簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃齡嫻
Ling-Hsien Huang
論文名稱: 紙本與電子繪本教學對國小輕度智能障礙學生閱讀理解學習成效之比較研究
指導教授: 王華沛
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 125
中文關鍵詞: 紙本繪本電子繪本輕度智能障礙學生閱讀理解閱讀態度
英文關鍵詞: traditional print storybooks, electronic storybooks, mild intellectual and developmental disability, reading comprehension, reading attitude
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:192下載:69
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討國小輕度智能障礙學生繪本和電腦的使用經驗及親子共讀現況、紙本與電子繪本教學對國小輕度智能障礙學生閱讀理解和閱讀態度之影響。本研究採等組前後測實驗設計,以立意取樣選取臺北市三所國小共12名輕度智能障礙學生為樣本,經配對後隨機分派為實驗組和控制組各6人。兩組學生各進行四本內容相同的繪本教學,並在教學後,立即實施「閱讀理解測驗」。教學完畢,兩組學生填寫「閱讀態度量表」。所得資料以描述統計及無母數統計魏可遜配對組帶符號等級考驗進行統計分析。
    根據研究結果,歸納結論如下:
    (一) 就「使用電腦閱讀繪本」而言, 只有1位學生曾使用電腦閱讀繪本。就「閱讀繪本經驗」而言,5位學生閱讀過繪本,7位學生從來沒有閱讀過繪本。就「親子共讀」而言,3位家長曾經陪伴小孩閱讀繪本,9位家長從來沒有陪伴過小孩閱讀繪本。
    (二) 當繪本故事較短且容易時,電子或紙本繪本的教學效果差異不大;當繪本故事較長且難時,電子繪本教學效果顯著優於紙本繪本的教學效果。
    (三) 電子繪本能增進學生的閱讀態度。
    最後,根據研究結果與限制,就學校、教師、家長及未來研究提出建議。

    This study aimed to discuss the experience of traditional print and electronic storybooks usage for the mild intellectual and developmental disabled elementary students, and the current status of parent-child reading. It also covered the different effects on reading comprehension and attitude for mild intellectual and developmental disabled elementary students by using traditional print and electronic storybooks.
    This study applied an equivalent group pretest-posttest experimental design. A sample size of twelve mild intellectual and developmental disabled primary students from three different elementary schools in Taipei City was taken. After being matched, the sample was randomly assigned to experimental group and control group, with each group sized of six. The two groups read four storybooks with same content. After reading, we conducted a reading comprehension test. After the teaching, the two groups were requested to complete the reading attitude scale. The data obtained was used in conducting statistical analysis by descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistical Wilconxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test.
    According to the statistical result, we would have the following conclusion:
    1. With respect to electronic storybooks usage, one student used electronic storybooks. With respect to traditional print storybooks usage, five students
    used traditional print storybooks, and seven students never used traditional print storybooks. With respect to parent-child reading, three parents read storybooks with their children and nine parents never read storybooks with their children.
    2. With a shorter and easier story, there were no significant different effects on using traditional print storybooks or electronic storybooks teaching. With a longer and more difficult story, using electronic storybooks teaching had a significant advantage in the learning effect than using traditional print storybooks teaching.
    3. Electronic storybooks could enhance the reading attitude.
    Finally, based on our results and constraints, we gave our suggestion to the educational institutions, the teachers and the parents.

    第一章 緒論..................................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機........................................................................1 第二節 研究目的....................................................................................3 第三節 研究問題與假設........................................................................3 第四節 名詞釋義....................................................................................4 第二章 文獻探討..........................................................................................7 第一節 閱讀理解相關理論....................................................................7 第二節 智能障礙學生閱讀理解問題之探討......................................18 第三節 紙本與電子繪本對兒童閱讀之影響......................................22 第三章 研究方法........................................................................................37 第一節 研究設計..................................................................................37 第二節 研究對象..................................................................................39 第三節 研究工具..................................................................................40 第四節 研究程序..................................................................................50 第五節 資料處理與分析......................................................................52 第四章 結果與討論....................................................................................53 第一節 紙本與電子繪本組學生繪本和電腦的使用經驗及親子共讀現況分析..................................................................................53 第二節 紙本與電子繪本組學生閱讀理解之差異比較......................55 第三節 紙本與電子繪本組學生閱讀態度之差異比較......................59 第五章 結論與建議....................................................................................63 第一節 結論..........................................................................................63 第二節 研究限制..................................................................................64 第三節 建議..........................................................................................65 參考文獻........................................................................................................69 中文文獻..................................................................................................69 英文文獻..................................................................................................73 附錄一 家長同意書....................................................................................79 附錄二 教學教案設計................................................................................80 附錄三 實驗教材簡介................................................................................96 附錄四 繪本篩選表....................................................................................97 附錄五 「短耳朵的蘿里」測驗題—預試版.............................................99 附錄六 「卡諾小鎮的新朋友」測驗題—預試版......................................102 附錄七 「小英雄拉比」測驗題—預試版................................................105 附錄八 「兔子的胡蘿蔔」測驗題—預試版.............................................108 附錄九 「短耳朵的蘿里」測驗題—正式版.............................................111 附錄十 「卡諾小鎮的新朋友」測驗題—正式版......................................113 附錄十一 「小英雄拉比」測驗題—正式版................................................115 附錄十二 「兔子的胡蘿蔔」測驗題—預試版..........................................117 附錄十三 閱讀態度量表—預試版..........................................................119 附錄十四 閱讀態度量表—正式版..........................................................123

    一、中文部分:
    何華國(2001):特殊兒童心理與教育(第四版)。臺北市:五南。
    何華國(2001):啟智教育研究(第二版)。臺北市:五南。
    何華國(2004):特殊兒童心理與教育(第四版)。臺北市:五南。
    何萬貫(1996):提高學業成績稍遜中學生讀、寫能力的教學策略--多讀多寫。教育學報,24(2),81-96。
    吳訓生(2000):國小低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解策略教學效果之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文,未出版,彰化市。
    吳清基(2004):打造孩子閱讀的桃花源親子共讀指導手冊(局長序)。臺北市:教育局。
    李連珠(1991):將圖畫書帶進教室—課室內的圖畫書。國教之友,43(2),29-36。
    周慧菁(2002):那一頁,翻新了人生。天下雜誌,263,16。
    孟瑛如、張淑蘋(2003):資源班語文教學—有趣的識字教學設計。國教世紀,207,31-40。
    岡田正章(1989):幼稚園繪本童話教學設計。臺北市:武陵。
    林男勝(2007):相互教學法對不同理解能力之國小六年級學童在閱讀策略運用與閱讀理解之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
    林宛霖(2002):台北市幼兒對圖畫書及電子童書之調查與反應研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林怡君(2006):國小學童閱讀互動式光碟故事書與紙本童書之閱讀理解重述能力之差異比較。國立台南大學教育學系課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
    林建平(1994):整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    林建平(1997):學習輔導-理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
    林敏宜(2000):圖畫書的欣賞與應用。臺北市:心理。
    林寶山、李水源(2000):特殊教育導論。臺北市:五南。
    邱上真、洪碧霞(1997):國語文低成就學生閱讀表現之追蹤研究(Ⅰ):國民小學國語文低成就學童篩選工具系列發展之研究(Ⅱ)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC86-2413-H-017-002-F5。高雄市:國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
    邱淑雅(1996):幼兒圖畫書的欣賞與應用。蒙特梭利雙月刊,29-31。
    施能木(1997):探討多媒體電子書之潛在學習問題。視聽教育月刊,38(6),28-34。
    施能木(1997):淺談多媒體電子書。國教之聲,30(4),50-55。
    柯華葳(1993):語文科的閱讀教學。載於李永吟主編,學習輔導(頁307-350)臺北市:心理。
    柯華葳(1994):從心理學觀點談兒童閱讀能力之培養。華文世界,39,25-32 。
    柯華葳(1999):閱讀理解困難篩選測驗施測說明。行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作組印行。
    洪文瓊(1998):電子童書對傳統童書的挑戰及其教育價值。出版界,56,42-48。
    洪美珍(2000):電子童書閱聽型態及其對兒童閱讀影響之研究。台東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。
    祝佩貞(2003):電子童書與紙本童書對國小學童閱讀理解及閱讀態度之比較研究。國立台中師範學院語文教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
    郝廣才(1998):油炸冰淇淋—繪本在台灣的觀察。美育,91,11-18。
    張正芬(1987):輕度智能不足學生語文能力之研究。特殊教育學刊,3,49-66。
    曹俊彥(1998):圖畫〃故事〃書。美育,91,19-30。
    郭恩惠(1999):兒童與成人對兒童圖畫書的反應探究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    陳心怡、陳榮華(譯)(2007):Wechsler著。魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(中文版)指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。
    陳百齡(1995):出版業的全新挑戰—閑化電子出版品設計。光碟購買指南詴刊號,18。
    陳佳賓(2005):學習的全方位設計對輕度智能障礙兒童國語科學習成效之研究。台北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    陳榮華(1992):智能不足研究-理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。
    陳慧卿(2003):國小二年級學童對電子童書與紙本童書之閱讀能力研究。朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。
    傅秀媚(2000):特殊教育導論。臺北市:五南。
    黃淑君(1993):國小學童聽覺理解能力與閱讀理解能力之相關研究。台中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
    黃瓊儀(1996):國小學童閱讀理解策略、閱讀理解歸因與閱讀理解能力相關之研究。國民教育研究學報,2,107-149。
    游仕偉(2000)。多媒體的結晶,超連結的閱讀。出版學刊,3,4-7。
    楊世麒(2002):以概念構圖作為國小高年級學童水循環概念的概念改變研究。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    楊惠菁(2005):國小學童對於不同媒體形式文本的閱讀理解比較-以紙本童書和電子童書為例。台東教育大學兒童文學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。
    齊若蘭(譯)(1995):Nicholas Negroponte著。數位革命。臺北市:天下文化。
    蔡宗穆(2006):資訊融入繪本教學於閱讀與認字之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    蔡蕙珊(2000):兒童文學中的圖畫書在閱讀教學中的角色。教師之友,41(3),35-42。
    鄭明進(1996):兒童圖畫書大世紀。雄獅美術,302,52-55。
    鍾敏華(2003):兒童繪本與兒童語文創造力之教學行動研究。國立台東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。
    藍慧君(1991):學習障礙兒童與普通兒童閱讀不同結構之閱讀理解策略之比較。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    羅慶文(1995):閱讀態度與閱讀理解關係之探討。研習資訊,12(6),34-38。
    蘇振明(2002):圖畫書與兒童教育。載於徐素霞主編,台灣兒童圖畫書導賞(頁28-32)。臺北市:國立台灣藝術教育館。
    二、英文部分:
    Adam, N., & Wild, M. (1997). Applying CD-ROM interactive storybooks to learning to read. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 113, 119-132.
    Alexander, J. E., & Heathington, B. S. (1988). Assessing and correcting classroom reading problems. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman /Little, Brown College Division.
    Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., & Readena, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
    Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting “considerate” content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47-52.
    Brown, A. J. (1974). The role of strategic behavior in retardate memory. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol.7, pp.55-104). New York: Academic Press.
    Buttery, T. J., & Mason, G. E. (1979). Reading improvement for mainstreamed children who are mildly mentally handicapped. Reading Improvement, 16(4), 334-337.
    Crossland, C. L. (1981). Comparison of retarded and non-retarded on the ability to use context in reading. Journal for Special Education, 17(3), 234-241
    Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
    Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young reader’s reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 374-384.
    Dreher, M. J., & Gambrell, L. B. (1985). Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository prose. Reading Improvement, 22, 2-7.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsadale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
    Gotze, S., & Walker, B. J. (2004). At-risk readers can construct complex meanings: Technology can help. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 778-780.
    Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanaugh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and eye: The relationship between speech and reading (pp.331-358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Greenlee-Moore, M. E., & Smith, L. L. (1996). Interactive computer software: The effects on young children’s reading achievement. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 17(1), 43-64.
    Haring, N. G., & McCormick, L. (1990). Exceptional children and youth (5th ed.). Columbus: Merrill.
    Hyde, A. A., & Bizar, M. (1989). Thinking in context: Teaching cognitive process across the elementary school curriculum. New York: Longman.
    Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378-393.
    Kendall, P. C., & Fischler, G. L. (1984). Behavior and adjustment correlates of problem-solving measures. Child Development, 55, 879-892.
    Korat. O., & Shamir, A. (2006). How to select CD-ROM storybooks for young children: The teacher’s role. The Reading Teacher, 59(6), 532-543.
    Lerner, J. W. (1989). Learning disabilities. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Lewin, C. (1996). Improving talking book software design: Emulating the supportive tutor. Bradford, UK: Center for Information Technology in Education, The Open University.
    Mary, L. M. (1986). The effect of goal structure, reading mode, type score, and measurement format on the reading comprehension of mildly handicapped children. Dissertation of George Peabody Cology for Teachers of Venderbilt University.
    Matthew, K. I. (1996). The impact of CD-ROM storybooks on children’s reading comprehension and reading attitude. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 379-394.
    Matthew, K. I. (1997). A comparison of the influence of interactive CD-ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(3), 263-273.
    Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
    Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
    Maynard, S., Mcknight, C., & Keady, M. (1999). Children’s classics in the electronic medium. The Lion and The Unicorn, 23, 184-201.
    Mckenna, M. C. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. In D. Reinking, M. Mckenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp.45-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlabum.
    McNeil, J. D. (1984). Reading comprehension-New directions for classroom practice. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman /Little, Brown College Division.
    Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C.A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
    Okolo, C., & Hayes, R. (1996). The impact of animation in CD-ROM books on student’s reading behaviors and comprehension. Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 395434.
    Paivio, A. (1983). The empirical case for dual coding. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition (pp. 307-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36-75.
    Pearman, C. J. (2003). Effects of CD-ROM storybooks on the independent reading comprehension of second grade students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(07a), 2427 (PorQuest Information and Learning NO.3097320)
    Pearman, C. J. (2008). Independent reading of CD-ROM storybooks: measuring comprehension with oral retellings. The Reading teacher, 61(8), 594-602.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce and W.F.Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical model and of processes Reading (3rd ed. pp. 722-750). Delaware, NY: International Reading Association.
    Sorrell, C. A., Bell, S. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2007). Reading rate and comprehension as a function of computerized versus traditional presentation mode: A preliminary study. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(1), 1-12.
    Stanovich, K. E. (1985). Cognitive determinants of reading in mentally retarded individuals. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 13, 181-213.
    Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 4 , 360-406.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Spear L. C. (1985). A triarchic theory of mental retardation. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 13, 301-326.
    Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399-411.
    Thomas, C. H., & Patton, J. R. (1994). Characteristics of individuals with milder forms of retardation. In M.Beirne-Smith, J. R. Patton & R. Ittenbach (Eds.), Mental retardation (4th ed., pp.205-240). New York: Macmillan College.
    Tompkins, G. E. (2006). Literacy for the 21st century: A balanced approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Vacca, J. A. L., Vacca, R. T., & Gove, M. K. (1995). Reading and learning to read (3th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
    Van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. M. Taylor, M F. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp.1-31). Amsterdam Avenue, NY: Teachers College.
    Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Wren (2000). Reading framework. Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from: http://www.sedl.org/reading/framework/
    Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1996). Introduction to special education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    QR CODE