研究生: |
曾品霓 Tseng, Pin-Ni |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
專業華語教材設計與評鑑發展研究 A study of Chinese for Specific Purpose Materials and Evaluation Development |
指導教授: |
陳麗宇
Chen, Li-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
應用華語文學系 Applied Chinese Language and Culture |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 103 |
中文關鍵詞: | 專業華語 、教材評鑑 、運動華語 、華語教材 、教材設計 |
英文關鍵詞: | CSP, material evaluation, sports Chinese, Chinese material, material design |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202617 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:394 下載:110 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以專業華語教學研究發展為起點,以發展專業華語教學的評鑑表和運動華語教材範例。透過文獻分析法,整合專業語言教學、英語為外語教學和對外華語教學之教材評鑑標準與方法,將評鑑準則分為10個面向,分別是基本理念、版面設計、教材配套、教學理論、學習理論、專業知識、語言、內容、真實性和練習活動,並得出50項針對專業華語教材的評鑑準則供學界參考。
而隨著健康意識抬頭,運動風氣越來越興盛,放眼全球,運動相關產業帶來可觀的經濟效益,越來越多人從事運動相關工作。雖然運動產業目前以美國最為發達,但是以中國和亞洲的經濟發展程度來看,運動相關產業也有一定的成長,需要會說華語的人才從事相關行業。因此本研究以運動為主題設計專業華語教材範例,並且請8位專家學者利用專業華語教材評鑑表對運動華語教材做評估,結果表示本研究的運動華語教材為優秀教材,顯示專業華語教材評鑑表及其在專業華語教材的研究中有其發展性。
The research starts with development of Sports Chinese. The core is to discuss about Chinese for Specific Purposes to design an example material of Sports Chinese and a material evaluation checklist of Chinese for Specific Purposes. Through citation analysis, the research integrates materials evaluation criteria of Language for Specific Purposes, English as Foreign Language and Chinese as Foreign Language teaching materials. As a result, the material evaluation includes 10 categories with 50 criterion, which are rationale, layout, supplementary material, pedagogic analysis, learning theory, knowledge for specific purposes, language, content, authenticity and practice.
With the rise of health awareness, more and more people participate in sports activities. When expanding one's horizons to include the whole world, sports prevail among Western countries especially in the United States. Sports industry, for instance, competition, news, athletics, sports commodities etc. bring considerable economy. There are more and more people take part in works related to sports. Though sports industry is prosperous particularly in the United States, in the view of economy development in China and Asia, sports industry grows fast as well. Therefore, people who can speak Chinese to work in related career are needed. The research invites 8 experts to evaluate the Sports Chinese material by evaluation checklist of Chinese for Specific Purposes and the result shows that Sports Chinese material is an excellent material which proves that Sports Chinese material has the value to develop and study.
一、 中文文獻
(一) 專書
王文科、王智弘 (2014) 。教育研究法。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
王蕓瑛(2004)。運動科學展專刊。高雄市 : 科學工藝博物館。
吳氏祿、李紫菱、姜景嚴、陳俞秀、陳鈺茹、傅筱雯、彭妮絲、廖宜瑤、劉碩、衛祥、黎承豪(2016)。專業華語概論。台北市: 新學林出版股份有限公司。
呂必松(1993)。對外漢語教學研究。北京語言學院出版社。
李泉(2006)。對外漢語教材研究。北京: 商務印書館。
沈庶英(2013)。商務漢語教學理論研究與方法創新。北京: 北京語言大學出版社。
林秀惠(2011)。對外華語教材研發,文鶴出版有限公司。
張黎(2007)。經貿漢語課程研究。北京: 商務印書館。
陳伯璋(1988)。教育研究方法的新取向:質的研究方法 (增訂版)。臺北:南宏。
趙金銘(2004) 。對外漢語教學概論。台北市:新學林出版股份有限公司。
劉珣(2002)。漢語作為第二語言教學簡論。北京: 北京語言大學出版社。
Pierre Singaravelou、Julien Sorez(2012)。運動帝國:文化全球化的史記。河中出版社。
(二) 期刊論文
王靜(2005)。基於需要分析的特殊目標漢語教學設計語言教學與研究。語言教學與研究,(5),56。
呂必松(1992)。對外漢語教學概論。世界漢語教學,(3),113-124。
李泉(2004) 。論對外漢語教材的針對性。世界漢語教學,(2),49-57。
李泉(2006) 。 對外漢語教學語法研究述評。世界漢語教學,(2),14。
李泉(2007) 。 論對外漢語教材的實用性。語言教學與研究,(3),28-35。
張黎 (2006)。商務漢語教學需求分析。語言教學與研究,(3),55-60。
陳麗宇(2010),任務型旅遊華語教材編寫設計分析—以台師大應華系學生台北縣市旅遊景點教材編寫為例。中原華語文學報,(6),161-177。
曾辰(2011)。從NBA透視美國文化。綏化學院學報,(4),79-81。
楊慶華(1995)。新一代對外漢語教材的初步設想。語言教學與研究,(4),4-7。
趙金銘(1998)。論對外漢語教材評估。語言教學與研究,(3),4-19。
趙金銘(2009)。教學環境與漢語教材。世界漢語教學,(2),210-223。
(三) 研討會論文
王靜(2005)。基於“需要分析” 的特殊目標漢語教學設計。語言教學與研究學年會暨學術研討會。台南。
陳懷萱(2011)。漢語語法作為專業華語課程之教學設計。臺灣華語文教學年會暨學術研討會。台南。
趙賢洲(1988)。建國以來對外漢語教材研究報告。第二屆國際漢語教學討論會論文選。北京语言学院出版社。
林房儹(2010)。美國運動產業產值分析與產業發展相關策略暨條例。各國運動產業產值與租稅優惠政策研討會。
(四) 學位論文
江書宏(2014)。針對以義大利文為母語者之導遊華語教材編寫-以景點介紹為例。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
金惠淑(2004)。觀光華語導遊教材設計—針對韓國的專門大學觀光中國語系之用途。台北市:台灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。
段范芳安(2014)。專業華語文國別化旅遊教材設計研究 —以越南觀光導遊為例。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
唐子騏(2010)。美國Trinity College運動文化研究。屏東市:國立屏東教育大學學位論文。
郭宗翰(2013)。越南觀光華語導遊教材的設計與發展研究。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
陳淑惠(2007)。法律華語教材設計與研究。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
舒兆民(2001)。網路華語語體及文化課程教學設計。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
謝文彬(2011)。高級商務華語教材編寫研究-以商務會議與簡報表述能力訓練為例。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
VU, Q. S.(2012)。越南商務華語之發展與華語學習者的需求探討。台北市:臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所學位論文。
二、英文文獻
Ansary, H. & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2).
Allwright, R. L. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? 1. ELT journal, 36(1), 5-18.
Al Fraidan, A. (2012). Evaluation of two ESP textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(6), 43.
Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. Language learning tasks, 7, 23-46.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching.
Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 415-428.
Chambers, F. (1997). Seeking Consensus in Coursebook Evaluation. ELT Journal, 51(1), 29-35.
Candlin, C. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. Language learning tasks, 5-22.
Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP journal, 2(2), 131-137.
Cunningsworth, A. (1979). Evaluating course materials. Teacher training, 31-33.
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London:Heinemann Educational Books.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.
Daoud, A., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating a textbook. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 2(3), 302-307.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge university press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
El-Sakran, A. T. (2012). Evaluation of an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) Book for Students of Islamic and Arabic Studies1. English for Specific Purposes.
Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). Quantification and graphic representation of EFL textbook evaluation results. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5), 511-520.
Garinger, D. (2002). Textbook Selection for the ESL Classroom.
Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook (Vol. 11, No. 8). London: Longman.
Hemsley, M. (1997). The evaluation of teachers’ guides–design and application. ELT Journal, 3(1), 72-83.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1981). Performance and competence in English for specific purposes. Applied Linguistics, 2, 56.
Jodai, H. (2012). Evaluation of worldview textbooks: textbooks taught at a military university. International J. Soc. Sci. & Education, 3(1).
Jones, G. M. (1990). ESP textbooks: Do they really exist? English for Specific Purposes, 9(1), 89-93.
Kim, H. (2015). Teachers' Opinions on the Evaluation of ELT Teachers' Books. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 1.
Law, W. H., & 羅慧嫻. (1995). Teachers' evaluation of English textbooks: aninvestigation of teachers' ideas and current practices and theirimplications for developing textbook evaluation criteria. HKU Theses Online (HKUTO).
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition, 18, 77-99.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers: Practice and theory. A&C Black.
McGinley, K. (1986). Coming to terms with evaluation. System, 14(3), 335-341.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Rea-Dickins, P. (1994). Evaluation and English language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(02), 71-91.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Richards, J. C. (2001). The role of textbooks in a language program. Retrieved November, 12(2), 2008.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials development and research—making the connection. RELC Journal, 37(1), 5-26.
Soori, A., Kafipour, R., & Soury, M. (2011). EFL textbook evaluation and graphic representation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 26(3), 481-493.
Sheldon, L. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Swales, J. (1980). ESP: The textbook problem. The ESP Journal, 1(1), 11-23.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.
Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(02), 143-179.
Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-255.
Williams, R. (1981). A procedure for ESP textbook analysis and evaluation on teacher education courses. The ESP Journal, 1(2), 155-162.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. Challenge and change in language teaching, 52-62.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice & Theory (pp. 184-187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.