研究生: |
李玲玲 Ling-Ling, Li |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中生師生依附、教師管教方式與適應困難之相關研究 The relationship among teacher-student attachment, teacher discipline, and life adjustment for junior high school students |
指導教授: |
程景琳
Cheng, Ching-Ling |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2014 |
畢業學年度: | 102 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 86 |
中文關鍵詞: | 國中生 、師生依附 、教師管教方式 、適應困難 |
英文關鍵詞: | junior high school students, teacher-student attachment, teacher discipline, students' adjustment difficulties |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:186 下載:23 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討國中生師生依附、教師管教方式與適應困難之相關和預測情形,以及不同背景變項(性別、年級)在教師管教上之差異性。研究參與對象為臺灣地區國中生共533位(男生272人、女生261人),採用「親子依附量表」、「師生依附量表」、「教師管教方式量表」、「適應困難量表」等研究工具獲取所需資料,再以描述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、Dunnett’s事後比較法、皮爾遜積差相關、多元逐步迴歸等統計方法進行分析,結果發現:
一、師生依附與適應困難具有顯著負相關存在。
二、教師管教方式之「導師回應」與適應困難具有顯著負相關存在;教師管教方式之「導師違規懲罰」與適應困難具有顯著正相關存在。
三、國中生知覺男導師和女導師管教方式在「導師回應」和「導師違規懲罰」上均未具顯著差異存在。
四、國中男學生和女學生知覺教師管教方式在「導師回應」上未具顯著差異存在;但是在「導師違規懲罰」上具有顯著差異存在,且男學生知覺現任導師對其要求,及違規時的懲罰情形高於女學生。
五、不同年級學生知覺教師管教方式在「導師回應」和「導師違規懲罰」上均具有顯著差異存在:9年級學生知覺受到現任導師的鼓勵,及與導師的溝通、討論狀況比7、8年級學生高;8年級學生知覺現任導師對其要求及違規時,給 予權威、負向的懲罰情形高於9年級。
六、教師管教方式之「導師違規懲罰」對國中生適應困難達顯著預測力存在。
本研究根據上述研究結果加以討論,並提出數點建議,以供後續相關實務工作及研究的參考。
This study aims to investigate the relationships among teacher-student attachment, teacher discipline, and life adjustment for junior high school students. This study employed the questionnaire survey to collect data. The sample consisted of 533 students (272 boys and 261 girls) from junior high schools in Taiwan.The instrument used in this study included the Inventory of Parents Attachment, Inventory of Teacher Attachment, Teacher Discipline Scale, and Difficulties Questionnaire. The data acquired were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s post hoc test, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and multivariate regression.
The main findings of this study are as follows:
1.There was significant negative correlation between teacher-student attachment and students’adjustment difficulties.
2.There were significant negative correlation between teachers’ responsive discipline and students’adjustment difficulties.There were significant positive correlation between teachers’ demanding discipline and students’ adjustment difficulties.
3.There were no significant differences among male and female teachers’ discipline.
4.There were no significant differences among male and female students’awareness of their teachers’ responsive discipline.There were significant differences among male and female students’ awareness of their teachers’ demanding discipline. Male students’ perception were higher than female students.
5.There are significant differences among the students in different grades in regard to their awareness of their teachers’ discipline. The level of the response received by the ninth grade students were significantly higher than seventh and eighth grade students. The level of the demandingness received by eighth grade students were significantly higher than ninth grade students.
6.The students’adjustment difficulties can be predicted by teachers’demanding discipline.
Finally, in light of the findings, some suggestions for education and future study were proposed.
中文部分
牛津大學出版社(民84)。牛津高階英漢雙解辭典Oxford Advanced Learner`s English-Chinese Dictionary。香港:敦煌書局。
王毓吟(民96)。國中生知覺父母、教師管教方式與其憂鬱情緒之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園縣。
王鍾和(民82)。家庭結構、父母管教方式與子女行為表現(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
古碧蓮(民97)。國小高年級學童親子關係、師生關係與學習動機之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。實踐大學,臺北市。
石文宜(民95)。國中生人格特質、師生互動關係與偏差行為之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
吳承珊(民89)。母親與教師的管教方式對幼兒社會行為影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳武典、陳秀蓉(民67)。教師領導行為與學生的期待、學業成就及生活適應。教育心理學報,11,87-104。
吳清山(民76)。國民中學導師性別、職業教育背景與管教態度對學生生活適應的影響。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
吳清山(民85)。教師管教權責之探討。初等教育學刊,5,124-135。
吳愛玲(民88)。臺北市國民小學級任教師領導行為類型與學生學習行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
呂麗珠(民92)。國小級任教師領導風格與學生班級氣氛之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
李昱德(民92)。國小學童依附關係傾向與人際行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院,臺北市。
李靜怡(民94)。國中生的師生關係、同儕關係與其快樂來源、快樂程度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
周愫嫻(民90)。愛上學的孩子,不會變壞嗎?論學校因素與青少年偏差行為之關係。應用心理研究,11,93-115。
林清財(民79)。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
林項爵(民99)。父母教養型態、教師管教方式與國小高年級學生霸凌行為之相關探討(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
林麗琴(民84)。國民小學教師領導型態與學生疏離感之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
孫育智(民93)。青少年依附品質、情緒智力與適應之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
孫旻儀(民94)。國中教師管教方式與學生在校行為表現之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
孫旻儀(民97)。「教師管教方式量表」之編制及模式之驗證研究。測驗學刊,55(3),611-633。
張民杰(民103 年2 月22 日)。老師接到後母班,怎麼辦?國語日報,13版。
張怡真(民97)。父母教養方式、教師支持與國三學生偏差行為之關聯性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
張春興(民84)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華出版社。
教育部(民101)。101學年度國民中學教師性別比率【原始數據】未出版之統計數據。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=3973&Page= 20272&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf#c
教育部(民101)。101學年度各縣市國中概況統計【原始數據】未出版之統計數據。取自 http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=3773&Page=18093& Index=7&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
教師法(民102年07月10日)。
莊燿隆(民88)。高雄市國小教師管教權力類型與班級氣氛關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
許清田(民92)。教師權力運用類型、班級經營策略與班級經營效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
許瑞蘭(民91)。國中生依附關係、人際問題解決態度與學校生活適應之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。
陳志銘(民98)。導師、輔導人員、軍訓教官對高中職在學學生偏差行為影響之比較研究─以臺北市高中職為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,臺北縣。
陳弦希(民90)。國民小學級任教師領導技巧與學生情緒智商關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
陳怡君(民99)。教師情緒智力師生關係與低年級學童情緒調節之相關(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南教育大學,臺南市。
陳俊、張積家(民95)。小學生對不同管理行為類型教師管教信息的情緒反應和行為傾向。華東師範大學學報,24(1),56-62。
陳姵君(民97)。青少年依附關係、自我認同、獨處能力與情緒調節之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育,臺北市。
陳敏瑜(民96)。國中教師管教信念、管教目標與管教策略關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
黃玉珍(民92)。高市國中學生人格依附類型、生活適應與師生關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
黃郁珉(民98)。國中生人格特質、知覺教師管教方式與偏差行為之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
黃姬芬(民91)。國小教師管教信念與管教行為相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學院,臺中市。
黃家燊(民93)。國小學童內外控信念、父母及教師管教與焦慮之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院,臺北市。
黃順利(民88)。國小教師權威性格、自我效能信念、學生行為信念與體罰態度及行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東師範學院,臺東縣。
黃鈺婷(民100)。個人、家庭與學校脈絡中的影響變因與青少年身心健康發展軌跡之討論。中華輔導與諮商學報,29,161-181。
楊曙戎(民99)。台灣高中職生社經地位、母子依附、師生互動與偏差行為相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
歐陽儀(民95)。青少年依附關係、知覺父母言語管教、情緒穩定之相關研究。教育心理學報,37(4),319-344。
學校訂定教師輔導與管教學生辦法注意事項( 民96 年 06 月 22 日 )。
賴佳伶(民92)。青少年親子依附關係及情緒因應方式、情緒因應能力之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中師範學,臺中市。
顏光正(民99)。臺北市國中導師管教方式與學生學業成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
蘇明進(民102)。親師SOS。臺北市:天下雜誌股份有限公司。
英文部分
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A
theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development ,40,
969-1025.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The Inventory of Parent and Peer
Attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological
well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454.
Bartholomew K. & Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young
adults:A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Beishuizzen, J., Hof, E., van Putten, C., Bouwmeeser, S., & Asscher, J. (2001). Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teachers. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 185-201.doi:10.1348/000709901158451
Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 141-170. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0
Bowlby, J. (1969, 1973, 1980). Attachment and loss (Vol.1 Attachment; Vol.
2. Separation: anxiety and anger; Vol 3: Loss: sadness and depression). New
York: Basic Books.
Charles, C. M. (1999). Building classroom discipline (6th ed). New York:Longman.
Chiu, L. H., & Tulley, M. (1997). Student preferences of teacher discipline
styles. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(3), 168-176.
Davis, H. A. (2006). Exploring the contexts of relationship quality between middle school students and teachers. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 193-223.
DeMulder, E., Denham, S., Schmidt, M., & Mitchell, J. (2000). Q-sort assessment of attachment security during the preschool years: Links from home to school. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 274-282.doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.274.
Goossens, F. A., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1990). Quality of infants’ attachment to professional caregivers: Relation to infant-parent attachment and day-care characteristics. Child Development, 61, 832-837.doi:10.2307/1130967.
Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00301.
Holmes, J. (1993). John Bowlby and attachment theory. London: Routledge.
Howes, C. (1999). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 671-687). New York: Guilford.
Howes, C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1992a). Children's relationships with caregivers: Mothers and child care teachers. Child Development, 63, 859-866. doi:10.2307/1131238.
Howes, C., & Hamilton, C. E. (1992b). Children’s relationships with child care teachers: Stability and concordance with parental attachments. Child Development, 63, 867-878. doi:10.2307/1131239.
Howes, C., & Ritchie, S. (1999). Attachment organizations in children with difficult life circumstances. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 251-268. doi:10.1017/S0954579499002047.
Howes, C., Hamilton, C., & Philipsen, L. (1998). Stability and continuity of child-caregiver and child-peer relationships. Child Development, 69(2), 418-426.
Howes, C., Rodning, C., Galluzzo, D., & Myers, L. (1988). Attachment and child care: Relationships with mother and caregiver. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 403-416. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(88)90037-3.
Joannon-Bellows, F. J. (1999). The relationship between high school mathematics teachers' leadership behavior and students' mathematics anxiety. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED431628)
Jones, D. c., Abbey, B. B., Cumberland, A. (1998). The development od display rule knowledge: linkages with family expressiveness and social compentence. Child Development,69(4), 1209-1222.
Maccoby , E. E. & Martin ,J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family : Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.)Handbook of child psychology (vol.4, pp.1-102). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E.M. Cummings, Attachment during the preschool years: Theory, research and intervention ( pp. 121-160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (2002). The relation of global first-grade environment to structural classroom features and teach and student behaviors. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 367-387. doi:10.1086/499709.
Parkay, F. W., & Conoley ,C. (1981). Discipline in the schools : The relationship of educatiors’ attitudes about corporal punishment to selected variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Texas, San Marcos.
Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pianta, R. C., & Nimetz, S. (1991). Relationship between children and teachers: Associations with classroom and home behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 379-393. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(91)90007-Q.
Pianta, R. C., Nimetz, S., & Bennett, E. (1997). Mother-child relationships, teacher-child relationships, and school outcomes in preschool and kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 263-280. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90003-X.
Resnick, M., Bearman, P., Blum, R., Bauman, K., Harris, K., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(10), 823-832. doi:10.1001/jama.278.10.823.
Rosenthal, T. L., Underwood, B. & Martin, M. (1969). Assessing classroom incentive practice. Jounal of Educational Psychology, 60(5), 370-376.
Tomal, D. R. (2001). A comaparison of elementary and high school teacher discipline styles. American Secondary Education, 30(1), 38-45.
Tsovili, T. D. (2004). The relationship between language teachers' attitudes and the state-trait anxiety of adolescents with dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(1), 69-87.
Van Ryzin, M. (2010). Secondary school advisors as mentors and secondary attachment figures. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(2), 131-154.doi:10.1002/jcop.20356
Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202-209.
Wolfgang , C. H. (1995). Solving discipline problems: Methods and models for today's teacher (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.