研究生: |
林弘展 Lin Hon-Chan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
立法院「新聞知識管理系統」對立法委員問政資源與議題管理之研究 The study on the role of Legislative Yuan’s “News knowledge Management System” in questioning resources usage and issue management for Legislators |
指導教授: | 劉立行 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖文傳播學系 Department of Graphic Arts and Communications |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 107 |
中文關鍵詞: | 知識管理 、新聞知識管理系統 、資訊尋求行為 、議題管理 |
英文關鍵詞: | Knowledge Management, Information Knowledge Management Systems, Information Seeking Behavior, Issue Management |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:142 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著資訊科技的發展,立法委員辦公室對問政資訊、新聞知識的需求越來越大,問政議題管理也逐漸受到重視並產生需求。因此立法院於2002年特別成立全e化的「新聞知識管理系統」,供立委問政、質詢、輿情反應及新聞發佈需求使用。
本文從立法院「新聞知識管理系統」之建置現況,對於立法委員國會辦公室對立法院「新聞知識管理系統」資訊尋求行為、取得使用情形及問政議題管理現狀進行探究。本研究利用「深度訪談法」,蒐集系統建置者以及管理者對立法院「新聞知識管理系統」管理功能之看法;同時為了解立法委員辦公室之「資訊尋求行為」與「立委問政議題管理」,同時實施「焦點團體法」,深入了解立法委員國會辦公室使用者對「議題管理」之需求。
研究中發現,立法院「新聞知識管理系統」建置之後,確實大幅提升立委問政資訊品質與效益,並且成為立委選區新聞、審議法案訊息以及立委傳播行為等最佳問政議題管理系統,更是立委辦公室「資訊尋求行為」之問政議題管理SOP程序首選系統。惟在立委辦公室過度依賴e化資訊下,除了影響立委問政議題欠缺深度內容之外,本系統必須思考在面對數位匯流之趨勢時,是否應結合影音與平面媒體之匯流功能,是目前使用者認為最值得探討的新議題。本研究嘗試提出操作功能、版面內容、資料來源等修正與建議,以作為相關管理單位與研究者之參考。
With the development of information technology, information and news knowledge demand is phenomena increasing for legislators’ office requirement and political issue management also get attention gradually and generate demand. Thus, the Legislative Yuan has set up comprehensive E-formalization "News knowledge management system" at year 2002 offering legislators in politics questions, reaction of public opinions, and press release needs to use.
This paper will study the build status of Legislative Yuan "News Knowledge Management System", discussing the behavior of Legislative Yuan Congressional office use “News Knowledge Management System " for seeking information, and also analysis the status of obtain usage for question in parliament and issue management. In this study, “In-depth interview” is the major way to collect data from actual system builders and managers of the Legislative Yuan "News knowledge management system" view of management functions. In the meantime to use “focus group" to know demands from legislators congressional office’s actual users for “issue management" and understand the office’s ” information seeking behavior " and " legislators asked political issue management ".
In this study found that significantly enhance the quality and effectiveness for legislators performance in Legislative Yuan after building "News Knowledge Management System", it become the best information and issue management system for the news from legislator’s own ward, scrutiny of bills and legislator’s propagation behavior. It is also the first choice system of issue management’s stander operating procedure and “Information seeking behavior” for legislator office. However, there are many aspects is affected when Legislator's office over rely on E-formalization, except lack of depth of view they question political issues in parliament, the system must be thinking to face the trend of digital convergence, whether it should be combined with the audio-visual and print media convergence functionality, it is the most valuable topics to discuss for current users. This study attempts to propose corrections and suggestions for operational functions, layout of contents, and documents of source, likewise as a reference for the relevant management units and researchers.
一、中文文獻
卜正珉(2003)。《公共關係─政府公共題決策管理》。臺北:揚智。
王如哲(2000)。《知識管理的理論與應用-以教育領域及其革新為例》。臺北:五南。
田倩惠(2008)。《國會助理立法資訊尋求行為之研究》。國立臺灣大學文學院圖書資訊 學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
行政院研考會(2004)。《加強行政院所屬各機關研發創新實施要點》。2012年11月 7日,取自:http://www.rdec.gov.tw/res01/research930408.htm
吳宜蓁(1998)。《議題管理:企業公關的新興課題》。臺北:正中。
李秀珠(1996)。〈媒體組織之議題管理-以頻道聯賣為例〉。《民意研究季刊》第198期, 頁56。
李嵩賢(2006)。〈公務機關對知識管理的實踐與應用-國家文官培訓所知經驗分 享〉。《考銓季刊》第48期,頁77-98。
林嘉誠(2006) 。〈知識型政府的意涵與發展〉。《考銓季刊》第48期,頁1-17。
倪炎元(2009)。《公關政治學》。臺北:商周。
胡幼慧(1996)。《質性研究》。臺北:巨流。
孫本初(2006)。《新公共管理》。臺北:一品。
孫秀蕙(2009)。《公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例》修訂二版。臺北:正中。
張紹勳(2001)。《研究方法》。臺中:滄海。
梁朝雲、陳偉如(2003)。〈青年學子網路資訊尋求行為及其輔導策略之研究〉。 《教育資料與圖書館學》第40卷第3期,頁357-380。
陳柏安、林宜蓁、陳容萱譯(2006)。《傳播理論》(原著者:Emory A. G.)。臺北: 五南。(原著出版年:2003)
萬文隆(2004)。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉。《生活科技教育月刊》第37卷 第4 期,頁17-23。
魯炳炎(2009)。〈策略性議題管理:組織與公共政策的挑戰〉。《公共行政學報》 第32期,頁171-177。
黃炳中(2002)。〈從網際網路索探立法院立法資訊〉。《立法院院聞》第30卷 第7期,頁64-86。
曾愛文(2011)。《國會法案助理資訊行為之研究》。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學 研究所圖書資訊學在職專班碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北。
劉宜君(2004)。《公部門知識管理之探討─理論與實務分析》。臺北:韋伯。
謝經庸(2004)。《數位電視中運動節目製播與發展之研究》。國立臺灣師範大學碩士 論文,未出版,臺北。
顧敏、郭憲鐘(2003)。〈立法院新聞知識管理系統:開啟知識管理領航新風貌〉。 《立法院院聞》第31卷 12期,頁83-91。
顧敏(2003)。《網站圖書館: 知識管理與創新》。臺北:揚智。
顧敏(2005)。《從傳統到數位圖書館》。臺北:文華。
二、英文部份
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
Alsondos, I. A. & Pangil, F. & Othman, S. Z. (2012). Requirement for knowledge management system. Journal of Communication and Computer, 9, 263-275.
Bystrom, K.& Kalervo, J. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 191-215.
Choo, C. & Wei, D. & Turnbull, D. (1999). Information seeking on the Web-An integrated model of browsing and searching. ASIS Annual Meeting Contributed Paper.
Davenport, T. H. & Long, D. & Beers, M. C. (1998). Building successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. ( 1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ives, S.J. & Blegen, M. & Coughlin, M.A. & J. Redmond & Matthews, T. & Paolone, V. (2011). Salivary estradiol, interleukin-6 production and the relationship to substrate metabolism during exercise in females. Eur. J. Applied Physiol, 111, 1649-1658.
Kruger, C. J. & Johnson, R. D. (2010). Information management as an enabler of knowledge management maturity: A south african perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 57–67.
Leckie & Gloria, J.& Pettigrew & Karen E. & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2):164-175.
Lu, I. Y. & Kuo, T. & Lee, W. P.(2010). Examining the effects of information quality on behavioral intention of knowledge management system. Journal of Quality, 17(4), 297-310. (EI)
Nonaka, I. & H. Takeuchi(1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University.
O’Dell, C. & Grayson, C.J. (1998). If only we knew what we know. New York: The Free Press.
Sveiby, K. E.(1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring intangible assets. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler
Sonnenwald, D. H.(1999). Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: Contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In T. D. Wilson & D. K. Allen (Eds.), Exploring the contexts of information behavior: proceedings of the second international conference in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts (pp. 176-190). London: Taylor Graham.
Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go?. Expert Systems with Applications, 14(5), 67-78.
Wilson & Thomas, D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(2), 3-15.
Wilson, T. D. (1997) . Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing & Management, 33(4), 551-572.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Recent trends in user studies: Action research and qualitative methods. Information Research, 5(3), 1-38.
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2000). Mass media research: an introduction.(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth