簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉佳育
Liu Chia-Yu
論文名稱: 教師專業成長:在不同領導類型下個案教師成長分析
Teacher Professional Development:The analysis of case teachers' development in different leaderships styles
指導教授: 黃芳裕
Huang, Fang-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 化學系
Department of Chemistry
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 210
中文關鍵詞: 衝突管理領導類型科學師資培育
英文關鍵詞: conflict management, leadership style, science teacher education
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:210下載:28
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 從教育的觀點來看,當前社會正從單一文化發展成多元文化並行的動態情境,這將使得教育環境產生如強調學校本位的教學課程、教師甄選等體制上的重大改革,以符合社會期許和需求。另外,在科學教育的領域,也從往昔培育科學家延伸成養成全民科學素養,同時強調學習者可學取帶得走的實用導向能力,而能適應當時所在情境,將多元化科學知識加以選擇、自我建構出適宜的表現。在此多元文化、體制變革以及科學教育的價值、功能轉變等多重影響中,科學教師正面臨個人和群體間互動情境,如何從中抉擇、經營與自我調整等以勝任當前教育活動,便是一個極大的挑戰,同時亦將是師資培育應以重視之處。
    基於以上觀點,本研究旨在探討不同領導類型、群體文化下,國中科學教師專業成長表現;並在質性研究架構中,輔以文獻分析為基礎,配合深度訪談、現場資料、教室觀察與其他平面文字等為期兩年相關資料的收集與分析,同時依據Tjosvold(1997)和Deutsch(1973)的主張與衝突管理的觀點,形成教學特性、人際關係、學校文化、衝突管理四個分析向度,探討教師的專業成長表現。本研究經相關理論與文獻佐證,分析影響教師專業成長因素如下:
    1.教師的師資培育理念與教學特性,不僅影響自身在群體中的角色認同、
    定位、幫助學生學習,並且對自身專業素養的成長呈現出高度的相關。
    2.在領導者和教師成員共同創造願景與使命感的新領導類型下,對教師個
    人專業成長獲益匪淺。
    3.不同的領導類型營造不同的群體文化,形成其不同特色和優勢,教師自
    身的師資培育理念在群體文化下,應加以選擇與配合以對自身專業素養
    4.群體內同儕教師相互合作、經驗分享以及共同面對與解決問題,有助於
    彼此專業素養的增進與群體發展。
    5.群體之間的良性互動,使得教師加強對群體的認同感與活動力讓本身在
    專業成長上有很好的發揮;若是互動不良,將降低教師的認同感並較難
    在專業素養良好發揮。
    此外,從研究結果得知在當前注重以學校本位課程的學校環境下,科學教師自身專業素養的成長將有以下思慮之處:
    1.教師在群體互動時,遭遇衝突所運用的管理策略與自身專業成長關係十
    分密切。
    2.師資培育機構協助與教師個人積極面對當前教學環境,對教師本身的成
    長相得益彰。
    3.教師與領導者共同營造出學校特色與遠景,以利學校整體發展、教師專
    業成長等多贏情境。
    本研究架構冀望探研出科學教師專業成長發展的相關因素,以作為相關師資單位參考之用。

    From the point of view in education, the dynamic condition of current society has been changed from the development of unitary culture into the cooperation of multi-culture. It encourages educational circle to make many significant reforms, such as school-based curriculums, which serves to satisfy the expectation and need of society. Besides, in the field of science education, the cultivation which aims for training scientists extended its direction to the growth of capacity in science. Now we put emphasis on the practicability-oriented ability that learners can acquire and choose multiple scientific knowledge in proper context. It is a quite great challenge for scientific teachers who are facing such dynamic condition as how to manage and adjust themselves.
    This research explores the junior high school teachers of their professional development in different leadership styles and group cultures. In order to analyze how teachers develop professionally, this research includes the views of Tjosvold(1997)and Deutsch(1973)’s conflict management that divided into four analytic dimensions:teaching character, interpersonal relationship, school culture, and conflict management. Through theoretical framework, we get conclusions below:
    1.Teachers’ ideal and teaching character not only relates to
    teacher professional development, but also affect their
    identity that helps student learn science in the group.
    2.Under the new leadership style, the leader and teachers
    create visions and missions that will help individual teacher
    get more advantages in professional development
    3.Leadership styles create many kinds of group cultures and
    superiorities. In different group culture, teachers should
    select and cooperate in their own ideals
    4.Teachers share their experiences, problem-solving,
    cooperative teaching that benefits professional development.
    5.Good interaction is the most important thing that will
    strengthen teachers' identities toward groups and perform
    well in their professional development. If there is no
    interaction, teachers’ identities will weaken.
    The research hopes to find out the related factors in science teacher professional development. We get suggestions as following:
    1.Science teachers’ conflict management strategies will help
    them develop well in group’s interaction.
    2.Leaders and teachers construct the school’s characters and
    visions that will avail its development and teachers’ growth.
    3.The assistance of teacher educational organization will
    benefit the science teacher professional development.

    目 次 博碩士論文上網授權書…………………………iii 學位考試委員審定書……………………………………………vi 誌謝………………………………………………......vii 中文摘要…………………………………………………..viii 英文摘要…………………………………………………..………x 目次…………………………………………………....xii 表次………………………………………………………...xiv 圖次…………………………………………………………….xv 1. 緒論…………………………………………………………….1 1.1. 研究動機與重要性…………………………………………1 1.2. 研究目的…………………………………………………...3 1.3. 研究範圍與限制………………………………………...4 1.4. 名詞界定與釋義……………………………………………...6 2. 理論基礎與文獻分析………………………………………………10 2.1. 衝突理論………………….………………………………….12 2.2. 領導與權力的轉變……….……………………………….31 2.3. 後現代社會生活理念……………….……………………….41 3. 研究設計與研究架構……………………………………57 3.1. 研究設計…………………………………………………….57 3.2. 研究架構……………………………………………….63 3.3. 資料蒐集與來源…………….………………………….65 3.4. 研究對象背景分析…………………….…………………….68 3.5. 資料分析與評量工具………………….………………….71 3.6. 研究之信度、效度………………………….……………….79 4. 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………81 4.1. 領導類型資料分析……………………….……………….82 4.2. A教師的資料分析………………….…..……………..94 4.3. B教師的資料分析…………………………….………….112 4.4. C教師的資料分析……………………………………..………126 4.5.綜合分析與結果討論……………………………….…….139 5. 結論與建議…………………………………………………….149 5.1. 結論……………………………………………………...150 5.2. 建議………………………………………………………...158 相關文獻…………………………………………………………161 附錄A:部分訪談資料…………………………………………….178 附錄B:部分現場記錄資料……………………………………….185 附錄C:部分課室觀察資料………………………………………….188 附錄D:部分著作與其他資料…………………………………….192 附錄E:資料分析範例:以Perry Scheme為分析工具………….194 附錄F:相關著作…………………………………………….197

    中文部分:
    尹淑萍、廖金閱、黃芳裕(1997) 國中理化實習教師對科學教學的認識
    省察表徵。中華民國第十三屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編,498-
    506
    江嘉杰(1998) 國民小學校長領導行為與教師衝突反應方式之研究。台
    中:台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    李富美(1998) 校長角色與學校效能之研究-一所國民小學之觀察。台
    東:台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    吳培源(1994)台灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係
    之研究。台北:台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版
    林振春(1993)衝突管理理論及其在團體中的應用。社會教育學刊,22
    期,73-106頁。國立台灣師範大學社會教育系
    林靜怡(1999) 校長認知型態、領導形式與領導效能之相關研究-以花
    蓮縣國民小學為例。花蓮:東華大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    林靜茹(1993) 國民中小學校長人際衝突管理及其相關因素之研究。高
    雄:高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    林懿萱(2001) 新制實習制度下國中理化實習教師的專業成長:質性個
    案研究。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版
    徐友漁等著(1996) 語言與哲學。北京:五聯書局
    柯進雄(1994) 衝突理論與學校領導。台北:台聯
    胡峻豪(1997) 國民小學校長衝突管理策略及其成效。台北:台北師範
    學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    徐宗國譯(1997) 質性研究概論。台北:巨流
    許榮富、黃芳裕(1995) 當今科學概念發展研究賦予科學學習的新意
    義。科教月刊,178,2-13
    許榮富(1993) 科學知識認識論的新詮釋及其對科學教育的衝擊。中華
    民國第九屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編
    張鐸嚴(1985) 國民小學教師與行政人員間衝突管理之研究。台北:台
    灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    陳美玉(1999) 教師專業學習與發展。台北:師大書苑
    陳秋瑾(1992)美術教育研究-論國小美勞科教師應具之特質。台北:藝
    風堂
    黃芳裕(2001) 科學實習教師成長的基本資料:以後現代哲學的衝突管
    理之社會學理論探討初任科學教師的成長動力。行政院國家科學委員
    會專題研究計畫報告
    黃芳裕(2000) 追求自我實現:教育實習的實現 國立台灣師範大學實習
    輔導研習會。台北:師大
    黃芳裕、廖金閱、尹淑萍(1998) 評估理化教師認識省察表徵分析的探
    討。中華民國第十四屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編
    黃芳裕(1996a) 建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(二)-當今
    科學哲學對建構論的評析。科教月刊,188,2-14
    黃芳裕(1996b) 科學教師在科學教學的省察發展之基本資料(Ⅰ):國
    中實習理化學校教學中的省察發展表徵。行政院國家科學委員會專題
    研究計畫成果報告
    黃芳裕(1994) 學生使用科學知識省察表徵分析。台北:國立台灣師範
    大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版
    陳永政(1992) 孫中山社會互助論與達倫道夫衝突理論之比較研究。台
    北:台灣師範大學三民主義教育研究所碩士論文,未出版
    陳美岑譯(2000) 領導心理學。台北:城邦
    陳瑞麟譯(1998) 傅柯。台北:桂冠
    曾塘、林季薇譯(2000) 教育哲學。台北:弘智
    趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(1995)建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應
    用(一)-建構論的典範與評析。科教月刊,180,2-16
    廖國智(2001) 以心智模型理論分析科學實習教師的專業表徵。台北:
    台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版
    熊偉(1994) 現象學與海德格。台北:遠流
    劉北成、楊遠嬰譯(1992)規訓與懲罰 : 監獄的誕生。台北:桂冠
    廖立文譯(1987) 當代社會理論。台北:桂冠
    蔡曉穎、郭光予譯(1996)當代社會學。台北:遠流
    蔡錚雲(1995)從現象學到後現代。台北:三民
    英文部分:
    Amason, A. C. & Schweiger, D. M. (1997) the effects of conflict
    on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational
    performance. In De Dreu, C. K. W. (Ed.). Using conflict in
    organization. (pp.101-115). London:Sage.
    Anderson, J.R., Green, J.G., Reder. L.M & Simon, H.A.(2000)
    Perspectives on learning, thinking and activity. Educational
    Researcher,29(4),11-13.
    Anthanase, S. Z.(1994)Teacher’s reports of the effects of
    preparating portfolios of literacy instruction. Elementary
    School Journal, 94(4), 421-439.
    Bacharach, S. B. & Lawler, E. J.(1980)Power and politics in
    organization, San Fransico: Jossey-Bass
    Balmuth, D.(1968)Marxist social thought. New York:Harcourt
    Barker, J. R.(1999)The Discipline Of Teamwork. California:
    SAGE
    Bendix, R.(1960)Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait, New
    York: Doubleday
    Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S.(1973)The Fifth Achievement. in
    CONFLICT Resolution through Communication, New York:Harper &
    Row
    Bliss, T. & Mazur, J.(1997)How INTASC standards com alive
    through case studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
    of the America Association of College Teacher Education.
    Phoenix. AZ.
    Bradley, A. (1994) Pioneers in professionalism Education week,
    13,18-21.
    Bronstein, G. & Erev, I.(1994)The enhancing effect of
    intergroup competition or group performance, International
    Journal of Conflict Management,5, 207-304
    Bryman(1992)Charisma and leadership in organization. London:
    Sage.
    Bryman, A. and Burgess, R. G. (eds.).(1999)Qualitative
    Research. (vol2). London: Sage
    Bogler, R.(2001)The influence of leadership style on teacher
    job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly.
    37(5),662-683
    Borisoff, D. & Victor, D. A.(1998)Conflict Management: A
    Communication Skill Approach,2nd ed, Boston: Allyn & Bacon
    Buzzeli, C., & Johnston, B.(2001)Authority, power, and
    morality in classroom discourse. Teaching and teacher
    education, 17, 873-884
    Clark, C. & Leat, S.(1998)The use of unstructured observation
    in teacher assessment. In Observing teaching and learning:
    principles and practice, (pp.71-87). London: David Fulton
    Publishers
    Craib, I. (1992)Modern social theory: from Parsons to
    Harbermas. New York: St. Martin’s Press
    Cross, G. P., Names, J. H. & Beck, D.(1979)Conflict and Human
    Interaction, Dubugue, IA: Kendall Hunt
    Collins, R.(1975)Conflict sociology. New York: Academic Press
    Coser, L. A.(1977)Master of sociological thought ; Ideas In
    Historical And Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace
    Jovanovich
    Coser, L. A.(1956)The functions of social conflict. Glencoe,
    Ⅲ.: Free Press
    Dahrendorf, R.(1990)The modern social conflict : an essay on
    the politics of liberty, Berkeley : University of California
    Press
    Darling-Hammond, L.(1999)Reshaping teaching policy,
    preparation and practice:Influences of the national board
    for professional teaching standards. Washington, DC: American
    of Colleges for Teacher Education.
    Darling-Hammond, L. Ancess, J. & Falk, B.(1995)Authentic
    assessment in action:studies of schools and students at
    work. New York:Teachers College Press.
    Darling-Hammond, L. & Snyder, J. (2000) Authentic assessment of
    teaching in context. Teaching and teacher education, 16(5/6)
    523-546.
    De Dreu, C. K. W.(1997)Productive Conflict: The Importance of
    Conflict Management and Conflict Issue. in USING CONFLICT in
    ORGANIZATION, pp.9-22,London:Thousand Oaks
    De Dreu, C. K. W. & De Vries, N. K.(1993)Numerical support,
    information processing, and attitude changes, European
    Journal of Social Psychology,25, 647-662
    Dettman, P.(2001)The strategic leader in school. Educational
    today,51(4), 24-29
    Derrida, J.(1978) Writing and difference. London: Johns
    Hopkins University Press.
    Deutsch, M.(1990)Sixty years of conflict. The International
    Journal of Conflict Management, 1, 237-263
    Deutsch, M.(1973)The resolution of conflict, New Haven, CT:
    Yale University Press.
    Deutsch, M.(1969)Conflicts:Productive and destructive,
    Journal of Social Issue,25(1), 7-41
    Doecke, B. & Brown, J. & Loughran, J. (2000) Teacher talk: the
    role of story and anecdote in constructing professional
    knowledge for beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher
    Education, 16, 335-348
    Dreyfus, H. L. & Rabinow, P. (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond
    structuralism and hermenentics. Chicago: Chicago University
    Press.
    Efran, J., Luckens, M. D. & Lucken, R. J.(1990)Language,
    structure, and change. New York: Norton
    Fraser, B. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1995) Improving science
    education. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of
    Education: University of Chicago Press.
    Freeman, R.(1961)Introduction, In Freeman, R.(ed.). Marx on
    economics, New York: Harcourt
    Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S. & Stutman, R. K.(1997)Working
    through Conflict:Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and
    Organization, New York: LONGMAN
    Follet, M. P. (1940)Constructive Conflict in Dynamic
    Administration, New York: Harper.
    Forsyth, D. R.(1990)Group Dynamics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove,
    California: Brooks
    Fosnot, C. T. (1996)Constructivism: a psychological theory of
    learning. In Fosnot, C. T. (ed.). Constructivism: Theory,
    Perspectives, and Practice. (pp.-). New York: Teachers
    College Press.
    Foucault, M.(1989)Focault live: Interviews 1966-84. New York:
    Semiotext. Foucault, M.(1983)On the genealogy of the modern
    individual . In Dreyfus, H. L. & Robinow, P.(eds.) Michel
    Focault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago:
    Chicago university press.
    Foucault, M.(1978)The history of sexuality: An introduction.
    Robert Hurley (trans.) .New York : Pantheon
    Foucault, M.(1977)Discipline and Punish: The birth of the
    prison.Sheridan, A.(trans.). New York: Pantheon.
    Foucault, M.(1972)The archaeology of knowledge. translated by
    Sheridan-Smith, A.M.(trans.). London: Tavistock.
    Fox, R.(2001)Constructivism Examined. Oxford Review of
    Education, 27(1), 23-35
    Gadamer, H. G.(1991) Gadamer and hermeneutics. edited with an
    introduction by Silverman, H. J., New York ; London :
    Routledge
    Gadamer, H. G.(1976) Philosophical hermeneutics. translated
    and edited by Linge, D. E., Berkeley: University of
    California Press
    Gage, N. L.(1989)The paradigm wars and their aftermath.
    Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16-23
    Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W.(1991)From Max Weber : essays in
    sociology, London : Routledge
    Giddens, A.(1991) Marx, Weber and the Development of
    Capitalism. in Max Weber(1):Critical Assessment, pp.21-41
    Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
    Gill, R.(1993)”Justifying in justice: broadcasters’
    accounts of inequality in radio” In Burman, E. and Parker,
    I. (eds). Discourse analytic research. New York: Pantheon
    Goetz, J. P. & LeCompte M.D.(1984) Ethnography and qualitative
    design in educational research. Orlando : Academic Press.
    Good, C. V.(1659)Dictionary of education. (2nd). New York:
    McGraw-Hill Book Company
    Habermas, J.(1970)Toward a rational society : student
    protest, science, and politics. Shapiro, J. J.(Ed). Boston :
    Beacon Press
    Hales, C.(1997)Power, authority and influence. In Harris, A.,
    Bennett, N. and Preedy, M. (eds.). Organizational
    effectiveness and improvement in education. (pp. 22-30).
    Philadelphia: Open University Press
    Halpin, A.(1966)Theory and research in administration, New
    York: Macmillian
    Harland, R.(1993)Beyond superstructuralism. New York :
    Routledge
    Hartley, J. F.(1994)Case Studies in Organizational Research.
    In Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (eds.). Qualitative Methods in
    Organizational Research. (pp.201-220). London: Sage
    Heidegger, M.(1949)Existence and being. South Bend, Ind.:
    Gateway Editions
    Heidegger, M.(1962)Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
    Heidegger, M.(1993)Basic writing. Edited by Krell, D. F.
    London: Routledge.
    Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H.(1969)Life cycle theory of
    leadership, Training and Development, 23, 26-34
    Hocker, J. L. & Wilmot, W. W.(1985)Interpersonal Conflict,
    Dubuque, I.A.: Wm. C. Brown
    House, R. J.(1971)A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness.
    Administration Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339
    Husserl, E.(1913a)Phenomenological Psychology., First Book
    (1913). Kersten, F.(trans.)(1976)Boston : M. Nijhoff
    Husserl, E.(1913b)Ideas: General Introduction to Pure
    Phenomenology
    Gibson, W. R. B.(trans.)(1976) Boston : M. Nijhoff
    Ingvarson, L & Marrett, M. (1997) Building professional
    community and supporting teachers as learners:The potential
    of case methods In Logan, L & Sachs, J (Eds) Meeting the
    challenge of primary schooling in 1990s. London; Routledge.
    Jacobs, T. O.(1970)Leadership and exchange in formal
    organization. Alexandria: Human Resource Research
    Jehn, K. A.(1997)Affective and Cognitive Conflict in Work
    Groups: Increasing Performance Through Value-Based Intragroup
    Conflict. In USING CONFLICT in ORGANIZATION, pp.87-100
    London;Thousand Oaks.
    Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F.P.(1991)Joining Together-Group
    theory and Group Skills. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:
    Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R.T.(1989)Cooperation and
    competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Books
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T., Pierson, W. & Lyons, V.(1985)
    Controversy versus concurrence seeking in multi-grades and
    single-grade learning groups. Journal of Research in Science
    Teaching, 22, 835-848
    Johnson, M. J. & Brown, L.(1998)Collegial support teams: peer
    supervision and professional growth. In Strategies for
    career-long teacher education, 84-97
    Kanter, R. M.(1977)Men and women of the corporation, New
    York: Colophon
    Kelly, G. A.(1991)The Psychology of Personal Constructucts.
    (vol.1 & 2). New York: Routledge
    Kloss, R. J. (1994) A nudge is best. College Teaching, 42(4),
    151-159.
    Koehler, J. W., et al. (1986)Public communication, New York:
    Macmillan Publishing
    Kolb, D. M. & Bartunek, J. M.(1992)Hidden Conflict
    Organization:Uncovering Behind-the-Scene Disputes,
    California: SAGE
    Kozulin, A.(1990)Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of
    ideas. New York: Harvester
    Kuhn, S. T.(1970)The structure of scientific revolutions.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kuhn, T. & Poole, M. S.(2001)Do conflict management styles
    affect group decision making? Evidence from field study.
    Communication, 24(3).
    Langer, M.(1989) Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of perception:
    a guide and commentary. London : Macmillan
    Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D.(2000)The effect of
    transformational leadership on organizational condition and
    student engagement with school. Journal of education
    administration, 38(2), 112-119
    Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.(1985)Naturalistic inquiry.
    Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage
    Loving, C.C.(1997)From the summit of truth to its shippery
    shapes science education’s journey through positivist-
    postmodernterritory. American Educational Research Journal, 34
    (3),421-445.
    Louis, K. S. & Riley, K. A.(2000)Introduction: Relational
    Leadershipfor change. In Louis, K. S. & Riley, K. A. (eds.).
    Leadership for change and school reform. (pp. 1-11). New
    York: Routledge
    Lulofs, R. S. & Cahn, D. D.(2000)Conflict: From Theory to
    Action,2nd ed, Boston: Allyn & Bacon
    Luther, A.(2000)The old method for teaching VS the new method
    for teaching. Journal of Thought, 35(2), 59-69
    Lyotard, J. F.(1984) The postmodern condition : a report on
    knowledge. Translated by Bennington, G. and Massumi,
    B.Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
    MacBeth, D.(1998)Qualitative methods and the ‘ analytic
    gaze' : Anaffirmation of scientism? Interchange, 29(2), 137-
    168
    Manno, B. V., Finn., C. E. Jr., & Vanourek., G.(2000)Charter
    School Accountability and Problems and Prospects. Educational
    Policy, 14(4), 473-493
    Mayer, G. (1975) Max Weber’s Interpretation of Karl Marx.
    Social Research, vol (42), 701-719.
    Mayo, C. (2000) The uses of Foucault. Educational theory, vol
    (50), 103-116.
    Merleau-Pondy, M.(1963)In praise of philosophy. Translated by
    Wild,J. & Edie, J. M. Evanston. : Northwestern University
    Press
    Mitchell, M. L.(1998) Employing qualitative methods in the
    private sector. London: Sage
    Murphy, J.(1995)Changing Roles of the teacher. Education
    teachers for Leadership and Change,pp.311-23
    Northouse, P. G.(2001)Leadership: Theory and Practice, 2nd,
    California: SAGE Osborne, M. D. & Barton, A. C. (2000)
    Science for all Americans:critiquing science education
    reform efforts. In Cornbleth, C.(Ed.) Curriculum politics,
    policy, practice:case in context.New York:State University
    of New York.
    Packer, M, J. & Goicoechea, J.(2000)Sociocultural and
    constructivisttheories of learning: Ontology, not just
    epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227-241
    Parsons, T.(1977a)Social systems and the evolution of action
    theory, New York: Free Press
    Parsons, T.(1977b)The evolution of Society, New Jersey:
    Prentice-Hall
    Parsons, T.(1956)Essays in sociological theory, Glencoe,
    Ill.: Free Press
    Perakyla, A.(1997)Reliability and validity in research based
    on transcripts. In Silverman, D. (ed). Qualitative Research:
    Theory, Method, and Practice. (pp.201-220) London: Sage
    Perry, W. G. Jr. (1970) Forms of intellectual and ethical
    development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehant
    and Winston, Inc.
    Piaget, J.(1929)The child’s conception of the world. London
    and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
    Piaget, J.(1967)Six psychological studies. New York: Vintage
    Books
    Pondy, L. R.(1983)Organization Symbolism, Greenwich, Conn.:
    JAI Press
    Rahim, M. A.(1986)Managing Conflict in Organization, New York:
    Praeger Publishers
    Robbins, S. T.(1994)Essentials of organizational behavior 4th,
    Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
    Sarbin, T. R.(1986)Narrative psychology: The stories nature
    of human conduct. New York: Preaeger
    Sartre, J. P.(1988) "What is literature?" and other essays.
    Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
    Schmidt, S. M. (1974) Conflict:A powerful process of (good or
    bad)change. Management Review, 63(12), 4-10
    Schon, D. A. & Argyris, C.(1974)Theory in practice: increasing
    professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    Publishers
    Schultz, B. G.(1989)Communicating in the small group:theory
    and practice, New York: Harper & Row Publishers
    Schutz, A. (1962) Collected papers (vol.1). Hagne: Martins
    Nijhoff
    Silins, H. C.(1994)The relationship between transformational
    and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes.
    Schooleffectiveness and school improvement, 5(3), 272-298
    Sipka, T. A. (1969) Social conflict and re-construction.
    Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Boston College, Boston
    Smith, P. L. et al. (2001)Using Multimedia Portfolios to
    Assess Preservice Teacher and P-12 Students Learning. Action
    in Teacher Education, 22(4), 28-3900
    Stenner, P.(1993)Discoursing jealousy. In Burman, E. and
    Parker,I. (eds). Discourse analytic research. New York :
    Pantheon
    Stogdill, R. M.(1974) Handbook of leadership. New York: Free
    Press
    Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M.(1998)Basics of qualitative
    research:techniques and procedures for development grounded
    theory. London;Thousand Oaks: Sage
    Thomas, K. W.(1976)Conflict and Conflict Management. in
    Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp.889-
    936, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publish
    Tjosvold, D.(1997)Conflict with Interdependence: Its Value for
    Productivity and Individuality. in USING CONFLICT in
    ORGANIZATION, pp.23-37, London;Thousand Oaks: Sage
    Tjosvold, D. & Tjosvold, M. M.(1995)Psychology for Leaders.
    New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Tjosvold, D. & Tjosvold, M. M.(1993)The emerging leader: Ways
    to stronger team. New York: Lexington
    Tjosvold, D.(1991)The Team Organization Model. Team
    Organization, pp.26-40, New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Van, de Vilert, Euwema, M. C. & Huismans, S. E.(1995)Managing
    conflict with a subordinate or superior: the effectiveness of
    conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80,
    271-81
    Veenman, M. et al.(2002)Cooperative learning and teacher
    education. Teaching and teacher education, 18, 87-103
    Von Glasersfeld, E.(1992) A constructivist’s view of
    learning and teaching. In Duit, R. et al. (eds.). Research in
    physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies.
    Proceeding of an international workshop held at the
    university of Bremen, Mach 4-8, 1991
    Von Glasersfeld, E.(1991)Radical Constructivism in Mathematics
    Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
    Wall, J. & Callister, R.(1995)Conflict and its management.
    Journal of Management, 21, 515-58
    Walkerdine, V.(1981)Sex, power, and pedagogy. Science
    Education, 38, 14-23
    Walkins, T.(1999)Don’t let the promise of charter schools
    blind you to the problems. American School Board Journal,
    Dec, 32-36
    Watson, T.(1994)In search of management: Chaos and control in
    managerial work. New York: Routledge
    Wertsch, J. V.(1990)The voice of rationality in a
    sociocultural approach to mind. In Moll, L. C. (ed.).
    Vygotsky and Education. (pp.111-126). New York: Cambridge
    University Press
    Welsch, F.(2001)Teaching and learning about change:why, what
    and how. Alpha Delta Kappan, 31(2), 13-15.
    Wittgenstein, L.(1980)Culture and value. Edited by von
    Wright, G.H. in collaboration with Nyman, H.; Translated by
    Peter Winch, Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
    Wittgenstein, L.(1968) Philosophical Investigations.
    Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M., Oxford: Basil Blackwell
    Wittgenstein, L.(1961) Tractatus logical-philosophicus.
    Translated by Pears, D. F. & Mcguinness, B. F. London and
    Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
    Yukl, G. A.(1989)Leadership in Organization, 2nd, New Jersey:
    Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Zambylas, M.(2000)Something paralogical under the sun:
    Lyotard's postmodern condition and science education.
    Educational philosophy and theory, 32(2), 159-184.
    Zembylas, M.(2002)Constructing genealogies of teachers’
    emotions in Science Teaching. Journal of research in science
    teaching. 39(1), 79-103
    Zuelke, D. C. & Willerman, M.(1992)Conflict and Decision
    Making in Elementary Schools: Contemporary Vignettes and
    case for School Administrators, U.S.A: Wm. C. Brown Publishers

    QR CODE