研究生: |
張敏霞 Cheong, Man-Ha |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
致我們的學生時代—澳門留級生之敘事研究 To our school days-A Narrative Research on Macau Students with experiences of grade retention |
指導教授: |
卯靜儒
Mao, Chin-Ju |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
課程與教學研究所 Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 215 |
中文關鍵詞: | 澳門 、留級 、學生經驗 、敘事研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | Macau, Grade Retention, Student Experience, Narrative Research |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203241 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:240 下載:78 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
高留級率,一直是澳門教育發展存在的難題。就目前的有關研究而言,似乎尚未有專門針對澳門留級學生經驗的專題研究。故此,本研究憑著對澳門留級學生的關懷,採用敘事研究的取徑,以深度訪談為主要資料蒐集方式,探究其等的經驗,以及留級對其等產生的影響。
本研究依據與二位留級學生的深度訪談,以其等留級經驗的「生成」、「應對」以及「意義」為核心,分析與詮釋二人所敘說的生命故事:(一)留級經驗的生成:二人皆處於複雜多元脈絡情境中,受到眾多脈絡因素影響,諸如社會文化思潮、學校教育制度、個人特質及家庭環境等,而二人的經驗亦深受這些脈絡因素影響,使得其個人人格需求與制度角色期望不符而留級。(二)留級經驗的應對:留級,不但為二人形成負面個人感受,而且為其等所處的社會關係,帶來眾多壓力,甚至產生危機。而老師、同儕的接納與關懷,以及生活重要支撐,是協助二人回復穩定狀態的關鍵;二人亦具有能動性,去對抗一些強加於其身上的角色期望。(三)留級經驗的意義:生命是持續不斷的累積,二人都將留級經驗視為其等眾多生命經驗,在時間的延伸與空間的交錯下,呈顯的一個生命交會點。最後,藉由研究限制與自我省思,提出若干建議。
The high occurrence of grade retention has been a difficult problem in educational development in Macau. However, there seems to have a lack of academic research on the related topic. Caring about students who experienced grade retention, this research uses narrative methodology as the research tool. The data collection is conducted through in-depth interviews. The purpose is to investigate into the influence of experiences of grade retention on students.
There are two research subjects invited to the in-depth interviews, both of them were students that experienced grade retention in school days. Based on the data gathered in the interviews, the author interprets and analyzes their life stories. Subsequently, their stories can be concluded into three major viewpoints: 1. “Cause”: the subjects lived in complicated and complex circumstances. They were also affected by multiple factors, such as social cultural thoughts, educational systems, personalities and family backgrounds. Profoundly influenced by these factors, a conflict between the needs of the subjects and the expectations of social systems was generated. Therefore, they were caused to repeat a year. 2. “Strategy”: Not only repeating a year brought negative influence on their emotion, but also gave pressure to their social relationships, even pushing them in danger. Fortunately, acceptance and care from teachers and classmates, as well as important life supports, were crucial strategies helping them back to stability. On the other hand, they had initiative to confront the imposed expectations. 3. “Significance”: The subjects believed that the experience of grade retention was a significant intersection of their life experiences. Last but not least, the author raises several suggestions regarding research restrictions and auto-criticism.
中文部分
毛彥文(摘譯)(1936)。Robinson, Bruce B著。學校留級制度對於兒童的害處。教育雜誌,26(7),261-263。
王智勇、鄧明宇(譯)(2003)。Riessman, Catherine Kohler著。敘說分析(Narrative Analysis)。臺北市:五南。
王順民(2004)。窗外有藍天—中輟生的何去何從。財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論。取自http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/093/SS-C-093-051.htm
朱儀羚、吳芝儀、蔡欣志、康萃婷、柯嬉慧(譯)(2004)。Crossley M. L著。敘事心理與研究:自我、創傷與意義的建構(Introducing Narrative Psychology: Self, Trauma and the Construction of Meaning)。臺北市:濤石。
何瑞珠(1998)。家長參與子女的教育:文化資本與社會資本的闡釋。教育學報,26(2),233-261。
吳木崑(2009)。杜威經驗哲學對課程與教學之啟示。臺北市立教育大學學報,40(1),35-54。
吳志良、楊允中、馮少榮(合編)(1995)。澳門1995。澳門:澳門基金會。
吳芝儀(2000)。國中階段中輟學生輟學經驗與危機因素之研究。犯罪學期刊,5,179-232。
吳芝儀(譯)(2008)。Amia Lieblich, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach & Tamar Zilber著。敘事研究:閱讀、分析與詮釋(Narrative research: reading, analysis and interpretation)。嘉義市:濤石。
吳蔓伶(2006)。主流看不到的本事與精彩—在國中中輟復學生的生涯階段轉換歷程中。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文,彰化市。
李日章(譯)(2005)。G. R. Geiger著。杜威:科學的人文主義哲學家(John Dewey in perspective)。臺北縣:康德。
李錦旭(譯)(1987)。David Blackledge & Barry Hunt著。教育社會學理論(Sociological Interpretations of Education)。臺北市:桂冠。
貝磊、古鼎儀(2006)。香港和澳門的教育—從比較角度看延續與變化。北京:人民教育。
周玉連(2010)。許自己一個未來—高職復學生求學生涯發展歷程之敘事研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職碩士論文,臺北市。
周新富(2013)。教育社會學。臺北市:五南。
林俊瑩、吳裕益(2007)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響──階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊,52(4),107-144。
林美珠(2000)。敘事研究:從生命故事出發。輔導季刊,36(4),27-34。
林曉芸(2002)。其實你不懂我的心—中輟少年學習經驗研究。國立臺灣大學社會研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
高勝文(2013)。淺談澳門留級制度問題—解決留級問題的治本良方。發表於2013年11月6日澳門中華教育會主辦之「留級制度存廢探討學術研討會」,澳門。
張浩賢、陳志峰(2013)。試論澳門教師面對留級問題的困境。發表於2013年11月6日澳門中華教育會主辦之「留級制度存廢探討學術研討會」,澳門。
梁啟賢(2011,3月28日)。請正視澳門的提早輟學問題。澳門日報,文化視野。
章勝傑、林烘煜(2009)。二分依變項相關性研究的後議分析:以留級興起齡對學童中酸的影響為例。台東大學教育學報,20 ( 1 ) , 1-31。
莊明貞(2008)。從方法論出發:理解一所郊區小型學校課程革新的敘事探究。課程研究,3(2),49-74。
莫安夏 (1954)。論本省中學生留級問題。臺灣教育輔導月刊,4(12),14-16。
許江雄(2012)。從福柯規訓權力的視角探討澳門私校初中升留級標準。澳門大學教育學院教育行政專業碩士論文,澳門。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南
陳志峰(2011)。澳門回歸十年非高等教育範疇大事記(1999.12-2009.12)。澳門:澳門中華教育會。
陳奎憙(2001)。教育社會學導論。臺北市:師大書苑。
傅佩榮(2007)。人生的快樂靠自己追求。臺北市:九歌。
單文經、鄭英傑、張建成、廖遠光(2013)。台灣中學留級觀念與作法的變革。發表於2013年11月6日澳門中華教育會主辦之「留級制度存廢探討學術研討會」,澳門。
湯仁燕(2010)。適性教育與自我價值的開展。T&D 飛訊,98,1-20。
黃武雄(2013)。學校在窗外。新北市:左岸文化。
黃益啟(2013)。馬來西亞獨中留級生逆境復原力之研究—以南馬某獨中留級生為例。國立成功大學教育研究所學位論文,臺南市。
黃素君、吳娟、孫旭花(2010)。澳門校本課程改革的「雙城記」:「遙控」vs.「浸入」式的U-S 夥伴協作兩種校本支援路徑。課程研究(香港特刊),1-28。
黃德祥、林重岑、薛秀宜譯(2007)。Jeanne H. Ballantine著。教育社會學(The Sociology of Education)。臺北市:心理。
楊文佳(2011)。從PISA視角透析澳門留級生特徵。澳門大學教育學院課程與教學專業碩士論文,澳門。
楊孟麗、謝水南(譯)(2003)。J.R.Fraenkel, N.E.Wallen, Helen H.Hyun著。教育研究法:研究設計實務(How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education)。臺北市:心理。
聖公會澳門社會服務處(2010)。「澳門失學青少年學習動機」調查報導。取自http://www.skhssco.org.mo/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=175%3A2010-10-11-02-36-34&catid=57%3A2009-07-16-09-36-38&Itemid=132&lang=zh
趙大英(1999)。從澳門所處的經濟環境看澳門未來發展。地理學報,6,487-495。
劉異(2011)。從社會規訓的角度看輟學現象。論盡媒體,每週專題。取自:http://aamacau.com/2011/02/25/從社會規訓的角度看輟學現象/
劉羨冰(2000)。《基本法》決定全民教育的路向。收編於單文經、林發欽主編(2004) 。澳門人文社會科學研究文選,教育卷。北京:教育科學出版社。
劉羨冰(2005,7月5日)。一個不能丟,芬蘭做到了。澳門日報,澳聞,來論。
劉羨冰(2007)。澳門教育史。澳門:澳門出版協會。
劉羨冰(2013,12月30日)。以弱抗強,得道多助—澳門回歸前政府強推葡語教育的經過。澳門日報,D7。
歐陽教(1985)。教育哲學導論。臺北市:文景出版社。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯(譯)(2003)。Jean Clandinin&Michael Connelly著。敘說研究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research)。臺北市:心理。
鄧偉強(2013)。學業失敗對教育系統對社會發展的影響和對策。發表於2013年11月6日澳門中華教育會主辦之「留級制度存廢探討學術研討會」,澳門。
鄭英傑、賴文輝、何錫標、蘇敏森、黃金花(2013)。澳門留級制度對學生學業成就表現之影響:以PISA 2009閱讀素養成績為例。發表於2013年11月6日澳門中華教育會主辦之「留級制度存廢探討學術研討會」,澳門。
鄭錦波、黃綺妮(2014,8月4日)。留級是學習的特效藥?。澳門日報,文化教思版。
澳門中華教育會(2014)。澳門留級制度研究。取自澳門中華教育會網頁http://www.edum.org.mo/download/294.pdf。
澳門中華教育會教育科學研究組(2013)。澳門基礎教育留級問題(教師視角)研究。澳門教育,1,4-11。
澳門政府(1991)。澳門教育制度(第11/91/M 號法令)。澳門:澳門政府。
澳門政府(1997)。核准並規範第二階段普及傾向免費教育(第4/97/M 號法令)。澳門:澳門政府。
澳門特別行政區(2006)。非高等教育制度綱要法。取自http://bo.io.gov.mo/bo/i/2006/52/lei09_cn.asp
澳門特別行政區(2015)。本地學制正規教育基本學力要求(第10/2015號行政法規)。澳門:澳門特區政府。
澳門教育暨青年局(2005)。離校暨輟學學生調查提要報告2004。取自http://portal.dsej.gov.mo/webdsejspace/internet/category/teachorg/Inter_main_page.jsp?id=8493
澳門教育暨青年局(2012)。教育數字概覽(2011/2012教育數字、2010/2011教育概要)。取自http://202.175.82.54/dsej/stati/2011/edu_num11_c.pdf
澳門教育暨青年局(2015)。2013/2014學年離校生狀況調查簡報(義務教育及非義務教育學生)。取自http://portal.dsej.gov.mo/webdsejspace/internet/category/teachorg/Inter_main_page.jsp?id=8493
澳門教育暨青年局(2015)。教育數字概覽(2014/2015教育數字、2013/2014教育概要)。取自http://202.175.82.54/dsej/stati/2014/edu_num14_c.pdf
澳門統計暨普查局(2015a)。就業調查—總體就業人口。取自http://www.dsec.gov.mo/TimeSeriesDatabase.aspx?KeyIndicatorID=26
澳門統計暨普查局(2015b)。就業調查—按行業統計之就業人口。取自http://www.dsec.gov.mo/PredefinedReport.aspx?ReportID=10
謝臥龍(主編)(2004)。質性研究。臺北市:心理。
聶鍾杉 (1958)。留級問題的研究。臺灣教育輔導月刊,8(3),11-15。
顏寧(譯)(2011)。Sharan B. Merrian著。質性研究:設計與施作指南(Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation)。臺北市:五南。
龔水桑.阿爾芙斯.斌多(1987)。澳門教育—對教育制度之探索。澳門:教育文化政務司辦公室。
英文部分
Abidin, R. R., Golladay, W. M., & Howerton, A. L. (1971). Elementary school retention: An unjustifiable, discriminatory, and noxious policy. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 410–414.
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1994). On the success of failure: A reassessment of the effects of retention in the primary grades. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, G. E., Jimerson, S. R., & Whipple, A.D. (2005). Student Ratings of Stressful Experiences at Home and School: Loss of a Parent and Grade Retention as Superlative Stressors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21(1), 1-20.
Bali, V.A., Anagnostopoulos, D., & Roberts, R. (2005). Toward a political explanation of grade retention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 133-155.
Blake, J. (1981). Family Size and the Quality of Children. Demography, 18, 421-42.
Brophy, J. (2006). Grade repetition. Paris/Brussels: International Academy of Education/International Institute for Educational Planning.
Byrnes, D. A., & Yamamoto, K. (1985). Academic retention of elementary pupils: An inside look. Education, 106(2), 208.
Cannon, J.S., & Lipscomb, S. (2011). Early grade retention and student success: Evidence from Los Angeles. Report of Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_311JCR.pdf
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Gottfredson, D. C., Fink, C. M., & Graham, N. (1994). Grade retention and problem behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 761–784.
Griffith, C. A., Lloyd, J. W., Lane, K. L., & Tankersley, M. (2010). Grade retention of students during grades K-8 predicts reading achievement and progress during secondary schooling. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 26, 51-66.
Grisson. J. B., & Shepard. L. A. (1989). Repeating and Dropping Out of School. In Shepard, L. A. & Smith, M. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 34-63). England: The Falmer Press.
Hofstadter, R. (1955). Social Darwinism in American Thought. B.S.N.: Beacon Press.
Holmes, C. T. (1989). Grade-level retention effects: A meta-analysis of research studies. In Shepard, L. A. & Smith, M. L. (Eds.), Flunking grades: Research and policies on retention (pp. 16–33). England: The Falmer Press.
Holmes, C. T., & Matthews, K. M. (1984). The effects of nonpromotion on elementary and junior high school pupils: A meta-analysis. Reviews of Educational Research, 54, 225-236
Jackson, G. (1975). The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 45, 613-635.
Jimerson, S. R., Anderson, G. E., & Whipple, A. D. (2002). Winning the battle and losing the war: Examining the relation between grade retention and dropping out of high school. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 441-457.
Jimerson, S. R., Woehr, S. M., & Kaufman, A. M. (2007). Grade retention and promotion: Information for parents. National Association of School Psychologists, 1-3.
Jimerson, S., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 3–25.
Jimerson, S.R. (1999). On the failure of failure: Examining the association between early grade retention and education and employment outcomes during late adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 243-272.
Jimerson, S.R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30, 420-437.
Martin, A.J. (2009). Age appropriateness and motivation, engagement, and performance in high school: Effects of Age Within Cohort, Grade Retention, and Delayed School Entry. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 101-114.
Martin, A.J. (2011). Holding back and holding behind: Grade retention and students’ non-academic and academic outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 739-763.
McCoy, A. R., & Reynolds, A.J. (1999). Grade retention and school performance: An extended investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 37(3), 273-298.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Makes a School Successful? –Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). Pisa, OECD Publishing.
OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). Pisa, OECD Publishing.
Range, B.G., Holt, C., Pijanowski, J., & Young, S. (2012). The Perceptions of Primary Grade Teachers and Elementary Principals about the Effectiveness of Grade Level Retention. The Professional Educator, 36(1), 1-17.
Roderick, M. (1995). Grade retention and school dropout- Policy debate and research questions. The Research Bulletin, 15, 88–92.
Sandoval, J. (1984). Repeating the first grade: How the decision is made. Psychology in the Schools, 21(4), 457–462.
Schwerdt. G., & West. M. R. (2013). The effects of Test-based Retention on Student Outcomes over Time: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Florida. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Paper Series 12-09. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
Silberglitt, B., Appleton, J. J., Burns, M. K., Jimerson, S. R. (2006). Examining the Effects of Grade Retention on Student Reading Performance: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of School Psychology, 44 (4), 255-270.
Tanner, C. K., & Combs, F. E. (1993). Student Retention Policy: The Gap between Research and Practice. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8(1), 69-77.
Tomchin, Ellen M., & Impara, James C. (1992). Unraveling Teachers’ Beliefs About Grade Retention. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 199- 223.
White, P. (2003). School retention reference: Directions and priorities. Report for the Social Inclusion Board of South Australia.
Wong, Yi-Lee (2013). Why are In-grade Retention Rates so High in Macao? Current Issues in Education, 16(3), 1-17.
Zill, N., Loomis, L., & West, J. (1997). The elementary school performance and adjustment of children who enter kindergarten late or repeat kindergarten: Findings from national surveys. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98097.pdf