簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄧慶筠
Teng, Ching-Yun
論文名稱: 幼兒推論理解類型發展之初探
A Preliminary Study on the Development of Preschool Children's Inferential Comprehension
指導教授: 蘇宜芬
Su, Yi-Fen
口試委員: 連啟舜
Lien, Chi-Shun
林正昌
Lin, Cheng-Chang
蘇宜芬
Su, Yi-Fen
口試日期: 2021/05/28
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 172
中文關鍵詞: 故事語法推論理解類型對話式閱讀橫斷研究法學齡前幼兒
英文關鍵詞: story grammar, inferential comprehension types, dialogic reading, cross-sectional research design, preschoolers
研究方法: 橫斷研究法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202101498
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:111下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討不同年齡之學齡前幼兒在推論理解類型的發展,參考Filiatrault-Veilleux 等人(2015b, 2016)的架構,將推論理解類型分為:事件問題(Problem)、內在反應(Internal response)、角色的目標(Goal of the character)、嘗試解決問題(Attempts to solve the problem)、預測(Prediction)和解決問題(Resolution),共六種。研究方法採橫斷研究法,研究對象為以雙北地區及臺東地區共160名幼兒,依據幼兒年齡分為小班、中班、大班三組。本研究以對話式閱讀(dialogic reading)的方式,讓幼兒聆聽符合故事語法(story grammar)結構的故事,並蒐集幼兒推論理解的資料。研究工具採自編的「幼兒推論理解測驗」。以二因子混合設計 MANOVA 探究不同年齡、不同性別幼兒在兩個不同故事版本中各推論理解類型的得分差異;以二因子混合設計 ANOVA 分析不同年齡、不同性別幼兒在兩個不同故事版本中反應品質的差異。
    研究結果主要如下:

      第一,關於不同年齡幼兒在不同故事版本的推論理解類型表現差異中,本研究發現「年齡」、「版本」的主要效果及「年齡與版本」的交互作用效果均達顯著水準。3到6歲幼兒在六種推論理解類型的平均比率分數都有隨著年齡增加的情形,但標準差則是隨者年齡遞減。交互作用顯著的結果則意謂幼兒在不同類型推論問題的表現,會受到故事情節或脈絡的影響,當故事情節涉及幼兒熟悉的生活經驗時,即使較難的推論類型,幼兒也會有不錯的表現。

      第二,不同年齡幼兒在不同故事版本的推論理解問題反應品質有顯著不同。反應品質最佳的級別A而言,次數百分比隨著年齡增加;以反應品質最差的級別 D 而言,次數百分比隨著年齡降低。總之,幼兒對於推論問題的反應品質隨著年齡發展越來越好。

      第三,不同性別幼兒的推論理解類型表現沒有差異,但幼兒在不同故事版本的推論理解類型表現有差異。因此提醒研究者未來進行幼兒推論發展的探究時,需留意材料代表性的問題。

      第四,不同性別幼兒的推論理解問題反應品質沒有差異。

      整體來說,幼兒的推論理解能力隨著年齡而增長,且不受性別差異影響。最後,根據本研究之結果,提出未來教學及研究上的建議。

    The purpose of this research was to explore the development of preschool children’s inferential comprehension. One hundred and sixty preschool children were recruited and divided into 3 groups based on their age. The cross-sectional research design was chosen. The categorical framework of inferential comprehension developed by Filiatrault-Veilleux et al. (2015b, 2016) was adopted. Six inference types were assessed, including Problem, Internal response, Goal of the character, Attempts to solve the problem, Prediction, and Resolution. Two narratives developed by story grammar were used. This study adopted dialogic reading method and " Children's Inference Comprehension Test " to assess preschool children’s performance on different types of inferential comprehension. The major findings were as follows.

      First, the scores of six inference types increased with age; whereas the standard deviation decreased with age. In addition, preschool children's performance on different inference types were influenced by the content of narratives. If the content of narratives was familiar to preschool children or was close to preschoolers' exprerience, then they could perform very well even on difficult types of inference.

      Second, regarding the quality of responses, the youngest groups produced significantly fewer expected responses than the oldest groups. On the contrary, the oldest groups produced significantly fewer "inadequate or off topic" responses than the youngest groups. In other words, the quality of responses increased with age.

      Third, there was no gender differences on inferential comprehension of preschoolers. However, this study found different version of narratives did influence preschoolers' performance of inferential comprehension.

      Fourth, there was no gender differences on quality of responses for preschoolers.

      As a whole, the inferential comprehension abilities of preschoolers increased with age and there was no gender difference. The content of narratives could influence preschoolers' performance of inferential comprehension. Suggestions for educational application and future research were proposed based on the results of this research.

    謝詞 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 目次 vii 表次 ix 圖次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第三節 名詞釋義 3 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 推論理解與閱讀理解的關係 7 第二節 推論的內涵 8 第三節 幼兒推論理解的發展 17 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 研究對象 27 第二節 研究工具 29 第三節 研究程序 39 第四節 資料分析與處理 45 第四章 研究結果 47 第一節 不同年齡組幼兒在不同故事版本之推論理解類型的表現分析 47 第二節 不同年齡組幼兒在不同故事版本的推論理解問題反應品質的分析 69 第三節 不同性別幼兒在不同故事版本之推論理解類型的表現分析 77 第四節 不同性別幼兒在不同故事版本的推論理解問題反應品質的分析 87 第五章 討論與建議 93 第一節 討論 93 第二節 建議 99 參考文獻 101 中文部分 101 西文部分 103 附錄 114 附錄 1 《小雞找新家》評分標準 114 附錄 2 《奇奇的寶貝蛋》評分標準 143 附錄 3 施測說明及家長同意書 171

    吳明隆(2008):SPSS操作與應用-多變量分析實務。五南圖書出版。
    吳明隆、張毓仁(2011):SPSS(PASW)與統計應用分析II。五南圖書出版。
    李慧慧(2006):國小閱讀理解困難學生先備知識、詞彙量、工作記憶、推論能力與閱讀理解之關係(未發表)。國立臺南大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
    沈欣怡(2007):「推論性問題引導課程」對國小四年級學童推論理解與閱讀理解能力之影響(未發表)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
    沈欣怡、蘇宜芬(2011):推論性問題引導課程對國小四年級學童推論理解與閱讀理解能力之影響。教育心理學報,43,337–356。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110801
    林慧芳(2002):國小六年級低閱讀能力學生工作記憶與推論能力之研究(未發表)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(2000):中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,19,79–104。https://bse.spe.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/journal/prog/6T0_006_2710_0481023.pdf
    洪宜芳、張鑑如(2017):三~六歲學齡前幼兒影片敘說:故事理解與故事重述之初探。教育心理學報,48(4),567–590。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20160907
    范沛瀅(2004):運用放聲思考法比較國小五年級閱讀理解困難學生與一般學生之推論能力(未發表)。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
    張境桓(2017):幼兒推論理解測驗之編製研究(未發表)。國立臺東大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文。
    張雅如、蘇宜芬(2003年10月3-4日):國小學童推論理解測驗之編製與研究。輔仁大學心理學系主辦「中國心理學會第四十二屆年會」宣讀之論文,臺北,臺灣。
    陸莉、劉鴻香(1998):修訂畢保徳圖畫詞彙測驗。心理出版社。
    楊美珠(2016):推論策略教學對國小五年級學童推論理解能力之影響(未發表)。國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學所碩士論文。
    賴明貞(2003):國小社會科教科書可閱讀性分析與高年級學童閱讀理解情形之研究(未發表)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    錡寶香(2004年1月8–9日):閱讀理解困難學童推論能力之研究。2004年手語暨溝通障礙研討會,臺北,臺灣。
    錡寶香(2009):兒童語言與溝通發展。心理出版社。
    薩文蕙(2015):從因果關係看漢語兒童敘事連貫能力的發展。臺灣語言學雜誌,13(1),25–51。
    顏志龍、鄭中平(2017):給論文寫作者的統計指南: 傻瓜也會跑統計。五南圖書出版。
    蘇宜芬、洪儷瑜、陳柏熹、陳心怡(2018):閱讀理解成長測驗之編製研究。教育心理學報,49(4),557–580。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201806_49(4).0003

    Applebee, A. N. (1978). The child’s concept of story. University of Chicago Press.
    Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). Longman. https://is.gd/w1Mp21
    Adams, C., Clarke, E., & Haynes, R. (2009). Inference and sentence comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(3), 301–318.
    Blanc, N. (2009). La compréhension de contes présentés oralement en classes de CP et CE1: quelle utilisation des dimensions situationnelles ? L’Ann´ee Psychologique, 109(4), 607-628. https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-psychologique1-2009-4-page-607.htm
    Blanc, N. (2010). La compréhension des contes entre 5 et 7 ans: Quelle représentation des informations émotionnelles? [The comprehension of the tales between 5 and 7 year-olds: Which representation of emotional information?]. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021283
    Botting, N., & Adams, C. (2005). Semantic and inferencing abilities in children with communication disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820410001723390
    Crais, E. R., & Chapman, R. S. (1987). Story recall and inferencing skills in language/learning-disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5201.50
    Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5), 489–503.
    Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005713
    Deconti, K. A., & Dickerson, D. J. (1994). Preschool children's understanding of the situational determinants of others' emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 8(5), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408952
    Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. American guidance service.
    Dickinson, D., Wolf, M., & Stotsky, S. (1989). Words move: The interwoven development of oral and written language. In J. B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 225–273). MacMillan.
    Desmarais, C., Archambault, M. C., Filiatrault-Veilleux, P., & Tarte, G. (2012). La compréhension d’inférences: comparaison des habiletés d’enfants de quatre et de cinq ans en lecture partagée [Comprehension of inferences: Comparing the abilities of four and five year old children in dialogic reading]. Revue des Sciences de L’éducation, 38(3), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.7202/1022712ar
    Desmarais, C., Nadeau, L., Trudeau, N., Filiatrault-Veilleux, P., & Maxes-Fournier, C. (2013). Intervention for improving comprehension in 4-6 year old children with specific language impairment: Practicing inferencing is a good thing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(6-7), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2013.791880
    Ford, J. A., & Milosky, L. M. (2003). Inferring emotional reactions in social situations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/002)
    Ford, J. A., & Milosky, L. M. (2008). Inference generation during discourse and its relation to social competence: An online investigation of abilities of children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/027)
    Ferreiro, E., & Taberoski, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Portsmouth. Heinemann Educational Books Inc.
    Florit, E., Roch, M., & Levorato, M. C. (2011). Listening text comprehension of explicit and implicit information in preschoolers: The role of verbal and inferential skills. Discourse Processes, 48(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.494244
    Filiatrault-Veilleux, P., Tarte, G., & Desmarais, C. (2015a). Inferential comprehension in a dialogic reading task: Comparing 5-year-old children with specific language impairment to typically developing peers. In G. M. Martinez (Ed.), Recent advances in language and communication (pp. 119–133). Nova Science.
    Filiatrault-Veilleux, P., Bouchard, C., Trudeau, N., & Desmarais, C. (2015b). Inferential comprehension of 3-6 year olds within the context of story grammar: A coping review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(6), 737–749. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12175
    Filiatrault-Veilleux, P., Bouchard, C., Trudeau, N., & Desmarais, C. (2016). Comprehension of inferences in a narrative in 3-to 6-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0252
    Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Little, Brown.
    Gnepp, J., & Gould, M. E. (1985). The development of personalized inferences: understanding other people’s emotional reactions in light of their prior experiences. Child Development, 56(6), 1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130465
    Graesser, A. C., & Kreuz, R. J. (1993). A theory of inference generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16(1-2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544833
    Gineste, M. D., & Le Ny, J. F. (2002). Psychologie cognitive du langage: de la reconnaissance à la comprehension [Cognitive psychology of language: From recognition to comprehension]. Dunod.
    Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
    Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
    Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). Harper Collins College.
    Justice, L. M., Kaderavek, J. N. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention I: Background and Description of Approach. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2004/020)
    Justice, L.M., Chow, S. M., Capellini, C., Flanigan, K., & Colton, S. (2003). Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable preschoolers: Relative effects of two approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(3), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/078)
    Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: Construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
    Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processing: Inferences. Discourse Process, 16(1-2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544837
    Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
    Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
    Kontos, S., & Wells, W. (1986). What preschool children know about reading and how they learn it. Young Children, 42(1), 58–66.
    Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., White, M. J., & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x
    Linda, K. (1993). Uncovering cognitive processes in reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED364842.pdf
    Low, J., & Durkin, K. (2000). Event knowledge and children's recall of television based narratives. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165670
    Lynch, J. S., & van den Broek, P. (2007). Understanding the glue of narrative structure: Children's on-and off-line inferences about characters’ goals. Cognitive Development, 22(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.02.002
    Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge and cognitive development. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp. 21–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20(3), 193–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90007-C
    Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8
    McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.440
    Oakhill, J. (1982). Constructive processes in skilled and less skilled comprehenders' memory for sentences. British Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01785.x
    Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x
    Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2000). Children's difficulties in text comprehension: Assessing causal issues. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.1.51
    Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
    Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
    Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Routledge.
    Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.3
    Potocki, A., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2013). Narrative comprehension skills in 5-year-old children: Correlational analysis and comprehender profiles. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667013
    Price, L. H., Van Kleeck, A., & Huberty, C. J. (2009). Talk during book sharing between parents and preschool children: A comparison between storybook and expository book conditions. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.2.4
    Reed, H. C., Hurks, P. P., Kirschner, P. A., & Jolles, J. (2015). Preschoolers’ causal reasoning during shared picture book storytelling: A cross-case comparison descriptive study. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2015.1042126
    Poulsen, D., Kintsch, E., Kintsch, W., & Premack, D. (1979). Children's comprehension and memory for stories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28(3), 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(79)90070-5
    Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (p. 480). Academic Press.
    Silva, M., & Cain, K. (2015). The relations between lower and higher level comprehension skills and their role in prediction of early reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0037769
    Singer, M., & Ferreira, F. (1983). Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90282-7
    Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Ablex.
    Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1984). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson, P. Mosenthal, M. Kamil & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 185–224). Longman.
    Schmidt, C. R., & Paris, S. G. (1978). Operativity and reversibility in children’s understanding of pictorial sequences. Child Development, 49(4), 1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128764
    Spackman, M. P., Fujiki, M., & Brinton, B. (2006). Understanding emotions in context: the effects of language impairment on children’s ability to infer emotional reactions. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820500224091
    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA (p. 94–95). Thomson/Brooks/Cole. https://is.gd/cJ6aPo
    Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
    Trabasso, T., & Nickels, M. (1992). The development of goal plans of action in the narration of a picture story. Discourse Processes, 15(3), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544812
    Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on‐line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544827
    Trabasso, T., & Wiley, J. (2005). Goal plans of action and inferences during comprehension of narratives. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651677
    Tompkins, V., Guo, Y., & Justice, L. M. (2013). Inference generation, story comprehension, and language skills in the preschool years. Reading and Writing, 26(3), 403–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9374-7
    Taylor, B. M., Peterson, D. S., Pearson, P. D., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). Looking inside classrooms: reflecting on the “how” as well as the “what” in effective reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 270–279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20205191
    Trabasso, T., Stein, N. L., Rodkin, P. C., Munger, M. P., & Baughn, C. R. (1992). Knowledge of goals and plans in the on-line narration of events. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)90009-G
    van Kleeck, A. (2008). Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: The importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook‐sharing interventions. Psychology in The Schools, 45(7), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20314
    Van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328(5977), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182594
    van den Broek, P., Bauer, P. J., & Bourg, T. (Eds.). (1997). Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events. Routledge.
    van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C. T., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigation of inference processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544835
    van Kleeck, A., Vander Woude, J., & Hammett, L. (2006). Fostering literal and inferential language skills in Head Start preschoolers with language impairment using scripted booksharing discussions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/009)
    van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (2004). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and online construction of a memory representation. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1244–1269). International Reading.
    van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.521
    van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. S., Butler, J., White, M. J., & Lorch, E. P. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107–130). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Westby, C. (1989). Assessing and remediating text comprehension problems. In A. G. Kahmi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective. Boston.
    Wenner, J. (2004). Preschoolers' comprehension of goal structure in narratives. Memory, 12(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000478
    Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06247.x
    Winne, P. H., Graham, L., & Prock, L. (1993). A model of poor readers' text-based inferencing: Effects of explanatory feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/747816

    下載圖示
    QR CODE