簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳虹仰
Chen, Hung-Yang
論文名稱: 家長支持自主性教養與青少年目標感—潛能信念與基本心理需求滿足的作用
Parents' Autonomy Support and Youth's Purpose: The Roles of Capability Beliefs and Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction
指導教授: 程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling
口試委員: 周麗端
Chou, Li-Tuan
劉奕蘭
Liu, Yih-Lan
王玉珍
Wang, Yu-Chen
吳志文
Wu, Chih-Wen
程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling
口試日期: 2024/01/09
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 166
中文關鍵詞: 家長支持自主性教養青少年目標感潛能信念基本心理需求滿足中期青少年
英文關鍵詞: parents' autonomy support, youth's purpose, capability beliefs, basic psychological need satisfaction, middle adolescence
研究方法: 調查研究
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400070
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:124下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 此論文以中期青少年階段的臺灣樣本,探討家長支持孩子自主性的教養方式與孩子目標感之關聯性。本論文的三個研究中,家長自主支持區分為促進自發意願(promotion of volitional functioning)和促進獨立性(promotion of independence)兩個面向。青少年目標感在三個研究中皆包含了兩個目標發展向度—目標探索(purpose exploration)與目標投入(purpose commitment),並在研究三檢驗了與目標內涵相關的另外三個向度—意義感(meaningfulness)、目的導向(goal orientation)和超越自我的意圖(beyond-the-self intention)。研究一以高職學生為樣本所進行的交叉延宕模式分析結果顯示,家長促進獨立性正向預測青少年一年後的目標探索,而家長促進自發意願與青少年一年後的目標探索或投入沒有顯著關聯。研究二參考社會認知理論框架,檢驗了青少年的潛能信念能否解釋家長自主支持對青少年目標感的預測效果。結果顯示,兩種家長自主支持正向預測青少年的內控信念和自我效能,並再進一步正向預測青少年的目標投入。青少年的內控信念也解釋了兩種家長自主支持對青少年目標探索產生的間接效果,但青少年自我效能並未在此關聯間扮演中介角色。上述間接效果雖然同時存在於高中及高職青少年的橫斷資料,但沒有在縱貫資料上獲得支持。研究三根據自我決定理論,檢驗青少年基本心理需求滿足能否解釋家長自主支持對青少年目標感的預測效果。分析結果不僅支持研究假設,也發現青少年特定需求的滿足在各種目標向度中發揮了不同效果。當兩種家長自主支持預測青少年的能力需求獲得愈多滿足,可進一步預測青少年的目標投入、意義感和目的導向。當兩種家長自主支持預測青少年的連結需求獲得愈多滿足,可進一步預測青少年的目標探索與其超越自我的意圖。在上述的間接效果中,多數能夠於高中及高職學生上同時被觀察到。

    This dissertation aims to investigate whether and how autonomy-supportive parenting contributes to youth's purpose development during middle adolescence in Taiwan. Across three studies, distinctions between the promotion of volitional functioning and the promotion of independence were drawn in examining parents' autonomy support. Youth's purpose was assessed in two dimensions in terms of the development of purpose—exploration and commitment—across this dissertation, with an additional three dimensions related to the essence of purpose—meaningfulness, goal orientation, and beyond-the-self intention—included in the third study. In study 1, the results of cross-lagged analyses showed that among vocational high school students parents' promotion of independence was associated with youth's enhanced purpose exploration one year later, whereas parents' promotion of volitional functioning was not associated with youth's purpose exploration or commitment one year later. Using a social-cognitive theory framework, Study 2 examined whether youth's capability beliefs account for the autonomy-supportive parenting effects on youth's purpose dimensions. The results revealed that both types of autonomy-supportive parenting positively predicted youth's internal locus of control and self-efficacy, which in turn positively predicted youth's purpose commitment. Youth's internal locus of control, but not self-efficacy, also explained the indirect effects the two types of parents' autonomy support had on youth's purpose exploration. Although these indirect effects were significant concurrently among both academic- and vocational-track high school students, such mechanisms did not occur when it came to longitudinal associations. Guided by a self-determination theory lens, moreover, Study 3 tested whether youth's basic psychological need satisfaction accounts for the autonomy-supportive parenting effects on youth's purpose dimensions. Such an argument was supported, with findings indicating that youth's satisfaction of specific needs plays different roles in the various purpose dimensions. That is, both types of autonomy-supportive parenting contributed to youth's purpose commitment, meaningfulness, and goal orientation when youth's competence need was satisfied. The two types of parents' autonomy support were also conducive to youth's purpose exploration and beyond-the-self intention when the youth's relatedness need was satisfied. These indirect effects largely applied to both academic- and vocational-track high school students.

    Acknowledgment  i English Abstract  iii Chinese Abstract  v Table of Contents  vii List of Tables  xiii List of Figures  xv Overview of the Dissertation  1 Study 1  13 Introduction  13 Method  17 Results  19 Discussion  28 Study 2  31 Introduction  31 Method  37 Results  41 Discussion  59 Study 3  65 Introduction  65 Method  71 Results  76 Discussion  102 General Discussion  109 References  119 Appendixes  141 Appendix A Cross-lagged model between parents' promotion of volitional functioning and youth's purpose exploration and commitment  141 Appendix B Cross-lagged model between parents' promotion of independence and youth's purpose exploration and commitment  142 Appendix C Concurrent mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of volitional functioning for Sample 1  143 Appendix D Concurrent mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of volitional functioning for Sample 2  144 Appendix E Concurrent mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of independence for Sample 1  145 Appendix F Concurrent mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of independence for Sample 2  146 Appendix G Longitudinal mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of volitional functioning  147 Appendix H Longitudinal mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's two capability beliefs (i.e., internal locus of control and self-efficacy) from parents' promotion of independence  148 Appendix I Mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's satisfaction of basic psychological needs from parents' promotion of volitional functioning  149 Appendix J Mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's satisfaction of basic psychological needs from parents' promotion of independence  150 Appendix K Mediation model predicting youth's meaningfulness, goal orientation, and beyond-the-self intention via the youth's satisfaction of basic psychological needs from parents' promotion of volitional functioning  151 Appendix L Mediation model predicting youth's meaningfulness, goal orientation, and beyond-the-self intention via the youth's satisfaction of basic psychological needs from parents' promotion of independence  152 Appendix M Mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs from parents' promotion of volitional functioning  153 Appendix N Mediation model predicting youth's purpose exploration and commitment via the youth's satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs from parents' promotion of independence  154 Appendix O Mediation model predicting youth's meaningfulness, goal orientation, and beyond-the-self intention via the youth's satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs from parents' promotion of volitional functioning  155 Appendix P Mediation model predicting youth's meaningfulness, goal orientation, and beyond-the-self intention via the youth's satisfaction of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs from parents' promotion of independence  156 Appendix Q The Measures of Promotion of Independence and Promotion of Volitional Functioning from Soenens et al. (2007)  157 Appendix R The Revised Youth Purpose Survey (RYPS)  158 Appendix S The Internal Locus of Control Measure  159 Appendix T The General Self-efficacy Scale  160 Appendix U The Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Scale (P-PASS)  161 Appendix V The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS)  162 Appendix W The Claremont Purpose Scale (CPS)  164

    Assor, A. (2018). The striving to develop an authentic inner compass as a key component of adolescents' need for autonomy: Parental antecedents and effects on identity, well-being, and resilience. In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & S. Van Petegem (Eds.). Autonomy in adolescent development: Towards conceptual clarity (pp. 119–144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511-6
    Assor, A., Soenens, B., Yitshaki, N., Ezra, O., Geifman, Y., & Olshtein, G. (2020). Towards a wider conception of autonomy support in adolescence: The contribution of reflective inner-compass facilitation to the formation of an authentic inner compass and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 44(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09809-2
    Audet, É. C., Levine, S. L., Holding, A. C., Powers, T. A., & Koestner, R. (2022). Navigating the ups and downs: Peer and family autonomy support during personal goals and crises on identity development. Self and Identity, 21(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2021.1939772
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
    Bandura, A. (2023). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective on human nature. John Wiley & Sons.
    Benson, P. L., & Scales, P. C. (2009). The definition and preliminary measurement of thriving in adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802399240
    Blattner, M. C., Liang, B., Lund, T., & Spencer, R. (2013). Searching for a sense of purpose: The role of parents and effects on self-esteem among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 36(5), 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.008
    Bronk, K. C. (2011). The role of purpose in life in healthy identity formation: A grounded model. New Directions for Youth Development, 2011(132), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.426
    Bronk, K. C. (2012). A grounded theory of the development of noble youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(1), 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558411412958
    Bronk, K. C. (2014). Purpose in life: A critical component of optimal youth development. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7491-9
    Bronk, K. C., & Finch, W. H. (2010). Adolescent characteristics by type of long-term aim in life. Applied Developmental Science, 14(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888690903510331
    Bronk, K. C., Hill, P. L., Lapsley, D. K., Talib, N., & Finch, H. (2009). Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271439
    Bronk, K. C., Mitchell, C., Hite, B., Mehoke, S., & Cheung, R. (2020). Purpose among youth from low-income backgrounds: A mixed methods investigation. Child Development, 91(6), e1231–e1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13434
    Bronk, K. C., Riches, B. R., & Mangan, S. A. (2018). Claremont Purpose Scale: A measure that assesses the three dimensions of purpose among adolescents. Research in Human Development, 15(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1441577
    Bundick, M. J., & Tirri, K. (2014). Student perceptions of teacher support and competencies for fostering youth purpose and positive youth development: Perspectives from two countries. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2014.924357
    Bundick, M., Andrews, M., Jones, A., Mariano, J. M., Bronk, K. C., & Damon, W. (2006). Revised youth purpose survey. Stanford Center on Adolescence.
    Burrow, A. L., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Purpose as a form of identity capital for positive youth adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023818
    Burrow, A. L., Agans, J. P., Jeon, H. J., & Creim, M. (2021). Are all purposes worth having? Integrating content and strength in purpose research. Human Development, 65(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515176
    Burrow, A. L., O'Dell, A. C., & Hill, P. L. (2010). Profiles of a developmental asset: Youth purpose as a context for hope and well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9481-1
    Carton, J. S. (1996). An observational study of antecedents of locus of control of reinforcement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502596386009
    Carton, J. S., & Carton, E. E. R. (1998). Nonverbal maternal warmth and children's locus of control of reinforcement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022904626582
    Carton, J. S., Ries, M., & Nowicki, S. (2021). Parental antecedents of locus of control of reinforcement: A qualitative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 565883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565883
    Chen, B., Van Assche, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2015). Does psychological need satisfaction matter when environmental or financial safety are at risk? Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(3), 745–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9532-5
    Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
    Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2013). Autonomy in family decision making for Chinese adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(7), 1184–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113480038
    Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
    Chen, H.-Y., & Cheng, C.-L. (2020). Developmental trajectory of purpose identification during adolescence: Links to life satisfaction and depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.013
    Chen, H.-Y., Chiou, H., & Cheng, C.-L. (2022). Purpose trajectories during middle adolescence: The roles of family, teacher, and peer support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01548-3
    Cheng, C.-L. (Principal Investigator). (2016–2018). 青少年階段之目標發展:以關係發展系統觀點探討內在資產、脈絡資源與正向適應 [The nature and development of purpose during adolescence: Exploring internal assets, contextual resources, and positive adjustment from a relational developmental systems perspective] (Report No. MOST 103-2410-H-003-048-SS3) [Grant]. Ministry of Science and Technology.
    Cheng, L., Chen, Q., & Zhang, F. (2021). Mediating effects of meaning in life on the relationship between general self-efficacy and nursing professional commitment in nursing students. Medicine, 100(29), e26754. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000026754
    Cheung, C. S., Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, M., & Qu, Y. (2016). Controlling and autonomy‐supportive parenting in the United States and China: Beyond children's reports. Child Development, 87(6), 1992–2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12567
    Cordeiro, P. M. G., Paixão, M. P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Luyckx, K. (2018). Parenting styles, identity development, and adjustment in career transitions: The mediating role of psychological needs. Journal of Career Development, 45(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316672742
    Costa, S., Gugliandolo, M. C., Barberis, N., Cuzzocrea, F., & Liga, F. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1168–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518756778
    Crumbauch, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the purpose in life test. Psychometric Affiliates.
    Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. Free Press.
    Damon, W., & Malin, H. (2020). The development of purpose: An international perspective. In R. L. Jensen (Ed.), Oxford handbook of moral development: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 109–127). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190676049.013.8
    Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0703_2
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319 –338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
    DeWitz, S. J., Woolsey, M. L., & Walsh, W. B. (2009). College student retention: An exploration of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and purpose in life among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0049
    Dietrich, J., & Kracke, B. (2009). Career-specific parental behaviors in adolescents' development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.005
    Duineveld, J. J., Parker, P. D., Ryan, R. M., Ciarrochi, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2017). The link between perceived maternal and paternal autonomy support and adolescent well-being across three major educational transitions. Developmental Psychology, 53(10), 1978–1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000364
    Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
    Enger, J. M., Howerton, D. L., & Cobbs, C. R. (1994). Internal/external locus of control, self-esteem, and parental verbal interaction of at-risk Black male adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711730
    Erford, B. T. (1995). Parent autonomy-enhancement and development of self-efficacy. Psychological Reports, 77(3), 1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3f.1347
    Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W.W. Norton & Company.
    Fousiani, K., Van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Chen, B. (2014). Does parental autonomy support relate to adolescent autonomy? An in-depth examination of a seemingly simple question. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(3), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558413502536
    Girelli, L., Alivernini, F., Lucidi, F., Cozzolino, M., Savarese, G., Sibilio, M., & Salvatore, S. (2018). Autonomy supportive contexts, autonomous motivation, and self-efficacy predict academic adjustment of first-year university students. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00095
    Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Erlbaum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606303
    Hill, N. E., Liang, B., Price, M., Polk, W., Perella, J., & Savitz‐Romer, M. (2018). Envisioning a meaningful future and academic engagement: The role of parenting practices and school‐based relationships. Psychology in the Schools, 55(6), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22146
    Hill, P. L., & Burrow, A. L. (2012). Viewing purpose through an Eriksonian lens. Identity, 12(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2012.632394
    Hill, P. L., Schultz, L. H., Jackson, J. J., & Andrews, J. A. (2019). Parent-child conflict during elementary school as a longitudinal predictor of sense of purpose in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(1), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0912-8
    Inguglia, C., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., Musso, P., & Ingoglia, S. (2018). Satisfaction and frustration of autonomy and relatedness needs: Associations with parenting dimensions and psychological functioning. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9702-6
    Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). Taylor & Francis.
    Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 194–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012754
    Keshavarz, S., & Baharudin, R. (2013). Perceived parenting style of fathers and adolescents' locus of control in a collectivist culture of Malaysia: The moderating role of fathers' education. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2012.678419
    Krampen, G. (1989). Perceived childrearing practices and the development of locus of control in early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548901200203
    Lane, F. C., & Schutts, J. W. (2014). Predicting the presence of purpose through the self-efficacy beliefs of one's talents. Journal of College and Character, 15(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/jcc-2014-0003
    Lekes, N., Gingras, I., Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Fang, J. (2010). Parental autonomy-support, intrinsic life goals, and well-being among adolescents in China and North America. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(8), 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9451-7
    Levy-Warren, M. H. (1999). I am, you are, and so are we: A current perspective on adolescent separation-individuation theory. In A. Esham, L. T. Flaherty, & H. A. Horowitz (Eds.), Adolescent psychiatry: Vol. 24. Developmental and clinical studies (pp. 3–24). Analytic Press.
    Li, Y. I., & Cheng, C.-L. (2022). Purpose profiles among Chinese adolescents: Association with personal characteristics, parental support, and psychological adjustment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1832242
    Liang, B., Lund, T., Mousseau, A., White, A. E., Spencer, R., & Walsh, J. (2018). Adolescent girls finding purpose: The role of parents and prosociality. Youth & Society, 50(6), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17697850
    Luyckx, K., Soenens, B., Goossens, L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2007). Parenting, identity formation, and college adjustment: A mediation model with longitudinal data. Identity, 7(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283480701600785
    Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Duriez, B. (2009). Basic need satisfaction and identity formation: Bridging self-determination theory and process-oriented identity research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015349
    Lynch, S., Hurford, D. P., & Cole, A. (2002). Parental enabling attitudes and locus of control of at-risk and honors students. Adolescence, 37(147), 527–549.
    Ma, C., Ma, Y., & Lan, X. (2020). A structural equation model of perceived autonomy support and growth mindset in undergraduate students: The mediating role of sense of coherence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02055
    Mageau, G. A., Ranger, F., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Moreau, E., & Forest, J. (2015). Validation of the Perceived Parental Autonomy Support Scale (P-PASS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039325
    Mageau, G. A., Sherman, A., Grusec, J. E., Koestner, R., & Bureau, J. S. (2017). Different ways of knowing a child and their relations to mother‐reported autonomy support. Social Development, 26(3), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12212
    Malin, H., Liauw, I., & Remington, K. (2019). Early adolescent purpose development and perceived supports for purpose at school. Journal of Character Education, 15(2), 1–20.
    Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2014). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12051
    Mariano, J. M., & Vaillant, G. E. (2012). Youth purpose among the ‘greatest generation'. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(4), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.686624
    Martela, F., Ryan, R. M., & Steger, M. F. (2018). Meaningfulness as satisfaction of autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: Comparing the four satisfactions and positive affect as predictors of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1261–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9869-7
    Martinent, G., Ferrand, C., Humblot, E., Bauvineau, A., & Noisiez, M. (2019). Role of need-supportive family behaviours on purpose in life and depressive feelings of French older people: A self-determination theory perspective. Applied Sciences, 9(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010115
    McClun, L. A., & Merrell, K. W. (1998). Relationship of perceived parenting styles, locus of control orientation, and self-concept among junior high age students. Psychology in the Schools, 35(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6807(199810)35:4<381::aid-pits9>3.0.co;2-s
    McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.64
    McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017152
    Ministry of Education (2023). 中華民國112年教育統計 [Education Statistics 2023: The Republic of China]. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=829446EED325AD02&sms=26FB481681F7B203&s=B19AF3B0B4D7BFAC
    Moè, A., Katz, I., & Alesi, M. (2018). Scaffolding for motivation by parents, and child homework motivations and emotions: Effects of a training programme. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12216
    Moran, S. (2016). What do teachers think about youth purpose? Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1226556
    Moran, S., Bundick, M. J., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. S. (2013). How supportive of their specific purposes do youth believe their family and friends are? Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(3), 348–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412457816
    Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). I can do this! The development and calibration of children's expectations for success and competence beliefs. Developmental Review, 48, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.04.001
    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user's guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
    Parada, R. H. (2006). School bullying: Psychosocial determinants and effective intervention [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Western Sydney.
    Pfund, G. N. (2023). Applying an Allportian trait perspective to sense of purpose. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(4), 1625–1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-023-00644-4
    Pfund, G. N., & Lewis, N. A. (2020). Aging with purpose: Developmental changes and benefits of purpose in life throughout the lifespan. In P. L. Hill, & M. Allemand (Eds.), Personality and healthy aging in adulthood (pp. 27–42). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_3
    Qin, L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). Are gains in decision‐making autonomy during early adolescence beneficial for emotional functioning? The case of the United States and China. Child Development, 80(6), 1705–1721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01363.x
    Quinn, B. (2014). Other-oriented purpose: The potential roles of beliefs about the world and other people. Youth & Society, 46(6), 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12452435
    Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Cheon, S. H., Matos, L., & Kaplan, H. (2022). Supporting students' motivation: Strategies for success (1st edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091738
    Roth, G. (2008). Perceived parental conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of young adults' self‐versus other‐oriented prosocial tendencies. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00494.x
    Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
    Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
    Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
    Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Competence and control beliefs: Distinguishing the means and ends. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd Edition, pp. 349–367). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874790
    Silk, J. S., Morris, A. S., Kanaya, T., & Steinberg, L. (2003). Psychological control and autonomy granting: Opposite ends of a continuum or distinct constructs? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301004
    Skhirtladze, N., Van Petegem, S., Javakhishvili, N., Schwartz, S. J., & Luyckx, K. (2019). Motivation and psychological need fulfillment on the pathway to identity resolution. Motivation and Emotion, 43(6), 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09795-5
    Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
    Soenens, B., Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2017). How parents contribute to children's psychological health: The critical role of psychological need support. In M. L. Wehmeyer, K. A. Shogren, T. D. Little, & S. J. Lopezet (Eds.), Development of self-determination through the life-course (pp. 171–187). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_13
    Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2019). Parenting adolescents. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 1: Children and parenting (3rd edition, pp. 101–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440847-4
    Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Sierens, E. (2009). How are parental psychological control and autonomy-support related? A cluster-analytic approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00589.x
    Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater: Applying the principle of universalism without uniformity to autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12103
    Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.633
    Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). How to solve the conundrum of adolescent autonomy? On the importance of distinguishing between independence and volitional functioning. In B. Soenens, M. Vansteenkiste, & S. Van Petegem (Eds.), Autonomy in adolescent development: Towards conceptual clarity (pp. 1–32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636511-1
    Spokas, M., & Heimberg, R. G. (2009). Overprotective parenting, social anxiety, and external locus of control: Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33(6), 543–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-008-9227-5
    Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
    Tanaka, A., Tamura, A., Ishii, R., Ishikawa, S., Nakazato, N., Ohtani, K., Sakaki, M., Suzuki, T., & Murayama, K. (2023). Longitudinal association between maternal autonomy support and controlling parenting and adolescents' depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(5), 1058–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01722-1
    Tsai, H.-W., & Cheng, C.-L. (2023). How social support relates to purpose commitment and purpose exploration among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of hope and self-efficacy. Education Journal, 51(1), 87–110.
    Tsai, H.-W., & Cheng, C.-L. (in preparation). The Chinese version of the Claremont Purpose Scale.
    Usher, E. L. (2015). Personal capability beliefs. In L. Corno, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd Edition, pp. 160–173). Routledge.
    Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
    Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359
    Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., De Muynck, G.-J., Haerens, L., Patall, E., & Reeve, J. (2018). Fostering personal meaning and self-relevance: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381067
    Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 605–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z
    Wang, T., Ye, Y. Q., & Zeng, X. Y. (2023). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Claremont Purpose Scale among youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2032102
    Wang, Y.-C. (2018). 青少年目的感經驗之探究 [The experience of adolescents' sense of purpose]. 教育心理學報, 49(3), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201803_49(3).0005
    Wang, Y.-C., Lin, C.-H., Liu, Y.-H., & Chang, T.-J. (2022). 家庭優勢及其對子女生涯目的感發展之影響經驗研究 [The influence experience of family strengths on adolescent's career purpose development]. 教育心理學報, 54(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202209_54(1).0001
    Wang, Y.-C., Tseng, C., Chen, C.-H., Jian, M.-Y., & Lin, X.-Y. (2020). 邁向志向之旅—青少年生涯目的感發展之歷程研究 [A study of Taiwanese adolescents' career purpose development process]. 教育心理學報, 52(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202012_52(2).0002
    Wang, Z., & Chen, W.-W. (2023). Is the way I was raised linked to how I love? Perceived parenting and implicit theories of relationships. Emerging Adulthood, 11(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968221130920
    Wu, C.-W., Guo, N.-W., Hsieh, Y.-S., & Yeh, K.-H. (2015). The facilitating effect of need-supportive parenting on the change rate and adaptation of dual autonomy among Taiwanese adolescents. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 74 (4), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000161
    Yarnell, T. D. (1971). Purpose-in-Life Test: Further correlates. Journal of Individual Psychology, 27(1), 76–79.
    Yeh, K.-H., & Yang, Y.-J. (2006). Construct validation of individuating and relating autonomy orientations in culturally Chinese adolescents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00192.x
    Yeh, K.-H., Liu, Y.-L., Huang, H.-S., & Yang, Y.-J. (2007). Individuating and relating autonomy in culturally Chinese adolescents. In J. Liu, C. Ward, A. B. I. Bernardo, M. Karasawa, & R. Fischer (Eds.), Progress in Asian social psychology: Global perspectives on Asian social psychology. Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing.
    Yeh, K.-H., Wu, C.-W., & Wang, M.-H. (2016). 知覺滿足需求的教養與青少年的適應表現:雙元自主能力的跨時間中介效果檢驗 [Perceived need-supportive parenting and adolescents' adaptation: The cross-lagged mediating effect of dual autonomous capacity]. 本土心理學研究, 45, 57–92. https://doi.org/10.6254/2016.45.57
    Yu, M. V. B., & Deutsch, N. L. (2020). Supporting youth purpose in adolescence: Youth-adult relationships as ecological assets. In A. L. Burrow & P. L. Hill (Eds.), The ecology of purposeful living across the lifespan (pp. 115–135). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52078-6_7
    Zeng, L., Peng, X., Zeng, X., Wang, H., Xiao, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Parental autonomy support and future-oriented coping among high school students: Serial mediation of future time perspective and meaning in life. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 895003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895003
    Zhang, Y. C., Zhou, N., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Yu, S., Li, J., Deng, L., Sun, R., Wu, Q., Li, P., Xiong, Q., Nie, R., & Fang, X. (2019). Career-specific parenting practices and career decision-making self-efficacy among Chinese adolescents: The interactive effects of parenting practices and the mediating role of autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00363

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2029/01/18
    QR CODE