簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 徐穎德
Suppanai Sriwararat
論文名稱： AHP 應用於物流委外決策的評估因素之探討
An Exploratory Study of the Application of AHP to the Evaluating Factors of Logistics Operations Outsourcing Decision
指導教授： 周世玉
Chou, Shih-Yu
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年： 2016
畢業學年度： 104
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 54
中文關鍵詞： 分層分析法 、物流外包 、第三方物流 、決策制定模型
英文關鍵詞： Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Logistics outsourcing, Third-party Logistics, Decision-Making Model
DOI URL： https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204576
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：164  下載：28 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 摘要

    在泰國美索地區的企業需要物流公司來負責貨品運輸的流程。此篇論文的目標是架構出方法來選擇適合第三方物流提供者(Third logistics providers)，並以泰國當地一家企業__ Hong-Li Inter Trade Company 宏利公司為例。研究目的為辨認出哪幾項因素對於第三方物流之選擇流程是有效的。因為，這是非常重要的事情，使公司了解到有哪幾項因子是有效果的對於決策者選擇第三方物流以利維持好的績效在貨物運輸的部分，當然對泰國宏利公司也有相同想法。在本研究中選用了五項準則與二十三項的次級準則，且認為它們有效地影響決策過程。研究過程中有問卷設計和發放，且對公司內部專家進行調查，同時使用分層分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)研究各因素之中要性。我們所選擇出的準則有：資訊科技(Information Technology)、企業關係、經營績效、能力與服務。另外，排名前五名的次級準則如下：運輸安全、準確的資料、是否容易合作、資料的安全性及專業程度。最後，我們將會總結並提供建言給予泰國宏利公司。

    關鍵詞：分層分析法、物流外包、第三方物流、決策制定模型

    Abstract

    The business in Mae Sot District, Thailand needs some logistics firm to take response in logistic process. The purpose of this paper is to serves as a structure for the logistics part of Hong-Li Inter Trade Company to select suitable of Third party logistics providers. The objective of the research is to identify which factors can affect the decision making process of 3PLs selection. Therefore, it is an important for the company to understand which factors could affect decision makers in choosing 3PLs in order to maintain the good performance in transportation part of Hong-Li Inter Trade Company at Mae Sot District, Thailand. Based on the literatures, 5 criteria and 23 of sub criteria that influence the selection process were used. Questionnaire is designed and experts in the Company are surveyed. Moreover, AHP method is applied in order to obtain the importance of any factors. We consider and choose the important criteria are as follows: Information technology, Relationship, Operation performance, Capabilities and Service. The rank of top five most important sub criteria are as follows: Transportation safely, Accuracy Data, Easy to work with, Data securities and Expertise. Finally, summarize the result and suggestions for the company.

    Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Logistics outsourcing; 3PL, Decision-Making Model

    Table of contents Abstract i 摘ั要 ii Acknowledgement iii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Purpose of the Research 2 1.3 Research process 2 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Paper Related to Third-party Logistics provider 4 2.2The criteria in the measurement of 3PL provider’s selection 6 2.3 The related paper of application of (AHP) 7 2.4 A Hierarchical Framework of Critical Factors 9 2.5 The criteria and Sub criteria definition related to Hong-Li Company 15 CHAPTER 3 Research Methodology 18 3.1 A Profile of Hong-Li Company 18 3.2 Supplier identification of Hong-Li Company 18 3.3 Analytical Hierarchy Process 19 3.4 The process of AHP 20 CHAPTER 4 Data Collection and Analysis 28 4.1 Data Collection 28 4.2 Expert’s Background 28 4.3 Data Analysis 29 4.3.1 The Data interpretation of Criteria 29 4.3.2 The Data interpretation of Sub criteria 31 4.3.3 The Data interpretation of Alternatives selections 32 CHAPTER 5 Conclusion 36 5.1 Summary of result 36 5.2 Suggestion for Hong Li Inter Trade Company 37 5.3 Limitations 38 5.4 Future development 39 REFERENCE 40 APPENDICES 42 List of Figures Figure 1 A Hierarchy Framework of criteria affecting the selection of 3PL providers 10 Figure 2 The Nature of Business process of Hong-Li Company 18 Figure 3 Decision hierarchy of AHP 21 Figure 4 An example of pairwise compairisons for the 4 elements being examined 24 List of Tables Table 1 The Definition of Criteria and Sub-criteria 11 Table 2 Evaluation scale used in pairwise comparisons between two elements 23 Table 3 Completed judgment matrix 25 Table 4 Average random consistency: the reference values of R.I. for different matrix sizes 26 Table 5 The Global weight and Rank of Criteria 29 Table 6 The Local Global weight and Rank of Sub criteria 30 Table7 The evaluation of the performance between supplier A and supplier B 33

    Asuquo, M., Coward, I., & Yang, Z. (2014). Modeling selection of third party ship management services. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2(1), 28-35.

    Bowersox, D.J. and Daugherty, P. (1990), Logistical Excellence: It’s Not Business as Usual, Digital
    Press, Burlington, MA.

    CSCMP (2006) Supply Chain and Logistics Terms and Glossary. Bellevue.

    Cooper, M. C., & Gardner, J. T. (1993). Building Good Business Relationships: More than Just Partnering or Strategic Alliances? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(6), 14-26.

    Daim, T. U., Udbye, A., & Balasubramanian, A. (2012). Use of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for selection of 3PL providers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(1), 28-51.

    Damme, D. A. v., & Amstel, M. J. P. v. (1996). Outsourcing Logistics Management Activities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), 85-94.

    Domingues, M. L., Reis, V., & Macário, R. (2015). A Comprehensive Framework for Measuring Performance in a Third-party Logistics Provider. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 662-672.
    Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.

    Ho, W., Dey, P. K., & Lockström, M. (2011). Strategic sourcing: a combined QFD and AHP approach in manufacturing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 446-461.

    Hoek, R. I. v. (2001). The contribution of performance measurement to the expansion of third party logistics alliances in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 15-29.

    Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2002). Supplier Selection and Assessment: Their Impact on Business Performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(3), 11-21.

    Qureshi, M. N., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2008). An integrated model to identify and classify the key criteria and their role in the assessment of 3PL services providers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(2), 227-249.

    Rabinovich, E., Windle, R., Dresner, M., & Corsi, T. (1999). Outsourcing of integrated logistics functions: An examination of industry practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 29(6), 353-374.

    Rahman, Z. (2004). Use of Internet in supply chain management: a study of Indian companies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 104(1), 31-41.

    Sahin, O., Mohamed, S., Warnken, J., & Rahman, A. (2013). Assessment of sea‐level rise adaptation options: Multiple‐criteria decision‐making approach involving stakeholders. Structural Survey, 31(4), 283-

    Saaty, T.L. (1980), “The analytic hierarchy process”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Seyed-Alagheband, S.-A. (2011). 5 - Logistics Parties A2 - Kardar, Reza Zanjirani FarahaniShabnam RezapourLaleh Logistics Operations and Management (pp. 71-91). London: Elsevier.

    Sinkovics, R. R., & Roath, A. S. (2004). STRATEGIC ORIENTATION, CAPABILITIES, AND PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURER — 3PL RELATIONSHIPS. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 43-64.

    Spencer, M. S., Rogers, D. S., & Daugherty, P. J. (1994). JIT Systems and External Logistics Suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 60-74.

    Tahriri, F., Osman, M. R., Ali, A., Yusuff, R. M., & Esfandiary, A. (2008). AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company. 2008, 1(2), 23.

    Vaidyanathan, G. (2005). A framework for evaluating third-party logistics. Commun. ACM, 48(1), 89-94.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE