研究生: |
吳佩軒 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
從學術工作模式探討大學教師對於機構典藏之態度研究 |
指導教授: | 邱銘心 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 130 |
中文關鍵詞: | 機構典藏 、開放取用 、學術工作模式 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:137 下載:10 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來隨著科技的進步,資訊傳遞由紙本轉為電子形式,但學術界長久以來受限出版社的授權機制,導致學術傳播的不自由,也因此促成開放取用的發展。而做為開放取用精神的具體實踐方法之一,大約自2000年起,國內外各大學開始建置自己的機構典藏,希望能成為展示與傳播各校學術研究成果的平台。
目前國內關於機構典藏的研究多為建置前的使用者研究,較無針對機構典藏正式營運後之使用情況進行研究。因此本研究以半結構式訪談法為主,探討臺大電資學院教師進行研究與備課之學術工作模式,及其對NTUR的認知與態度,最後將記錄內容加以編碼分析,為機構典藏的經營與推廣提出建議。
本研究結果顯示,電資學院教師的研究歷程大致可分為:產生動機、收集資料、定義問題、提出解決方法、進行實驗分析、撰寫發表研究成果等六步驟;備課過程則包括:產生開課主題與大綱、收集資料、編寫上課講義等三步驟。
而電資學院教師參與使用NTUR之正面考量為:系統使用方便易學、確保資料的可尋獲性、提高研究能見度及引用率、統一展示研究成果、建構社會網絡等;反面考量則包括:行政體系不支援、資料典藏範圍的侷限、有固定習慣的資源管道、著作權的問題、增加學術工作負擔、對文件品質的疑慮等。
另一方面,電資學院教師期望NTUR能在學術工作中的「產生動機」、「收集資料」、「進行實驗分析」等階段提供協助,並從發展政策、系統功能設計、內容提交制度、圖書館推廣活動等四方面針對NTUR的未來發展提出建議。
總結研究結果分析,本研究為圖書館經營推廣機構典藏歸納七點建議:確實瞭解各領域研究人員之資訊需求、增加以「主題」分類的瀏覽方式、整合現有研究成果提交管道、加強宣導出版社著作權政策詳表、學科館員親至院系說明推廣機構典藏、將機構典藏納入圖書館利用教育、積極發展跨機構之機構典藏平台。
一、中文部分
Neuman, W. L.(2002)。當代社會研究方法:質化與量化途徑(Qualitative and quantitative approaches)(王佳煌、潘中道、郭俊賢、黃瑋瑩、邱怡薇譯)。台北市:學富。(原作2000年出版)
Patton, M. Q.(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(Qualitative evaluation and research methods)(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯)。台北市:桂冠圖書公司。(原作1990年出版)
王昱昭(2008)。公立高中圖書館機構典藏之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學資訊學院在職專班數位圖書資訊組,新竹市。
黃文琪(2006)。電機及資訊領域教師研究歷程中之電子期刊使用研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
李治安、林懿萱(2007)。從傳統到開放的學術期刊出版:開放近用出版相關問題初探。圖書館學與資訊科學,33(1),39-52。
邱炯友、林串良(2003)。變遷中的學術傳播體系。在淡江大學資訊與圖書館學學系編,2003年資訊科技與圖書館學術研討會論文集(頁123-143)。台北縣,編者。
邱炯友、蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access模式。中華民國圖書館學會會報,74,165-183。
林呈潢、曾品方(2007)。機構典藏之作者調查研究。圖書與資訊學刊,60,12-27。
林聖凱(2004)。研究資源典藏系統。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學資訊工程學研究所,台北市。
陳光華、吳哲安(2007)。臺灣大學機構典藏系統之建置。圖書館學與資訊科學,33(2),33-47。
陳亞寧、陳淑君、鍾豐謙(2004)。DSpace跨機構虛擬典藏庫之可行性研究。教育資料與圖書館學,42(2),243-256。
張凈怡(2008)。大學新進教師工作壓力與專業發展之探究-以北部某國立大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學學習與教育研究所,中壢市。
許麗萍(2007)。大學教師工作滿意度之研究。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所,台北縣。
曾品方(2007)。從作者觀點探討機構典藏-以國立政治大學為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班,台北市。
項潔、洪筱盈(2005)。臺灣機構典藏發展芻議。教育資料與圖書館學,43(2),173-189。
彭森明主持(2006)。大學教師評鑑機制之研究(教育部委託專案研究計畫成果報告,94A1004EI)。新竹市:國立清華大學高等教育研究中心。
羅淑美(2008)。機構典藏網站功能研究與實作[電子檔]。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學資訊學院在職專班數位圖書資訊組,新竹市。
羅靜純、黃鴻珠(2005)。機構典藏相關政策之探討。教育資料與圖書館學,43(2),191-214。
二、英文部分
Baudoin, P., & Branschofsky, M. (2003). Implementing an institutional repository: the DSpace experience at MIT. Science & Technology Libraries, 24(1/2), 31-45.
Belefant-Miller, H., & King, D. W. (2001). How, what, and why science faculty read. Science and Technology Libraries, 19(2), 91-112.
Bergstrom, T. C. (2001). Free labor for costly journals? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4). Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/jeprevised.pdf
Brittain, M. (1989). The integrative effects of IT upon the research process. In M. Feeney, & K. Merry, (Eds.), Information Technology and the Research Process (pp. 30-44). London: Bowker Saur.
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/ir_final_release_102.pdf
Davenport, E., Gorman, C., Hauke, J., & Will, M. (1996). Working habits of six US information science faculty: where does technology fit? Aslib Proceedings, 48(5), 129-135.
Davis, P. M., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2007). Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html
Dym, C. L., & Little, P. (2000). Engineering design: A project-based introduction. New York: John Wiley.
Feeney, M., & Merry, K. (1990). Information technology and the research process. London: Bowker Saur.
Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
Garvey, W. D. & Compton, J.(Eds.) (1979). Communication: The Essence of Science. New York: Pergmon Press. In D. W. King, & J. Casto, H. Jones, (1994). Communication by engineers: A Literature Review of Engineers'' Information Needs, Seeking Processes, and Use. Washington, D.C.: Council on Library Resources.
Gibbons, S. (2004). Establishing an institutional repository. Library Technology Reports, 40(4), 1-67.
Gould, C. C. (1989). Scholarly information needs and RLG’s program for research information management. In M. Feeney, & K. Merry, (Eds.), Information Technology and the Research Process (pp. 171-181). London: Bowker Saur.
Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2000). The information-seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing and Management, 36(5), 761-778.
Hicks, B. J. et, al. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International Journal of Information Management, 22(4), 263-280.
Johnson, R. K. (2002). Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substaintially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411(May), 521. Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v411/n6837/full/411521a0.html
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL, 226, 1-7.
Lynch, C. A., & Lippincott, J. K. (2005). Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lynch/09lynch.html
Maness, J. M., Miaskiewicz, T., & Sumner, T. (2008). Using personas to understand the needs and goals of institutional repository users. D-Lib Magazine, 14(9/10). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september08/maness/09maness.html
McCord, A. (2003). Institutional repositories: enhancing, teaching, learning, and research. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/DEC0303.pdf
Mehta, U., & Young, V. E. (1995). Use of electronic information resources: A survey of science and engineering faculty. Science and Technology Libraries, 15(3), 43-54.
Philip, M. D., & Matthew, J. L. C. (2007). Institutional repositories: evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). Retrieved October 23, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html
Prosser, D. (2003). Institutional repositories and open access: the future of scholarly communication. Information Services & Use, 23(2), 167-170. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from EBSCOhost EJS database.
Registry of Open Access Repositories. (2005). Registry of Open Access Repositories. Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://roar.eprints.org/
Richard, F., & Forrest, B. (2005). Scholarly communication in a digital world: the role of an institutional repository. Retrieved April 9 , 2009, from The University of Kansas, KU ScholarWorks Web Site: http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/handle/1808/126
Rumsey, S. (2006). The purpose of institutional repositories in UK higher education: a repository manager's view. International Journal of Information Management, 26(3), 181-186. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from http://EPrints.lse.ac.uk/800/1/Viewpoint_article_Int_J_of_Info_Management_v_4_Nov_2005_(2).pdf
Van Halm, J. (1989). Impacts of information technology on the information flow from author to end user in the research community. In M. Feeney, & K. Merry, (Eds.), Information Technology and the Research Process (pp. 45-51). London: Bowker Saur.
Van Westrienen, G. & Lynch, C. A. (2005). Academic institutional repositories: deployment status in 13 nations as of mid 2005. D-Lib Magazine, 11(9). Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/westrienen/09westrienen.html
Walters, T. O. (2006). Strategies and frameworks for institutional repositories and the new support infrastructure for scholarly communications. D-Lib Magazine, 12(10). Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october06/walters/10walters.html
Yeates, R. (2003). Institutional repositories. VINE: the Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 33(2), 96-101. Retrieved October 8, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database.
Zuber, P. A. (2008). A study of institutional repository holdings by academic discipline. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11/12). Retrieved October 16, 2008, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/zuber/11zuber.