簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張馨仁
CHANG, HSIN JEN
論文名稱: 過度激動特質對於資優生與普通生學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測研究
The study of overexcitibilities predicting learning performance, creativity, and psychological adjustment on gifted and regular students
指導教授: 郭靜姿
Kuo, Ching-Chih
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 402
中文關鍵詞: 過度激動學習表現創造力心理適應
英文關鍵詞: overexcitibility, learning performance, creativity, psychological adjustment
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:595下載:105
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要
    本研究主要探討過度激動特質對學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測,研究內容分為兩部分。第一部分首先修訂「我的特質量表」以為研究工具,以2211位四年級、六年級、八年級資優生及普通生為受試,探討不同性別、類別、年級受試在本量表之表現。第二部分以1214位八年級資優生及普通生為受試,建立過度激動特質預測組型與效標變項之結構方程模式,檢驗其與實際資料之適配性,最後檢驗所提出之結構方程模式是否具有性別、類別之測量不變性。茲將本研究之結果說明如下:
    一、不同性別、類別、年級受試在「我的特質量表」(II)之表現
    在性別方面,男生過度激動特質與女生有差異。在類別方面,資優生過度激動特質較普通生明顯,而數理資優生在三類資優生中尤為明顯。在年級方面,八年級學生過度激動特質較四年級、六年級學生明顯。
    二、過度激動特質對學習表現、創造力及心理適應之預測能力
    在預測學習表現方面,最能正向預測學業成就之過度激動特質為「智能激動」與「完美主義」;最能正向預測學習適應之過度激動特質為「智能激動」及「挑戰」。在預測創造力方面,最能正向預測創造力及創造傾向特質之過度激動特質為「創造力」及「想像力」。在預測心理適應方面,最能正向預測心理適應之過度激動特質為「智能激動」及「同理心」;
    最能負向預測心理適應之過度激動特質為「情緒變異性」及「生理激動」。
    三、過度激動特質與學習表現、創造力及心理適應之結構方模式及其
    測量不變性
    本研究所提出之九個結構方程模式其模式基本適合度、整體模式適
    合度及內在結構適合度之各項檢驗均顯示理論模式與實際觀察資料之適配度良好,因此九個結構方程模式均可解釋實際觀察資料。九個結構方程模式均具有跨性別、跨類別之測量不變性,因此均可以相同模式解釋不同性別、不同類別之觀察資料。

    Abstract
    The main purpose of the research was to develop OE patterns predicting learning performance, creativity, and psychological adjustment. The study contains two parts. In part I, ‘The Me Scale’ was remodeled as ‘The Me Scale II’. There were 2211 gifted and regular graders included as subjects. Their performance on ‘The Me Scale II’ was analyzed by gender, category of giftedness, and grade. Part II was to develop OE patterns which were expected to predict learning performance, creativity, and psychological adjustment. There were 1214 8th gifted and regular graders included. As the patterns being developed, they were transformed into structural equation models which could confirm the fitness between hypothesized models and sample data. The following multi-group invariance was also tested. Main conclusions are stated as follows:
    Male students reported different OE patterns from their female counterparts. Gifted and talented students reported stronger OEs than regular students. Among gifted and talented students, mathematically talented students reported the most significant OEs than musically and art talented students did. 6th graders reported the least significant OEs than 4th and 8th graders, while 8th graders reported the most significant OEs among the three groups.
    The study found that “intellectual” and “perfectionistic” OEs were the most positively predictive OEs on learning performance and that ‘creative’ and ‘imaginative’ OEs were the most positively predictive OEs on creativity. It was also found that ‘intellectual’ and ‘empathetic’ OEs were the most positively predictive OEs on psychological adjustment while ‘physical’ and ‘emotional’ OEs were the most negatively predictive ones.
    The nine structural equation models constructed in this study fitted well between hypothesized models and sample data, indicating that the nine models could explain the sample data well. Multi-group invariance test also showed that the nine structural equation models could well imply to different gender and groups of gifted and general students, meaning that any single model developed could be inferred to different group of subjects.

    目 錄 誌謝 中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目錄 iv 圖次 vi 表次 x 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 7 第三節 名詞定義 11 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 過度激動特質 15 第二節 過度激動特質與學習表現 35 第三節 過度激動特質與創造力 64 第四節 過度激動特質與心理適應 80 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構 97 第二節 受試者 98 第三節 研究工具 100 第四節 資料處理與分析 123 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 資優生與普通生在過度激動特質量表上之表現 125 第二節 資優生與普通生過度激動特質的差異比較 163 第三節 過度激動特質與學習表現、創造力、心理適應之 相關及其預測組型 193 第四節 過度激動特質與學習表現、創造力、心理適應之 結構方程模式驗證分析及測量不變性檢定 217 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 研究結論 334 第二節 研究限制 344 第三節 研究建議 346 參考文獻 352 附錄 附錄一 我的特質量表(II)內容效度專家評鑑名單 372 附錄二 我的特質量表(II)內容效度評鑑表 373 附錄三 我的特質量表(II)預試題本 389 附錄四 我的特質量表(II)正式題本 397

    參考文獻
    朱瑜華(2003):中部地區國小資優學生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究。國立嘉義大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
    吳沛青(2006):高雄市國小一般智能優異學生和普通生過度激動特質與生活適應之比較研究。屏東教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
    吳明隆(2009):SPSS操作與應用─問卷統計分析實務。臺北:五南。
    吳明隆(2009):結構方程模式─AMOS的操作與應用。臺北:五南。
    吳武典、林幸台、王振德、郭靜姿(1999):基本人格量表指導手冊。臺北:心理。
    吳裕益(2009):結構方程模式的理論與應用。未出版手稿,國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
    吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998):新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北:教育部。
    李坤崇(1996):學習適應量表指導手冊。臺北:心理。
    林妙華(2003):資優生過度激動特質與友伴關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    林幸台、王木榮(1994):威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。臺北:心理。
    花敬凱(譯)(2007):啟迪資優 ─如何開發孩子的潛能(原作者:B. Clark)。 臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:2002)。
    張玉佩(2003):臺灣北區高中數理資優班學生情緒發展層次與情緒適應之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    張玉佩、潘裕豐(2008):國小美術資優生與普通生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究。資優教育研究,8(1),67-89.
    張春興(1989):張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
    張馨仁(2001):資優生過度激動特質之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    教育部(1997):特殊教育法。載於教育部特殊教育工作小組(編)特殊教育法規選輯(頁1-9),臺北:編者。
    黃希庭(2005):簡明心理學辭典。臺北:國家。
    黃珮琇(2005):國中資優生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    溫世頌(民95):心理學辭典。臺北:三民。
    蔡典謨(2004):資優低成就的問題與界定。資優教育季刊,91,1-7。
    蔡麗婉(2006):國小資優生生活適應影響因素之研究。臺北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    謝燕珠(2005):國中音樂資優班學生過度激動特質與社會情意適應之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    魏俊陽(2008):國小美術資優班學生過度激動特質與創造力之相關研究。臺北市立教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    李伯黍等(譯)(2003):適應。心理學辭典(頁17)(原作者:A. S. Reber)。臺北:五南。(原著出版年:2002)
    Ackerman, C. M. (1993). Investigating an alternate method of identifying gifted students. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    Ackerman, C. M. (1997). A secondary analysis of research using the overexcitability questionnaire. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.
    Adelson, J. L. (2007). A “perfect” case study: Perfectionism in academically talented fourth graders. Gifted Child Today, 30(4), 14-20.
    Ammirato, S. P. (1987). Comparison study of instruments used to measure developmental potential according to Dabrowski’s theory of emotional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
    Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 5-15.
    Barton, P. E. (2006). The dropout problem: Losing ground. Educational Leadership, 63(5), 14-18.
    Baum, S. M., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD, and more. Exceptionality, 10(2), 77-91.
    Bernardo, D. (1990). Competitive overdrive stalls high achieving teens. Gifted Child Today, 13(3), 30-31.
    Bottems, G., & Carpenter, K. (2003). Factors affecting mathematics achievement for students in rural schools. Research brief. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477 284).
    Bouchard, L. L. (2004). An instrument for the measure of Dabrowskian overexcitabilities to identify gifted elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48 (4), 339-350.
    Bouchet, N., & Falk, R. F. (2001). The relationship among giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(4), 260-267.
    Bouchet, N., & Fusun, A. (2006). Comparing overexcitabilities of gifted and non-gifted 10th grade students in Turkey. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 43-56.
    Caldeira, J., Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. G. (1979). Imaginary playmates: Some relationships to preschoolers’ spontaneous play, language and television-viewing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 174 303).
    Calic, S.(1994). Heightened sensitivities as an indicator of creative potential in visual and performing arts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
    Carbo, M., & Hodges, H. (1988). Learning styles strategies can help students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20(4), 55-58.
    Chan, D. W. (2002). Giftedness, adjustment problems, and psychological distress among Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(1), 6-24.
    Chan, D. W. (2003). Assessing adjustment problems of gifted students in Hong Kong: The development of the students adjustment problems inventory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 107-117.
    Chan, D. W. (2007). Positive and negative perfectionism among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: Their relationships to general self-efficacy and subjective well-being. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(1), 77-102.
    Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (4th edition). New York, NY: Merrill.
    Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1989). The motivation to win: Negative aspects of success at competition. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 293-305.
    Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (1988). Is being gifted? A social handicap? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11(4), 41-56.
    Coleman, M. R. (1996). Recognizing social and emotional needs of gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 19(3), 36-37.
    Dabrowski, K. with Kawczak, A. & Piechowski, M. M. (1970). Mental growth: Through positive disintegration. London, England: Gryf.
    Dabrowski, K.(1964). Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
    Dabrowski, K. & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development (Vols.1& 2). Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.
    Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th edition). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Delisle, J. (1982). Striking out: Suicide and the gifted adolescent. Gifted Child Today, 24, 16-19.
    Dirkes, M .A. (1985). Anxiety in the gifted: Pluses and minuses. Roeper Review, 8(1), 13-15.
    Dixon, F. A., Lapsley, D. K., & Hanchon T. A. (2004). An emotional typology of perfectionism in gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(2), 95-106.
    Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Dwairy, M. (2004). Parenting styles and mental health of Arab gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 275-286.
    Eckhoff, A., & Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociacultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 179-185.
    Edmunds, A. L., & Edmunds, G. A. (2005). Sensitivity: A double-edged sword for the pre-adolescent and adolescent gifted child. Roper Review, 27(2), 69-77.
    Ely, I. E. (1995). The overexcitability questionnaire: An alternative method for identifying creative giftedness in seventh grade junior high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH.
    Emerick, L .J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140-146.
    Falk, R. F., Lind, S., Miller, N.B., Piechowski, M. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1999). The Overexcitability Questionnaire-Two (OEQII). Denver, CO: Institute for the Study of Advanced Development.
    Falk, R. F., Manzanero, J. B., & Miller, N. B. (1997). Developmental potential in Venezuelan and American artists: A cross-cultural validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2 & 3), 201-206.
    Falk, R. F., Piechowski, M. M., & Lind, S. (1994). Criteria for rating the intensity of overixcitabilities. Unpublished manuscript.
    Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N .D. (1986). Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4-17.
    Feldhusen, J. F., Dai, D. Y., & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2000). Dimension of competitive and cooperative learning among gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 23(3), 328-342.
    Flint, L J. (2001). Challenges of identifying and serving gifted children with ADHD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 62-69.
    Ford, D. Y. (1992). Determinants of underachievement as perceived by gifted, above-average, and average black students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 130-136.
    Ford, D. Y., & Thomas, A. (1997). Underachievement among gifted minority students” problems and promises. ERIC Digest E544,1-13 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 409 660).
    Gallagher, J. J. (1990). The public and professional perception of the emotional status of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(3), 202-211.
    Gallagher, S. A. (1986). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth-grade students. Roeper Review, 8 (2), 115-119.
    Gallagher, S.A. (1985). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth grade students. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
    Garber, S. H. (2002). “Hearing their voice”: Perceptions of high school students who evidence resistance to schooling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465 939).
    Gardner, H. (1994). The fruits of asynchrony: A psychological examination of creativity. In D. H. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity (pp. 47-68). Westport, CT: Praeger.
    Garland, A. F., & Zigler, E. (1999). Emotional and behavioral problems among highly intellectually gifted youth. Reoper Review, 22(1), 41-44.
    Gleason, T. R. (2005). Mothers’ and fathers’ attitudes regarding pretend play in the context of imaginary companions and of child gender. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(4), 412-436.
    Gleason, T. R., Sebanc, A. M., & Hartup, W. W. (2000). Imaginary companions of preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 36(4), 419-428.
    Gold, S. R. (1990). Daydreaming and curiosity: Stability and change in gifted children and adolescents. Adolescence, 25(99), 701-708.
    Grobman, J. (2006). Underachievement in exceptionally academically gifted adolescents and young adults: A psychiatrist’s view. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 199-210.
    Gross, C. M., Rinn, A. N. & Jamieson, K. M. (2007). Gifted adolescents’ overexcitabilities and self-concept: An analysis of gender and grade level. Roeper Review, 29 (4), 240-248.
    Gross, M. U. M. (1985). The pursuit of excellence of the search for intimacy: The forced choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189-193.
    Gross, M. U. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.),The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp. 19-29). Washington DC: Prufrock.
    Guenther, A. (1995). What educators and parents need to know about ADHD. creativity and gifted students. Practitioners’ guide A9814. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 429 415).
    Guilford, J. P. (1973). Characteristics of creativity. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED080 171).
    Hale-Benson, J. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Hartnett, D. N., Nelson, J. M., & Rinn, A. N. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The possibilities of misdiagnosis. Roeper Review, 26(2), 73-76.
    Hébert, T. P. (1998). Gifted black males in an urban high school: Factors that influence achievement and underachievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(4), 385-414.
    Helson, R. (1996). In search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 295-306.
    Hoffman, J. L., Wasson, F. R., & Christianson, B. P. (1985). Personal development for the gifted underachiever. Gifted Child Today, 8(3), 12-14.
    Hoover-Schultz, B. (2005). Gifted underachievement: Oxymoron or educational enigma? Gifted Child Today, 28(2), 46-49.
    Hubbard, L. (2005). The role of gender in academic achievement. International Journal of Qualitative Students in Education, 18 (5), 605-623.
    Hurlock, E. B., & Burstein, M. (1932). The imaginary playmate: A questionnaire study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 41, 380-391.
    Imre, D. & Laszle, B. (1997). Teachers’ opinion about the nature of giftedness. Acta Psychologica Debrecina, 20, 189-195. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 429 373).
    Jackson, Y. (2005). Unlocking the potential of African American students: Keys to reversing underachievement. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 203-210.
    Janos, P. M., Marwood, K. A., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Friendship patterns in highly intelligent children. Roeper Review, 8(1), 46-49.
    Jeon, K .W. (1993). A study on mental health of scientifically gifted high school males and females. Gifted Education International, 9(2), 85-92.
    Joen, K. W., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1993). Teachers’ and parents’ perceptions of social-psychological factors of underachievement among the gifted in Korea and the United States. Gifted Education International, 9(2), 115-119.
    Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20-28.
    Kanter, S. (1982). Divergent thinking abilities as a function of daydreaming frequency. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 5(1), 12-23.
    Kaplan, L. S. (1990). Helping gifted students with stress management.. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 493).
    Kitano, M. K. (1995). Ethnography of a preschool for the gifted: What gifted young children actually do. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(2), 67-71.
    Larson , R. W., & Richards, M .H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 418-443.
    Lee, S. Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 27-67.
    Lehman, E. B., & Erdwins, C. J. (1982). The social and emotional adjustment of young, intellectually gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(3), 134-137.
    Leroux, J. A. & Levitt-Perlman, M. (2000). The gifted child with attention deficit disorder: An identification and intervention challenge. Roeper Review, 22(3), 171-176.
    Lewis, R. B., Kitano, M. K., & Lynch, E. W. (1992). Psychological intensities in gifted adults. Roeper Review, 15(1), 25-31.
    Li, A. K.F., & Adamson, G. (1992). Gifted secondary students’ preferred learning style: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 46-54.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1993). The quest for meaning: Counseling issues with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.29-50). Denver, CO: Love.
    Lysy, K.Z., & Piechowski, M. M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108, 267-320.
    Manosevitz, M., Fling, S., & Prentice, N. M. (1977). Imaginary companions in young children: Relahionships with intelligence, creativity and waiting ability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18, 73-78.
    Manzanero, J. B. (1985). A cross-cultural comparison of overexcitability profiles and levels of emotional development between American and Venezuelan artists. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
    Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 167-181.
    Mauro, J. A. (1991). The friend that only I can see: A longitudinal investigation of children’s imaginary companions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
    McNabb, T. (2003). Motivational Issues: Potential to performance. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 417-423). Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
    Mellou, E. (1994). The values of dramatic play in children. Early Child Development and Care, 104(1), 105-114.
    Mendaglio, S., & Tillier, W. (1992). Feeling bad can be good: Using Dabrowski’s theory to reframe gifted children’s adjustment difficulties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED371 548).
    Mendaglio, S. (1998). Understanding gifted children’s intense emotionality: Sensitivity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED129 388).
    Miller, N. B., Silverman, L .K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(1), 20-38.
    Moon, S. M., Zentall, S. S., Grskovic, J. A., Hall, A., & Stormont, M. (2001). Emotional and social characteristics of boys with AD/HD and giftedness: A comparative case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(3), 207-247.
    Moore, M. (2005). Meeting the educational needs of young gifted readers in the regular classroom. Gifted Child Today, 28(4), 40-47, 65.
    Nail, J. M., & Evans, J. G. (1997). The emotional adjustment of gifted adolescents: A view of global functioning. Roeper Review, 20 (1), 18-21.
    Neihart, M. (2002). Risk and resilience in gifted children: A conceptual framework. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.),The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp. 113-122). Washington DC: Prufrock.
    Neusmeister, K. L. S. (2004). Factors influence the development of perfectionism in gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 259-274.
    Norman, A. D., Ramsay, S. G., Martray, C. R., & Roberts, J. L. (1999). Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment. Roeper Review, 22(1), 5-9.
    Ochse, R. (1993). Before the gates of excellence. The determinants of creative genius. Cambridge, UL: Cambridge University Press.
    Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2000). The transition from childhood giftedness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports. Roeper Review, 23(2), 65-71.
    Parker, W. D. (1996). Psychological adjustment in mathematically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 154-157.
    Partington, J. T., & Grant, C. (1986). Imaginary playmates and other useful fantasies. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play: In animals and humans (pp. 217-240). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
    Pfeiffer, S. I., & Stocking, V. B. (2000). Vulnerabilities of academically gifted students. Special Services in the Schools, 16(1/2), 83-93.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp.366-381). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Piechowski, M. M., & Colangole, N.(1984). Development potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 80-88.
    Piechowski, M. M., & Cunningham, K. (1985). Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(3), 153-174.
    Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549.
    Piirto, J., Montgomery, D., & May, J. (2008). A comparison of Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities by gender for American and Korean high school gifted students. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 141-153.
    Pinto, K. (2007). Growing up young: The relationship between childhood stress and coping with early puberty. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27 (4), 509-544.
    Plucker, J. A., & Mclntire, J. (1996). Academic survivability in high-potential, middle school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(1), 7-14.
    Preuss, L. J., & Dubow, E. F. (2004). A comparison between intellectually gifted and typical children in their coping responses to a school and a peer stressor. Roeper Review, 26(2), 105-111.
    Pruett, G. P. (2004). Intellectually gifted students’ perceptions of personal goals and work habits. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 54-57.
    Pyryt, M. C., Sandals, L. H., & Begoray, J. (1998). Learning style preferences of gifted, average-ability, and special needs students: A multivariate perspective. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(1), 71-71.
    Rabiner, D. L., Murray, D. W., & Schmid, L. (2004). An exploration of the relationship between ethnicity, attention problems, and academic achievement. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 498-509.
    Ramirez-Smith, C. (1997). Mistaken identity: Gifted and ADHD. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413 690).
    Rayneri, L J, Gerber, B. L., & Wiley, L. P. (2003). Gifted achievers and gifted underachievers: The impact of learning style preferences in the classroom. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14(4), 197-204.
    Rayneri, L J, Gerber, B. L., & Wiley, L. P. (2006). The relationship between classroom environment and the learning style preferences of gifted middle school students and the impact on levels of performance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50 (2), 104-118.
    Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J .S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119-130.
    Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152-170.
    Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Exceptionality, 10(2), 113-125.
    Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Diaz, E. I., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M .E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 414 687).
    Reynolds, C. R. & Bradley, M. (1982). Emotional stability of gifted children as estimated by chronic anxiety levels. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 217 616).
    Rice, K. G., Leever, B. A., Chirstopher, J., & Proter, J. D. (2006). Perfectionism, stress, and social (dis)connection: A short-term study of hopelessness, depression, and academic adjustment among honors students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 524-534.
    Richards, J. C., Gipe, J. P., & Duffy, C. A. (1992). Characteristics of students in high schools for the visual and performing arts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 630 ).
    Richards, J. C., Gipe, J. P., & Duffy, C. A. (1993). Psychological and personal dimensions of students and teachers in high schools for the visual and performing arts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360 584).
    Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The meotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: a multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 153-164.
    Richardson, A. G., & Crichlow, J. L. (1995). Subject orientation and the creative personality. Educational Research, 37(1), 71-78.
    Rimm, S. B. (1986). Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures. Watertown, WI: Apple.
    Rimm, S. B. (1987). Creative underachievers: Marching to the beat of a different drummer, Gifted Child Today, 10(1), 2-6.
    Robert, J. A. (1984). A study of typologies of personal growth. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
    Robinson, N. M. (2002). Introduction. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.),The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp. 11-24). Washington DC: Prufrock.
    Rosenfeld, E., Huesmann, L .R., Eron, L. D., & Torney-Purta, J. V. (1982). Measuring patterns of fantasy behavior in children. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 42(2), 347-366.
    Sandal-Miller, K. A. (1988). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of everexcitabilities with measures of verbal and mathematical aptitude among academically precocious adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
    Schaefer, C. E. (1969). Imaginary companions and creative adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 1(6), 747-749.
    Schiever, S. W. (1985). Creative personality characteristics and dimensions of mental functioning in gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 7(4), 223-226.
    Schober, B., Reimann, R., & Wagner, P. (2004). Is research on gender-specific underachievement in gifted girls an obsolete topic? New findings on an often discussed issue. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 43-62.
    Seagoe, M. (1974). Some learning characteristics of gifted Children. In R. Martinson (Ed.), The identification of the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
    Shaughnessy, M. F., & Lehtonen, K. (1998). The emotionally sensitive adolescent. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 823).
    Shaunessy, E., Suldo, S. M., Hardesty, R. B., & Shaffer, E. J. (2006). School functioning and psychological well-being of international baccalaureate and general education students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 76-89.
    Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Promoting a positive achievement attitude with gifted and talented students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.),The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp. 237-249). Washington DC: Prufrock Press.
    Silverman, L. K. (1983). Issues in affective development of the gifted. In J. Van Tassel-Baska (Ed.), A practical guide for counseling the gifted (pp.6-21). Reston, VA: CEC Press.
    Silverman, L. K. (1985). Personality development: The pursuit of excellence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 6(1), 5-19.
    Silverman, L .K. (1999). Perfectionism. Gifted Education International, 13(3), 216-225.
    Silverman, L .K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.),The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp. 31-37). Washington DC: Prufrock Press.
    Silverman, L. K., & Ellsworth, B. (1981). The theory of positive disintegration and its implications for giftedness. In N. Duda (Ed.), Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the Third International Conference(pp.179-194). Miami, FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28(1), 37-44.
    Subotnik, R., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
    Suldo, S. M., & Shaffer, E. J. (2008). Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 37 (1), 52-68.
    Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Terman. L. M., & Oden, M. (1947). Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 4). The gifted child grows up. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Therival, W. A. (1999). Why are eccentrics not eminently creative? Creativity Research Journal, 12(1), 47-55.
    Thorne, Y. M. (1995). Achievement motivation in high achieving Latina women. Roeper Review, 18(1) , 44-49.
    Tieso, C. L. (2007a). Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent? Roeper Review, 29 (4), 232-239.
    Tieso, C. L. (2007b).Patterns of overexcitabilities in identified gifted students and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51 (1), p11-22.
    Tomchin, E. M., Callahan, C. M., Sowa, S. J., & Play, K. M. (1996). Coping and self-concept: Adjustment patterns in gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8(1), 16-27.
    Treat, A. R. (2006). Overexcitabilities in gifted sexually diverse populations. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 244-257.
    Tucker, B., & Hafenstein, N. L. (1997). Psychological intensities in young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 66-75.
    Turk, T. N., & Campbell, D. A. (2002). What’s wrong with Doug? The academic struggles of a gifted students with ADHD from preschool to college. Gifted Child Today, 25(4), 48-59.
    Udvari, S. J., & Schneider, B. H. (2000). Competition and the adjustment of gifted children: A matter of motivation. Roeper Review, 22(4), 212-216.
    Van de Grift, W., & Houtveen, T. (2007). Weaknesses in underperforming schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(4), 383-403.
    Vialle, W., Jeaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong Youth Study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 569-586.
    Wahlberg, A. C. (2004). Dabrowski’s overexcitabilties as identifiers of creative giftedness. Unpublished master thesis, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
    Webb, J. T. (1994). Nurturing social emotional development of gifted children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 554).
    Webb, J. T., Amend, E. R., Webb, N . E., Goerss, J., Beljan, P., & Olenchak, F. R. (2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
    Whitmore, J. R. (1985). Characteristics of intellectually gifted children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262 517).
    Wickes, K. N. S., & Ward, T. B. (2006). Measuring gifted adolescents’ implicit theories of creativity. Roeper Review, 28(3), 131-139.
    Zental, S., Moon, S., Hall, A., & Grskovic, J. (1997). Learning characteristics of boys with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and/or giftedness. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 791).
    Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Skinner, E. A. (2008). Adolescents coping with stress: Development and diversity. Prevention Researcher, 15(4), 3-7.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE