研究生: |
陳凌羽 Chen, Ling-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案對國小資優生情緒智能之成效研究 A Study on the Effect of Integrating Board-Games into Affective Curriculum program on the Emotional Intelligence Quotient of Elementary School Gifted Students |
指導教授: |
潘裕豐
Pan, Yu-Fong |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 88 |
中文關鍵詞: | 桌上遊戲 、情意課程 、國小資優生 、情緒智能 、學習滿意度 |
英文關鍵詞: | board-games, affective curriculum, elementary school gifted students, Emotional Quotient Inventory, learning satisfaction |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000790 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:203 下載:40 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討以桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案對國小資優生在情緒智能方面之成效,及學習滿意度的調查,研究對象為雲林某國小資優班16位學生及苗栗某國小資優班16位學生。研究方法採準實驗研究之不等組前後測設計,透過「情緒智能量表青少年版(EQ-i: YV)」實施前後測評量後對資料進行共變數分析處理,並請學生於每堂課後填寫心得及課程滿意度量表作為質性資料的補充。研究結果如下:
一、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「內省」,未顯著高於控制組。
二、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「人際」,顯著高於控制組。
三、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「壓力管理」,顯著高於控制組。
四、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「適應」,顯著高於控制組。
五、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「一般心情」,顯著高於控制組。
六、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「正向印象」,顯著高於控制組。
七、「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」在提升國小資優生於情緒智能量表之「情緒智能總分」,顯著高於控制組。
八、接受「桌上遊戲融入情意課程教學方案」之國小資優生於情意課程的學習滿意度高。
本研究依據上述結果提出建議,以期能提供教學實務與未來研究之參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and learning satisfaction of integrating board-games into affective curriculum program on the emotional intelligence quotient of elementary school gifted students. The subjects of the study are 16 gifted students from Yunlin elementary school and 16 gifted students from Miaoli elementary school. The research method adopts the pre- and post-test design of quasi-experimental research. After implementing the pre- and post-test through the " Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQ-i: YV)", the data is analyzed and processed by covariance. In addition, students were asked to fill in their experience and satisfaction scale after each class as a supplement to the qualitative data. The results are as follows:
1. In improving the " Intrapersonal " aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were not significantly higher than the control group.
2. In improving the " Interpersonal" aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
3. In improving the " Stress Management " aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
4. In improving the " Adaptability " aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results
iv
that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
5. In improving the " General Mood Scale " aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
6. In improving the " Positive impression " aspect of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
7. In improving the total score of the elementary school gifted student's Emotional Quotient Inventory, the experimental group's results that implement the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " were significantly higher than the control group.
8. The elementary school gifted student who accepted the " Integrating board-games into affective curriculum program " have highly learning satisfaction in the affective curriculum.
Based on the above results, the researcher proposed relevant suggestions for teaching practice and future research.
王春展、詹志禹、李良哲(2000):兒童情緒智能發展之探討研究。教育與心理研究,23,352-382。
王財印(2000):國民中學學生情緒智能、生活適應與學業成就關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
王琡棻(2009):資優生情意特質的一體兩面。國小特殊教育,48,100-110。
吳妮真(2016):桌上遊戲融入創造思考教學對國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生創造力與學習動機成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳昆壽(2006):資優教育概論。臺北: 心理。
吳武典(2001):資優學生的適應類型與心理輔導。測驗與輔導,166,3481-3484。
吳鴻鑫(2015):抽象類桌上遊戲對提升國小四年級學生創造力成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。
李泳緹,方敏全(2017):論國小情緒教育之紮根。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(6),185-188
李尉嘉(2017):以合作式桌上遊戲為媒介促進資賦優異學生社會能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東市。
李瑞玲等(譯)(1998) :EQ II(Daniel,G.著。Emotional Intelligence Quotient II)。臺北:時報。(原著出版於 1998)
林子淳(2014) :運用桌上遊戲教學對國小五年級學童人際互動能力之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
林妙華(2002):資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林秋吟(2016):國小中年級一班智能資優班全人藝術教育之行動研究-以情意課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
林書瑜(2014):國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生個人情意特質傾向之探究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
洪榮照、張妤婷、謝孟岑(2009):國小資優兒童的人格特質與情緒智能之相關研究。臺中教育大學學報, 23(1),1-24。
國家教育研究院(2019) : 十二年國民基本教育資賦優異相關之特殊需求領域課程綱要。
張玉珮(2001):以讀書治療來進行資優生的情意教育,資優教育季刊(80),22-30。
張妤婷(2005):影響國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生情緒智能之因素研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
張富湖(2002):情緒教育課程對提昇國中學生情緒智能效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
郭如育(2011):國中情意課程對學生道德認知發展之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
郭靜姿(2000):談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊,75,01-06
陳介宇(2010):從現代桌上遊戲的特點探討其運用於兒童學習的可行性。國教新知,57(4),40-45。
陳介宇、王沐嵐(2017):臺灣桌上遊戲研究與文獻之回顧分析。取自:https://sites.google.com/site/taiwanbgstudy/home
陳李綢(2008):中學生情緒智慧測量與適應性指標研究。教育心理學報,39,61-81。
陳秀娟(2009):國小中高年級學童情緒智能對同儕關係之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺北市。
陳貞如(2013):合作型與競爭型桌上遊戲對幼兒社會能力影響之比較研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
陳皎眉、李睿杰(2010):EQ的理論與實務。T&D飛訊,89,1-26。
陳慧芳(2016):桌上遊戲教學方案對國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生推理能力及問題解決能力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
陳騏龍(2001):國小學童情緒智能與幸福感、人際關係及人格特質之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
許雅惠(2007):角色扮演法之道德教學對國小學生道德判斷、道德行為及內省智能的影響。(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
黃永和(2012):激發學習活力-遊戲在教學上的應用。教師天地,179,23-28。
黃秋霞(2016):情緒智能的正思與反思。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(7),101-110。
黃若綺(2015):圖形類桌上遊戲對提升國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生創造力及學習動機成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。
黃麗蓉(2019):分組合作學習融入國小四年級自然領域學習成效之研究—以高雄市某國小為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東市。
葉瑜真(2018):基於活動理論之桌上遊戲創作教學方案對國民小學一般智能資賦優異學生創造力與學習歷程影響之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
劉力君(2011) :專題式合作學習在教育桌上遊戲設計課程之應用-以師資培育學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
潘裕豐(2000):談資優學生的情意教育。資優教育季刊,77,1-7。
蔡玉瑟、張妤婷、謝孟岑(2006):資優兒童的學校環境因素與情緒智能之相關研究。臺中教育大學學報,20(2),1-30。
鄧蔭萍(2012):兒童情緒智能與社會行為之初探。兒童照顧與教育,2,1-21。
鄭聖敏、王振德(2009):情緒智能量表青少年版。臺北:心理出版社。
魏妤珊(2014):桌上遊戲融入國中視覺藝術課程設計之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
Andrei, F., Siegling, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Baldaro, B., & Petrides, K. V. (2016). The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Quotient Questionnaire : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pers Assess, 98(3),261-76.
Austin, E. J. (2004). An investigation of the relationship between trait Emotional Intelligence Quotient and emotional task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1855-1864.
Bar-On, R. (1997). The Emotional Quotient Inventory ( EQ-I ): Technical Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Boghian, I., Cojocariu, V., Popescu, C .V.,Mâţӑ, L. (2019). Game-based learning. Using board games in adult education. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology. 9(1), 51-57.
Cheiroz, D., Beltramini, L., Beltramini, L.R.S. (2019). Using a board game to teach protein synthesis to high school students. Journal of Biological Education. 53(2), 205-216.
Clark, B. (2007). Growing up gifted: Developing thepotential of children at home and at School. Prentice Hall : Person Education, Inc..
Cooper, R. K. & Sawaf, A. (1997). Executive EQ. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Dabroski,K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston : Little,Brown.
D'Amico, A. (2018). The Use of Technology in the Promotion of Children's Emotional Intelligence Quotient: The Multimedia Program "Developing Emotional Intelligence Quotient". International Journal of Emotional Education, 10(1), 47-67.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented (3). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
De Beauport, E., & Diaz, A. S. (1996). The three faces of mind:Developing your mental, emotional, and behavioral intelligences. Wheaton, IL: Quest Books.
Donovan, T. (2018). The four board game eras: Making sense of board gaming's past. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies,10(2), 265-270.
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion (studies in emotion & social interaction). New York : Cambridge University Press.
John,D. M., Peter, S, & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional Intelligence Quotient: New ability or eclectic traits? , American Psychologist, 63(6), 503-517.
John,D. M., Peter, S. & David R. (2004). Emotional Intelligence Quotient: Theory, Findings, and Implications, Psychological Inquiry, 15(3),197-215.
Kaplan, L. S. (1990). Helping gifted students with stress management. ERIC Publications.
Lane,T. (2019). Emotional Intelligence Quotient. Annals Of The Royal College Of Surgeons Of England, 101(1), 1.
Liswandi., Hutabarat, E. (2019). Students Perception of the Role of Emotional Intelligence Quotient on Academic Achievements. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 6(2), 172-183.
Locke, E. A. (2005). Why Emotional Intelligence Quotient is an invalid concept. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 425 – 431.
Mattlin, M. (2018). Adapting the DIPLOMACY Board Game Concept for 21st Century International Relations Teaching. Simulation & Gaming, 49(6), 735-750.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Quotient Test User’s Manual. Toronto. Canada, MHS Publishers.
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R.D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008) Human Abilities: Emotional Intelligence Quotient . Annual Review of Psychology, 59 , 507-536.
Nakpong, N.,Chanchalor, S. (2019). Interactive Multimedia Games to Enhance the Emotional Intelligence Quotient of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Adolescents. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2),305-320.
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait Emotional Intelligence Quotient: Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39 –57.
Petrides, K. V., Siegling, A. B., & Saklofske, D. (2016) .The Wiley handbook of personality assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence Quotient. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 91, 185-211.
Shapiro,L. E. (1997). How raise a child with a high EQ. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
Simmons, S., & Simmons, J. C. (1997). Measuring Emotional Intelligence Quotient: The groundbreaking guide to applying the principles of Emotional Intelligence Quotient. Arlington, Texas: The Summit Publishing Group.
Steiner, C., & Perry P. (1997). Achieving emotiona1 literacy: A personal program to increase your Emotional Intelligence Quotient. New York: Avon Books.
Stufft, W. D. (1996). Assessing your emotional IQ professional notes. Teaching Music, 4(1), 42-43.
Terman, L.M. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius(1). Stanford : Stanford University Press.