本研究的目的是為「多點觸控支援合作設計式學習（multi-touch enhanced collaborative design based learning, M-T CDBL）」建立一實施模式，使教學者與學習者能依循此模式進行M-T CDBL活動。本研究共邀請到八位具備資訊科技融入教學、合作學習研究、與現場教學等經驗的教育工作者參與研究，透過凱利方格法分析參與者對於M-T CDBL活動流程的組成構件之共識，藉以得出M-T CDBL模式，並進一步將模式導入系統中。本研究所建立的M-T CDBL模式共包含九個階段，分別為操作練習、澄清問題、蒐集資料、發展想法、建構作品、檢討反思、發表作品、再次修正、以及教師總結，而每個階段皆有一至三個組成構件，共20個組成構件。本研究建議模式的使用者依據設計任務的難度、活動時間的規劃、學習者的程度等考量，選擇欲採用的組成構件，此外，本研究也根據研究結果提供一精簡模式，該精簡模式包含本研究建議模式使用者應執行的五個階段，分別為澄清問題、蒐集資料、建構作品、檢討反思、以及發表作品，每個階段有一至兩個建議採用的組成構件，共7個組成構件。

中文部分
王佑鎂、李璐（2009）。設計型學習──一種正在興起的學習範式。中國電化教育，10，12-16。
吳百興、吳心楷（2010）。八年級原住民學生在設計導向活動的科學學習。科學教育學刊，18（4），277-304。
林清山（1988）。多變項分析統計法（5版）。臺北市：臺灣東華。
邱瓊慧、黃森山、楊凱翔（2013）。多點觸控增進合作設計式創新學習模式之發展與評估：以平面幾何為主題（1/3）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期中成果報告（NSC 101-2511-S-003-033-MY3）。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。
陳佳惠、阮明淑（2010）。壽險顧問銷售流程的隱性知識之研究─方格技術運用。圖書館學與資訊科學，36（2），52-70。
陳啟亮（2010）。以凱利方格法探索書後索引編製行為。圖書館學與資訊科學，36（2），35-51。
楊坤原、張賴妙理（2005）。問題本位學習的理論基礎與教學歷程。中原學報，33（2），215-235。

英文部分
Agostini, A., Di Biase, E., & Loregian, M. (2010). Stimulating cooperative and participative learning to match digital natives’ needs. In Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp. 274-279). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Apedoe, X., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.
Barnett, M. (2005). Engaging inner city students in learning through designing remote operated vehicles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 87-100.
Battocchi, A., Esposito, G., Ben-Sasson, A., Gal, E., Pianesi, F., Venuti, P., et al. (2008). Collaborative puzzle game - an interface for studying collaboration and social interaction for children who are typically developed or who have autistic spectrum disorder. In P. Sharkey (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Series on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, Maia, Portugal. Reading University Press.
Beail, N. (1985). An introduction to repertory grid technique. In N. Beail (Ed.), Repertory grid technique and personal constructs: Applications in clinical and educational settings (pp. 1-24). London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.
Cammock, P., Nilakant, V., & Dakin, S. (1995). Developing a lay model of managerial effectiveness: A social constructionist perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 443-474.
Curtis, A. M., Wells, T. M., Higbee, T., & Lowry, P. B. (2008). An overview and tutorial of the repertory grid technique in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 23(3), 37-62.
Custer, R. L., & Wright, R. T. (2009). Restructuring the technology teacher education curriculum. In C. Y. P. Committee (Ed.), Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology (pp. 150-172). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107-126.
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., … Tilson, J. L. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
de Bono, E. (1986). The practical teaching of thinking using the cort method. Special Services in the Schools, 3(1-2), 33-47.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education (1st Free Press Paperback ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Company.
Dietz, P., & Leigh, D. (2001). Diamondtouch: A multi-user touch technology. In J. Marks & E. D. Mynatt (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 219-226). Association for Computing Machinery.
Donaghue, H. (2003). An instrument to elicit teachers' beliefs and assumptions. ELT journal, 57(4), 344-351.
Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of project-based learning in a mechatronics context. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 7-24.
Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55-65.
Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.
Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. (2008). Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 11(3), 195-209.
Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology: Genetic engineering experience improves understanding of gene expression. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298.
Elliott, J., & Bruckman, A. (2002). Design of a 3d interactive math learning environment. In B. Verplank, A. Sutcliffe, W. Mackay, J. Amowitz & W. Gaver (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 64-74). ACM.
Epting, F. R., Suchman, D. I., & Nickeson, C. J. (1971). An evaluation of elicitation procedures for personal constructs. British Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 513-517.
Fessakis, G., Tatsis, K., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2008). Supporting “learning by design” activities using group blogs. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 199-212.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879.
Foster, J. J., Barkus, E., & Yavorsky, C. (2006). Understanding and using advanced statistics: A practical guide for students (1 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Gómez Puente, S. M., van Eijck, M., & Jochems, W. (2011). Towards characterising design-based learning in engineering education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 137-149.
Hagans, C. L., Neimeyer, G. J., & Robert Goodholm, C. (2000). The effect of elicitation methods on personal construct differentiation and valence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 13(2), 155-173.
Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Hankinson, G. (2004). Repertory grid analysis: An application to the measurement of destination images. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9(2), 145-153.
Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., et al. (2009). Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1 (pp. 335-344). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55(1), 76-83.
Hwang, G.-J. (1994). Knowledge elicitation and integration from multiple experts. Journal of Inforamtion Science and Engineering, 10(1), 99-109.
Jankowicz, D. (2004). The easy guide to repertory grids (1 ed.). Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (1 ed. Vol. 1). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Kelly, G. A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs (reprint ed. Vol. 1). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kharrufa, A., Leat, D., & Olivier, P. (2010). Digital mysteries: Designing for learning at the tabletop. Paper presented at the 5th ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Kobourov, S., Pavlou, K., Cappos, J., Stepp, M., Miles, M., & Wixted, A. (2005). Collaboration with diamondtouch. In M. Costabile & F. Paternò (Eds.), Human-computer interaction - interact 2005 (Vol. 3585, pp. 986-989): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Kolodner, J. L. (2002a). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9-40.
Kolodner, J. L. (2002b). Learning by design: Iterations of design challenges for better learning of science skills. Cognitive Studies, 9(3), 338-350.
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
Kolodner, J. L., & Gray, J. (2002). Understanding the affordances of ritualized activity structures for project-based classrooms. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 222-228). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kolodner, J. L., Gray, J. T., & Fasse, B. B. (2003). Promoting transfer through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning-by-design classrooms. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3(2), 119-170.
Kreber, C. (2000). How university teaching award winners conceptualise academic work: Some further thoughts on the meaning of scholarship. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 61-78.
Mamlok, R., Dershimer, C., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2001). Learning science by designing artifacts (lsda) - a case study of the development of a design-based science curriculum. Paper presented at the 2001 NARST Annual International Conference. St. Louis, MO.
Marsden, D., & Littler, D. (2000). Repertory grid technique – an interpretive research framework. European Journal of Marketing, 34(7), 816-834.
Marshall, P., Hornecker, E., Morris, R., Sheep Dalton, N., & Rogers, Y. (2008). When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems (pp. 33-40). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Martínez Maldonado, R., Kay, J., & Yacef, K. (2010). Collaborative concept mapping at the tabletop. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-85.
Mehalik, M. M., & Schunn, C. (2006). What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 519-532.
Neimeyer, G., Bowman, J., & Saferstein, J. (2005). The effects of elicitation techniques on repertory grid outcomes: Difference, opposite, and contrast methods. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(3), 237-252.
Neimeyer, G. J., & Hagans, C. L. (2002). More madness in our method?: The effects of repertory grid variations on construct differentiation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15(2), 139-160.
Papert, S. (1990). Introduction. In I. Harel (Ed.), Constructionist learning (pp. 1-8). Boston, MA: MIT Media Laboratory.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (1998). Distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn in a ‘learning by design’ environment. In A. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. Kolodner & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1998 (pp. 35-41). AACE.
Puddifoot, J. E. (1996). A methodological note on the application of the generalized grid technique in the measurement of perceived intercultural distance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 433-441.
Reger, R. K. (1990). The repertory grid technique for eliciting the content and structure of cognitive constructive systems. In A. S. Huff (Ed.), Mapping Strategic Thought (pp. 301-309). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Rick, J., Rogers, Y., Haig, C., & Yuill, N. (2009). Learning by doing with shareable interfaces. Children, Youth and Environments, 19(1), 321-342.
Shaw, M. L. G., & Thomas, L. F. (1978). Focus on education—an interactive computer system for the development and analysis of repertory grids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 10(2), 139-173.
Shen, C., Everitt, K., & Ryall, K. (2003). {ubitable}: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In A. Dey, A. Schmidt & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Ubicomp 2003: Ubiquitous computing (Vol. 2864, pp. 281-288): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Silk, E., Schunn, C., & Strand Cary, M. (2009). The impact of an engineering design curriculum on science reasoning in an urban setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(3), 209-223.
Stanton, D., Neale, H., & Bayon, V. (2002). Interfaces to support children's co-present collaboration: Multiple mice and tangible technologies. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (pp. 342-351). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Stewart, J., Bederson, B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sultanum, N., Sharlin, E., Sousa, M. C., Miranda-Filho, D. N., & Eastick, R. (2010). Touching the depths: Introducing tabletop interaction to reservoir engineering. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Tan, F. B., & Hunter, M. G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39-57.
Tio, J., LaCaze, A., & Cottrell, W. N. (2007). Ascertaining consumer perspectives of medication information sources using a modified repertory grid technique. Pharmacy World & Science, 29(2), 73-80.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills : Learning for life in our times (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vattam, S. S., Kramer, C. W., Kim, H., & Kolodner, J. L. (2007). Effects of technology-based support for explanation construction on learners' discourse during design-based learning in science. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 741-750). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Yorke, D. M. (1978). Repertory grids in educational research: Some methodological considerations. British Educational Research Journal, 4(2), 63-74
Yorke, D. M. (1985). Administration, analysis and assumption: Some aspects of validity. In N. Beail (Ed.), Repertory grid technique and personal constructs: Applications in clinical and educational settings (pp. 383-399). London, United Kingdom: Croom Helm.
Yorke, M. (2001). Bipolarity… or not? Some conceptual problems relating to bipolar rating scales. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 171-186.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., & Roche, V. (2004). A constructivist model for evaluating postgraduate supervision: A case study. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(2), 82-93.