研究生: |
吳冠玫 Wu, Kuan-Mei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國小四年級學生英語閱讀力與英語教科書可讀性之比較:以臺北市某國小四年級學生為例 The Comparison of English Reading Ability and Textbook Readability of Fourth Graders: A Case Study of a Primary School in Taipei |
指導教授: |
陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen |
口試委員: |
陳昭珍
Chen, Chao-Chen 陳海泓 Chen,Hai-Hon 邱銘心 Chiu, Ming-Hsin |
口試日期: | 2024/06/21 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所圖書資訊學數位學習碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies_Online Continuing Education Master's Program of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 78 |
中文關鍵詞: | 英語教科書 、可讀性 、英語閱讀力 、Lexile閱讀分級架構 、引導式閱讀 |
英文關鍵詞: | English textbooks, readability, English reading competence, Lexile Framework for Reading, guided reading |
研究方法: | 量化研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400766 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:57 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討臺灣國小四年級學生的英語閱讀力與英語教科書可讀性之間的關聯性。研究對象為臺北市某公立小學的四年級學生及其使用的康軒版《Wonder World》教科書。本研究採用Lexile閱讀分級架構進行分析,透過Scholastic Literacy Pro的Lit-Pro Test線上閱讀分級檢測系統測量學生的英語閱讀力,並使用Lexile Analyzer評估教科書的可讀性。
研究結果顯示,學生的英語閱讀力與教科書的可讀性存在顯著差距,表示學生在英語閱讀力上有很大的提升空間。此外,研究結果發現學生的英語成績不完全反映其真實的英語閱讀力,需要進一步考量其他因素。本研究結果對於英語教科書的選擇以及教師在英語教學中的策略調整提供了實證依據,並對提升國小英語教育的效果具有重要意義。
This study aims to explore the relationship between the reading competence of fourth-grade students in Taiwan and the readability of their English textbooks. The subjects were fourth-grade students from a public elementary school in Taipei, using the Kang Hsuan version of "Wonder World" textbooks. The Lexile Framework for Reading was used for analysis, with students' English reading competence measured by the Scholastic Literacy Pro's Lit-Pro Test online reading level assessment system, and the textbooks' readability assessed by the Lexile Analyzer.
The results indicate that there is a significant gap between students' English reading competence and the readability of the textbooks, suggesting substantial room for improvement in students' reading skills. Additionally, the findings show that students' English grades do not fully reflect their true reading abilities, requiring further consideration of other factors. The findings provide empirical evidence for the selection of English textbooks and the adjustment of teaching strategies in English instruction, contributing to the improvement of elementary English education effectiveness.
丘智愛(2010)。國民中學英語教科書課文適讀性及其銜接性之分析。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
白可莉(2018)。國小英語教科書與補習班英語教材之語料庫分析研究。未出版之碩士論文,南台科技大學,臺南市。
伍振鷟、高強華(1999)。新教育概論。臺北市:五南。
朱宜君(2013)。比較台灣國小英語教科書三種版本之閱讀難易度。未出版之碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
吳清山(1997)。初等教育。臺北市:五南。
宋佩貞、鄭承昌(2009)。臺灣審定版國民小學英語教科書適讀性研究與應用。 教科書研究,2(1),55-80
李宗薇(1998)。教科書的編選機制。課程與教學季刊,1(1),41-56。
卓珈郁(2020)。以文學圈進行小組討論對於高中生英文閱讀能力及興趣影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,臺北市。
周淑卿(2003)。論中小學教科書評鑑機制建立的必要性。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編)教科書之選擇與評鑑(頁 55-78)。高雄市:復文。
柯華葳(2011)。語文課與閱讀能力的培養。教育研究月刊,210,5-14。
荊溪昱、趙世範,翁凌志(2007)。中文文章適讀性線上分析系統之發展研究。 科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集,2006,47-57。
張春興(1996)。教育心理出版社學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:臺灣東華。
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校(語文領域-英語文)。2024年03月22日取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/26192/74206.pdf
梅文慧(2010)。國小教科書開放政策困境與因應之探討。學校行政雙月刊,71, 176-193。
陳世敏(1971)。中文可讀性公式試擬。新聞學研究,8,181-226。
陳昭珍(2024)。淺述閱讀理論及發展趨勢。「桃園市113年度品牌學校校長專業成長研討會」發表之論文,桃園市政府教育局。
陳昭珍、宋曜廷、章瓊方、曾厚強(2020)。配合國小課程單元科普讀物人工 分級推薦與系統可讀性分析之差異研究。圖書資訊學刊,18(1),45- 67。doi: 10.6182/jlis.202006_18(1).045
陳昭珍、趙子萱(2010)。讀本分級及閱讀者程度評量-Lexile 架構簡介。圖書教師電子報,第 3 期。取自http://teacherlibrarian.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/index.php?id=31
陳海泓(2012)。以適讀性公式挑選英文讀本之探究。教育資料與圖書館學,50(2),229-254。
黃光雄、楊龍立(2000)。課程設計:理念與實作。臺北市:師大書苑。
黃政傑(1991)。課程設計。臺北市:臺灣東華。
黃政傑(1996)。教科書的誤用與正用。載於黃政傑(主編)教材教法的問題與趨勢(頁167-179)。臺北市:師大書苑。
黃政傑、李隆盛、呂建政、張芬芬、張煌熙、曾火城…張嘉育(1994)。國民中小學教 84 科書審定制度與審查標準之研究。國立編譯館委託之專題研究報告(編號0009)。臺北市:國立編譯館。
黃嘉雄(主編)(1999)。國民教育九年一貫課程教科書審查之研究。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
葉興華(2007)。教科書評鑑與選擇後的重要課題—教師的教科書使用。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編),教科書制度與影響(頁77-94)。臺北市:五南。
臺北市政府教育局(2019)。臺北市國民小學英語文暨彈性學習課程綱要。臺北市:作者。
臺北市政府教育局(2022)。臺北市雙語教育白皮書建置校園雙語環境、培養跨語學習力。2024年03月22日取自 https://sites.google.com/mqes.tp.edu.tw/bilingual/%E9%A6%96%E9%A0%81
歐用生(1993)。加強教科書的評鑑和選擇。研習資訊,10(5)。
歐宗智(2013)。推展閱讀教育,提升國民文化素養。商業職業教育,(130),12-18。
賴伯勇(2005)。論英文教材適讀性之研究與應用。人文及社會學科教學通訊, 16(4),97-120。
賴香伶(2010)。國中文言文閱讀教學策略設計研究。未出版之碩士論文,高雄師範大學,高雄市。
謝玉婷(2015)。以 Lexile 閱讀分級架構分析臺灣國中英語教科書短文閱讀難 度。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學碩士班,臺南市。
藍順德(2002)。九年一貫課程教科書審定與選用。中等教育雙月刊,53(3),4-18。
藍順德(2003)。教科書開放政策的演變與未來發展趨勢。國立編譯館館刊,31,3-11。
藍順德(2005)。教科書政策與制度。臺北市:五南。
蘇正隆 (2019)。分級讀本 Graded Readers & Leveled Readers。Facebook of Jerome Su, August 19, 19。
蘇復興(2003)。英語教科書乎?英語測驗書乎?。2024年03月22日取自 https://caveselite.pixnet.net/blog/post/72856
Ali, M. M., & Saiden, M. N. (2015). Application of graded reading materials in the teaching of reading skills for children with reading difficulties. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2631-2633.
Armstrong, J., & Bray, J. (1986). How can we improve textbooks? Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED292208)
Bamman, H. A. (1989). Readability. In World book encyclopedia (Vol.16, p.165). Chicago: World Book, Inc.
Barone, D., & Barone, R. (2018). “I never thought I would read this much”: Becoming a reader. The Educational Forum, 82(1), 21–39.
Bates, L. L. (2022). Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of Scholastic Literacy Pro to Monitor and Support Students’ Independent Reading (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250.
Catalano, K. (1990). On the wire: How six news services are exceeding readability standards. Journalism Quarterly, 67(1), 97- 103.
Cegelka, P. T., & Berdine, W. H. (1995). Effective instruction for students with learning difficulties: Allyn and Bacon.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. (4th ed.). New York, NY:McGraw Hill
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Crawley, S. J., & Mountain, L. H. (1995). Strategies for guiding content reading (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Crystal, D.(2003).English as a Global Language.New York:Cambridge University Press.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(1), 19-26.
Flesch, R. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221-233
Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21(3), 242-252.
Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fry, E. (2002). Readability versus leveling. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 286-291.
Goodman, K. (1996). On Reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gottlieb, R., & Rogers, J. L. (2004). Readability of health sites on the Internet. International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 7, 38-42.
Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1981). Readability In A dictionary of reading and related terms (pp.262-263). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Harvey, C. A. (2011). An inside view of Lexile measures: An interview with Malbert 99 Smith III. Knowledge Quest, 39(4), 56-59. Retrieved from http://cdn.lexile.com/m/ uploads/downloadablepdfs/AASL_Article.pdf
Hiebert, E. H. (2011). The Common Core Standards and TextComplexity. In M. Hougen, & S. Smartt (Eds.), Becoming an effective literacy teacher: Integrating Research and the New Common Core State Standards. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing. Retrieved from http://textproject.org/assets/library/papers/Hiebert-2011-Text-ComplexityLexiles.pdf
Jenkins, J. (2007) English as Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Johnson, K. (1998). Readability. Retrieved from http://www.timetabler.com/ reading.html
Johnson, K. (2006). Readability and reading ages of school science textbooks. Retrieved from http://www.timetabler.com/readable.pdf
Klare, G. R. (1963). The measurement of readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr., M. I. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 681-744). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Klare, G. R. (2000). The measurement of readability: Useful information for communicators. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24(3), 107-121.
Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 393-410.
Krashen, S.D. (1988) Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Prentice Hall, New York
Lennon, C. & Burdick. H. (2004). The Lexile Framework as an approach for reading measurement and success. Retrieved from http://cdn.lexile.com/cms_page_media/ 135/The%20Lexile%20Framework%20for%20Reading.pdf
Lively, B. A., & Pressey, S. L. (1923). A method for measuring the vocabulary burden of textbooks. Educational Administration and Supervision Including Teacher Training, 9, 389-398.
McCrum, R. (2010). Globish: how the English language became the world's language. New York, W.W. Norton & Co.
MetaMetrics (2024a). Understanding Lexile® Measures. Retrieved from https://lexile.com/educators/understanding-lexile-measures/
MetaMetrics (2024b). Lexile Analyzer® User Guide. Retrieved from https://la-tools.lexile.com/help/
MetaMetrics (2024c). Lexile Text Analyzer. Retrieved from https://hub.lexile.com/analyzer
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Macmillan.
Oakland, T., & Lane, H. (2004). Language, reading, and readability formulas: Implications for developing and adapting tests. International Journal of Testing, 4, 239-252.
Rafael, S. D., & Tamban, V. E. (2022). Effectiveness of Localized English Reading Materials in Enhancing the Reading Skills of the Grade two Pupils. Journal of English as A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 67–77.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
Scholastic (2024). Students take the LitPro Test, a computer-adaptive assessment that determines their Lexile level. Retrieved from https://au.scholastic.com/sites/all/themes/scholastic_slz_au/iframe/get.htm?a=https://au.scholastic.com/en/literacy-pro&b=1&b=1
Sperling, R. A. (2006). Assessing reading materials for students who are learning disabled. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 138-143.
Stahl, S. A. (1986). Three principles of effective vocabulary instruction. Journal of reading, 29(7), 662-668.
Stover, K., Sparrow, A., & Siefert, B. (2017). “It ain’t hard no more!” Individualizing instruction for struggling readers. Preventing School Failure, 61(1), 14–27.
Stover, K., Sparrow, A., & Siefert, B. (2017). “It ain’t hard no more!” Individualizing instruction for struggling readers. Preventing School Failure, 61(1), 14–27.
Thorndike, E. L. (1921). The teacher's word book. Teachers College Press.
Warming, E. O. (1982). Textbooks. In H. E. Mitzel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.