簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 柯志宏
Chih-Hung Ko
論文名稱： Borg 6~20量表和OMNI量表之自覺強度與各生理反應之相關比較
Relationship of the Borg 6~20 Scale and OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Response in Men
指導教授： 林正常
Lin, Jung-Charng
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年： 2008
畢業學年度： 96
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 66
中文關鍵詞： Borg 6~20量表 、OMNI量表
英文關鍵詞： Borg 6~20 scale, OMNI scale
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：1580  下載：81 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 目的：本研究目的在比較Borg 6~20量表和OMNI量表於腳踏車衰竭性運動中，所得之RPE值與各生理反應的相關。方法：本研究以三十位體育系之健康男性（年齡：20.03 ± 2.22歲；身高：175.37 ± 4.57公分；體重：70.57 ± 7.33公斤；身體質量指數：22.91 ± 1.85公斤/公尺2）為受試對象，每位受試者以平衡次序方式，分別使用Borg 6~20量表和OMNI量表，在原地腳踏車測功儀上各進行一次衰竭性運動測驗。測驗過程中記錄受試者各階段的心跳率、換氣量、攝氧量、呼吸交換率、RPE值等人體生理反應值。實驗所得之資料以皮爾遜積差相關進行分析，以得到各生理反應和兩種量表之相關係數；再以相依樣本t考驗比較相關係數間之差異顯著情形。結果：兩種量表所得之RPE值與心跳率、換氣量、攝氧量、呼吸交換率反應等生理變項有顯著相關 ( p < .05)；Borg 6~20和OMNI兩種量表所得RPE值與各生理反應之相關係數間無顯著差異。結論：在原地腳踏車上進行漸增式運動測驗時，使用Borg 6~20量表或OMNI量表，皆能準確反應成人在運動過程中各項生理指標。

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the RPE value and the relationship of physiological responses in comparing Borg 6~20 scale and OMNI scale during the exhaustive exercise on bicycle ergometer. Methods: 30 healthy males students (age: 20.03 ± 2.22 years; height: 175.37 ± 4.57 cm; weight: 70.57 ± 7.33 kg; BMI: 22.91 ± 1.85 kg/m2) of the Department of Physical Education were tested in this study. Each testing subject used Borg 6~20 scale and OMNI scale respectively by counter-balance design, and did the testing of the exhaustive exercise on bicycle ergometer. Heart rate, ventilation, oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange rate, and RPE value of every subject during each stage were measured when exercising. Pearson’s correlation was applied to get the correlation between RPE value of two kinds of scales and physiological responses. Dependent t-test was applied to compare the correlation between two kinds of scales. Results: The RPE value of the two scales were significantly correlated with heart rate, ventilation, oxygen consumption and respiratory exchange rate ( p<.05). And the correlation coefficients were not significantly different between the two kinds of scales. Conclusion: The Borg 6~20 scale and OMNI scale are all good for identifying exercise intensity for adults during incremental exercise testing.

    中文摘要..................................I 英文摘要..................................II 謝誌......................................III 目次......................................IV 表次......................................VI 圖次......................................VII 第壹章 緒論...............................1 一、問題背景...............................1 二、研究目的...............................4 三、研究假設...............................5 四、名詞操作性定義 ..........................5 五、研究的重要性............................9 第貳章 文獻探討............................10 一、Borg 6~20量表的發展與介紹...............10 二、OMNI量表的發展與介紹....................12 三、Borg 6~20量表與OMNI量表文字表達之比較....14 四、RPE值與運動時各生理指標之相關............16 五、本章總結...............................20 第參章 研究方法............................21 一、受試對象...............................21 二、實驗時間與地點 .........................21 三、實驗儀器與設備 .........................21 四、實驗步驟...............................22 五、資料處理與統計分析......................27 第肆章 結果................................29 一、受試者基本資料 ..........................29 二、受試者最大運動表現之生理值................29 三、RPE值與生理變項之相關程度................30 四、兩種量表RPE值與各生理反應相關係數之比較....36 第伍章 討論與結論...........................37 一、RPE值與心跳率的關係......................37 二、RPE值與換氣量的關係......................38 三、RPE值與攝氧量的關係......................39 四、RPE值與呼吸交換率的關係...................39 五、兩量表之RPE值與各生理反應相關程度之比較.....40 六、結論與建議...............................41 參考文獻....................................43 附錄........................................47 附錄一 受試者健康情況調查表...................47 附錄二 受試者須知............................48 附錄三 受試者參與同意書.......................49 附錄四 受試者最大運動表現生理數值表(Borg 6~20量表).51 附錄五 受試者最大運動表現生理數值表(OMNI量表)....52 附錄六 受試者第一階段運動強度生理數值表..........53 附錄七 受試者第二階段運動強度生理數值表..........55 附錄八 受試者第三階段運動強度生理數值表..........57 附錄九 受試者第四階段運動強度生理數值表..........59 附錄十 受試者第五階段運動強度生理數值表..........61 附錄十一 受試者第六階段運動強度生理數值表........63 附錄十二 受試者第七階段運動強度生理數值表........65 表 次 表1-1 Borg 6~20量表（1985)....................6 表1-2 成人OMNI腳踏車量表.......................7 表2-1 Borg 6~20量表（1966; 1985)..............11 表2-2 成人OMNI跑步量表.........................13 表2-3 成人與兒童OMNI量表的文字敘述比較...........13 表2-4 Borg 6~20量表與OMNI量表文字表達之比較......15 表2-5 RPE量表與心跳率之相關文獻表................17 表2-6 RPE量表與攝氧量之相關表文獻表..............18 表2-7 RPE量表與換氣量之相關文獻表................19 表2-8 RPE量表與呼吸交換率之相關文獻表.............20 表4-1 受試者基本資料表..........................29 表4-2 受試者最大運動表現之生理值..................30 表4-3 生理指標相關係數差異顯著考驗表..............36 表5-1 漸增性運動中各階段的心跳率與RPE值...........38 圖 次 圖3-1 實驗流程.................................23 圖3-2 運動測驗流程..............................26 圖4-1 心跳率與Borg 6~20量表相關圖................31 圖4-2 心跳率與OMNI量表相關圖.....................31 圖4-3 換氣量與Borg 6~20量表的相關圖..............32 圖4-4 換氣量與OMNI量表的相關圖...................33 圖4-5 攝氧量與Borg 6~20量表的相關圖..............34 圖4-6 攝氧量與OMNI量表的相關圖...................34 圖4-7 呼吸交換率與Borg 6~20量表的相關圖...........35 圖4-8 呼吸交換率與OMNI量表的相關圖 ................36

    林正常(1997) 。運動生理學。台北市：師大書苑。

    American College of Sports Medicine. (1991). Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.

    Borg, G. (1962). A simple rating scale for use in physical work tests. Kungliga Fysiografiska Sallskapets i Lund Fdrhandlingar, 32, 7-15.

    Borg, G. (1966). About determination of physical
    “maximalarbeten” and possibility to predict these on the basis of subjective effort. Poster session presented at the Education-Department of Psychology, Umea.

    Borg, G. (1982a). A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In Geissler, H. G., & Petzold, P. (Eds.),Psychophysical judgement and the process of perception (pp.25-34).
    Berlin: VEB Deutcher Verlag der Wissenschaften.

    Borg, G. (1982b). Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 14, 371-381.

    Borg, G. (1985). An introduction to Borg’s RPE-scale. Ithaca, NY: Mouvement.

    Borg, G., & Dahlstrom, H. (1959). Psychophysical study of work on the bicycle ergometer. Nordisk Medicine, 62, 1383-1386.

    Covey, M. K., Larson, J. L., & Wirtz , S. (1999). Reliability of submaximal exercise tests in patients with COPD. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, 1257-1264.

    Eston, R.G., & Williams, J. G. (1986). Exercise intensity and perceived exertion in adolescent boys. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 20, 27-30.

    Eston, R.G., & Williams, J. G. (1988). Reliability of ratings of perceived effort for regulation of exercise intensity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 22, 153-154.

    Eston, R.G., & Connolly, D. (1996). The use of ratings of perceived exertion for exercise prescription in patients receiving beta-blocker therapy. Sports Medicine, 21, 176-190.

    Gamberale, F. (1972). Perceived exertion, heart rate, oxygen uptake and blood lactate in different work operations. Ergonomics, 15(5), 545–554.

    Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Hardy, C. J., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). Not what, but how one feels: The measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 304-317.

    Karavatas, S. G., & Tavakol, K. (2005). Concurrent validity of Borg’s rating of perceived exertion in African-American young adults, employing heart rate as the standard. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(1). Retrieved November 20, 2006, from
    http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/vol3num1/karavatas.htm

    Lamb, K. L., Eston, R. G., & Corns, D. (1999). Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 33, 336-339.

    Leung, R. W., Chung, P. K., & Leung, M. L. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of two perceived exertion rating scales among Hong Kong children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 1047-1062.

    Leung, R. W., Leung, M. L., & Chung, P. K. (2004). Validity and reliability of a Cantonese-translated rating of perceived exertion scale among Hong Kong adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 725-735.

    Mahon, A. D., Stolen, K. Q., & Gay, J. A. (2001). Differentiated perceived exertion during submaximal exercise in children and adults. Pediatric Exercise Science, 13, 145-153.

    Mark, M., Sharon, P., & Christine, W. (2002). Using ratings of perceived exertion to reproduce blood lactate levels during a continuous exercise bout of varying intensities. European Journal of Sport Sciences, 2, 1-11.

    Marriott, H. E., & Lamb, K. L. (1996). The use of ratings of perceived exertion for regulating exercise levels in rowing ergometry. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 72, 267-271.

    Morgan, W. P., & Pollock, M. L. (1977). Psychologic characterization of the elite distance runner. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 301, 382-403.

    Pollock, M. L. (1988). Prescribing exercise for fitness and adherence. In: R. K. Dishman (Ed.). Exercise adherence: Its Impact on Public Heaith. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.

    Pfeiffer, K. A., Pivarnik, J. M., Womack, C. J., Reeves, M. J., & Malina, R. M. (2002). Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 2057-2061.

    Riechman, S. E., Zoeller, R. F., Balasekaran, G., Goss, F. L., & Robertson, R. J. (2002). Predicition of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20(9), 681-687.

    Robertson, R. J., Goss, F. L., Boer, N. F., Peoples, J. A., Foreman, A. J., Dabayebeh, I. M., et al. (2000). Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: Mixed gender and race validation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 452-458.

    Robertson, R. J., Goss, F. L., Rutkoeski, J., Lendz, B., Dixon, C., Timmer, J., et al. (2003a). Concourrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35, 333-341.

    Robertson, R. J., Goss, F. L., Dube, J., Rutkoeski, J., Dupain, M., Brennan, C., et al. (2003b). Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 102-108.

    Robertson, R. J. (2004). Perceived exertion for practitioners: Rating effort with the OMNI picture system. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Stoudemire, N. M., Wideman, L., Pass, K. A., McGinnes, C.L., Gaesser, G. A., & Weltman, A. (1996). The validity of regulating blood lactate concentration during running by ratings of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in
    Sports and Exercise, 28, 490-495.

    Utter, A. C., Robertson, R. J., Nieman, D. C., & Kang, J. (2002). Children’s OMNI scale of perceived exertion: walking/running evaluation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 139-144.

    Utter, A. C., Robertson, R. J., Green, J. M., Suminski, R. R., Mcanulty, S. R., & Nieman, D. C. (2004). Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 1776-1780.

    Ward, D. S., & Bar-Or, O. (1990). Use of the Borg scale in exercise prescription for overweight youth. Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 15, 120-125.

    Whaley, M. H., Woodall, M. T., Kaminsky, L. A., Emmett, A., & John, D. (1997). Reliability of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 17, 37-42.

    QR CODE