本研究旨在探討漢語連接性詞語於五種書面文體（記敘文、論說文、抒情文、報導文、及廣告文）之使用情形。漢語連接性詞語在此定義為表達被連接篇章成分間邏輯關係之詞語，而根據Halliday的理論架構，此類連接性詞語有三類：elaboration, extension, enhancement。文體在此則定義為語言社群文化中，有階段性及目的性之行為表現。不同的文體有其不同的溝通目的，因而可能使用不同的邏輯關係構成篇章。本研究結果顯示所分析的五種文體在連接性詞語的使用上，有相同的趨勢，即enhancement 的使用多於extension，而extension的使用多於 elaboration，然各文體之間仍有其相異性之存在。就所使用連接性詞語之總數而言，報導文及論說文使用之頻率最高。廣告文使用最少連接性詞語，但子句的平均長度卻是最長。記敘文在連接性詞語extension分類中使用頻率最高，而抒情文因其所蘊含溝通目的之複雜性所致，比起其他文體在連接性詞語的使用上較無特殊性。另一方面，報導文雖使用最多的連接性詞語，但在語料分析中並非如論說文一樣，在每一段落均有連接性詞語之使用，同時報導文在連接性詞語子分類的使用上也不如論說文多樣化。本研究結果顯示含議論性成分越高的文體，連接性詞語的使用頻率也傾向於越高。

The present study investigates the use of Chinese conjunctives in written texts of five genres: Narrative, Argumentation, Expressive, News report and Advertisement. Chinese conjunctives here are defined as words or expressions used to link clauses, and also indicate the type of relationships operating between the clauses being joined. Following Halliday’s theoretical model, three types of logical relationship are identified: elaboration, extension, and enhancement. On the other hand, genres are defined as staged, goal–oriented, purposeful activities in which speakers engage as members of a culture. Different genres thus carry different communicative purposes, and are assumed to reflect different logical relationships. The results of study show that the five genres have the same preference for using cohesive conjunctives in the following hierarchy: enhancement> extension > elaboration, but each genre does show its own uniqueness from the others. In terms of the total number of conjunctives used, Expressive, Narrative and Advertisement do not rely as much as Argumentation and News report do on conjunctives in constructing a text. Advertisement texts use the fewest conjunctives but have the longest clauses on average. Narrative texts, in the total number of conjunctives used, generate the highest percentage of extension type of conjunctives. Expressive, with its complex purposes of narrating events/ objects/ scenes and commentating on what has been previously said, has less distinctive features than Narrative and Advertisement. On the other hand, News report though utilizes the most conjunctives, but does not always have conjunctives in each paragraph as Argumentation. Besides, as for the diversity of conjunctive subtypes, Argumentation though uses fewer conjunctives than News report, it has more diverse choice of conjunctive subtypes than News report. In addition, if we compare both hierarchies of the total number of used conjunctives and used conjunctive subtypes, we will discover a cline among these five genres. That is, the more argumentative elements of a text are involved, the more conjunctives are required. Finally, some issues generated from the study are raised and proposed to serve as a reminder for teaching a discourse level grammar of Chinese conjunctives.

Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Batstone, Rob. 1994. ‘Product and Process: Grammar in the Second Language Classroom’. In M. Bygate et al. (ed.) Grammar and the Language Teacher. Prentice Hall International (UK).
Bever, T. G. and D. T. Langendoen. 1971. ‘A dynamic model of the evaluation of language’. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 435-463.
Bloor T. and M. Bloor. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach. London: Arnold.
Canal, M. and M. Swain. 1980. ‘Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and learning’. Applied Linguistics vol.1, 1-47.
Chalker, Sylvia. 1994. ‘Pedagogical Grammar: Principles and Problems’. In M. Bygate et al. (ed.) Grammar and the Language Teacher. Prentice Hall International (UK).
Chalker, Sylvia. 2000. Linking Words. Hong Kong：Commercial Press.
Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Enkvist, N.E. 1978. ‘Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence’. In J-O, Ostman (ed.) Cohesion and Semantics. Findland: Abo Akademi Foundation.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second Edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hinds, John. 1979. ‘Organizational Patterns in Discourse’. In Talmy Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, 12 Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1994. ‘Students’ Grammar － Teachers’ Grammar －Learners’ Grammar’. In M. Bygate et al. (ed.) Grammar and the Language Teacher. Prentice Hall International (UK).
Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Cherry Ing. 1985. Participant Anaphora in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, USA.
Liu, Chi-fang. 1999. Use of English Cohesive Devices in the Academic Writing of English and Chinese Students. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Warwick, UK.
Martin, J.R. 1984. ‘Language, Register and Genre’. In F. Christie (ed.) Children Writing: Reader. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press: 21-29.
McCarthy, M. and R. Carter. 1994. Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Richards, J. C. 1997. Developing Tactics for Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rutherford, W. E. 1987. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Teng, Shou-hsin. 1997. ‘Towards a pedagogical grammar of Chinese’. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 32/2 29-39.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1979. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step Towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Student Book Co.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1980. ‘Sentences in Chinese and English— an exploration of some basic syntactic differences.’ In Li, Chen, Tien and Tsao (eds.) Papers in Honor of Professor Lin Yu-k’eng on Her Seventieth Birthday. Taipei: Wen Shin Publishing Co.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1990. Clause and Sentence Structure in Chinese: A Functional Perspective. Taipei: Student Book Co.
Widdowson, H. G. 1990. Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilkins, D. A. 1977. ‘Current Developments in TEFL’. In S. Holden (ed.) English for Specific Purposes. Modern English Publications.
Yalden, J. 1983. The Communicative Syllabus: Evolution, Design and Implementation. New York: Pergamon.
Yu, Hsreh-ying. 1990. Connectives in Chinese Narrative Discourse. Unpublished MA thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.
陳平. 1987. 〈漢語零形回指的話語分析〉. 於《中國語文》5, 363-378.
廖秋忠. 1992a. 〈篇章中的論證結構〉. 於《廖秋忠文集》. 116-132.北京：北京語言學院出版社.
廖秋忠. 1992b. 〈現代漢語篇章中的連接成分〉. 於《廖秋忠文集》. 62-91.北京：北京語言學院出版社.
劉月華. 潘文娛. 故韋華. 1996. (繁體字版 鄧守信策劃). 〈實用現代漢語語法〉. 台北：師大書苑.