本研究旨在探討B. Reimer「美感教育」與D. J. Elliott「實踐哲學」立論之緣起背景、發展與立論之核心概念，以及兩種哲學派典間的思辯與批判，從中分析「美感教育」與「實踐哲學」立論之價值性與差異性，因此，音樂教育哲學文獻是本論文資料研究之主要來源，目的在探究音樂教育的本質與價值；此外，Reimer與Elliott將音樂教育哲學所探討的範圍涉獵到「權力」、「意識型態」、「社會正義」等議題，所以批判教育學文獻是本論文中另一個輔助資源，作為提供與Reimer及Elliott的立論之間關於「政治」議題的對話，最後就台灣未來學校音樂教育的實踐方向提出具體建議。本研究採取理論分析法，針對研究議題作深入剖析，依研究目的與研究結果發現，將本研究獲得結論分述如下：
一、「美感教育」哲學在1970年代是全盛期，Reimer「美感教育」思想之來源包括： Langer, Meyer, Mursell, Broudy, Leonhard & House, Schwadron等人，Reimer提出「美感教育」之後，北美音樂教育界中認為音樂對人文素養與生活品質有很大的影響；1980年代中期，批判「美感教育」哲學最為激烈的為Elliott，Elliott「實踐哲學」思想之來源包括：Sparshott, Dennett, Csikszentmihalyi等人，Elliott提出「實踐哲學」之後，北美音樂教育界更加重視教育中變動的脈絡議題。
二、Reimer「美感教育」的立論可以分成五個核心概念，包括「協同合作」的哲學、「美感的體驗」、「美感認知」、「音樂智能理論」、「課程模式」；Elliott「實踐哲學」的立論可以分成五個核心概念，包括「整合性的」與「反省性的」哲學、「音樂的體驗」、「音樂認知」、情境中的「音樂製作」與「音樂聆聽」、「課程理論」。兩人的論述足以提供音樂教育者從事教學實踐時的參考。
三、「美感教育」與「實踐哲學」兩個派典經過相互思辯之後，研究者發現它們各有其價值性，可並行不悖。音樂教育實踐時需兼具「美感教育」與「實踐哲學」的思維，才足以反映社會多元文化的價值觀，進而達到整合性的學校音樂教育目標。
四、本研究從音樂教育實務的三個基本議題去比較兩人之立論：（一）我們為何要教導音樂：Reimer主張音樂教育主要在於從聆聽中去加深人們情感生活的體驗；Elliott主張動態的多元音樂課程可以使學生達到「自我實現」的價值。（二）我們需要教導什麼音樂：Reimer主張要教導音樂的內涵要素，也就是要教導「內在認知」；Elliott主張「音樂製作」與「音樂聆賞」的教學應包含多面向的層面。（三）我們應該如何教導音樂：Reimer主張普通音樂課程計畫與特殊音樂教育課程計畫要並重以及實行；Elliott主張要反思性地去實行「音樂課程即是實驗課程」。
五、Reimer「美感教育」與Elliott「實踐哲學」的立論與批判教育學論述，對於台灣未來學校音樂教育實踐的重要蘊義為：（一）音樂教育主要在於從聆聽中去加深人們情感生活的體驗，這需要一種「內在認知」的深化教學；在動態的多元音樂課程中，教師亦應運用各種「音樂挑戰」方式以激發學生多元的「音樂素養」；（二）音樂內涵須以非語言的情感投注超越語言的「概念化教學」；「音樂製作」與「音樂聆聽」的教學應包含多面向的層面；（三）音樂教師除了規劃普通音樂教育課程，也要注重對音樂有較高層級學生認知的需求；因此，音樂教師的專業素養要具有反思性，才能幫助學生提昇「音樂素養」的層級。（四）音樂教師需對傳統音樂教育的實施提出質疑與反省；（五）音樂教師需以多元的「星叢式」（constellation）論述方式解說音樂作品；（六）音樂文化必須自律，不能被「文化工業」（cultural industry）所宰制；（七）個人應經由批判的反向思考能力以建立對音樂教育的價值觀。
關鍵字：B. Reimer、D. J. Elliott、美感教育、實踐哲學、音樂教育哲學、批判教育學

The research of B. Reimer’s“aesthetic education”and D. J. Elliott’s“praxial philosophy”argumentation

ABSTRACT

This study intended to inquire about the background, development, core concept in B. Reimer’s“aesthetic education” and D. J. Elliott’s“praxial philosophy” argumentation and probe into the debate between the two music education paradigms. So, music education philosophy literature is the main resource of the essay. In addition, Reimer and Elliott also discussed the topic of“power”,“ideology”, and“social justice”; therefore, the researcher inquired about the critical pedagogy literature to dialogize with the argumentation of Reimer’s and Elliott’s about the topic of “politics”. Finally, according to those analyses above, the researcher proposed some suggestions about the direction of future music education practice in Taiwan.
The conclusion of this study included five aspects : 1) “aesthetic education”was flourishing in 1970, the original figures of “aesthetic education”included Langer, Meyer, Mursell, Broudy, Leonhard & House, and Schwadron. After Reimer proposed “aesthetic education”, the music education domain in North America thought that music had important effect on humanistic literacy and life quality of people. In 1980s, Elliott criticized “aesthetic education”severely, and then he proposed“praxial philosophy”. The original figures of “praxial philosophy”included Sparshott, Dennett, and Csikszentmihalyi. After Elliott proposed “praxial philosophy”, the music education domain in North America much more emphasized on the context topic in education than before. 2) Reimer’s “aesthetic education”argumentation included five core concepts: synergic philosophy, aesthetic experience, aesthetic cognition, musical intelligence theory, and curriculum model; Elliott’s “praxial philosophy”argumentation included five core concepts: comprehensive and reflective philosophy, musical experience, musical cognition, musical making and musical listening in context, curriculum theory. 3) the researcher found that Reimer’s“aesthetic education”and Elliott’s “praxial philosophy”argumentation both had values, the two music education paradigms could work together to achieve the comprehensive goals of school music education. 4) three differences between the argumentation of Reimer’s and Elliott’s are: a) why do we teach music: Reimer proposed that music education must deepen the feel experience of people. Elliott proposed that dynamic and multiple music curriculum could help students to achieve the value of self-actualization. b) what music do we teach: Reimer proposed that teachers must teach the intrinsic elements of music. Elliott proposed that the instruction of “music making”and “music listening”must include multidimensional aspects. c) how do we teach music: Reimer proposed that music educators must equally stress general music curriculum plan and specialized music education plan. Elliott proposed that music educators must reflectively implement“music curriculum as practicum”. 5) Reimer’s “aesthetic education”, Elliott’s “praxial philosophy”argumentation, and the discourse of critical pedagogy had some implications for school music education practice in Taiwan: a) if music educators wanted to deepen the feel experience of people, they needed the instruction of “knowing within”. In a dynamic and multiple music curriculum, music educators must make use of“musical challenge”to arouse the multiple“musicianship”of all students. b) if music educators wanted to teach the intrinsic elements of music, they must notice that the nonverbal feeling engagement must transcend the verbal“conceptual teaching”. c) in addition to planning general music education curriculum, music educators must notice the cognitive need of some students who had advanced music literacy. So, music educators must reflectively possess professional musicianship and educatorship, then they could have the ability to help students to raise their musicianship level. d) music educators must propose query and reflection to traditional music education practice. e) music educators must make use of the discourse of multiple“constellation”to explain the musical works. f) musical culture couldn’t be controlled by “cultural industry”. g) music educators must become a reflective practitioner through critical thought.
Keywords: B. Reimer, D. J. Elliott, aesthetic education, praxial philosophy, philosophy of music education, critical pedagogy

壹、中文部分
方銘健（1997）。藝術、音樂情感與意義。台北：全音樂譜。
方永泉（1999）。教師作為一種轉化的知識份子─教育史角度的考察。載於國立暨南國際大學學報，3(1)，（頁99-126）。
王麗琪（2003）。從美學價值觀探究中等學校音樂教師應具備之專業素養及認知—以台中縣市音樂教師為例。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，092NTNU0248009。
王恩芳（2007）。貝內特‧雷默音樂教育哲學專書之探究。台北市立教育大學音樂藝術研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，096TMTC5248002。
朱 剛（1999）。薩伊德。臺北：生智。
伍鴻沂（2003）。藝術教學教學與評鑑—音樂教學研究。載於「藝術與人文」學習領域基礎研習手冊（頁8-27）。教育部。
宋文里（2006）。「批判教育學」的問題陳顯。載於李錦旭、王慧蘭（主編），批判教育學：臺灣的探索。台北：心理。
李雄揮（1997）。教育哲學。台北：師大書苑。
何育真（2003）。從國民小學「藝術與人文」領域的實施現況探討未來藝術教育的發展。載於國立新竹師範學院（主編），「藝術與人文」領域教學理論與實務研討會（頁201-218）。新竹：國立新竹師範學院。
何育真（2004a）。「藝術與人文」領域課程統整設計之哲學探究—以杜威之試驗主義為例（頁1431-1464）。發表於國立屏東師範學院主辦之「九十三學年度教育學術研討會」。屏東：國立屏東師範學院。
何育真（2004b）。以「指涉主義」之美學觀點分析國小「藝術與人文」領域康軒版本之音樂欣賞教學策略。載於台北市立師範學院2004年音樂教育學術研討會系列一—音樂教育研究的時代趨勢與派典研究（頁35-38）。台北：台北市立師範學院。
何育真（2004c）。探討阿多諾之批判美學思想及其對藝術教育的啟示。載於國立新竹師範學院主辦之「2004年音樂教育社會學學術研討會」（頁7-8）。新竹：國立新竹師範學院。
何育真（2007. 7. 25）。台灣「藝術與人文」教育未來之發展趨勢—以Reimer之「MEAE」理論為基礎。（The future development trend of“Arts and Humanities”education in Taiwan-Based on the MEAE theory of Reimer ）。泰國：第六屆亞太音樂教育研討會。
李醒塵（2000）。西方美學史教程。台北：淑馨。
林小玉（1997）。音樂欣賞—衍生教學理念。載於基隆市八十五學年度國民小學音樂科教材教法研習活動手冊（頁1-46）。基隆市政府教育局。
林炎旦、裘尚芬、朱美玲、李賢輝（2003）。我國藝術教育現況與發展策略。台北：國立台北師範學院（國立台灣藝術教育館委託研究）。
林逢棋（2006）。〈藝術的何種知識最有價值？〉評述。中等教育，57（4），146-154。
邱天助（1998）。布爾迪厄文化再製理論。台北：桂冠。
周珮儀（1999）。從社會批判到後現代—季胡課程理論之研究。台北：師大書苑。
姚世澤（1999）。從現代音樂教育哲學觀—論「藝術與人文」的教改理念。載於「藝術與人文」之全人教育研討會論文集（頁79-94）。台北：國立台灣師範大學藝術學院。
姚世澤（2003）。現代音樂教育學新論。台北：師大書苑。
高宣揚（1991）。哈伯瑪斯論。台北：遠流。
孫芝君（1997）。日治時期台灣師範學校音樂教育之研究。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，085NTNU3248003。
張芳杰主編（1984）。牛津高級英漢雙解辭典。台北：東華。
張炫文（1999）。論21世紀台灣國民小學音樂教育的危機。載於「藝術與人文」之全人教育研討會論文集（頁47-66）。台北：國立台灣師範大學藝術學院。
張盈堃（2000）。教師作為轉化型知識份子的教育實踐。教育與社會研究，1，25-58。
張春興（2004）。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華書局。
張盈堃 郭瑞坤（2005.1.8-1.9）。批判教育學只是個名：關於翻譯政治的討論。載於去國．汶化．華文祭：2005年華文文化研究會議。台灣：國立新竹交通大學。
崔光宙（1992）。美感判斷發展研究。台北：師大書苑。
梁福鎮（2001）。審美教育學。台北：五南。
陳碧娟（1995）。台灣新音樂史：西式新音樂在日據時代的產生與發展。台北：樂韻。
陳瓊花（1999）。國民教育階段九年一貫視覺藝術課程之探討。載於「藝術與人文」之全人教育研討會論文集（頁127-154）。台北：國立台灣師範大學藝術學院。
陳照雄（1986）。當代美國人文主義教育思想。台北：五南。
陳木子（1998）。台灣藝術教育發展史。台北：寰宇。
陳伯璋（1988）。意識型態與教育。台北：師大書苑。
陳郁秀（1999）。台灣音樂教育回顧與前瞻。教師天地，100，28-37。
陳美如（2002）。當教師遇見課程評鑑：轉變與成長。師大學報，47(1)，17-38。
陳新轉（2003）。課程統整的理論與實務。2003年3月23日，取自http://vschool.scu.edu.tw/edu/newsp/p18/p1821.htm
莊明貞（2001）。當前台灣課程重建的可能性：一個批判教育學的觀點。國立台北師院學報，14，141-162。
教育部（1993）。國民小學課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1994）。國民中學課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1998）。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北：教育部。
教育部（2005）。藝術教育政策白皮書。台北：教育部。
郭禎祥（1990a）。現代藝術教育思潮與國內藝術教育研究之現況與展望（上）。藝術貴族，9，128-132。
郭禎祥（1990b）。現代藝術教育思潮與國內藝術教育研究之現況與展望（下）。藝術貴族，10，130-133。
郭榮瑞（2006）。藝術與人文學習領域素養指標的再商榷。國新新知，53（4）。
國教司（2005）。藝術與人文學習領域六年級、九年級基本素養指標解說手冊。台北：教育部國教司。
郭美女（2003）。藝術與人文學習領域各版本教科書內涵分析與討論。載於第1245期九年一貫課程深耕計畫種子教師研習資料（「藝術與人文」學習領域第一階段）（頁89-93）。台北：國立教育研究院籌備處。
曾淑惠（2004）。教育評鑑模式。台北：心理。
黃藿（1996）。理性、德行與幸福。台北：學生書局。
黃藿（2000）。亞里斯多德哲學中的教師圖像。2008年5月15日，取自http://140.122.68.249/~TIP/pdf/03.pdf
黃嘉雄（2000）。轉化社會結構的課程理論：課程社會學的觀點。台北：師大書苑。
黃庭康（2002）。葛蘭西：國家權力與文化霸權。載於蘇峰山（主編），意識、權力與教育－教育社會學理論導讀。嘉義：南華大學教社所。
黃華光、徐力源（2001）。一個未完成的政治思索：葛蘭西的《獄中雜記》。北京：社會科學文獻。
葉啟政、陳國祥(1985)。訪葉啟政教授─從文化觀點談知識份子。載於周陽山（主編），知識份子與中國。台北：時報。
葉自強（2005）。從美學觀點探討九年一貫藝術與人文學習領域之理念與實施。國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，093NTNU5248021。
葉文傑（2006）。音樂經驗本質之教育學觀點-技術與實踐智關係之詮釋性研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，095NCCU5331004。
劉沛（2004a）。美國學校音樂課程和教材的思想基礎及型態—教育改革中音樂課程和教材的國際比較研究。載於音樂教育的實踐與理論研究。上海：上海音樂。
劉沛（2004b）。音樂教育的文化、實踐和功能價質的觀點—音樂教育價值觀點的融合及多維度邏輯起點及價值建構。中國音樂，4。
劉信成（2000）。台灣政治民主化對小學社會科課程影響之研究。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，088NTPTC611002。
楊深坑（1999）。知識形式與比較教育。台北：揚智。
楊道鑌（2006）。艾略特的哲學。2008年3月1日，取自http://www.msu.edu/~yangtaob/Philosophy/Phi-Elliott.htm
楊欣怡（2007）。教育改革中教師之角色—一個批判教育學的觀點。網路社會學通訊期刊，60。嘉義：南華大學社會學研究所出版。國際標準期刊號ISSN：1609-2503。
張蕙慧（2002）。以音樂為核心之課程統整教學設計。國教世紀，200。
漢寶德（2001. 9. 21）。藝術教育改革方案的探討（國政研究報告）。中央日報，15版。
歐用生（2000）。課程改革。台北：師大書苑。
鄭方靖（2002）：當代四大音樂教學法之比較與運用。高雄：復文。
潘罡（1999. 4. 1）。藝文界質疑「國民教育九年一貫課程綱要」。中國時報，2版。
蔡佳珮（2007）。國中音樂教師教學信念與教學實踐之個案研究─以音樂欣賞活動為例。國立台北教育大學音樂研究所碩士論文。全國碩博士論文資訊網，096NTPTC247031。
賴美鈴（1997）。台灣音樂教育史研究。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告：NSC86-2415-H-003-003。
賴美鈴（2000）。戰後初期臺灣國民學校之音樂教育—以教科書的分析為中心。載於臺灣社會文化變遷學術研討會論文集（頁367-392）。
賴美鈴（2003a）。美國藝術教育政策總論。載於世界重要國家中小學藝術教育課程統整模式參考手冊（頁83-86）。台北：國立台灣藝術教育館。
賴美鈴（2003b）。台灣藝術教育政策總論。載於世界重要國家中小學藝術教育課程統整模式參考手冊（頁241-245）。台北：國立台灣藝術教育館。
謝孟穎（2001）。由課程知識社會學的角度評析文化對教育的支配性。載於財團法人國立台南師院校務發展文教基金會與台灣教育社會學學會主編，九年一貫課程與教育改革議題－教育社會學取向的分析（頁119-130）。高雄：復文。
蘇永明（2000）。九年一貫課程的哲學分析－以「實用能力」的概念為核心，載於財團法人國立台南師院校務發展文教基金會主編，九年一貫理論－從理論、政策到執行（頁3-19）。高雄：復文。
貳、中文翻譯部分
王麗雲（譯）（2002）。M. W . Apple.著。意識型態與課程。台北：桂冠。
徐恒醇（譯）（1987）。R. J. Shiller著。美育書簡。台北：丹青。
夏鎮平（譯）（2001）。M. Csikszentmihalyi著。創造性：發現與發明的心理學。上海：譯文。
陳慧珊（譯）（1997）。E. Hanslick著。論音樂美--音樂美學的修改芻議。台北：世界文物文化。
張洪島等（譯）（1994）。F. Liszt著。李斯特論白遼士與舒曼。台北：世界文物文化。
彭秉權（譯）(2005)。B. Kanpol原著。批判教育學的議題與趨勢。台北：麗文。
熊蕾（譯）（2003）。B. Reimer原著。音樂教育的哲學。北京：人民音樂。
簡成熙（譯）（1995）。G.. R. Knight原著。教育哲學導論。台北：五南。
謝苑玫（譯）（1994）。E. Frindly著。節奏與律動。高雄：復文。
參、西文部分
Abeles, H. F., Hoffer, C. R., ＆ Klotman, R. H. （1984）. Foundations of music education. 2nd ed. New York : Schirmer.
Abrahams, F. （2004）. The application of critical theory to a sixth grade general music class. Vision of research in music education, 5. Retrived August, 12, 2006, from http://musicweb.rutger.edu/vrme/.
Adorno, T. W.（1970）. Aesthetic theory. London, Boston : Melbourne and Henley.
Alperson, P. A.（1991）. What should one expect from a philosophy of music education? Journal of Aesthetic Eeducation, 25, 25-42.
Althusser, L. （1971）. Lenin and philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Althusser, L. （1972）. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Cosin, B.R. (Ed.). Education: structure and society. Haemondworth: Penguin.
Apple, M.W. & Weis, L. （1983）. Ideology and Practice in Schooling: A political and Conceptual Introduction. In Apple, M.W. & Weis, L. (Eds), Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Aristotle（1960）. Posterior analytics, topic(Trednnick, H. &Forster, E. S. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 601, 145A12-18.
Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. （1985）. Education under Sieg: The conservative, liberal, and radical debate over schooling. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey.
Barrett, M. （2002）. Toward a “situated”view of the aesthetic in music education. Journal of Aesthetic Eeducation, 36(3), 67-77.
Blacking, J.（1973）. How Musical is Man? Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Boardman, E. (1996）. Toward a theory of music instruction: A generative approach to music learning.
Boothe, R. L. （1993）. The philosophy of aesthetic education as enhanced by the interdisciplinary fine arts in the Silver Burdett music series, 1950-1975 . Ohio University. Ph.D.（DAI-A 55/08, p. 2198, Feb 1995）（AAT 9500752）
Bourdieu, P. （1969）. Intellectual field and creative project. Social Science Information, 8(2) , 89-119.
Bourdieu, P. （1977）. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Karabel, J. & Halsey, A. H. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education. Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. （1977）. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowman, M. W.（1993）. The problem of aesthetics and multiculturalism in music education. Canadian Music Educator, 34(5), 23-30.
Bowman, M. W. （1998）. Philosophical perspectives on music. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowman, M. W. （2005）. The limits and grounds of musical praxialism. In Elliott, D. J. (Eds.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. N.Y. Oxford University Press.
Coates, P.（1983）. Alternatives to the aesthetic rationale for music education. Music Education Journal, 69, 31-32.
Colwell, R.（1986）. Music and aesthetic education: A collegial relationship. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20, 12-25.
Colwell R. J.（1991）. Basic concepts in music education, II. USA: University Press of Colorado.
Crook, E., Reimer, B., & Walker, D. S.（1974）. Silver Burdett Music. Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett.
Darder, A., Baltodano, M. & Torres, R. （2003）. Critical pedagogy: An introduction, In Darder, A., Baltodano, M. & Torres, R. (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader. New York: Routledge Falmer .
Dewey, J.（1916）. Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Dewey, J.（1934）. Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.
Elliott, D. J.（1986）. Jazz education as aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20, 25-32.
Elliott, D. J. （1987）. Structure and feeling in jazz: Rethinking philosophy foundations. Bulletin of The Council for Research in Music Education, 95, 13-38.
Elliott, D. J. （1990）. Music as culture: Toward a multicultural concept of arts education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 24,(1), 21-30.
Elliott, D. J.（1991a）. Music as knowledge. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 25 (3), 21-40.
Elliott, D. J.（1991b）. Music education as aesthetic education: A critical inquiry. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 2, 48-66.
Elliott, D. J.（1993）. Music, education and schooling. In McCarthy, M. (Ed.), Wind of change: A colloquium in music education with Charles and D. J. Elliot,. New York: ACA Books.
Elliott, D. J. （1994）. Rethinking music: First steps to a new philosophy of music education. International Journal of Music Education, 24, 9-20.
Elliott, D. J. （1995）. Music matters : A new philosophy of music education. New York: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, D. J. （1998）. The curriculum experiment: Meeting the challenge of social change. New York: Open University Press.
Elliott, D. J.（2000）. Music and affect: The praxial view. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 8(79), 23-35.
Elliott, D. J. （2001）. Modernity, postmodernity and music education. Research Studies in Music Education, 17, 10-21.
Elliott, D. J. （2005）. Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. N.Y. Oxford University Press.
Elliott, D. J. （2007a）. Socializing” music education. action. Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 6(4), 60-95.
Elliott, D. J.（2007b）. Music for citizenship: A commentary on Paul Woodford’s democracy and music education: Liberalism, ethics, and the politics of practice. Forthcoming in Action. Criticism and Theory for Music Education, 6(3), 22-31.
Fontana, B. （1993）. Hegemony and power. MN：The University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977. (edited by Gordon, C). New York: Pantheon Books.
Freire, P.（1970）. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, London: Continuum.
Frindly, E. （1971）. Rhythm and movement t: Applications of Dalcroze eurhythmics. Miami, Florida: Summy - Birchard.
Gardner, H. （1989）. To open minds: Chinese clues to the dilemma of contemporary education. New York: Basic Books.
Geahigan, G. （1992）. The arts in education: A historical perspective. In Reimer, B. & Smith, R. A.（Eds.）, Nineth-first rearbook of the national society for the study of education. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE).
Giroux, H. A. （1983a）. Theories of reproduction and resistancein the new sociology of education：A critical analysis. Harvard Education Review , 53,(3), 257-293.
Giroux, H. A. （1983b）. Theory as resistance. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Giroux, H. A. （1985）. Teachers as transformative intellectuals. Social Education, 49(5), 376-79.
Giroux, H. A. （1988）. Teacher as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. South Hadlet, MA: Begin & Garvey.
Giroux.H.A. （1992）. Border crossing：Cultural workers and the culture. London & New York：Routledge
Goble, J. S. （2003）. Perspectives on practice: A pragmatic comparison of the praxial philosophys of David Elliott and Thomas Regelski. Philosophy of Music Education Reivew, 11(1), 23-44.
Gramsci, A. （1971）. Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Haack, P. （1997）. Toward a social / functional music education. In Rideout, R. (Ed.), The sociology of music education, 85-94. Norman: University of Oklahoma School of Music.
Hall, S. （1982）.The rediscover of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In G. Michael, et al.(Eds.), Culture, society and the media, 56-90. London: Methuen.
Hansen, F. （2003）. A philosophy of music education: Advancing the vision. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 11(2), 200-203. ProQuest Education Journals.
Hargreaves, D. J. & North, A. C.（1997）. The social psychology of music. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heneghan, J, F. （2004）. Ireland's music education national debate: Rationalization, reconciliation, contextuality and applicability of global philosophies in conflict. University of Pretoria (South Africa). Ph. D.（DAI-A 66/03, Sep 2005）（AAT 0807960）.
Hooks, b. （1994）. Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
Jorgensen, E. R. （1996）. The artist and the pedagogy of hope. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 36-50.
Jorgensen, E. R. （1997）. In search of music education. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Jorgensen, E. R. （2002）. The aims of music education: A preliminary excursion. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36(1), 31-49.
Jorgensen, E. R. （2005）. Four philosophical models of the relation between theory and practice. Philososphy of Music Education Review,13(1),21-36.
Jorgensen, E. R. （2006）. Reflection on futures for music education philosophy. Philosophy of Music Education Reiview, 14(1), 15-23.
Kivy, P. （1990）. Philosophical reflections on the purely musical experience. Ithaca, N. Y., & London: Cornell University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. （1970）. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Koopman, C. （1998）. Music education: Aesthetic or praxial? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 32(3), 1-17. ProQuest Education Journals.
Leonhard, C. &. House. （1959）. Foundations and principles of music education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leonhard, C. （1985）. A realistic rationale for teaching music. Reston, VA: MENC.
Levi, A. W. & Smith, R. A. （1991）. Art education: A critical necessity. University of Illinois Press.
Lincoln, Y. S. （1992）. Curriculum studies and the tradition of inquiry: The humanistic tradition. In Jackson, P. W. (Ed), Handbook of research on curriculum. NY: American Educational Research Association.
Livingstone, D. W. （1987）. Critical pedagogy and cultural power.. In Hadley, S (Ed.). MA: Bergin & Garvey.
Maattanen, P. & Westerlund, H. （1999）. Tradition, practice, and musical meaning. A pragmatist approach to music education. In Nielsen, F. V. Brandström, S. Jorgensen , H. & Olsson , B. (Eds.), Nordic research on music pedagogy, Yearbook 3, 33-38.
Maattanen, P.（2000）. A pragmatist notion of work of art. Retrived March, 15, 2008, from http://www.members.aol./jtgates/maydaygroup/penttiAWE.html.
Maattanen, P. & Westerlund, H. （2001）. Travel agency of music meanings? Discussion on music and context in Keith Swanwick’s interculturalism. British Journal of Music Education18(3), 261-274.
Maattanen, P. （2003）. Aesthetic experience and music education. Philosophy of Music Education review, 11(1),63-70.
Mark, M. L. （1982）. The evolution of music education philosophy from utilitarian to aesthetic. Journal of Research on Music Education, 30(1) , 16-21.
Mark, M. L. （1988）. Aesthetics and utility reconciled: The importance to society of education in music. In Gates, J. T. (Ed.), Music education in the United States: Contemporary issues. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press, 85-110.
Mark, L. M. （1996）. Contemporary music education(3rd ed.). New York: Schirmer Books.
Mary, R. C. （2003）. A philosophically based praxis for teaching symphonic music literature. University of the Pacific. Ed. D.（DAI-A 64/04, p. 1204, Oct 2003） （AAT 3088099）
McCarthy, M. & Goble, J. S. （2002）. Music education philosophy: Changing times. Music Educators Journal ,89,19-26.
McMarthy, M. & Goble, J. S. （2005）. The praxial philosophy in historical perspective. In Elliott, D. J.(Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. New York: Oxford University Press.
McLaren, P., & Kincheloe, J. （1998）. Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Dezin, N. K. & Lncoln , Y. S. (Eds. ), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
McMillan, J. H. , & Schumacher, S. （1989）. Research in education: A conceptual introduction. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
MENC: The National Association for Music Education. （1994）. National Standards for Arts Education:What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Resta, VA: Author.
Panaiotidi, E.（2005）. The nature of paradigms and paradigm shift in music education. Philosophy of Music EducationReivew,13(1), 71-89.
Peters, G. D.& Miller, R. （1982）. Music teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University.
Pinar, W.F., Reynolds, W.M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P.M. （1995）. Understanding curriculum. NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Rainbow, E. L. & Froehlich, H. C. （1987）. Research in music education. New York: Schirmer Books.
Reid, L. A. （1980）. Meaning in the arts. In Ross, M（Ed.）, The arts and personal growth. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Reimer, B. （1970）. A philosophy of music education. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reimer, B. （1972）. Putting aesthetic education to work. Music Educators Journal, 59, 21-30.
Reimer, B. （1977）. Philosophical monism in music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 51, 8-15.
Reimer, B. （1989a）. A philosophy of music education（2nd ed.）. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reimer, B. （1989b）. Music education and aesthetic education: past and present. Music Eeducators Journal, 75, 22-28.
Reimer, B. （1989c）. Music education and aesthetic education: Toward the future. Music Educators Journal, 75, 26-32.
Reimer, B., & Smith, R. A. （1992）. The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education. The University of Chicago Press.
Reimer, B. ＆ Wright J. E. （1992）. On the nature of musical experience. USA:University Press of Colorado.
Reimer, B. （1993）. Music education in our multimusical culture. Music Educators Journal, 79(7), 21-26.
Reimer, B. （1996）. David Elliott’s “new” philosophy of music education: Music for performers Only. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 128, 22-31.
Reimer, B. （2000）. Why do humans value musics? In C. K. Madsen（Ed.）,. Vision 2020. Reston, VA:MENC.
Reimer, B. （2002）. Performing with understanding: The challenge of the national standards for music education. USA: MENC.
Reimer, B. （2003）. A philosophy of music education: Advancing the vision(3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Reimer, B. （2004）. New brain research on emotion and feeling: Dramatic implications for music education. Arts Education Policy Eeview, 106(2), 21-27.
Reimer, B.（2004. 12. 4）. Music education for cultural empowerment. 載於國立台灣師範大學音樂系主辦音樂教育國際學術研討會，「音樂教育的趨勢與展望」專題演講，為文化增能的音樂教育。台北：國立台灣師範大學音樂學系、中華民國音樂教育學會。
Regelski, T. （1978a）. Principles and problems of music education. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Regelski, T. （1978b）. Art education and brain research. Reston, Virginia: Music Educators National Conference, 8.
Regelski, T. （1981）. Teaching general music: Action learning for middle and secondary schools. New York: Schirmer Books
Regelski, T. （1994）. Taking the‘art’of music for granted: A critical sociology of the aesthetic philosophy of music. In Critical reflections on music education: Proceedings of the second international symposium on the philosophy of music education, 12-16.
Regelski, T. （1996）. Prolegomenon to a praxial philosophy of music and music education. The Finnish Journal of Music Education,1,(1), 23-38.
Regelski, T. （1997）. Action learning: Curriculum and instruction as and for praxis. In McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Music education as praxis: Reflection on music-making as human action. College Park, Maryland: University of Maryland.
Regelski, T. （1998a）. Schoolings for musical praxis. Canadian Music Educator, 40(1), 25-30.
Regelski, T. （1998b）. The Aristotelian bases of praxis for music and music education as praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 6(1), 18-26.
Regelski, T. （2002）. On “methodolaty”and music teaching as “critical”and reflective praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 10(2), 102-124.
Regelski, T. （2005）. Curriculum implications of aesthetics versus praxial philosophy. In Elliott, D. J.（Ed.）, Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues. N.Y. Oxford University Press.
Saukko, P. （2003）. Doing research in cultural studies: An introduction to classical and new methodological approaches. London: Sage.
Salinas-Stauffer, M. （1997）. Musical worlds and works: The philosophy of Nicholas Wolterstorff and its implications for music education. Michigan State University. Ph.D.（DAI-A 59/01, p. 118, Jul 1998）（AAT 9822518）
Schwadron, A. （1967）. Aesthetic: Dimensions for music education. Washington, D.C. : Music Educators National Conference.
Shepherd, J. & Wicke, P. （1997）. Musical and cultural theory. Cambridge, England: Policy Press.
Shor, I. （1986）. Culture wars: School and society in the conservative restoration, 1969-1984. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sleeter, C. E. & Mclaren, P. （1995）. Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference. New York: SUNY.
Sloboda, J. A. （1985）. The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Small, C.（1977）. Music, society, education. London: Calder.
Smith, R. A. （1989）. The sense of art : A study in aesthetic education. New York: Routledge.
Smith, R. A. （2000）. Policymaking for the future: Three critical issues. Arts Education Policy Review, 102( 2), 21-22.
Smith, R. A. （2003a）. The aesthetic form of life: Eisner on arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(6), 35-37.
Smith, R. A. （2003b）. Reimer on music education: All about feeling, synergy, and intelligence. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(5), 33-39.
Sparshott, F. E. （1988）. Off the ground: First steps to a philosophical consideration of the dance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sparshott, F. E.（1987）. Aesthetics of Music: Limits and Grounds. In Alperson, P. A. (Ed.), What is Music? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Music. NY: Haven Publications.
Sparshott, F. E. （1994）. Music and feeling. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52 (1), 26-32.
Shepherd, J., Virden, P. , Vulliamy, G. & Wishart, T. （1977）. A sociology of musical languages. London: Transaction Books.
Swanwick, K. （1999）. Teaching music musically. London: Routledge.
Stanly, W. B. （1992）. Curriculum for Utopia: Social reconstructionism and critical pedagogy in the postmodernera. New York: SUNY Press.
Stubley, E.（2003）. A tale thrice told: Reflections on Bennett Reimer’s vision across the decades action. Criticism & Theory for Music Education, 2(1), 18-30.
Swanwick, K. （1979）. A basis for music education. Windsor: NFER Nelson.
Swanwick, K. （1988）. Music, mind and education. London: Routledge.
Swanwick, K. （1999）. Music education: Closed or open? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 33(4). ProQuest Education Journals.
Thompson, K. （2003. 12. 8）. Reimer and Elliott--philosophy of music education. 國立台灣師範大學音樂研究所客座演講，Reimer與Elliott的音樂教育哲學思想。台北：國立台灣師範大學音樂學系。
Valentine, T, S. （2000）. A passion for order: Music education for eloquence. Columbia University, Ph.D.（DAI-A 59/01, p. 216, Jul 2001）（AAT 9970303）
Vaugeois, L. C.（2004）. Where politics and music meet: Why developing critical consciousness is important to the education of professional musicians. M.Ed., Lakehead University (Canada), Ph.D.（DAI-A 59/01, p. 220, Jul 2005）（AAT MR00490）.
Vaugeois, L. C. （2007）. Examinating the political: Materiality, ideology, and power in the lives of professional musicians. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 1(2), 5-21.
Westerlund, H. （1999）. Universal against contextual thinking in multicultural music education. Western Colonialism or Pluralism? International Journal of Music Education , 33(99), 94-103.
Westerlund, H. （2003）. Reconsidering aesthetic experience in praxial music education. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 11(1), 45-62.
Wheeler, R. T. （2006）. Toward a framework for a new philosophy of music education: Logstrup as synergy between the Platonic and Aristotelian perspectives in the music education philosophies of Bennett Reimer and David Elliott. University of North Texas. Ph. D.（DAI-A 68/03, Sep 2007）（AAT 3254233.）
Wright, J. E. （1992）. Harry Broudy. In Reimer, B. & Wright, F. E. (Eds.), On the nature of musical experience. Niwot, CO: University Press of Colorado.
Wringe, C. （1995）. Two challenges to the notion of rational autonomy and their educational implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 27(2), 49-63.