研究生: |
崔在勝 Choi, Jai-Seung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
對智能手機消費者的品牌喜好程度:中國市場某案例研究 Consumer Brand Preference of Smartphones: A Case Study of the Chinese Market |
指導教授: |
蕭中強
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 73 |
中文關鍵詞: | 智能手機 、客戶策略 、消費者品牌喜好程度 、值和量數據 |
英文關鍵詞: | smartphone, customer strategy, consumers’ brand preference, focus group interview, framework, qualitative and quantitative data |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202205002 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Not available
Recently, the companies involved in the smartphone business are facing various challenges and unpredictable business environment changes. Various companies strive to be the market leader through various strategies. Recently, the smartphone market has been experiencing slowdown in growth and an emergence of new brands. Under these market circumstances, display maker company LGD Mobile (where the author is employed) has also been struggling to gain market share and better profits for the last few years, despite employing various methods to counter the downturn. At present, LGD Mobile has not made any remarkable progress in this industry.
For this reason, this research adopted two methods to gain a specific solution from a customer strategy point of view: one is a case study to gain qualitative data by analyzing market trends and smartphone brand dynamics and the other is focus group interviews (FGIs) to determine implications from consumers’ mindsets regarding smartphone brands.
As an initial step, this research analyzed the smartphone market outlook. As mentioned above, the growth rate of the Chinese market, which is the main contributor to the growth of the smartphone market, also dropped from 14% in 2014 to 5% in 2015 due to saturated penetration of the smartphone. In the case of other IT products, such as notebooks, according to market survey data from IDC, three brands maintained their position in the top five from 2010 through in 2015; Acer and Toshiba were displaced by Apple and Asus. However, in the case of the smartphone market, only Apple and Samsung, which displaced Nokia and Motorola from the top spots, maintained their position in the top five smartphones list in the same time period. Nokia, the number one brand, Blackberry, the number two brand, and HTC, which was the first device with the Android OS, were all displaced from the top five by 2015. Even Samsung and Apple are struggling after facing the challenges presented by emerging Chinese smartphone makers.
For the next step, this research reviewed LGD Mobile customer portfolios and found that LGD concentrated on traditional mobile leaders, such as Nokia and Motorola, regardless of market trends by following a path similar to LG’s IT business. Moreover, the sales of LGD Mobile mainly came from a captive market—LG Electronics. The sales share of LG Electronics was 76% of the total revenue in 2015. This means that LGD Mobile’s lack of diversity in its customer base led to difficulties when its major customer was experienced a downturn.
The third step was to determine consumers’ brand preference for smartphone brands. This research conducted an FGI and assembled consumers’ perceptions and preferences for major brands in China, ranking them as high, middle, and low.
As a final step, by combining the sales trends of each brand from 2014 to 2015 and brand preference and brand preference levels, this research prioritized the customers on which LGD Mobile needs to focus by grouping the brands into five groups, A to E, from high to low priority.
It is difficult to predict what the market structure will be like in the near future, but we can surely deduce that the competition will be getting more intense than ever before. Under this circumstance, every company needs to improve its efficiency and competency to survive in the ruthlessly competitive smartphone market. This research intends to provide LGD Mobile with a more efficient framework using qualitative and quantitative data to set up a customer strategy that provides market advantages despite environment changes or challenges from competitors.
Keywords: smartphone, customer strategy, consumers’ brand preference,
focus group interview, framework, qualitative and quantitative data
Baltas, G., & Saridakis, C. (2010). Measuring brand equity in the car market: A hedonic price analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(2), 284–293.
BusinessDictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved January 15, 2016 from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/brand-image.html
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (April 2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81–93.
Connetinglab. (2015). Mobile trend 2016, Seoul: Miraeeuchang, 271–272.
Cowley, E., & Mitchell, A. A. (December 2003). The moderating effect of product knowledge of the learning and organization of product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 443–454.
Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln, Y. S., eds. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN 0-7619-2757-3.
Ebrahim, R. S. (April 2013). A study of brand preference: An experiential view, London, Brunel Business School, Brunel University, 113–114.
Garvin, D. (Sept.–Oct. 2003). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 106(1), 56–107.
Garvin, D. (May. –Jun. 1985). Product quality: An important strategic weapon. Business Horizons, 27, 440–43
Given, L. M. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage Publications. ISBN 1-4129-4163-6.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
Johansson, J. K. (2009). Global marketing: Foreign entry, local marketing, and global management. 5th ed. Burr Bridge, IL: McGraw-Hill-Irwin.
Kahle, L. R., Poulos, B., & Sukhdial, A. (February/March 1988). Changes in social values in the United States during the past decade. Journal of Advertising Research, 35–41.
Kaufman, M. T. (February 23, 2003). Robert K. Merton, versatile sociologist and father of the focus group, dies at 92. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/24/nyregion/robert-k-merton-versatile-sociologist-and-father-of-the-focus-group-dies-at-92.html?pagewanted=all.
Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 595–600.
Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Global edition, 4th edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Kotler, P., Gregor, W., & Rogers, W. (Winter 1977). The marketing audit comes of age. Sloan Management Review, 18, 2, 25–43.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing management. 14th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
LG Business Insight. Retrieved March 1, 2016 from http://www.lgeri.com/industry/electronic/article.asp?grouping=01030200&seq=582
Management Study Guide. (n.d.). Retrieved February 20, 2016 from http://www.managementstudyguide.com/measuring-outcomes-of-brand-equity.htm
McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (January 2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66, 38–54
McBee, R. D. (Fall 2001). Harley-Davidson’s future. International Journal of Motorcycle Studies, 7.
McWilliam, G. (Spring 2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41, 3, 43–54.
Muniz, A. & O’Guinn, T. (March 2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 421–432.
Norman, B. (1998). Revitalizing brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 5(3), 15–20.
Palmer, G., & Lordanou, L. (2015). Exploring cases using emotion, open space and creativity. Case-based Teaching and Learning for the 21st Century, (Libri), 19–38.
Sister Mary Edward Healy, C. S. J. (1947). Le Play’s contribution to sociology: His method. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 8(2), 97–110.
Sujan, M., & Dekleva, C. (December 1987). Product categorization and inference making: Some implications for comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 372–378.
Srinivasan, V. (January 1979). Network models for estimating brand-specific effects in multi- attribute marketing models. Management Science, 25, 11–21
Srinivasan, V., Park, C. S., & Chang, D. R. (September 2005). An approach to the measurement, analysis, and prediction of brand equity and its sources. Management Science, 51, 9, 1433–1448.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Strategy Analytics. (2015). Global smartphone user penetration forecast by 88 countries: 2007– 2020.
Swaminathan, V., Page, K., & Zeynep Gu(..)rhan-Canil. (August 2007). My brand or our brand: Individual-and group-based brand relationships and self-construal effects on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34. 248–259.
Walker, R. (2008). Buying in. New York: Random House.
Weil, R., Schipper, K., & Francis, J. (2010). Financial accounting: An instruction to concepts, methods, and uses. Mason, OH: Southwestern Engage Learning.
Wentz, L. (September 1996). Brand audits reshaping images. Ad Age International, 38–41.
Whowired Korea. Retrieved January 5, 2016 from http://kr.whowired.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=410020
Wilkie, W. L. (1994). Consumer behavior. 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Yip, G. S. (1996). Total global strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall