals 27th National Conference on the Training and Employment of Paraprofessionals in Harford CT.
Price, J. H.(1972). Handbook of organizational measurement. DC: Heath & Company.
Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications. New Jersey, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Robin, H. & Jerry, F.(2007). The roles and responsibilities of teacher aids supporting students with special needs in secondary school settings. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31, 25-43.
SPeNSE (2001).The Role of Paraprofessionals in Special Education. SPeNSE (Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education) Fact Sheets. Retrieved September, 2014, from ://ferdig.coe.ufl.edu/spense/parasFinal.doc
Tillery, C. Y., Werts, M. G., Roark,R. & Harris, S.(2003). Perceptions of paraeducators on Job Retention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26 (2), 118-127.
Vasa, S. F., Steckelberg, A. L., & Ronning, L. U. (1982).A state of art assessment of paraprofessional use in special education.Lincoln:Department of Special Education,University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Wisconsin Administrative Code(2004). Department of public instruction,Chpater 34. Retrieved September, 2014, from http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/admin_code/pi/34.pdf