研究生: |
張家豪 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
不同測驗類型融入超媒體學習環境對國小學童自我調整學習和閱讀成效之影響 |
指導教授: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 宋曜廷 Sung, Yao-Ting |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 83 |
中文關鍵詞: | 超媒體學習 、自我調整學習 、遊戲式學習 、網路閱讀 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:152 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
具有自我調整學習特徵的學生通常會有較佳的學習表現,然而研究指出在超媒體學習的環境中,由於學習者本身缺乏自我調整的能力以及無法充分利用此環境,因此沒有運用關鍵的自我調整歷程。此外,多項研究均支持測驗將能促使學習者的自我調整行為進而提升學生的學習成效,更有研究指出將遊戲應用在教學環境中,有促進學習動機的效果。因此利用遊戲式測驗類型去設計一套的超媒體閱讀學習環境,強化學習者的使用動機、提升自我調整的能力,並藉以促使閱讀效果發揮其最大成效,實乃值得探討的主題。
本研究主要目的在探討國小學童在超媒體環境中進行網路閱讀活動時,運用不同的測驗類型(精熟測驗組、非精熟測驗組、非精熟遊戲測驗組、無測驗組),對於其自我調整行為包括閱讀次數、閱讀時間、用心程度、回視次數、以及回視時間等是否產生改變,及對於閱讀成效的影響,做為將來探討國小學童網路閱讀行為及超媒體學習環境設計的參考。本研究採用等組後測實驗設計,以台北市某國小五年級四個班級學生96人為對象進行實證研究。實驗後,採用單因子變異數分析進行資料分析與探討。研究結果發現:(1) 不同測驗類型對國小學童在網路閱讀時的閱讀次數、回視次數以及回視時間具有顯著影響;(2) 超媒體學習中不同測驗類型對國小學童的閱讀時間、用心程度與閱讀成效無顯著差異。
參考文獻
ㄧ、中文部份
王金國(民90)。成功學習的關鍵~自我調整學習。課程與教學季刊,5(1),145-164。
李紋綺(民94)。鷹架國小學童英語科自我調整學習之研究。國立花蓮教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。
李孟達(民89)。幼兒分類概念多媒體遊戲教材的設計與應用研究。國立臺灣師範大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
李咏吟(民85)。模擬與遊戲教學法。載於黃政傑 (主編),多元化的教學方法 (第玖章)。台北市:師大書苑。
巫博瀚、王淑玲(民93)。自我調整學習的理論與實踐。中等教育,55(6),94-109。
辛佩倚(民95)。多媒體遊戲在兒童空間定位學習上之研究。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
林文正(民91)。國小學生自我調整學習能力、對教師自我調整教學之知覺、動機信念與數學課業表現之相關研究。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林美娟、莊志洋(民82)。輔助學習電玩之可行性探討。中等教育,44 卷6 期, 46-51 頁。
林建平(民94)。自律學習的理論與研究趨勢。國教新知,52(2),8-25。
洪榮昭、劉明洲(民89)。電腦遊戲策略性思考學習之研究。
孫春望(民87)。1997 童話幻想曲:合作式電腦遊戲設計。教學科技與媒體, 37 期,2-9 頁。
海連胥(Heinich, Robert) (民84)。教學媒體與教學新科技 (初版) (李文瑞等譯)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版年﹕1995 年)
黃千綺(民93)。閱讀理解策略自我調整輔助系統對國一學生在閱讀理解能力的效果。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
詹永宗(民93)。自我調整學習對國小學童自然科學習成效影響之研究。臺北市立師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部份
Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523-535.
Azevedo, R. (2005). Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344-370.
Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87-111.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1996). The effects of content-structure focusing on learner structural and disorientation in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 271-281.
Boom, G., Paas, F., Jeroen J.G., & Gog, T. (2004). Computers in Human Behavior , 20 (2004), 551–567.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press of Harvard University. Cambridge,Mass.
Corno. L., & Mandinach. E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Foorman, B. R., & Pressley, M. (1989). Improving children’s regulation of their reading PREP time. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 49-66.
Hannafin, M. J., Garhart, C., Rieber, L. P., and Phillips, T. L. (1985). Keeping interactive video in perspective: Tentative guidelines and cautions in the design of interactive video. In E. Miller (Ed.), Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Denver, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Hannafin, M. J.,& Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167–202.
Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulatedlearning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57-85). NY: GuilfordPress.
Hogle, J. G. (1996). “Considering Games as CognitiveTools: In Search of Effective "Edutainment" University of Georgia Department of Instructional Technology,”
Hunter-Blanks, P., Ghatala, E. S., Pressley, M., Levin, J. R. (1988). Comparison of Monitoring During Study and During Testing on a Sentence-Learning Task. Journal Educational Psychologist, 80(3),279-283.
Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 149–199.
Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick, L. (1986). Self-management methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P.Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change: A textbook of methods (3rd ed., pp.283-345). New York: Pergamon.
Kathryn, L., & Dawn, B. Y. (2001). Instructional principles for self regulation. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(2), 93-111.
Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24-33.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory in intrinsically motivation instruction.Cognitive Science, 4,333-369.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.
Pressley, M., Snyder, B. L., Levin, J. R., Murray, H.,& Ghatala, E.S.(1987).Perceived readiness for examination performance(PREP) produced by initial reading of text and text containing adjunct questions. Reading Research Quarterly,22,219-236.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing:What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13,857-867.
Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1988). Comparison of monitoring during study and during testing on a sentence-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 279-283.
Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1988). Delusion about performance on nultiple-choice comprehension test item. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 454-464.
Pressley, M. & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Education Psychologist, 25(1), 19-33.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning.In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Reynolds, A. J. W. (1987). Wvaluation of a design for an educational Computer game: Learning outcome and attitude response. New Mexico.
Robison, K. A. (2002). Student perceptions of middle school: Relation to academic motivation, learning strategies, and academic achievement in science. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63(3), 166A. (UMINo. 3046660)
Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J .(Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum
Shapiro, E. S. (1984). Self-monitoring procedure. In T. H. Ollendick, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Child behavioral assessment: Principles and procedures (pp. 148-165),New York: Pergamon Press.
Singhanayok, C., & Hooper, S. (1998). The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on students’ achievement, option selections, and attitudes. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 46(2), 17-33.
Williams, M., & Janice E. (1998, April). The role of test anxiety in the self-regulated learning to motivation relationship. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Associatioin, San Diego, CA.
Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Dds.),Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications( pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4),614-628.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing selfregulated learner : Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington,DC: American Psychological Association.