簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李金樺
Jessie Jin-hwa Li
論文名稱: 提升高中生聽力自主學習之成效
The Effect of Learner Autonomy Promotion on Listening Comprehension for Senior High School Students
指導教授: 馮怡蓁
Fon, Yee-Jean
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 136
中文關鍵詞: 學習者主動性自主學習計畫後設認知策略聽力理解英語教學廣播節目高中生
英文關鍵詞: Learner autonomy, autonomous learning plan, metacognitive strategy, listening comprehension, English-teaching broadcasting program, senior high school students
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:368下載:60
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    本研究探討提升學生自主學習在聽力能力、策略運用及學習態度的成效。研究者設計一個自主學習計畫幫助高中生收聽英語教學廣播節目。研究的對象是二百三十位台北縣立錦和高中一年級學生,最後獲得一百七十一位有效資料。實驗組和對照組皆收聽活用空中美語English 4U英語教學廣播節目。實驗組輔以自主學習計畫,發展後設認知策略。收集分析的資料包含聽力前、後測,上學期三次段考聽力測驗和下學期三次段考的成績,二次聽力策略問卷調查以及實驗組每週自我評量學習心得。
    研究結果發現實驗組比對照組更常收聽英語教學廣播節目,實驗組的聽力後測和上學期三次段考聽力測驗成績顯著優於對照組,顯示實驗組比對照組聽力能力進步更多。下學期實驗組停止實施自主學習計畫,成績仍顯著優於控制組,顯示學生即使沒有學習單的輔助,仍能保持收聽習慣,發展主動學習的能力。聽力策略調查問卷顯示學生最常使用後設認知策略,其次是認知策略,最後是社會 / 情意策略。雖然後測問卷調查結果顯示實驗組沒有增加後設認知策略的使用頻率,但是藉著完成每週學習單,接受自我監控、評量的訓練,學生確實能夠運用後設認知策略。大部分的學生對於收聽英語教學廣播節目和自主學習計畫也抱持非常正面的態度。他們認為自己在很多方面進步許多,對於英語學習也更有信心與興趣,並且認為每週自我評量學習單有助於監控養成收聽習慣和評量該週表現。
    此外,不同的性別與聽力程度在聽力能力與策略使用有顯著影響。女生與高成就組的所有聽力測驗成績顯著優於男生和中、低成就組。前者也比後者使用更多的聽力策略。然而,低成就組在聽力後測時進步最多;實驗組學生每週收聽節目三至四天者也進步最多。高成就組以及每週收聽五至六天的學生可能受到上限效應影響,而無法有很大的進步。一般而言,收聽節目愈頻繁者,沒有家長監督在家學習情況的學生,使用愈多的策略,顯示愈主動學習的學生愈常使用策略。
    本研究證明提升高中生聽力自主學習不但可行而且有顯著的聽力進步。因此,英語教學廣播節目搭配自主學習計畫是有效的聽力課外自修教材。每週自我評量學習單的形式可依照學習者的需要,做彈性調整。教師應該提供更多且有效的自主提升訓練,幫助學生增加後設認知策略運用。在整個訓練學習過程,教師需不斷地鼓勵與建議學生更加重視聽力訓練,妥善運用時間收聽英語教學廣播節目,才能在課業壓力下也能養成收聽習慣,並且增加自我評量的信心,即使成績不佳時也能保持學習熱忱。在本研究中,低成就組進步幅度最大,但可能需要較長的時間才有明顯進步;高成就組則需要更有挑戰性的教材和測驗來提高動機。最後,本論文對於自主學習計畫研究提供具體建議。

    Abstract
    The purpose of this study aims to investigate the effect of learner autonomy promotion on listening comprehension, strategy use and learners’ attitudes. 230 10th grade students of Taipei County Jing-Ho Senior High School participated in this study, and the final total number of subjects for valid data analyses was 171. Both the experimental and the control group learners were required to listen to the English 4U broadcasting program. The experimental group learners were aided with an autonomous learning plan, which helped them develop metacognitive strategies. The collected data included listening pretest, posttest, listening tests in the three monthly exams in the first semester, three monthly exams in the second semester as the delay test, listening comprehension strategy pre- and post- questionnaires and the experimental group learners’ weekly self-evaluation checklists and journal entries.
    The results showed that the experimental group learners self-reported higher frequency of listening to the program than the control group. The former also had significantly better performances in the listening posttest and the three monthly exams. Their performances of the three monthly exams in the second semester without the treatment of autonomous learning plan were also significantly better than the control group, which might indicate that they have learned to listen to the program autonomously without the required worksheets. The results of listening strategy questionnaires showed that the metacogntive strategy was used most frequently, followed by the cognitive strategy and then the social / affective strategy. Although the experimental group learners did not increase the metacognitive strategy uses after the training program, they did exercise these strategies through the weekly worksheets. Also, most of them showed very positive attitudes toward the broadcasting program and the autonomous learning plan. They perceived themselves as having made progress in many aspects, increased confidence and interest in learning English and considered the weekly worksheets effective.
    Besides, the females performed significantly better than the males in all the listening tests and used strategies more frequently. The HP group learners also performed significantly better than the MP and the LP groups in all the listening tests and used strategies more frequently. However, the LP group learners made the most progress in the listening posttest. The experimental group learners listening to the program for 3-4 days also made the most progress. The reason why the HP group learners and those listening for 5-6 days did not make the most progress may due to ceiling effect. Learners listening for 5-6 days used significantly more strategies than those for 3-4 days and those for 1-2 days. Females, HP and MP group learners without parental monitoring also used significantly more strategies than those with parental monitoring. In other words, autonomous learners tend to use more strategies.
    The positive results of this study have proved that learner autonomy promotion is feasible in senior high school context and has significant proficiency gains. Therefore, English-teaching broadcasting programs with the aid of an autonomous learning plan should be recommended as supplementary autonomous learning materials. The weekly worksheets do not need to be in a fixed format and more autonomy promotion tasks should be offered to increase the metacognitive strategy use. During the training program, teachers should keep offering support and suggestions to motivate students to put more emphasis on listening. Learners need guidance to schedule their time well so that they can form the habit regardless of pressure from schoolwork. They also need more opportunities to do self-assessment and keep passion burning when facing dissatisfying grades. The LP group learners can benefit a lot from this training program, but they may need more time to make great progress. The HP group learners need more challenging materials and tests to increase their motivation. Finally, suggestions for further studies on the effect of autonomy promotion are provided.

    CONTENTS Chinese abstract ____________________________________________________ i English abstract ____________________________________________________iii Acknowledgements _________________________________________ v Contents __________________________________________________________ vi List of tables ______________________________________________ ix List of figures _____________________________________________ xi 1. Introduction _____________________________________________________ 1 1.1 Motivation of the study __________________________________________ 1 1.2 Significance of the study _________________________________________ 3 1.3 Research questions of the study ____________________________________ 4 1.4 Organizations of the study ________________________________________ 5 1.5 Definition of terms ______________________________________________ 5 2. Review of the Literature __________________________________________ 8 2.1 Autonomy in language learning ___________________________________ 8 2.1.1 Definitions of autonomy _____________________________________ 9 2.1.2 Developing learner autonomy from a student’s perspective ________ 11 2.1.3 Fostering learner autonomy from a teacher’s perspective __________ 13 2.1.4 Implementation of autonomous learning _______________________ 14 2.1.5 Pros and cons of autonomous learning _________________________ 18 2.2 Listening comprehension ________________________________________ 22 2.2.1 Listening comprehension strategies ___________________________ 22 2.2.2 Listening instruction _______________________________________ 25 2.3 Research on learner autonomy and listening comprehension ____________ 28 3. Research Methodology __________________________________________ 31 3.1 Subjects _____________________________________________________ 31 3.2 Material: English 4U broadcasting programs ________________________ 33 3.3 Autonomous learning plan ______________________________________ 34 3.3.1 Autonomous learning plan contract ___________________________ 34 3.3.2 Weekly self-evaluation checklist and journal entry _______________ 34 3.3.3 Overall self-evaluation form _________________________________ 35 3.4 Instruments __________________________________________________ 36 3.4.1 Listening pretest and posttest ________________________________ 36 3.4.2 Three monthly listening tests in the first semester ________________ 37 3.4.3 Three monthly exams in the second semester as the delay test ______ 38 3.4.4 Pre-questionnaire and post-questionnaire _______________________ 38 3.5 Procedures ___________________________________________________ 39 4. Results_________________________________________________________ 42 4.1 Descriptive statistics ___________________________________________ 42 4.2 Quantitative statistic analyses of listening comprehension strategy questionnaire _________________________________________ 58 4.3 Quantitative statistic analyses of listening comprehension tests __________ 65 4.3.1 Listening comprehension pretest and posttest ___________________ 65 4.3.2 Listening comprehension tests in the three monthly exams _________ 70 4.3.3 Three monthly exams in the second semester as the delay test ______ 73 5. Discussion _____________________________________________________ 75 5.1 Listening tests_________________________________________________ 75 5.2 Listening strategy use __________________________________________ 80 5.3 Learners’ attitudes _____________________________________________ 87 6. Conclusion _____________________________________________________ 91 6.1 Summary ____________________________________________________ 91 6.2 Pedagogical implications ________________________________________ 93 6.3 Limitations and suggestions _____________________________________ 95 References _______________________________________________________ 97 Appendix A _____________________________________________________ 112 Appendix B _____________________________________________________ 113 Appendix C _____________________________________________________ 114 Appendix D _____________________________________________________ 115 Appendix E _____________________________________________________ 116 Appendix F _____________________________________________________ 122 Appendix G _____________________________________________________ 128 Appendix H ____________________________________________________ 129 Appendix I _____________________________________________________ 133 Appendix J _____________________________________________________ 134

    References
    Abraham, R.G., & Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: a case study. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp.85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Assinder, W. (1991). Peer teaching, peer learning: One mode. ELT Journal, 45(3), 218-229.
    Bacon, S.M. (1992a). Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: a descriptive study. Foreign Language Annuals, 25 (4), 317-334.
    Bacon, S.M. (1992b). Authentic listening in Spanish: How learners adjust their strategies to the difficulty of the input. Hispania, 75, 398-412.
    Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. England: Person Education Limited.
    Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigation the relationship in Hong Kong. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55 (4), 490-514.
    Candy, P.C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood cliffs, NJ:
    Prentice-Hall, 71-84.
    Chan, T. H. (2003). Bilingual magazines in three Chinese-speaking communities and their uses for foreign language and translation teaching: a preliminary report. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 43-53.
    Chang, Y. L., Chang, T. S. & Kuo, C. H. (1995). Listening difficulties and learning strategies of non-native speakers. Proceedings of the 9th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 145-158.
    Chao, Y. G. (1999). EFL listening strategies by English majors in Taiwan. Proceedings of the 16th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 265-279.
    Cheng, C. H. (2002). Effects of listening strategy instruction on Junior High school students. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 289-297.
    Chien, C. N. (2000). Listening improvement by intervening at the matacognitive level. Selected papers from the ninth international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 255-263.
    Chien, C. N. & Kao, L.W. (2002). Effects of metacognitive strategy on listening comprehension with EFL learners. Selected papers from the eleventh international
    symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 298-307.
    Chiu, M. H. (2000). Developing learner autonomy in advanced listening comprehension class. Selected papers from the ninth international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 89-98.
    Cotterall, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23 (2), 195-206.
    Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principle for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54 (2), 209-117.
    Dam, L. (1982). Beginning English: an experiment in learning and teaching pupils in 5th year Karslunde Skole. Copenhagen: Demarks Laererhoskle.
    Dam, L. & Gabrielsen, G. (1988). Developing learner autonomy in a school context: a six-year experiment beginning in the learners’ first year of English. In H. Holec (Ed.), Autonomy and self-directed learning: present fields of applications. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 19-30.
    Dam, L. & Legenhausen, L. (1996). The acquisition of vocabulary in an autonomous learning environment --- the first months of beginning English. In R. Pemberton et al. (Eds.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 265-280.
    Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Dickinson, L. (1993). Talking shop: aspects of autonomous learning. An interview with Leslie Dickinson. ELT Journal, 47(4), 330-336.
    Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: a literature review. System, 23 (2), 165-174.
    Ellis, G. & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English: a course in learner training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fan, J. Y. (2003). The effects of teaching connected speech rules on English listening comprehension. Master’s Thesis. Tamkang University in Taiwan.
    Field, J. (1998). Skills and strategies: towards a new methodology for listening. ELT Journal, 52 (2), 110-118.
    Fowler, A. (1997). Developing independent learning. In A. Burns and S. Hood (Eds.), Teacher’s voices 2: teaching disparate learner groups. Sydney: National Centre For English language Teaching and Research, 115-123.
    Goh, C. C. M. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT Journal, 51 (4), 361-369.
    Coh, C. C. M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185-206.
    Gremmo, M.-J. & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in
    language teaching and learning: the history of an idea. System, 23 (2), 151-64.
    Guglielmino, L.M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. PhD Thesis. University of Georgia.
    Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: a case study. System, 28, 85-96.
    Harding, E. & Tealby, A. (1981). Counseling for language learning at the University of Cambridge: progress report on an experiment. M’elanges P’edagogiques, CRAPEL, Universit’e Nancy 2, 95-120.
    Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language learning in formal settings. ELT Journal, 51 (1), 12-20.
    Hart, N. (2002). Intra-group autonomy and authentic materials: a different approach to EFL in Japanese colleges and universities. System, 30, 33-46.
    Heath, S. B. (1992). Literary skills or literate skills? Considerations for ESL / EFL learners. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40-55.
    Henner-Stanchina, C. & Holec, H. (1985). Evaluation in an autonomous learning scheme. In R. Philip (Eds.), Discourse and learning. New York: Longman, 256-262.
    Ho, J. & Crookall, D. (1995). Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: learner autonomy in English language teaching. System, 23(2), 235-243.
    Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
    (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.)
    Holec, H. (1985). On autonomy: some elementary concepts. In P. Riley (Ed.), Discourse and learning. London: Longman, 173-190.
    Hu, L. S. (2000). The effects of knowledge of topical background and textual vocabulary on EFL students’ listening performance. Master’s Thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University in Taiwan.
    Huang, C. (1992). How to increase effective learning in listening comprehension for Chinese students: a research on problems and design of materials. Taipei: Crane.
    Huang, C. C. & Chen, S. W. (2002). Using radio broadcasting English to help EFL students’ listening comprehension. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 348-358.
    Huang, T.L. (2003). The effects of listening strategy instruction for junior high school students in Taiwan. Master’s Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University in Taiwan.
    Hurd, S. (1998). Autonomy at any price? Issues and concerns from a British HE perspective. Foreign Language Annuals, 31(2), 219-230.
    Hurd, S., Beaven, T., & Ortega, A. (2001). Developing autonomy in a distance language context: issues and dilemmas for course writers. System, 29, 341-355.
    Jones, J. F. (1995). Self-access and culture: retreating from autonomy. ELT Journal, 49 (3), 228-234.
    Kao, T. C. (1999). Can semantic maps help EFL listening comprehension? Master’s Thesis. National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan.
    Katchen, J. E. (1995). Listening journals: a way to enhance students’ listening strategies. Proceedings of the 12th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 352-362.
    Kirtikara, K. (1997). Autonomy rediscovered. In Autonomy 2000: The development of learning independence in language learning. Conference Proceedings. Bangkok: King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Thonburi, 93-100.
    Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guide for learners and teachers. New York: Cambridge, The Adult Education Company.
    Kohonen, V. (1992) Experiential language learning: second language learning as cooperative learner education. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 14-39.
    Ku, P. Y. (1998). Strategies associated with listening comprehension of EFL students in Taiwan. Selected papers from the seventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 581-591.
    Lee, H. M. (1997). A study of the listening strategies of junior college EFL students in Taiwan. Proceedings of the 14th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 393-412.
    Lee, I. (1998). Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 52 (4), 282-289.
    Lin, S. U. (2000). A study of English listening comprehension strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Master’s Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University in Taiwan.
    Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. 1: definition, issues and problems. Dublin: Authnetik.
    Little, D. (1996). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. In R. Pemberton. (Ed.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 203-218.
    Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 21 (1), 71-94.
    Lor, W. (1998). Studying the first-year students’ experience of writing their reflection journals with the use of a web-based system. MA dissertation. University of Hong Kong.
    McNamara, M. J. & Deane, D. (1995). Self-assessment activities: toward autonomy in language learning. TESOL Journal, 17-21.
    Morrison, B. (1989). Using mews broadcasts for authentic listening comprehension. ELT Journal, 43 (1), 14-18.
    Mould, H. (1985). Extending self-directed learning of English in an engineering college. In P. Riley. (Ed.), Discourse and learning. London: Longman. 210-232.
    Moulden, H. (1983). Apprentissage auto-dirige: compte-rendu d’experiences 1978-1983. Melanges Pedagogiques, CRAPEL, Universit’e Nancy.
    Murphy, J. M. (1985). An investigation into the listening strategies of ESL college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (9), 2677A, 1986.
    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nunan, D. (1994). Self-assessment and reflection as tools for learning. Paper presented at the Assessment Colloquium, International Language in Education Conference, University of Hong Kong, December 1994.
    Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Pemberton. (Ed.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 13-26.
    O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. UK: Frentice Hall International Ltd, 133-144.
    O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989) Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418-437.
    O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
    Pemagbi, J. (1995). Using newspapers and radio in English language teaching. English Teaching Forum, 33 (3), 53-55.
    Pierson, H. D. (1996). Learner culture and learner autonomy in the Hong Kong Chinese context. In R. Pemberton (Ed.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 49-58.
    Press, M.- C. (1996). Ethnicity and the autonomous language learner: different beliefs and different strategies. In E. Broady & M.- M. Kenning (Eds.), Promoting learner autonomy in university language learning. London: Association for French Language Studies / CILT, 237-259.
    Race, E. (1985). Self-access at Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Melbourne: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.
    Renaud, J. & Mitchell, N. (1994). Children’s use of radio: a pilot study.
    (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375440)
    Riley, P. & Sicre, M. (1985). An experiment in self-directed group learning. In P. Riley (Ed.), Discourse and learning. London: Longman, 275-282.
    Rowsell, L.V. & Libben, G. (1994). The sound of one hand clapping: how to succeed in independent language learning. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (4), 668-687.
    Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. (1982). How to be a more successful language learner. Boson, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Inc.
    Sakian, S. M. (1997). The radio in the language classroom. English teaching Forum, 35(2), 54.
    Simmons, D. (1996). A study of strategy use in independent learners. In R. Pemberton (Ed.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 61-76.
    Sinclair B. (1999). Survey review: recent publications on autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 53 (4), 309-320.
    Slimani, Y. (1992). Evaluating classroom interaction. In J.C. Alderson & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197-221.
    Sun, K. C. (2002). Investigation of English Listening difficulties of Taiwan Students. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 518-525.
    Sung, H. & Padilla, A. M. (1998). Student motivation, parental attitudes, and involvement in the learning of Asian languages in elementary and secondary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 82 (2), 205-216.
    Teng, H. C. (1996). An investigation of EFL listening comprehension strategies used by college freshmen in Taiwan. Research report submitted to National Science council (NSC85-2418-H-224-002).
    Teng, H. C. (1997). An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 509-519.
    Teng, H. C. (1998a). A study of EFL listening comprehension strategies.
    (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 422745)
    Teng, H. C. (1998b). An investigation of learning strategies used by EST students in Taiwan. Research report submitted to National Science Council (NSC 87-2411-H-224-002).
    Teng, H. C. (2000). An investigation of English learning strategies used by technology college students. The fifteenth technological and vocational education and humanities I. Taipei: Jinwen Institute of Technology.
    Teng, H. C. (2002). An investigation of EFL listening difficulties for Taiwanese college students. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Taipei: Crane, 526-533.
    Thompson & Rubin (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annuals, 29 (3), 331-342.
    Thomson, C. K. (1996). Self-assessment in self-directed learning: issues of learner diversity. In R. Pemberton (Eds.), Taking control: autonomy in language learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 77-92.
    Tompkins, C. & McGraw, M-J. (1988). The negotiated learning control. In D. Boud (Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning. London: Kogan Page limited, 172-191.
    Tsai, C. H. (2002). The effects of two pre-listening tasks on L2 listening proficiency. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane, 546-554.
    Tsai, C. S. (1994). Applying authentic materials in the language lab --- using ICRT programs to develop listening comprehension and speaking skills. Proceedings of the 11th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 211-231.
    Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: a descriptive study. Foreign Language Annuals, 30(3), 387-409.
    van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
    Victori, M. & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing metacognition in self-directed language learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.
    Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous learning? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman, 98-113.
    Wang, W. Y. (2002). Effects of gender and proficiency on listening comprehension strategy use by Taiwanese EFL senior high school students --- a case from Changhua, Taiwan. Master’s Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University in Taiwan.
    Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. UK: Frentice Hall International Ltd.
    White, C. (1995). Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: research finding. System, 23(2), 207-221.
    Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
    Yang, N. D. (1995). Language learning strategies: investigation and instruction. Proceedings of the 12th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 137-153.
    Yang, N. D. (1996). Teaching students how to learn: a language learning project. Proceedings of the 13th conference on English teaching and learning in R.O.C. Taipei: Crane, 195-204.
    Zhu, J. (1984). Making use of news broadcasts. ELT Journal, 38 (4), 242-247.
    陳秀櫻 (Chen, S.) (1999). 結合課堂與英語教學。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃(編號:NSC 89-2411-H-141-001)

    QR CODE