研究生: |
許議鶴 Hsu, Yi-Ho |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
自我評估融入專題式學習的成效 The Effects of Embedding Self-assessment in Project-based Learning |
指導教授: |
張文華
Chang, Wen-Hua |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 127 |
中文關鍵詞: | 自我評估 、植物概念 、專題式學習 |
英文關鍵詞: | self-assessment, plant-related conception, project-based learning(PBL) |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203783 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:214 下載:31 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究目的在探討自我評估量表融入專題式學習課程對學生之學習成效及科學喜好及興趣的影響、自我評估能力及學習成效的關係以及自我評估的表現。研究方法為準實驗設計,教學時間為暑期試行之第三學期,上課時間共兩週(八節課),研究對象為六個班級(N = 100)的七年級新生,實驗組(n = 51)在專題式學習課程中融入自評表填寫,對照組(n = 49)僅實施專題式學習課程,並未填寫自評表。
本研究工具包含量化及質性資料,前者包括科學喜好及興趣量表、植物認知測驗;後者為自評表的填寫內容。量化資料將以學生前後測分數描述性統計、相依樣本t檢定、單因子共變數分析做數據統計;質性資料先以編碼系統表及評分者一致性評分,再以Spearman等級相關以及簡單迴歸分析做量化數據統計,探討自評準確者及不準確者學生之自評能力與成績變化量的關係,最後再探討學生自評內容,輔作自評能力與成績間關係之結果探討。
研究結果發現:一、僅實施專題式學習課程,學生在植物認知「低階能力」有顯著進步,而融入自評表並未對植物認知成績造成影響;二、在專題式學習課程中融入自評表並未對學生科學喜好及興趣產生影響;三、學生自評能力與其植物認知成績有中等相關性,而其中自評準確之學生則有高等相關性。以上三項結果顯示,本研究未能證明實施自評表能改善專題式學習課程中面臨的困難與限制所影響之學習成就及內在動機,研究者建議實施專題式學習課程時,可以合併運用自評表,但應配合階段性訓練,實施期間需給予背景知識或技能不足的學生適時的協助,自我評估進行後需再給予學生回饋。
The purposes of this study are to probe into the students’ learning achievement and scientific interests, the relationship between the students’ self-assessment ability and learning achievement, and the students’ performance of self-assessment in self-assessment embedded project-based learning (SA-PBL).
The research methodology adopted quasi-experimental design. The teaching time lasted for two weeks (8 periods) in the third semester of the summer program. Six classes (N = 100) of the new seventh graders in one junior high school located in New Taipei City were involved in this study. The SA-PBL group (n=51) enrolled self-assessment during the PBL instruction, however, the PBL group (n = 49) was only reminded of reviewing their project report. Two research instruments collected the quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data contained Test of Science-Related attitudes (TOSRA) toward interest and test of the plants-related conception. The qualitative data were the students’ written self-assessment forms. The quantitative data was analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, paired t test, and one-way ANCOVA. The qualitative data was analyzed by applying coding system and calculating the inter-rater reliability. The scores were analyzed by Spearman rank-order correlation and simple regression analysis
The results indicated three findings as follow. First, the students with lower ability of the plants-related concepts progress significantly; Second, the students’ scientific interest would not differ whether embedding the self-assessment in PBL or not. Third, the correlation between the ability of self-assessment and the learning achievement is moderate; however, there is a high correlation in those students who can self-assess accurately. According to the findings, we conclude that the students exercised self-assessment did not overcome the difficulties encountered in PBL instruction. Furthermore, the term of conducting the self-assessment or PBL should last longer and it should be collocated with phased training. Finally, teachers should further assist students with poor learning skills. More specifically, after writing self-assessment forms, teachers need to give more feedback continually.
參考文獻
中文文獻
王仁宏(2006)。專題學習對國小六年級學生在社會領域學習效果之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
吳宗霖(2008)。運用專題導向學習策略與無所不在學習環境於國小六年級生態環境教育之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
吳紀蓉(2003)。偏遠小學專題式學習之行動研究-以蝴蝶養殖為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮市。
李妤慧(2005)。應用學習環教學模式於國民小學網路輔助教學之成效研究-以「植物世界面面觀」為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
李崑玉(2014)。尖石鄉新樂國小泰雅族在地植物課程之教學行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
呂意仁(2008)。專題本位學習對國小學生科學態度和創造力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
施春輝(2008)。專題本位的教學與學習對國小五年級兒童「力與運動」單元學習影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
徐淑蓮(2008)。在國小四年級自然與生活科技課程中進行PBL教學之行動研 究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
徐新逸(2001)。如何利用網路幫助孩子成為研究高手?網路專題式學習與教學創新。台灣教育,607,25-34。
張凱昱(2013)。行動情境式學習對自我效能、自我調節與學習成效之影響:以英語學習校園植物為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
梁榮富(2008)。不同自我監控輔助機制對國小學童網路閱讀行為與學習成效的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
陳汶華(2013)。數位內容與戶外教學融入國小課程之學習成效研究-以植物為例(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。
陳智成(2010)。運用專題式學習探討外來種議題之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
陳麗茹(2010)。專題式導項學習運用於國小節能減碳教學之行動研究-以「太陽-永續家園」主題為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
塗瑞臻(2006)。直接教學模式及自我監控策略對國小六年級數學低成就學生數學學習之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
楊彩貝(2007)。校園植物導覽書應用於國小植物單元教學成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
楊琳萱(2011)。利用學校周邊自然地區以「專題導向學習法」進行自然探索學習(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
賴永福(2005)。國小六年級學生利用校園植物網站與校園植物認知之研究-以 台中縣某國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
謝春興(2013)。自我評估式科學寫作對九年級學生概念學習與動機的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
顏麗娟(2003)。國小學童植物概念之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
魏淑珍(2010)。國中生運用自我監控策略對於英語科學業成就與動機之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。慈濟大學,花蓮市。
行政院教育改革審議委員會國民中小學課程綱要總綱、各學習領域、生活課程暨重大議題審議小組(96 年 10 月至 97 年 4 月)。自然與生活科技學習領域。查詢日期:2014 年9月5日,檢自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC2/9cc_97.php。
教育部國民及學前教育署(103年11月28日)。國民小學及國民中學推動夏日樂學試辦計畫。查詢日期:2015年9月16日,檢自 http://www.k12ea.gov.tw/ap/news_view.aspx?sn=6ed2e617-acdb-4a2a-8df6-ffc93
d9afc4f。
英文文獻
Bound, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Educational Research & Development, 34(1), 45-59.
Chu, S. K. W., Tse S. K., & Chow K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school student develop information literacy and information skills. The Library & Information Research , 33(2), 132-143.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Ertugrul, U. (2011). The examination of online self-regulated learning skills in web-based learning environments in the terms of different variables. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 278-286.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes. Victoria, Australia: Radford House.
Guven E. (2014). The effect of project based learning method supported by prediction-observation-explanations on the attitude and behaviors towards environmentalproblems. Education and Science, 39(173), 25-39.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Kubiatko, M., & Vaculova, I. (2011). Project-based learning: Characteristic and theexperiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(1), 65-74.
Lew, M. D. N., Alwis, W. A. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). Accuracy of students’ self-assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 135-156.
Li, D., Zhang, C., & He, Y. (2015). Project-based learning in teaching translation: students‘ perceptions. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), 1-19.
Macias-Guarasa, J., Montero, J. M., San-Segundo, R. (2006). A project-based learning aprroach to design electronic systems curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education,49(3), 389-397.
Martinez, F., Herrero L. C., & Pablo, S. (2011). Project-based learning and rubrics in the teaching of power supplies and photovoltaic electricity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 54(1), 87-96.
McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy& practice, 10(2), 209-220.
McMillian, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40-49.
Minnaert, A., Boekaerts, M., & Brabander, C. D. (2007) Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101(2), 574-586.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A reviw of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Treacy, D. J., Sankaran, S. M., Gordon-Messer, S., Saly, D., Miller, R., Isaac, R. S., & Kosinski-Collins, M. S. (2011) Implementation of project-based molecular biology laboratory emphasizing protein structure-function relationships in a large introductory biology laboratory course. CBE life sciences education, 10(1), 18-24.
Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5-21.