研究生: |
胡志鋒 Chih-feng Hu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大專甲組桌球雙打技術分析 The Skill Analysis of Doubles for Table Tennis In College Sports |
指導教授: |
林靜萍
Lin, Ching-Ping |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2005 |
畢業學年度: | 93 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 95 |
中文關鍵詞: | 大專甲組 、雙打 、桌球三段技術 |
英文關鍵詞: | College Sports grup A, Doubles, Three-stage Skill Analysis |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:255 下載:53 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
大專甲組桌球雙打技術分析
研究生:胡志鋒
指導教授:林靜萍
摘要
本研究主要目的為瞭解大專甲組桌球賽,雙打之比賽勝負對球隊勝負之影響、三段技術指標與技術型態及致勝球落點分佈,藉以提供國內教練在從事桌球運動訓練與比賽之參考。
本研究以參加九十三年度全國大專校院運動會甲組桌球團體賽的二十支球隊,七十八場雙打賽為研究對象,以桌球比賽過程記錄表為研究工具,所得數據以描述性統計及獨立樣本t考驗進行統計分析,所得結論為:
一、大專甲組桌球團體賽,男、女子組雙打勝負對球隊勝負有絕影
響。
二、大專男子甲組雙打三段技術指標評估:在發球搶攻段及接發球搶
攻段得分率指標為「優秀」,使用率為「及格」。相持段得分率
指標為「及格」,使用率為「不及格」。
三、大專女子甲組雙打三段技術指標評估:在發球搶攻段得分率指標
為「良好」,使用率為「及格」。接發球搶攻段得分率指標為
「優秀」,使用率為「及格」。相持段得分率及使用率指標皆為
「不及格」。
四、大專甲組桌球雙打不同性別在各段使用率上有差異:三段技術的
六個變項間男甲組在發球搶攻段、接發球搶攻段中使用率高於女
甲組,相持段使用率女甲組高於男甲組。
五、大專男、女甲組雙打的得分技術類別以正手攻擊(包含側身攻)
為主。
六、大專男、女甲組雙打得分及失分落點在右半出檯區比例最多。
七、我國大專甲組桌球雙打不同性別落點分佈差異情形,女甲組擊球
落點在左半區出檯高於男甲組有差異,其他三個區域均無差異。
針對研究結果,本研究提出下列建議:
一、雙打佔團體賽比重約三到四成,但雙打勝可影響團體勝負七成,
對團體賽勝負有絕對之影響。
二、發搶段及接搶段表現佳,可繼續強化,但相持段技術則要加強。
三、在訓練過程中對擊球落點也要嚴格要求,在比賽應用才能控制節
奏及方向。
關鍵詞:大專甲組、雙打、桌球三段技術。
The Skill Analysis of Doubles for Table Tennis(Grup A)
In College Sports
Student:Chih-feng Hu
Advisor:Ching-ping Lin
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand the influence of scoring victories of Doubles teams(grup A)for table- tennis three-stage skill analysis, and what spots the smashed shots possibly went to in College Sports.Doing this reseach would certainly give more information to our national table tennis coaches.
The subjects of this study included twenty table tennis teams(grup A) competing in College Sports in 2004. There were also 78 games studied by the researcher who used the process of match records as a studying tool. The researcher analyzed these results through Descriptive Statistics and Independent t Test.the summary was as follows:
1.Winning or not for male and female table tennis Doubles
teams(grup A)had an absolute influence on the
competition results for their own teams in College Sports.
2.Evaluation of the three-stage skill index of college
female Doubles teams:The index of scoring percentage of
serve-then-aggress part and receive-then-aggress part was
“Excellent” ,and the using percentage was ”Pass”。
The index of scoring percentage of rally part was
”Pass”, but the using percentage was”No Pass”.
3.Evaluation of the three-stage skill index of college
female Doubles teams :The index of scoring percentage
of serve-then-aggress part was”Good” and the using
percentage was”Pass”.The index of scoring percentage of
receive-then-aggress part was”Excellent”,and the using
percentage was”Pass” Both the index of scoring
percentage of rally part and the using percentage were”
No Pass”.
4.There were differences in different genders about using
percentage in each section.The six variables in three-
stage skill showed that the using percentage of male
teams,serve-then-aggress part, receive-then- aggress
part was higer than that of female teams,but the
using percentage of female teams’rally part was higher
than that of male teams’.
5.Both male and female teams mainly used forehand as a way
of scoring.
6.The spots of scoring points or losing points for both
male and female teams basically lay on the left area.
7.Different genders obviously made the spots of striking
balls also different:The spots of striking balls for
female teams often lay on the left area and easily got
out of the table; that was different from male
teams.But,the other three areas were the same.
I’d like to make my suggestions from the final result of this research as below :
1. The numbers of Doubles teams were about 30 percent to 40
percent out of a total ,but the winning of the Double
teams would make a significant influence reaching as
high as 70 percent on the total competition.
2. Both the serve-then-agress part and the receive-then-
aggress part were very good; both of them could be
strengthened. But the techniques of rally part should
be trained more.
3.Be strict to ask for players to strike the right spots
during the training process, and then players can
control the rhythms and directions.
Key words: College Sports grup A ,(is for Physical Education student in College or student who are admitted to college without taking any exam.) Doubles, Three-stage Skill Analysis,
引用文獻
丘鐘惠(1982)。現代乒乓球技術的研究。北京:人民體育出版社。
丘鐘惠、吳煥群、莊家富、劉建和(1992)。中國優勢競技項目致勝
規律。北京:人民體育出版社。
中華民國桌球協會(1994)。亞洲女強技術特點。中華桌協內部資
料。
朱昌勇(1999)。我國大專桌球國手三段技術、心理變項與成績表現
之相關研究。國立政治大學升等論文。
吳煥群、周健康、李振彪、陶志翔、丁衛、吳宏(1988)。第二十四
屆奧運會雙打主要對手技戰術分析。乒壇競技科學診斷,123-
156。
吳煥群、李振彪(1990)。乒乓球運動員技術診斷方法的研究。乒乓
世界,38,38-40。
吳煥群、秦志峰、張曉蓬(1993)。為中國隊準備二十五屆奧運會科
研攻關的成果及效益。乒壇競技科學診斷,169-184。
李浩松(2001)。雙打。北京:人民體育出版社。
李曉東(2003)。王楠對弧圈球的攻防轉換。乒乓世界,131,54-
55。
周禾程(2002)。系統觀察法與電腦資訊在運動教育學上的運用。
動教育學,台北市:師大書苑。
姚漢禱。(1986)。桌球雙打技術分析。中華體育,2,40-45。
胡志鋒、林慶宏(2003)。莊智淵選手技、戰術之研究。中華桌球,
2003(2)。
秦志峰(1992)。乒乓球雙打比賽技術運用和配合規律研究。乒乓世
界,48,32-33。
秦志峰(1992)。乒乓球雙打比賽技術運用和配合規律研究。乒乓世
界,48,32-33。
秦志峰、張曉蓬、吳煥群、張燮林、蔡振華(1994)。第十二屆亞運
會乒乓項目中外主力隊員技術特徵和比賽實力研究。乒壇競技科
學診斷,215-225。
唐建軍(1997)。第四十三屆世乒賽中國及歐洲優秀選手技術分析。
北京體育大學學報,20(2),85-89。
張惠欽、蘇坎(1998)。乒乓球。北京:人民體育出版社。
張博(2002)。乒乓球步法的技巧。北京:人民體育出版社。
張曉蓬(2003)。蔣澎龍側身後轉推擋。乒乓世界,131,56-57。
張曉蓬(2003)。波爾發球搶攻技術。乒乓世界,131,58-59。
黃國義(1980)。桌球運動與運動力學。國民體育季刊,69(3),
27-30。
黃國義(1991)。桌球。台灣省政府教育廳。
黃國義(2000)。桌球比賽攻防能力之評估方法探討。國際大專運動
教練科學研討會。
許樹淵(2001)。運動訓練智略。臺北:師大書苑。
陳德林(2000)。乒乓球12區落點訓練法的實驗研究。成都體育學院
學報,26(2),86-88。
陳裕芬(2002)。我國少年桌球國手三段技術分析。(未出版碩士論
文)台灣師大體育學系,台北市。
陳金海(2002)。十五屆亞洲盃桌球雙打冠軍決賽綜合技術分析。長
榮學報,6(2),131-143。
陳金海(2002)。世界優秀男女桌球雙打運動員攻防技術之差異研
究。2002年國際運動訓練科學研討會(抽印本),1-5。
教育部(2004)。九十三年全國大專校院運動會,桌球秩序冊。
Barrett,K.R.(1979)Observation for teaching and coaching.
Journal of Physical Education and Recreation,23-25.