研究生: |
鄭羽辰 Cheng, Yu-Chen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以中文為母語的兒童頻率副詞詮釋之實證研究 An Empirical Study of Children’s Interpretations of Frequency Adverbs in Mandarin |
指導教授: |
陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
英語學系 Department of English |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 129 |
中文關鍵詞: | 頻率副詞 、第一語言習得 、理解 、中文 |
英文關鍵詞: | frequency adverbs, first language acquisition, interpretations, Mandarin Chinese |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202935 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:280 下載:69 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討以中文為母語之兒童頻率副詞詮釋的發展。本研究主要包含兩階段理解測驗:第一階段為辨認與排序測驗,可得知兒童對於頻率副詞的理解差異;第二階段為接受度測驗,可觀察兒童對於頻率副詞修飾動詞事件種類的接受程度是否有別,語境效應亦融入此階段測驗中。兩階段測驗皆探討年齡效應。研究對象包含實驗組的八十位兒童,依其就讀年級分為四組:幼兒園大班、小學二年級、四年級、六年級,每組各二十位,以及對照組的成人二十位。
研究結果顯示,頻率副詞之習得隨著年齡增長,理解能力逐漸與成人趨向一致。典型頻率副詞的語意較非典型頻率副詞模糊,因此兒童較難理解典型頻率副詞,六年級兒童亦尚未具備成人母語者理解典型頻率副詞的能力,但四年級兒童已可正確理解非典型頻率副詞。關於頻率副詞用於修飾的動詞事件方面,除了大班兒童外,其他組兒童皆對於頻率副詞修飾有界動詞事件的接受度遠高於頻率副詞修飾無界動詞。而且,四年級、六年級兒童及成人組對於頻率副詞修飾有界動詞事件的次類型有相似的接受度。由於四年級兒童已具備理解非典型頻率副詞意思的能力,亦能依頻率副詞能修飾的事件區分出有界與無界動詞事件,對於有界動詞的各項次分類,亦皆能接受其被頻率副詞修飾,因此,四年級是習得中文頻率副詞的關鍵期。最後,語境效應在本研究呈現負面效果,受試者在提供語境的試題中,對句子的接受度普遍降低。
The present empirical study aims at investigating children’s interpretations of Chinese frequency adverbs. Two phases were designed to elicit the child subjects’ interpretations. In Phase 1, the children’s interpretations of frequency adverbs were obtained from the identification and the ordering tasks. Similarly, in Phase 2, the children’s acceptability of various kinds of event types was investigated by the acceptability task. A comparison between a context-free task and a context-provided task was also explored in this phase. Age differences were examined in the both phases. A total of eighty children studying in an elementary school in New Taipei City were recruited and further divided into four experimental groups according to their grades (i.e., the kindergartners, Grades 2, 4 and 6). Moreover, twenty adults were recruited as the control group.
The results indicated an age-related pattern in the acquisition of Chinese frequency adverbs. It was found that Grade 4 was able to interpret atypical frequency adverbs. However, even Grade 6 had not yet acquired adult-like interpretations of typical frequency adverbs. Therefore, typical frequency adverbs were more challenging for the subjects to interpret than atypical ones because typical frequency adverbs were vaguer in meaning than atypical ones. As for the events modified by frequency adverbs, it was found that telic events were more acceptable than atelic ones. All the groups, except for the kindergartners, accepted frequency adverbs when they were used to modify telic events in a higher degree than those used to modify atelic events. Moreover, the subtypes of telic events displayed a similar degree of acceptability when they were modified by frequency adverbs for the older children (Grades 4 and 6) and the control group but not for the younger children (the kindergartners and Grade 2). Because Grade 4 was able to interpret atypical frequency adverbs, differentiate telic from atelic events and accept frequency adverbs when they were used to modify the subtypes of telic events in a similar degree, it was concluded that Grade 4 was a critical period for the acquisition of Chinese frequency adverbs. Finally, it was found that contextual clues showed a negative effect on the interpretations of frequency adverbs. The subjects generally gave lower acceptability ratings to the context-provided task than the context-fee task.
Belke, E., Brysbaert, M., Meyer, A. S., & Ghyselinck, M. 2005. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96(2), B45-B54.
Beyth‐Marom, R. 1982. How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting, 1(3), 257-269.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conard, S., & Finegan, F. 2000. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 558-559.
Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, S. F., & Krems, J. F. 2012. Sometimes, often, and always: Exploring the vague meanings of frequency expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 144-157.
Busby J., & Suddendorf, T. 2005. Recalling yesterday and predicting tomorrow. Cognitive Development, 20(3), 362-372.
Cacciari, C., & Levorato, M. C. 1989. How children understand idioms in discourse. Journal of Child Language, 16(02), 387-405.
Chang, Yi-Sheng. 2003. “Fu + shi” de lishi yanhua han gongshi bianyi— jianlun xiandai hanyu “fu + shi” de biaoda gongyong han fenbu fanwei [The diachronic evolution and synchronic variation of “Fu + shi”]. Linguistic Sciences, 3, 34-39.
Chen, I-Ching. 2003. Xiandai Hanyu Dongci Houzhi Chengfen Zhi Yuyi Yiyi Yu Jiaoxue Paixu [Syntax and Semantics of Modern Chinese postverbal elements and the pedagogical sequences] MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Clark, E. V. 1971. On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 266-275.
Clark, E. V. 1973. What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York Academic Press, 1973, 65-110. (a)
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. 1977. Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Coates, J. 1988. The acquisition of the meanings of modality in children aged eight and twelve. Journal of Child Language, 15(02), 425-434.
Cohen, J. & Hansel, C. E. M. 1956. Risk and Gambling. London: Longman.
Donaldson, M., & Balfour, G. 1968. Less is more: A study of language comprehension in children. British Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 461-471.
Donaldson, M., & Wales, R. J. 1970. On the acquisition of some relational terms. Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: Wiley, 235-268.
Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. 2004. N400-like semantic incongruity effect in 19-month-olds: Processing known words in picture contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1465-1477.
Gardner, Howard. 1999. Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic books.
Gardner, Howard. 2011. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
Gardner. 1983. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basics.
Garey, H. B. 1957. Verbal aspect in French. Language, 33(2), 91-110.
Ho, Hsin-Chang. 2008. Second Language Acquisition of English Telicity-related Constructions. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua, 74(2-3), 101-139.
Hoff, Erika. 2010. Context effects on young children’s language use: The influence of conversational setting and partner. First Language, 30.3-4: 461-472.
Hoffner, C., Cantor, J., & Badzinski, D. M. 1990. Children's understanding of adverbs denoting degree of likelihood. Journal of Child Language, 17(1), 217-231.
Hsieh, Meng-Hsuan. 2008. L1 Acquisition of Metaphorical Expression: A Case Study of ‘si’ in Mandarin Chinese. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Hu, Zhuang-Lin, Zhu, Yong-Sheng, & Zhang, De-Lu. 1989. Xitong Gongneng Yufa Gailun. [Introduction to Systematic Grammar]. Zhangsha: Hunan Education Publishing House.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Wǒ pǎo de kuài and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 64:274-311.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1992. Complex predicates in control. Control and grammar ed. by Richard K. Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Uptal Lahiri, and James Higginbotham, 109-147. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Huang, Rong, & Huang, Chun-Lin. 2011. A study on children aged 1-5’s acquisition of frequency adverbs. Journal of Shangqiu Vocational and Technical College, 10(1): 77-78.
Jaxontov, Sergej Je. 1988. Resultative in Chinese. Typology of resultative constructions, ed. by Vladimir P. Nedjajov, 63-85. Amsterdam; Philadelphia; John Benjamins.
Kayne, Richard. S. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht, Netherlands; Cinnaminson, USA: Foris Publications.
Kayne, Richard. S. 1985. Principles of particle constructions. Grammatical Representation, ed. by Jacqeline Guernon, Hans-Georg Obenauer, and Jen-Yves Pollock, 101-140. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications.
Kuczaj, Stan A. 1975. On the acquisition of a semantic system. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(4), 340-58.
Kuczaj, Stan A. 1982. Acquisition of word meaning in the context of the development of the semantic system. In Verbal processes in children (pp. 95-123). Springer New York.
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson. 1982. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Taipei: Crane.
Li, Ya-Fei. 1990. On VV compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(2), 177-207.
Li, Yan. 2010. The Research of Modern Chinese Frequency Adverbs and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language. MA thesis, Inner Mongolia Normal University.
Lichtenstein, S., & Newman, J. R. 1967. Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Science, 9(10), 563-564.
Lin, Chien-Jer. Charles. 2004. Aspect is result: Mandarin resultative constructions and aspect incorporation. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Linguistics (WECOL-2003) ed. by Benjamin V. Tucker, 437-464. Fresno: California State University Press.
Liu, Yue-Hua, Pan, Wen-Yu, & Gu, Wei. 1983. Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa. [Practical Grammar in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Language & Culture Press.
Looby, R. 1939. Understandings Children Derive from Their Reading. The Elementary English Review, 16(2), 58-62.
Nippold, Marilyn A. 2000. Language development during the adolescent years: Aspects of pragmatics, syntax, and semantics. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(2), 15-28.
Nippold, Marilyn A. 2004. Research on later language development. In Berman, 1-8.
Palermo, D. S. 1973. More about less: A study of language comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(2), 211-221.
Piaget, Jean. 1964. Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3), 176-186.
Piaget, Jean. & Inhelder, Bärbel. 1975. The origin of the idea of chance in children. New York: Norton.
Piao, Jin-Hai. 2011. Discussion of Chinese frequent adverbs. Journal of Jixi University, 11(2): 138-140.
Qian, David. D. (1996). ESL Vocabulary Acquisition: Contextualization and Decontextualization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 120-42.
R Core Team 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Schatz, Elinore Kress, & Baldwin, R. Scott. 1986. Context clues are unreliable predictors of word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 439-453.
Shen, Jia-Xuan. 1995. Youjie yu wejie. [The boundness and the Unboundness]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 5, 367-380.
Shi, Jin-Sheng. 2002. Xiandai Hanyu Fuci De Yuyi Gongneng Yanjiu. [The Study of Semantic Functions of Modern Chinese Adverbs]. Doctoral dissertation, Nankai University.
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. Second edition. Dordrecht; Boston London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Snyder, William. 1995. A neo-Davidsonian approach to resultatives, particles and datives. Proceeding of the 25th Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 25 (NELS-25) Volume I, ed. by Jill N. Beckman, 457-471. Amherst, Mass.: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA), University of Massachusetts.
Stanovich, K. E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading research quarterly, 360-407.
Tai, James H-Y. 1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, Chicago Linguistic Society, 20, 289-296.
Tai, James H-Y. 2003. Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 301-316.
Teng, Shou-hsin. 1977. A grammar of verb-particles in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5:1-25.
Townsend, D. J. 1974. Children’s comprehension of comparative forms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18(2), 293-303.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 143-160.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Walqui, Aida. 2000. Contextual Factors in Second Language Acquisition. ERIC Digest.
Wu, Chun-Xiang & Ding, Shu-Juan. 2005. A study of levels and meaning about Chinese frequency adverbs. Chinese Language Learning, 6, 20-25.
Wu, Chun-Xiang. 2006. Xiandai Hanyu Shiliang Fanchou Yanjiu. [The Study of the Scope of Time in Modern Chinese]. Doctoral dissertation, Shanghai Normal University.
Xiao, Richard & Tony McEnery. 2004. Aspect in Mandarin Chinese. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Xing, Gong-Wan & Ma, Qing-Zhu. 1992. Xiandai Hanyu Jiaocheng. [Teaching Programs of Modern Chinese.] Tianjing: Nankai University.
Zhang, Niina. 2001. The structures of depictive and resultative constructions in Chinese. ZAS papers in Linguistics, 22(2001), 191-221.
Zhang, Yi-Sheng. 2000. Xiandai Hanyu Fuci Yanjiu. [The Study of Modern Chinese Adverbs]. Shanghai: Academia Press.
Zhao, Yuan-Ren. 1979. Hanyu Kouyu Yufa. [The grammar of Spoken Mandarin]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Zheng, Dai-Guo. 2011. Pindu Fuci De Yongfa. [The Usage of Frequency Adverbs]. Yu shuwai Xuexi: Ba Nianji, (9), 36-38.
Zhou, Xiao-Bing. 1999. Pindu fuci de hualei yu shiyong guize/ [Classification and using rules of frequency adverbs]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (4), 116-119.
Zhu, De-Xi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi. [The Handout of Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Zou, Hai-Qing. 2006. The scope and the type of frequency adverbs. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3(6), 20-25.
Zou, Hai-Qing. 2007. Pinlu Fuci De Lianxing Tezheng Dui Wujie Weici De Xuanze Zhiyue. [Frequency Adverbs’ Feature of Diffuseness to the Selective Restriction on Unbounded Predicates]. Overseas Chinese Education, 2007(3), 31-35.