研究生: |
陳柔君 Chen, Jou-Chun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中生複雜問題解決能力量表之發展 Development of a Scale for Assessing High School Students’ Complex Problem-Solving Skills |
指導教授: |
林坤誼
Lin, Kuen-Yi |
口試委員: |
張美珍
Chang, Mei-Chen 游光昭 Yu, Kuang-Chao 林坤誼 Lin, Kuen-Yi |
口試日期: | 2024/01/19 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 88 |
中文關鍵詞: | 科技教育 、工程設計 、複雜問題解決能力 |
英文關鍵詞: | technology education, engineering design, complex problem-solving skills |
研究方法: | 調查研究 、 文件分析法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400265 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:13 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
為提升學生適應未來能力,教育部提出21世紀關鍵能力,其中包含複雜問題解決能力,常見的複雜問題包含工程問題,而複雜工程問題大多需要透過工程設計將問題分析並解決。臺灣高中階段的科技課程即包含工程設計為主軸的專題實作課程,目標為培養學生知識與能力的整合,讓學生進行系統性的思考,與複雜問題解決所需能力有相符的部分。為使高中生在學習工程設計的流程時能與生活會遇到的複雜問題做連結,提早了解工程問題與複雜問題的關聯對未來實際應用工程設計流程會有所幫助。因此本研究以臺灣高中階段科技教育工程設計實作專題為背景,旨在發展一份高中生複雜問題解決能力之量表,探究學生透過工程設計實作專題課程的學習,會具備哪些複雜問題解決能力。本研究邀請3位科技教育專家組成內容審查小組,以協助完成量表的指標及題項審查,發展量表的形式能帶入各個實作活動,方便不同單元使用。為使高中生清楚作答,本研究以橋梁結構的工程設計專題實作課程為情境導入,在學生完成橋梁實作後可依照學習的結果量測自己複雜問題解決能力。最終發展的複雜問題解決能力指標包含六大構面,依序為「目標解構」、「探究並提出假設」、「動態預測」、「計畫與決策」、「監控與評估」以及「自我反思與調節」,同時亦依據研究結果編制13項能力指標。
The study aims to develop a scale for assessing high school students’ complex problem-solving skills. Complex problem-solving is one of the key competencies of the 21st century. Common complex problems include engineering problems, and most of them require problem analysis and solution through engineering design. The goal of engineering design-based thematic practical courses is to cultivate the integration of students' knowledge and abilities and to allow students to think systematically, which aligns with the abilities required for complex problem-solving. To enable high school students to connect with the complex problems they will encounter in life when learning the engineering design process, understanding the relationship between engineering problems and complex problems early will be helpful for the actual application of the engineering design process in the future. This study invited three technology education experts to form a content review team to assist in completing the index and item review of the scale. This study uses the course on the engineering design of bridge structures as the context introduction. The finally developed complex problem-solving skills include six major aspects, namely "goal deconstruction", "exploring and proposing hypotheses", "dynamic prediction", "planning and decision-making", "monitoring and evaluation" and "self-reflection and adjustment", and also compiled 13 indicators based on the research results.
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。心理。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2011)。SPSS與統計應用分析。五南。
邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術與應用(二版)。雙葉書廊。
范斯淳、游光昭(2016)。科技教育融入STEM課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊,61(2),153-183。
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06
教育部(2014)。教育部中小學數位閱讀計畫104年度成果發表會。
https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2700/News_Content.aspx?n=727087A8A1328DEE&sms=49589CE1E2730CC8&s=532F622196CFEC29
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校科技領域。臺北市:教育部。
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用(五版)。五南。
Barak, M. (2012). From ‘doing’ to ‘doing with learning’: Reflection on an effort to promote self-regulated learning in technological projects in high school. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37, 105–116.
Beckett, G. H., & Miller, P. C. (Eds.) (2006). Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies. Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1986). The IDEAL problem solver. Freeman.
Buehner, M. J., & Cheng, P. W. (2005). Causal Learning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 143–168). Cambridge University Press.
Bühner, M., Kröner, S., & Ziegler, M. (2008). Working memory, visual spatial-intelligence and their relationship to problem-solving. Intelligence, 36(6), 672-680.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Heath. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000
Dörner, D. (1980). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. Simulat. Gam. 11, 87–106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104687818001100108
Dörner, D. (1986). Diagnostik der operativen Intelligenz. [Diagnosis of operative intelligence.]. Diagnostica, 32(4), 290-308.
Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1153.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153
Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D. and Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103-120.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
D’ Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107–126.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031360
Fernando, A. R., Vergara, J. G. U., & Canlapan, C. A. D. (2022). Work in Progress: Perception of complex engineering problem among capstone design students. [Conference presentation]. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tunis, Tunisia.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766721.
Fischer, A., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). The Process of Solving Complex Problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4 (1), 19-42.
https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1118
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Foster, N., & Piacentini, M. (Eds.) (2023). Innovating Assessments to Measure and Support Complex Skills. OECD Publishing, Paris.
https://doi org/10.1787/e5130341-en
Frensch, P. A. & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In P. A. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Funke, J. (2001). Dynamic systems as tools for analysing human judgment. Thinking & Reasoning, 7(1), 69-89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780042000046
Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition?
Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133-142.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0
Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 38, 682–685.
Funke, J., Fischer, A., & Holt, D. V. (2018). Competencies for Complexity: Problem Solving in the Twenty-First Century. In E. Care, P. Griffin, M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 41-53). Springer, Cham.
Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Dynamic problem solving: A new measurement perspective. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36 (3), 189-213.
Greiff, S., & Fischer, A. (2013). Measuring complex problem solving: an educational application of psychological theories. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5, 38-58.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (2015). The ATC21S method. In E. Care, P. Griffin, M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 3-33). Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_1
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A Global Perspective. (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson University Press.
Herde, C. N., Wüstenberg, S., & Greiff, S. (2016). Assessment of complex problem solving: what we know and what we don’t know. Applied Measurement in Education. 29 (4), 265–277.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209208
Hynes, M.M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E.A., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D., & Carberry, A.R. (2011). Infusing Engineering Design into High School STEM Courses.
International Engineering Alliance [IEA]. (2021). Graduate Attributes and
Professional Competences.
https://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/IEA-Graduate-Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies-2021.1-Sept-2021.pdf
Jansson, A. (1994). Pathologies in dynamic decision making: Consequences or precursors of failure? Sprache & Kognition, 13(3), 160–173.
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Kluge, A. (2019). Complex problem solving research and its contribution to improving work in High Reliabilty Organisations. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making. 5. https://doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2019.1.69295
Kretzschmar, A., & Süß, H. -M. (2015). A study on the training of complex problem solving competence. Journal of Dynamic Decision Making. 1, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11588/jddm.2015.1.15455
Kröner, S., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2005). Intelligence assessment with computer simulations Intelligence, 33(4), 347-368.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Martín, P., Potočnik, K., & Fras, A.B. (2017). Determinants of students’ innovation in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1229-1243.
Microsoft Partners in Learning, Pearson Foundation, and Gallup. (2013, May 30). 21st century skills and the workplace. Retrieved from
https://www.gallup.com/services/176699/21st-century-skillsworkplace.aspx National Research Council. (2011). Assessing 21st Century Skills: Summary of a Workshop. The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/13215.
Novick, L. R., & Bassok, M. (2005). Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Quesada, J., Kintsch, W., & Gomez, E. (2005). Complex problem-solving: A field in search of a definition? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220512331311553
Ramnarayan, S., Strohschneider, S., and Schaub, H. (1997). Trappings of expertise and the pursuit of failure. Simulat. Gam. 28, 28–43.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878197281004
Ren, Y., Luo, F., Ren, P., Bai, D., Li, X., & Liu, H. (2019). Exploring Multiple Goals Balancing in Complex Problem Solving Based on Log Data [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01975
Schoppek, W., & Fischer, A. (2015). Complex problem solving-single ability or complex phenomenon? Frontiers in Psychology. 6.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01669
Seel, N. M. (2012). Problems: Definition, Types, and Evidence. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2690-2693). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_914
Spering, M., Wagener, D., & Funke, J. (2005). The role of emotions in complex problem- solving. Cognition & Emotion, 19 (8), 1252–1261.
Simon, H. A., & Lea, G. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.
Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2008). Self-regulated learning as a competence: Implications of theoretical models for assessment methods. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 102-110.
Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving more than reasoning? Intelligence, 40(1), 1–14.