簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許育彰
Yu-Chang Hsu
論文名稱: 探討高中生從力學情境中發現問題的能力之研究
Research of Problem Finding Ability from Mechanics Situation of High School Students
指導教授: 譚克平
Tam, Hak-Ping
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 科學教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Science Education
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 173
中文關鍵詞: 發現問題矛盾式的問題情境潛在式的發現問題聚斂式發現問題的能力發散式發現問題的能力
英文關鍵詞: Problem Finding, Contradictiory Problem Situation, Potential Problem situation, convergent problem finding ability, divergent problem finding ability
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:262下載:24
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 論文名稱:探討高中生從力學情境中 研 究 生:許育彰
    發現問題的能力之研究
    論 文 摘 要
    本研究旨在探討我國現階段高中生從力學情境中發現問題的能力。研究樣本係選自台北市兩所公立高中,計有七個班級,共292人。在研究工具方面,本研究係以自編的「矛盾式問題情境」和「潛在式問題情境」充當發現問題的題材,然後再搭配其它測驗工具,包括:物理力學基本概念測驗、邏輯推理群測試題(GALT)、威廉斯創造性思考活動、後設認知量表、威廉斯創造性傾向量表(又名情意測驗)等,進行資料的蒐集。從蒐集所得的資料中,本研究首先將受試者發現問題的內涵、次數、及類型加以歸類,並依不同判準評定學生發現問題的表現;此外並進行描述性統計、相關係數、以及多元迴歸分析,最後還輔之以質的分析,藉以進一步了解現階段高中生發現問題的能力到達什麼程度。
    研究結果顯示,除物理學科知識之外,其餘各工具的次量表中就只有邏輯推理能力與發現問題的能力比較有相關,而上述兩者也只是與聚斂式發現問題能力呈線性相關而已,故此學科知識對於發現問題來說其地位不容忽視。此外,還發現有某個班級其學科知識不強,但其發散式發現問題的能力卻優於聚斂式發現問題的能力,故推想該班級的特色是能夠發現發散式的問題,但卻不一定有能力解題。至於多元迴歸分析的結果,則發現學科知識在預測學生發現問題的能力亦有重要的貢獻。
    總括來說,本研究發現:「現階段的高中生在發現問題的能力上,尚有很多企待改善的地方。」至於如何提供適合的條件與教材以培養學生發現問題的能力,則是教育界應進一步探討的課題。

    Research of Problem Finding Ability from Mechanics Situation
    of High School Students
    Yu-Chang Hsu
    Abstract
    This dissertation mainly discusses the problem finding ability from mechanics situation of the high school students in Taiwan. The research samples are chosen from two public high schools in Taipei, including 7 classes, 292 students. The research is done by self-made “Contradictory Problematic Situation” and “Potential Problematic Situation” as themes for problem finding along with other testing tools, including Mechanics Essential Knowledge Test, Group Assessment of Logical Thinking(GALT), Test of Divergent Thinking, Test of Metacognition, Test of Divergent Feeling, and so on. From the gathered data by above mentioned tools, this research first categorizes the content, times and types of how the subject finding the problems. Then evaluates the performance of the problem finding ability of students by different criteria. By using Descriptive Statistics, Multiple Regression Analysis and Quality Analysis, We may figure out and understand the level of high school students’ problem finding ability.
    The result of research shows that in addition to basic physical knowledge, among all tools’ subscales, only the logical reasoning ability is related to problem finding ability. The above mentioned is only linear related to convergent problem finding ability. Thus, the knowledge of the subject is important to the problem finding ability. Moreover, one of the sample classes, though in poor knowledge, the divergent problem finding ability is better than the convergent problem finding ability. In my assumption, the class is good at finding divergent problems, Yet is probably unable to do problem solving. As for the result of Multiple Regression Analysis, we find that the knowledge of the subject is very important in predicting students’ problem finding ability.
    In conclusion, this research discovers that the problem finding ability of current high school students takes a great effort to be improved. Yet, as for how to provide adequate teaching materials and condition to cultivate high school students’ problem finding ability, it is still a big issue for educators to have further discussion and study.

    目 錄 第壹章 緒論.................................................................. 1 第一節 研究背景與研究動機.......................................................... 1 第二節 名詞釋義............................................................................ 5 第三節 研究目的與研究問題........................................................... 11 第四節 研究範圍與研究限制........................................................... 13 第五節 論文架構............................................................................. 14 第貳章 理論基礎與文獻探討......................................... 15 第一節 問題的本質......................................................................... 15 第二節 問題與探究......................................................................... 28 第三節 發現問題的成份.................................................................. 36 第四節 發生認識論:發現問題的機制.............................................. 54 第參章 研究設計............................................................ 65 第一節 研究架構............................................................................. 65 第二節 研究樣本............................................................................. 66 第三節 研究工具............................................................................. 67 第四節 研究程序............................................................................. 77 第五節 資料分析............................................................................. 78 第肆章 研究結果與討論................................................ 81 第一節 發現問題的類型與分佈....................................................... 81 第二節 發現問題的能力與各主體變項間的關係............................. 89 第三節 各班級在各評量工具中的表現............................................ 97 第四節 發現問題的預測變項:多元迴歸分析..................................101 第五節 發散式發現問題之質的分析...............................................106 第伍章 結論與建議.......................................................109 第一節 結論....................................................................................109 第二節 建議....................................................................................112 參考文獻..........................................................................117 中文部份...........................................................................................117 英文部份...........................................................................................120 附錄一.............................................................................131 附錄二.............................................................................143 附錄三.............................................................................164 附錄四.............................................................................171 圖 表 目 次 圖目次 圖1-2-1 「問題」的圖示形式................................................................. 5 圖1-2-2 不同受試者聚斂式發現問題的能力....................................... 9 圖1-2-3 不同受試者發散式發現問題的能力........................................ 10 圖1-3-1 人境互動發現問題模式的建構理念........................................ 11 圖1-5-1 研究架構................................................................................ 14 圖2-1-1 問題的邏輯結構以及其與背景知識的關係............................. 23 圖2-2-1 問題呈指數增殖的現象.......................................................... 31 圖2-2-2 Treffinger & Isaksen的創造性解題模式................................... 34 圖2-3-1 Popper三個世界之互動與變動的情形..................................... 40 圖2-3-2 Guilford智力結構的解題模式................................................. 44 圖2-3-3 解決例行性問題的心智運作................................................... 45 圖2-3-4 解決非例行性問題的心智運作............................................... 45 圖2-3-5 Flavell後設認知與認知互動的模式........................................ 47 圖2-3-6 發現問題的成份模式.............................................................. 51 圖2-3-7 滋生問題的系統與發現問題的心智歷程................................. 53 圖2-4-1 基模與認知結構的關係圖....................................................... 56 圖2-4-2 同化及調適雙向運作的認知圓環............................................ 60 圖2-4-3 主體的內部結構與外在環境互動的平衡過程......................... 61 圖2-4-4 發現問題與解決問題的循環歷程............................................ 62 圖3-1-1 實證實驗的研究架構.............................................................. 65 圖3-3-1 問題情境的編製流程.............................................................. 67 圖3-3-2 發散式發現問題的“力學”評分架構.................................... 71 圖3-3-3 發散式發現問題的“創意”評分架構.................................... 71 圖3-3-4 物理力學基本概念測驗的編製流程........................................ 72 圖3-4-1 研究流程圖............................................................................ 77 圖4-1-1 聚斂式發現問題的評分架構................................................... 82 圖4-1-2 發散式發現問題的百分比圖-以力學觀念進行分類(飛機).... 85 圖4-1-3 發散式發現問題的百分比圖-以力學觀念進行分類(鳥)....... 86 圖4-1-4 發散式發現問題的百分比圖-以創意進行分類(飛機)........... 87 圖4-1-5 發散式發現問題的百分比圖-以創意進行分類(鳥)............... 88 表目次 表2-1-1 Getzels & Csikszentmihalyi的問題分類............................... 26 表2-2-1 傳統解題與創造性解題的流程及步驟............................... 33 表2-3-1 不同的問題情境與主體相應的心智活動........................... 39 表2-3-2 發散性思考與聚斂性思考的屬性...................................... 44 表3-2-1 本研究樣本的基本資料..................................................... 66 表3-3-1 矛盾式問題情境的內容、涉及的力學概念、以及學科專 家評估的難度.................................................................. 68 表3-3-2 聚斂式發現問題能力的評分標準及示例........................... 69 表3-3-3 物理力學基本概念測驗雙向細目表................................... 73 表3-3-4 後設認知修訂量表的配置情形.......................................... 76 表4-1-1 本研究樣本聚斂式發現問題的得分情形........................... 82 表4-1-2 發散式發現問題的類型-以力學觀念進行分類(飛機)..... 84 表4-1-3 各班級發散式發現問題的分佈-以力學觀念進行分類 (飛機)........................................................................... 84 表4-1-4 發散式發現問題的類型-以力學觀念進行分類(鳥)......... 85 表4-1-5 各班級發散式發現問題的分佈-以力學觀念進行分類(鳥)............................................................................... 86 表4-1-6 各班級發散式發現問題的分佈-以創意進行分類 (飛機)........................................................................... 87 表4-1-7 各班級發散式發現問題的分佈-以創意進行分類(鳥)............................................................................... 88 表4-2-1 學生的學科知識與三種發現問題能力之間的線性相關 係數表............................................................................. 89 表4-2-2 學生的邏輯思考與三種發現問題能力之間的線性相關 係數表............................................................................. 90 表4-2-3 全體學生在「威廉斯創造性思考活動」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 90 表4-2-4 高二學生在「威廉斯創造性思考活動」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 91 表4-2-5 高三學生在「威廉斯創造性思考活動」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 91 表4-2-6 全體學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性思考 活動」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 91 表4-2-7 高二學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性思考 活動」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 92 表4-2-8 高三學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性思考 活動」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 92 表4-2-9 全體學生在「後設認知量表」中各次量表間的相關係數... 92 表4-2-10 高二學生在「後設認知量表」中各次量表間的相關係數... 93 表4-2-11 高三學生在「後設認知量表」中各次量表間的相關係數... 93 表4-2-12 全體學生各種發現問題的能力與後設認知各次量表間 之相關係數...................................................................... 93 表4-2-13 高二學生各種發現問題的能力與後設認知各次量表間 之相關係數...................................................................... 94 表4-2-14 高三學生各種發現問題的能力與後設認知各次量表間 之相關係數...................................................................... 94 表4-2-15 全體學生在「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 95 表4-2-16 高二學生在「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 95 表4-2-17 高三學生在「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」中各次量表間 的相關係數...................................................................... 95 表4-2-18 全體學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性傾向 量表」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 95 表4-2-19 高二學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性傾向 量表」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 96 表4-2-20 高三學生各種發現問題的能力與「威廉斯創造性傾向 量表」中各次量表間之相關係數....................................... 96 表4-3-1 「威廉斯創造性思考活動」的平均值與標準差.................... 97 表4-3-2 「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」的平均值與標準差.................... 97 表4-3-3 「邏輯推理能力」的平均值與標準差................................... 98 表4-3-4 「後設認知」的平均值與標準差.......................................... 98 表4-3-5 「力學知識」的平均值與標準差.......................................... 98 表4-3-6 「聚斂式發現問題」的平均值與標準差............................... 99 表4-3-7 「發散式發現問題」的平均值與標準差(力學評分)............100 表4-3-8 「發散式發現問題」的平均值與標準差(創意評分)............100 表4-4-1 甲校J215班聚斂式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................101 表4-4-2 甲校J215班發散式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................102 表4-4-3 乙校高二學生聚斂式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................103 表4-4-4 乙校高二學生發散式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................103 表4-4-5 乙校高三學生聚斂式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................104 表4-4-6 乙校高三學生發散式發現問題能力的預測變項之迴歸 係數參數表.....................................................................104 表4-4-7 各迴歸模式中顯著的相關係數一覽表.............................105

    一、中文部份
    凡異出版社(民75) 現代數學的巨星:希爾伯特。凡異出版社。
    朱建民(民80) 探究與真理:珀爾斯探究理論研究。臺學生書局印行。
    朱智賢主編(1989) 心理學大詞典。北京師範大學出版社,台北結構群出版社總代理。
    吳江霖主編(1996) 心理學概論。廣東高等教育出版社。
    李 丹(1997) 兒童發展。台北:五南圖書公司。
    李常井(民82) 杜威知識論中的「轉型」說。載于第三屆美國文學與思想研討會論文選集:哲學篇。洪裕宏主編,台灣:中央研究院歐美研究所,頁55-81。
    李鴻長譯(1994) PQRST 的讀書方法。台北:聯經出版社。
    杜麗燕(民84) 皮亞傑。台北:東大圖書公司。
    杭 生譯(民76) 思維、學習與教學。台北:文笙書局。
    林幸台與王木榮(民83) 威廉斯創造力測驗。台北:心理出版社。
    林清山(民65) 科學教育的心理學基礎(上)。科學教育月刊,創刊號,頁27-36。
    林隆儀譯(民77) 創造性思考與腦力激盪法。清華管理科學圖書中心。J. Geofferey Rawlinson原著者。
    胡 適(1935) 贈與今年的大學畢業生。載于《胡適論學近著》大陸:商務印書館,頁525。
    都筑卓司(1992) 易迷惑的物理問題(II)。銀禾事業有限公司,新世紀編輯小組。
    許育彰(民87) 科學家探究問題的邏輯結構與機制運作。科學教育月刊,第210期,頁2-11。
    黃榮村(民74) 思考。載于劉英茂編著之《普通心理學》一書,台北:大洋出版社,頁153-211。
    崔慶龍(民84) 皮亞傑階段理論的教育哲學。輔大哲學研究所碩士論文。
    張巨青、吳寅華(1994) 邏輯與歷史:現代科學方法論的嬗變。淑馨出版社。
    張春興(1991) 現代心理學。台北:東華書局。
    張春興(民85) 教育心理學──三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。
    張華夏(1989) 波普爾和科學問題的研究(15)。分析哲學與科學哲學論文集,新亞學術集刊第九期,香港中文大學新亞書院出版。
    張景媛(民83) 國中生數學學習歷程統整模式的驗證及應用:學生建構數學概念的分析及數學文字題教學策略的研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
    梁淑坤(民83) 擬題的研究及其在課程的角色。國民小學數學學術研討會,國立嘉義師範學院。
    郭有遹(民83) 創造性的問題解決方法。台北:心理出版社。
    郭建慶(1989) 平衡──認識發展的內在機制。收錄于孫翠寶主編《智者的思路》一書,復旦大學出版社出版。
    陳正賢(民80) 職前教師數學解題情意因素之研究。科學教育,第二期,頁1-58。
    陳永明(1994) 哲學子午線。臺灣商務印書館發行。
    陳明福譯(民71) 問題與答案。鵝湖月刊,九卷五期,頁18-22。
    陳龍安(民79) 創造思考與問題解決。創造思考教育,第 2期,頁7-18。
    陶國璋(民84) 開發精確的思考。台北:書林出版有限公司。
    單繩武(民67) 慎思與明辨。台北:大海文化事業公司。
    項退結(民81) 西洋哲學辭典。台北:華香園出版社,頁512。
    黃敏偉、陳雅茜譯(民86) 大腦如何思考。台北:天下文化出版,頁233 。
    溫亦剛(民79) 怎樣學好數學。九鼎出版社。
    趙敦華(1991) 卡爾‧波普。台北:遠流出版公司。
    劉玉燕譯(1994) 皮亞傑訪談錄。台北:書泉出版社。
    蔡信行譯(民85) 數學遊樂園之觸類旁通。台北:牛頓出版社。
    蔡聰明(民85) 瓦里斯尋π的發現理路。科學月刊,第27卷4 期。

    二、英文部份
    Agre,G.P.(1982). The concept of problem. Educational Studies ,Vol.13,No.2,121-142.
    Allison, P.(1999). Multiple regression: a primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
    Ausubel,D.P.(1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
    Balajthy,E.(1984). Using student-constructed questions to encourage active reading. Journal of reading.
    Belnep,N. & Steel,T.(1975). The logic of questions and answers. Yale University Press.
    Beyer,B.K.(1988). Developing a thinking skills program. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Bloom,B.S., Englehart,M.D., Furst,E.J., Hill,W.H., & Krathwohl,D.R.(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
    Blosser,P.E.(1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Education Associates, Inc. Worthington, Ohio.
    Boden,M.A.(1985). Piaget. London: Fontana Press.
    Bruner,J.S.(1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Bruner,J.S.(1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review,31,21-32.
    Bruner,J.S.(1966). Toward a Theory of instruction, New York: W.W. Norton.
    Chapman,M.(1988). Constructive evolution: origins and development of Piaget's thought, NY: Cambridge University Press,6-9.
    Chi,M.T.H., Feltovich,P.J. & Glaser,R.(1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science,5,87-119.
    Chi,M.T.H. & Glaser,R.(1985). Problem-Solving Ability. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 257630.
    Chi,M.T.H., & Koeske,R.D.(1983). Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 19,29-39.
    de Bono,E.(1970). Lateral thinking: creativity step by step. New York: Harper Row.
    De Corte,E., Verschaffel,L., & De Win,L.(1985). Influence of rewording verbal problems on children's problem representations and solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4):460-470.
    De Groot,A.D.(1965). Thought and choice in chess. Mouton.
    Dewey,J.(1910). How We Think. Chicago: Henry Regnery,1933.
    Dewey,J.(1929). The quest for certainty. NYC: Putnam.
    Dewey,J.(1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.,1964.
    Dillon,J.T.(1978). Using questions to depress student thought. School Review,87,50-63.
    Dillon,J.T.(1982a). Problem Finding and Solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, vol.16,No.2, Second Quarter.
    Dillon,J.T.(1982b). The multidisciplinary study of questioning. Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 147-165.
    Dillon,J.T.(1982c). The effect of questions in education and other enterprises. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14,127-153.
    Duncker,K.(1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs 58, No.5.
    Einstein,A., & Infeld,L.(1938). The Evolution of Physics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Elstein,A.S., Shulman,L.S., & Sprafka,S.A.(1978). Medical Problem Solving. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Flavell,J.H.(1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick(Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Flavell,J.H.(1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. Patrick Dickson, Children's oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.
    Frank,M.L.(1985). Mathematical beliefs and problem solving. Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University.
    Garofalo,J. & Lester,F.K.(1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,3,163-176.
    Getzels,J.W.(1964). Creative thinking, problem-solving and instruction. In E.R. Hilgard(Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction. Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt.1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,240-267.
    Getzels,J.W.(1979). Problem finding: a theoretical note. Cognitive Science,3,167-172.
    Getzels,J.W.(1982). the problem of the problem. In P.M Hogarth(ed.), Question framing and response consistency. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Getzels,J.W. & Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1966). Portrait of the artist as an explorer. Trans-Action,3,31-35.
    Getzels,J.W. & Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal,3, 80-84.
    Getzels,J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi,M.(1976). The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
    Glaser,R.(1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist,39, 93-104.
    Glaser,R.(1985). All's well that begins and ends with both knowledge and processes: A reply to Sternberg. American Psychologist,40, 573-575.
    Gleitman,H.(1991). Psychology. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
    Graybill, F. & Iyer, H. (1994). Regression analysis: concepts and applications. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
    Greeno,J.G.(1978). Natures of problem solving abilities. In W.K. Estes(Ed.) Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Vol.5: Human information processing(pp.239-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Greeno,J.G., & Riley,M.S.(1987). Process and development of understanding. In F.E. Weinert R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and understanding (pp.289-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Guilford,J.P.(1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin,52,267-297.
    Hayes,J.R.(1981). The complete problem solver. Philadephia resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60,549-571.
    Hidi,S.(1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60,549-571.
    Higgins,J.M.(1994). 101 Creative problem solving techniques: The handbook of new ideas for business. New Management Publishing Company, Inc.
    Hoover,S.M. & Feldhusen,J.F.(1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 838-848.
    Hoover,S.M., & Feldhusen,J.F.(1994). Scientific problem solving and problem finding: A theoretical model. In M.A. Runco(Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity(pp.201-219). Norwood,NJ: Ablex.
    Hudson,T.(1983). Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoin sets. Child Development, 54:84-90.
    Inhelder,B., & Piaget,J.(1958). The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. Basic Books.
    Isaksen,G.S. & Parnes,S.(1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. Journal of Creative Thinking,19,1-29.
    Isaksen,S.G., Dorval,K.B., & Treffinger,D.J.(1994). Creative approaches to problem solving. Dubuque, IA: Kenddall- Hunt.
    Januszewski,A., & Pearson,R.(1992). Problem identification techniques: So what's the problem? ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347996.
    Kilpatrick,J.(1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A.H. Schoenfeld(Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education(pp.123-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Kintsch,W. & Greeno,J.G.(1985). Understanding and solving word arithmatic problems. Psychological Review,92, 109-129.
    Klausmeier,H.J., & Laughlin,L.T.(1961). Behavior during problem solving among children of low, average, and high intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59,148-152.
    Lakatos,I.(1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Larkin,J.H.(1981). Enriching formal knowledge: a model for learning to solve textbook physics problems. In J.R. Anderson(Ed.) Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp.311-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Larkin,J.H., McDermott, J., Simon,D.P. & Simon,H.A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4:317-345.
    Laudan,L.(1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Lester,F.K.(1980). Research in mathematical problem solving. In R. Shumway(Ed.), Research in Mathematics Education. Reston,VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematic.
    Lester,F.K., & Garofalo,J.(1987). The influence of affects, beliefs, and metacognition on problem solving behavior: some tentative speculations. Washington, D.C.
    Lindquist,M.M.(1980). Selected issues in mathematics education. Berkeley, Calif: McCutchan Pub. Co.
    Mandler,G.(1975). Mind and emotion. New York: John & Sons.
    Mayer,R.E.(1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. HarperCollins Publisher.
    Mayer,R.E.(1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
    Mazur,E. (1992). Physics intuitive test. Paper presented at the seminar of the Science Education Institution, NTNU.(December 3, 1992)
    Mcintosh,T.C.(1995). Problem-solving processes. The Science Teacher. 16-19.
    McLeod,D.B.(1986). Affective issues in research on teaching mathematical problem solving. In E.A. Silver(Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 267-279.
    Mcleod,D.B.(1987). Affect and problem solving: two theoretical perspectives. Washington,D.C.
    McWalters,M.(1990). Understanding Psychology. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
    Moore,M.T.(1983). The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem-discovery process: A study of creative and noncreative middle school students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 258186.
    Mulholland,T.M., Pellgrino,J.W., & Glaser,R.(1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology,12, 252-284.
    NCTM(1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
    NCTM(1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
    Peirce,C.S.(1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol.7 & 8 edited by A.W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
    Piaget,J.(1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Piaget,J.(1952). The origins of intelligence. New York: International University Press.
    Piaget,J.(1968). Six Psychological Studies, Harvester press.
    Piaget,J.(1970). Piaget's theory. In P.H. Mussen(ed.), Carmichael's Handbook of Child Psychology, Wiley, 703-732.
    Piaget,J.(1971). Biology and knowledge. trans. B. Walsh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Piaget,J.(1972). The principles of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Piaget,J., & Inhelder,B.(1969). Psychology of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Polya,G.(1945). How to Solve it. New York: Doubleday.
    Popper, K.(1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Popper,K.(1979). Objective knowledge. N.Y.: Tornto Melbourne Auckland.
    Reitman,W.(1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
    Riley,M.S., Greeno,J.G., & Heller,J.I.(1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetical. In H.P. Ginsburz(Ed.) The development of mathematical thinking. Academic Press.
    Roadrangka,V., Yeany,R.H., & Padilla,M.J.(1983). Group Test of Logical Thinking. In Mattheis,F.E. and others(1985). A study of the logical thinking skills, integrated process skills and attitudes of junior high school students in North Carolina, ED 285754.
    Rossman,J.(1931). Psychology of the inventor: A study of the patentee.(New and rev. ed.) Washington, D.C. Inventors Publishing Company.
    Rothopf,E.Z. & Bisbicos,E.(1967). Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58,pp.56-61.
    Schoenfeld,A.H.(1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance.
    Schoenfeld,A.H.(1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press,Inc.
    Schwab,J.(1962). The teaching of science as inquiry. In J.J. Schwab & P.F. Brandwein(Eds.), The Teaching of Science. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, pp.1-103.
    Silver,E.A.(1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem solving instruction. In A. Schoenfeld(Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematical Education(pp. 33-60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Simon,D.P., & Simon,H.A.(1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. Siegler(Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp.110-137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Simon,H.A.(1978). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4,181-201.
    Skemp,R.(1987). Psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Smith,M.U., & Good,R.(1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: Successful and unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,9, 895-912.
    Sternberg,R.J.(1985). All's well that ends well, but it's a sad tale that begins at the end: A reply to Glaser. American Psychologist,40, 571-573.
    Suchman,J.R.(1960). Inquiry training in the elementary school. Science Teacher,27, 42-47.
    Suchman,J.R.(1966). Inquiry development program in physical science. Chicago:Science Research Associates.
    Sweller,J., Mawer,R.F., & Ward,M.R.(1983). Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 639-661.
    Taitt,N.(1985). The effect of computer programming instruction on the problem solving ability of pre-service elementary teachers.(Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois,1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46,1908A.
    Thelen,H.A.(1972). Education and the human quest (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Treffinger,D.J., & Isaksen,S.G.(1992). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Center for Creative Learning, Inc.
    Washton,N.S.(1967). Teaching science creatively: a taxonomy of pupil questions. Science Education,51, 428-431.
    Washton,N.S.(1971). Creativity and science teaching. Science Education,55, 147-150.
    Watkins,B.T.(1992). Teaching students to think like scientists: Software enables experiments to be conducted that would be impossible in a laboratory. The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 25.
    Wertheimer,M.(1945) Productive Thinking. New York: Harper and Row, p.123.
    Wickelgren,W.A.(1974). How to solve problems. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, PP10-15.
    Williams,F.E.(1980). Creativity Assessment Packet(CAP): Manual. Buffalo, NY:D.O.K. Pub.
    Witkin,H.A., Moore,C.A., Goodenough,D.R., & Cox,P.W.(1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research,47, 1-64.
    Wolfe,A.B.(1924). Functional economics. In R.G. Tugwell (Eds.), The trend of economics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.,p.450.
    Wong,B.Y.L.(1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research,55, 227-239.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE