關於籃球的文獻很多，但是探討籃球運動不同位置的文獻並不多見，特別是針對場上指揮官，也就是控球後衛的文獻更是少見。研究者本身是籃球運動員，主打控球後衛。經歷國高中聯賽、大學聯賽、SBL職業隊、以及國家隊的不同經歷。深深感受到一個控球後衛的重要性，以及開發此研究的必要性。本研究旨在探討籃球控球後衛選手在比賽歷程中的角色詮釋，以及與隊友在領導與被領導間的互動與關係，並深入詮釋籃球與人生的課題！
　　本研究不是利用做實驗，也不是透過問卷調查的方法。而是意圖深入控球後衛的特殊經驗，萃取出值得借鏡的思維與資訊，因此選擇敘說研究的方法。
　　研究結果透過控球、傳導、防守、判斷力、得分與助攻、無私的精神、發號與執行戰術等內容，來詮釋控球後衛角色的多面性。又分別以領導自己、領導隊友、領導球 隊等角色，來詮釋領導的藝術。皆說明了控球後衛必須具備一流的體能、技術、戰術等綜合能力，以及高度的智慧，才能脫穎而出勝任此角色。
　　另外，藉由長方形球場上習得的寶貴經驗，驗證了「球場如人生，人生如球場」這句話的真諦，點出了運動的價值。分別以「掌握時間」、「克服逆境」、「完成使命」、「領導他人」及「抉擇」等面向，詮釋從長方形球場體悟到的道理，和人生旅途的相似處。

　　While numerous literatures regarding basketball were conducted, few research investigating positions of the basketball player; specifically, none of research was on the study of point guard. In this study, the primary researcher was a point guard basketball player who experienced several significant competitions including junior/senior high school, university league matches, Super Basketball League (SBL), and national squad. Based upon these unique experiences, the researcher pointed out the importance of point guard and the essentiality of this research. The aim of this research is threefold: Exploration of how a point guard basketball player interprets his role during the competition process; revelation of the issues of leadership and interactive relationship with others; and the discussion of the topic on basketball and life.
This research method design was neither experiment nor questionnaire; rather, it was based upon a point guard’s unique experience, through which referable ideas and information were extracted. To do this, narrative study was considered an appropriate approach.
　　Several findings are worthy of notice: Firstly, the versatileness of the point guard basketball were interpreted by the discussion of dribbling, passing, defending, judgement on court, scoring and assisting, unselfish spirit, calling and operating game strategy. Secondly, the art of leadership were interpreted by the discussion of self-leading, leading others and leading the team. It was found out that a top point guard basketball player required the integration of physical strength, skills, game strategy, and high intelligence.
　　In addition, the point guard’s invaluable experiences gained on the square basketball court verified the statement of games and play on basketball court is like the battle of life; importantly, it pointed out the value of sports. Consequently, the researcher discussed the dimensions of time management, overcoming the adversity, accomplishing the mission, leading others and making choices to interpret how he learned from the square basketball court and the similarity between basketball and life.

一、中文
1.王家通、曾燦燈（1988）：教育行政學─理論、研究與實際，高雄：復文圖書。
2.王建忠（2001）：團隊領導與團隊效能：團隊內互動的中介效果，國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，7-16。
3.石明宗、許立宏、周偉航、胡天玫、林秀珍（2011）：運動倫理：品德與生命教育，台北：華都文化。
4.徐望雲（1997）：決戰禁區，台北：建行文化。
5.陳德禹（1993）：行政管理，台北：三民書局。
6.陳履安編（2012）：第十季SBL明星賽秩序冊，台北：籃球部落有限公司。
7.蔡敦浩、施進忠、利尚仁（2010）：「敘說創業故事：察覺、學習與再詮釋」，組織與管理，三卷二期，67-91。
8.蔡敦浩、劉育忠、王慧蘭（2011）：敘說探究的第一堂課，台北：鼎茂出版社，敘說與開創研究室叢書。
9.樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）：「華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析」，本土心理學研究，第 13 期，1-54。
10.鄭伯壎（1995a）：「不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係：台灣民營企業的實徵研究」，台北：國科會專題研究報告。
11.鄭伯壎（1995b）：「差序格局與華人組織行為」，本土心理學研究，第 3 期，142-219。
12.鄭伯壎（1995c）：「家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究」，中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，第 79 期，119-173。
13.鄭伯壎（2000）：「華人組織的家長式領導：概念再建構、測量及模式的建立」，台北：國科會專題研究報告。
14.羅虞村（1989）：領導理論研究，台北：文景書局。
15.Daniel Goleman著，張美惠譯（1996）：EQ-Emotional Intelligence，台北：時報文化。
16.Flulence Robin著，黃哲譯（2004）：氣度－管理大師的獨家領導藝術，台北：羚羊文化。
17.James L. Lundy著，李宛容譯（2001）：風格領導，台北：天下文化出版公司。
18.Neil H. Snyder,James J. Down Jr. & Dianne Morse Houghton著，張佩傑譯（1995）：解讀領導，台北：牛頓出公司。
19.Philip Douglas Jackson著，杜默譯（1997）：公牛王朝傳奇，台北：智庫文化。
20.Warren Bennis, Burt Nanus合著，黃佳慧等譯（1990）：領導新論，台北：天下文化出版公司。

二、英文
1.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expections. New York: Free Press.
2.Burns, J. H. (1978). Leadership. New York: Happer & Row.
3.Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related value. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.Jessup, H. R. (1990). New roles in team leadership. Training and Development. An examination of meddiating processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 775-790.
5.Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G. , & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
7.Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
8.Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and value: The organizational of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1),89-103.
10.Thomas, J. B., & Kenneth, P. D. M. (1996). Diagnosing whether an organization is truly ready to empower work teams: A case study. Human Resource Planning, 19, 38-47.
11.Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for “paternalistic headship” among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18,445-480.

三、網路
1. 李弘斌報導，李天助攝影（2005）：SBL戰報：王志群大三元，新浪六連敗平隊史紀錄，麗台運動報【線上資料】，來源：http://www.ltsports.com.tw/main/news.asp?no=39162&N_Class=3【2005,January 9】