研究生: |
黃建國 Huang Chien-kuo |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
企業運用人力派遣關鍵成功因素之探討—以台北世貿中心為例 A Study of Corporate Use of the Dispatch Industry and Its Key Success Factors |
指導教授: |
余鑑
Yu, Chien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 166 |
中文關鍵詞: | 人力派遣 、關鍵成功因素 |
英文關鍵詞: | Dispatching Industry, Key Success Factors |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:332 下載:71 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的主要在探討影響組織運用人力派遣之因素,及瞭解台北世貿中心使用人力派遣的運作現況,並歸納影響其關鍵成功因素。研究方法採質化的個案研究法,以訪談方式進行個案資料蒐集,訪談要派企業、派遣企業、派遣員工三方,共九位受訪者,並根據研究主題將訪談資料整理與分析,得到以下的發現。
一、影響組織運用人力派遣的因素:要派企業因素、派遣企業因素、派遣員工因素、外部環境因素。
二、台北世貿中心人力派遣運作現況:甄選派遣企業、進行派遣人力需求評估、甄選派遣員工、三方之契約訂定、權利與義務規範、派遣員工派遣期間的管理、三方互動關係、派遣後檢討。
三、影響台北世貿中心人力派遣的關鍵成功因素:(一)派遣前:要派企業、派遣企業、派遣員工三方對人力派遣的認知。(二)派遣成立階段:慎選派遣企業、派遣費用合理化、要派契約規範、人力需求評估明確、招募管道順暢、遴選合適派遣員工、勞動契約保障、要派企業對派遣員工複試、要派與派遣企業合作認知。(三)派遣期間:建立溝通協調、規範派遣員工權利義務、提供教育訓練、對派遣員工績效評估、關懷派遣員工、對派遣企業服務評估、授權管理、派遣企業遞補人選能力、派遣員工薪資福利、派遣員工任務執行能力、適才適所、詳細規劃工作內容。(四)派遣後:有派遣任務檢討措施、要派企業對派遣關係評估、派遣企業對派遣關係評估、派遣員工對派遣關係評估。
The main purpose of the research is to analyze specific elements that influence organizations to resort to the dispatch industry and to understand the key success factors of this industry through the case study of the Taipei World Trade Center (TWTC).
The research method employed was case study of the qualitative research and the data was collected by in interviews. The sample population of nine participants consisted members from the user enterprise, dispatched work agency and dispatched workers. According to the arrangement and the analysis of the research data, we can get the findings of the study are as follows:
1. The four main factors that influence an organization’s outsourcing decision-making include the user enterprise, dispatched work agency, dispatched workers, and external environment.
2. The TWTC dispatch process is similar to that of the hiring process: Need assessment, selection, contract formulation, rights and responsibilities, management, triangular arrangement, and re-evaluation.
3. The crucial element affecting the success of TWTC human-resource dispatching is the conjoint cognition for human-resource dispatching among the triangular arrangement (user enterprise, dispatched work agency and dispatched workers) before working. At the pre-dispatch phase, several areas need special attention to ensure success: Careful selection of outsourcer, reasonable wage and service fees, reasonable contract specifications, accurate assessment of worker needs, transparent recruitment process, fair selection criteria, appropriate indemnification (guarantee) for operative (labor) contract, consistent reevaluation, and understanding and cooperation between user enterprise and the dispatched work agency. Throughout the contract duration, user enterprise are obligated to establish communication, ensure worker rights, provide continuous training, deliver performance appraisal, afford emotional support, evaluate the outsourcer, delegate management, arrange alternative candidates with outsourcer, secure employee welfare, acknowledge worker competencies, locate best-fit for every position, and assist in planning and development of job description . Post-dispatch involves evaluations from all three parties, and are used to improve job descriptions for future dispatched workers. The package includes evaluations on the outsourcer from the user enterprise, the user enterprise from the outsource agency, and outsourcer from the dispatched workers.
一、中文部份
才庫人力資源「人力派遣」有一套(1999,8月27日)。經濟日報,41版。
三浦和夫(1997)。人才派遣導覽134家公司。台北:帕魯。
西谷敏(1994)。日本派遣勞動之法律與實務。台北:行政院勞委會譯印。
行政院勞工委員會(2004)。人力派遣服務業發展綱領及行動方案。台北:行政院勞工委員會編印。
行政院勞工委員會(2006)。中華民國臺灣地區職類別薪資調查報告。台北:行政院勞工委員會編印。
成之約(1998)。淺論派遣勞動及其對勞資關係的影響。就業與訓練,16(6),3-11。
成之約(1999)。我國勞動派遣法草案之研擬。台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託計畫。
李元隆(2000)。台灣人才派遣制度現況之研究─以日本人才派遣為比較基礎。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
林旭彥(2004)。公部門設置人力派遣公司之探討。大葉大學工業關係學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
吳思華(1988)。產業政策與企業策略。台北:中國經濟企業研究所、華泰。
吳若萱(2000)。派遣勞動如何重塑僱傭關係與企業用人政策。非典型工作型態發展與勞動政策研討會論文集,85-96。
邱駿彥(1998)。勞工派遣業法律問題之探討。台北:行政院勞委會。
邱駿彥(2000)。勞工派遣法制之研究-以日本勞工派遣法為例。台灣勞動法學會學報,1,1-68。
侯俊言(2004)。醫院使用派遣勞工之研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
尚榮安(譯)(2001)。Yin,R.K.(著)。個案研究。台北:弘智文化。
涂春河(1991)。光電產業關鍵成功因素之研究。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
孫茄綾(2001)。人力派遣的利基。管理雜誌,320,76-79。
陳正良(1994)。派遣業勞工之僱用關係與勞動條件。勞資關係月刊,12(12), 6-15。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
高梨昌(1997)。人才派遣的活用法。台北:東洋經濟新聞社。
翁玉珍(2000)。派遣勞動對派遣員工的功能評估研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
黃英忠(1997)。人力資源管理。台北:三民。
焦興鎧(2000)。論勞動派遣之國際勞動基準。台灣勞動法學會學報,1,151-200。
楊通軒(1998)。勞動派遣立法必要性之研究。全國律師,2 (7),34-41。
楊通軒(2000)。論德國勞動派遣法制。台灣勞動法學會學報,1,69-121。
楊朝安(2006)。台灣人力派遣的市場現況與因應之道。「勞動派遣」:理論與實務對話研討會。台北:行政院勞工委員會,9月21-22日。
張愷倫(2001)。人力派遣業之跨國性比較-以在台執業之人力派遣業者為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
劉秀珍(1999)。人才派遣在促進就業所扮演的角色。勞資關係月刊,17(9),43-47。
劉愛生(1993)。派遣勞動的組織活動與外包承攬制的差異性。勞工行政,67,47-48。
鄭津津(2000)。美國勞動派遣法制之研究。台灣勞動法學會學報,1,123-150。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。
蔡博全(2000)。國內人力派遣業制度運作及人力資源管理實務之探討-以美國相關產業為對比。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
簡建忠(1999)。台灣派遣勞工對派遣工作看法之研究。勞資關係論叢,9,99-124。
二、外文部份
Aaker, D. A. (1995). Strategic Market Management, 4th ed., N.Y.: John Wiely & Sons.
BLS (2003). Employment Situation, http://www.BLS.gov
Christine, V. B., & Rockart, J. F. (1981). A Primer On Critical Success Factors, CISR ND. 69, MIT, 1-12.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publication.
Daniel, R. D. (1961). Management Information Crisis, Harvard Business Review, Sep. ~Oct, 111.
Ferguson, C. R., & Dickinson, R. (1982). Critical Success Factor or Directors in the Eighties, Business Horizons, May-June, 14-18.
Freund, Y. P. (1988). Critical Success Factors, Planning Review, 20.
Hambric, D. C. (1989). Key Success Factor: Test A General Theory in The Mature Industrial – ProductSector, Strategic Management Journal, 1(10).
Hofer, C. W., & Schendle, D. (1978). Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concept, West Publishing Co., 75-76.
Jette, K. D., & Dixon, C. E. (1998). The Outsourced / Contingent Workforce – Abuse, Threat, or Blessing?, Library Administration & Management, 12, 220-225
Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Nonstandard employment relations: part-time, temporary and contract work. in K. S. Cook and H. John (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 341-365. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Leidecker, J. K., & Bruno, A.V. (1984). Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors, Long Range Planning, 17(4), 23-32.
Mcclurg, L. N. (1999). Organisational Commitment in the Temporary-help service industry, Journal of Applied Management Studies, 8(1), 5-26.
Melchionno, R. (1999). The Changing temporary work force: managerial , professional, and technical workers in personnel supply services industry, Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 43(1), 24-32.
NAPEO (2003). Industry Information, http://www.napeo.org
Nollen, S., & Axel, H. (1996). Does contingent labor cost less? Tools to get the answer. In Nollen , S. & Axel, H. (Eds.), Managing Contingent Workers: How to Reap the Benefits and Reduce the Risks. New York: Amacom. 61-84.
Pfeffer, J., & Baron, J. N. (1988). Taking the Workers Back out: Recent Trends in the Structuring of Employment, Research in Organizational Behavior. Volume 10. Staw, Barry M., ed Cummings, L. L., ed, Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews Greenwich, Conn. And London: JAI Press, 257-303.
Reilly, P. A. (1998). Balancing Flexibility-Meeting theInterests of Employer and Employee. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology. 7(1), 7-22.
Rockart, J. (1979). Chief Executives Defined Their Own Data Needs, Harvard Business Review, March~April, 64-65.
Segal, L. M., & Sullivan, D. G. (1997). The growth of temporary services work, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(2), 117-136.
Thomson, A.(1995). The contingent workforce, Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 39(1), 45-48.
Willey, T. J.(1995). The Business of Employee Leasing, San Bernardino:The Aegis Group.