簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 宋沛珊
Song, Pei-Shan
論文名稱: 校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練需求之探究
The Study on the Training Needs of Drug-Abuse Prevention in School
指導教授: 郭鐘隆
Guo, Jong-Long
口試委員: 黃久美
Huang, Chiu-Mieh
廖容瑜
Liao, Jung-Yu
郭鐘隆
Guo, Jong-Long
口試日期: 2023/05/23
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 健康促進與衛生教育學系
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 藥物濫用校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練實務需求實務困境內容分析法
英文關鍵詞: Drug abuse, Drug Use Prevention and Control on Campus, Educational Training, Needs, Dilemmas, Content Analysis
研究方法: 內容分析法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300588
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:169下載:54
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 背景:藥物濫用(Drug Abuse)問題一直是全球矚目焦點,而青少年階段經常是開始接觸非法藥物的關鍵時期。反毒教育的實踐涵蓋到學生、家庭、同儕與師生關係,需全校人員投入。推動校園藥物濫用防制通常由新進人員擔任,工作負荷量大,不熟悉相關流程、相關計畫等工作內容;在法令上也未強制要求教育訓練,進而影響承辦人投入藥物濫用防制工作之意願與動能。如何提升校園反毒承辦人專業能力,應瞭解其需求及執行業務所遇困境,規劃教育訓練內容,發展因應對策,增進承辦人之自我效能,使藥物濫用防制工作推行順利。
    目的:本研究旨在探討一般教師與學務人對校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練內容之需求及困境,並分析其差異性。
    方法:共計21位一般教師與35位學務人員,進行校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練需求與困境問卷調查。了解其對於校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練之需求,以及分別在實務推動上所遭遇之困境。問卷蒐集完畢,以內容分析法進行文本資料分析,並以文字雲圖呈現重要性。
    結果: 第一面向中有81.0%的一般教師及82.0%的學務人員表示,應讓訓練對象認識「相關法令」。第二面向有76.2%的一般教師認為,應認識「入門成癮物質、常見的新型態毒品之類型及各種危害」;37.1%的學務人員認為應「認識藥物濫用入門成癮物質與分級」。第三面向有57.1%的一般教師表示,應瞭解「多元舒緩壓力技巧,培養藥物濫用學生具備自我覺察調適壓力的能力」;有37.1%的學務人員表示,應「認識相關理論,進而協助學生戒除毒癮」。第四面向有42.9%的一般教師與40.0%的學務人員認為,應「認識校園反毒實務工作流程」。
    結論:研究結果顯示,一般教師與學務人員對於校園藥物濫用教育訓練有所重視,表達了他們對於訓練課程所需涵蓋的知識內容的期待,顯示出定期辦理教育訓練可增加對於藥物濫用的認知與警覺性。為了更有效達成訓練的目的,建議規劃初階或進階教育訓練內容,以符合不同承辦人的專業程度和學習需求。在校園中,許多教職員認為反毒工作為學務處或輔導人員的責任,導致承辦人容易陷入獨立作戰之困境,這表示目前校園反毒業務負荷繁重,後續應增加相關人力協助,並改善與精進作業流程,提高承辦人意願。

    Background:Drug abuse has been a global concern, and adolescence is often a critical period when individuals begin to be exposed to illegal drugs. The practice of drug use prevention in schools involves students, families, peer relationships, and teacher-student relationships, which requires the involvement of all school staff. Typically, the responsibility for promoting drug use prevention on campuses falls on newly appointed personnel, who may be faced with high workloads and be unfamiliar with relevant procedures and plans. The lack of legal requirements for related education and training also reduces the willingness and motivation of these personnel to engage in drug use prevention work. To enhance the professional competence of individuals responsible for campus drug prevention, it is of great importance to understand their needs and the challenges they encounter in implementing their duties. It is essential to draw up effective educational training content, strategies, and self-efficacy enhancement measures as well to facilitate the implementation of drug use prevention work smoothly.
    Amis:This study aims to explore the needs and challenges of teachers and student affairs personnel who are in charge of the content of education and training for campus drug use prevention, and analyze the differences between them.
    Methods:A total of 21 teachers and 35 student affairs personnel participated in a questionnaire survey on the needs and challenges of education and training for campus drug use prevention. The survey aimed to understand their needs for education and training on campus drug use prevention, as well as the challenges they encountered in practical implementation. After collecting the questionnaires, content analysis was conducted using textual data, and the highlight was presented through word cloud visualization.
    Results:In the first aspect, 81.0% of teachers and 82.0% of student affairs personnel expressed the need for training participants to understand "relevant laws and regulations." In the second aspect, 76.2% of teachers claimed that participants should be familiar with "introductory addictive substances, types of common new drugs, and various hazards," while 37.1% of student affairs personnel believed they should understand "the classification of addictive substances in drug use." In the third aspect, 57.1% of teachers indicated the importance of understanding "diverse stress relief techniques to cultivate students' ability to self-observe and adapt to stress," while 37.1% of student affairs personnel stated the need to "understand relevant theories to assist students in overcoming drug addiction." As for the fourth aspect, 42.9% of teachers and 40.0% of student affairs personnel considered that participants should be skilled in "the practical workflow of campus anti-drug work."
    Conclusion:This study indicates that research participants are aware of the importance to education and training for campus drug use prevention, also expressing their expectations regarding the knowledge content that training courses should cover. It demonstrates that regular educational training can increase awareness and vigilance related to drug use. To achieve more effective training, it is recommended to scheme out introductory or advanced educational training content that meets the professional levels and learning needs of different personnel. In schools, many staff members perceive drug prevention work as the responsibility of the student affairs office or counselors, which leads difficulties and a feeling of isolation to the responsible personnel. The study also shows that the current workload for campus drug prevention is heavy, and additional manpower should be provided to assist in improving and streamlining the operation process, thereby enhancing the willingness of personnel involved.

    第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究動機與重要性1 第二節 研究目的5 第三節 名詞定義6 第二章 文獻探討8 第一節 國內外校園藥物濫用現況8 第二節 校園藥物濫用防制推行現況12 第三節 校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練18 第四節 校園藥物濫用防制實務困境25 第三章 研究方法28 第一節 研究設計28 第二節 研究流程29 第三節 研究對象30 第四節 研究工具33 第五節 內容分析法35 第六節 資料處理與統計分析40 第四章 研究結果42 第一節 研究對象背景資料42 第二節 次數統計47 第三節 校園藥物濫用防制教育訓練需求54 第四節 校園藥物濫用防制實務困境74 第五節 一般教師與學務人員之異同88 第五章 討論與建議92 第一節 校園藥物濫用防制業務需求之探討92 第二節 校園藥物濫用防制業務困境之探討96 第三節 結論103 第四節 研究建議106 參考文獻109

    丁冠玉(2013)。台灣大專研生對藥物濫用的認知、態度、行為之研究〔未出版之碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。AiritiLibrary。
    王文科、王智弘(2020)。教育研究法(十九版)。臺北市:五南書局。
    全國法規資料庫(2022)。毒品危害防制條例。https://law.moj.gov.tw/
    LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=C0000008
    行政院(2020)。新世代反毒策略(第二期 110-113 年)。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/ 27697522FC25AF7C?A=C
    李景美、張鳳琴、苗迺芳、徐美玲、李淑卿、張瑜真、廖淑慎、廖瑢如、林世華、陳映廷、徐孟君、羅錦萍(2015)。陽光少年計畫-社區青少年藥物濫用預防模式。學校衛生,(66),91-119。
    李易蓁(2010)。高風險用藥少年戒癮防制處遇之實務探討。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集策與犯罪研究論文集,13,119-143。
    李樂樂、陳漢瑛(2007)。臺北市高中職校春暉專案對學生有助益性反毒活動之研究。健康促進暨衛生教育雜誌,(27),23-46。
    宋宥賢(2018)。臺灣校園毒品防制之現狀、因應與困境:實務現場觀點反思。新社會政策,(57),68-79。
    吳佳儀、李明濱、黃名琪、黃三原、蕭斐元、陳錫中、陳為堅(2021)。臺灣藥物濫用之衝擊與防制。台灣醫學,25(5),669-678。
    吳永達、周柏源(2015)。台灣毒品氾濫情形之比較研究(一)。法務通訊,2758,3-6。
    吳齊殷、高美英(2001)看顧台灣的未來:台灣青少年藥物使用相關信念、態度與行為的長期研究。行政院衛生署管制藥物管理局90年度科技研究計畫,計畫編號:DOH90-NNB-1001。
    林孟安(2022)。國民中學反毒教育承辦人員之個案研究:以McDonnell政策反饋模式分析。學校行政,(138),326-350。
    林群、黃名琪(2020)。青少年藥物濫用。台灣醫學,24(4),427-433。
    林育賢(2020)。學務工作者推動特定人員作業之政策執行研究:以宜蘭縣為例〔未出版之碩士論文,佛光大學〕。AiritiLibrary。
    林怡君(2005)。運用同儕戲劇教育課程於國中生預防新興藥物濫用教育介入研究-以台北市某國中學生為例。〔未出版之碩士論文〕國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文。
    邱名謙(2016)。青少年藥物濫用認知在反毒教育需求之調查研究-以雲林縣國中學生為例。彰化師大教育學報,(30),87-109。
    周思源、李玫姿、梁文敏、張麗惠、郭憲華、賴璟賢、朱日橋、郭憲文(2006)。台灣地區在學青少年藥物使用行為與其家庭型態特性之相關性。中臺灣醫學科學雜誌,11(4),243-251。
    洪榮昭(2012)。人力資源發展:企業教育訓練完全手冊。臺北市:五南書局。
    洪玉靖、孫樹根、莊淑姿(2010)。農業推廣人員之休閒農業專業教育訓練研究。農業推廣學報,(27),47-70。
    高子修(2019)。探討藥物濫用諮詢服務團防制學生藥物濫用策略及團員輔導知能。健康生活與成功老化學刊,11(1),14-25。
    張淑慧、張文賢(2019)。施用毒品者家庭的社會安全網。社區發展季刊,(165),223-235。
    張文賢(2018)。高中職學校藥物濫用通報機制與影響因素之研究:基宜花東地區軍訓教官觀點。藥物濫用防治,3(1),21-44。
    張鳳琴、李景美、林世華、苗迺芳、張瑜真、廖信榮、龍芝寧、李淑卿(2010)。青少年藥物濫用預防教育指標建構及介入研究:以國中階段青少年為焦點(一)。行政院衛生署食品藥物管理局。https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=1966921&docId=
    322700。
    張伶嘉、張靖姿、徐嘉鄉、黃雅文(2008)。臺日藥物濫用預防策略之比較。健康促進與衛生教育學報,(30),1-33。
    許禎元(2003)。內容分析法的研究步驟與在政治學領域的應用。師大政治論叢。
    國家衛生研究院論壇(2018)。台灣藥物濫用防制策略之行動綱領與方案規劃。https://forum.nhri.edu.tw/107-pp-2/
    陳義峰、董芝妤(2021)。家庭及同儕因素對青少年毒品施用之影響。藥物濫用防治,6(1),49-75。
    陳氏蘭(2018)。台灣越南語教學師資培訓現況與問題。高大人文學報,(3),117-155。
    陳為堅、蕭朱杏、顏正芳、陳娟瑜(2006)。全國青少年非法藥物使用調查:第三年。行政院衛生署管制藥品管理局(編號:PG9301-0942)。
    郭鐘隆、朱元珊(2016)。反毒教育或反毒宣導?論兩者之異同及其有效策略與方法。載於法務部司法官學院(主編),刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(頁139-162)。法務部司法官學院。
    教育部學生事務及特殊教育司(2021)。教育部防制學生藥物濫用實施計畫。https://enc.moe.edu.tw/Law/Index2#
    教育部(2021)。春暉小組輔導工作手冊2.0。http://www.cdway.
    com.tw/demo2/happy/bx38/
    教育部(2021)。教育部校園安全及災害防救通報處理中心作業規定。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002120
    教育部(2020)。各級學校特定人員尿液篩檢及輔導作業要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL050895
    教育部(2018)。教育部補助辦理校園安全維護暨防制學生藥物濫用活動要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001717
    教育部(2016)。校園藥物濫用防制諮商輔導工作參考手冊。https://reurl.cc/yQNvzl
    彭如瑩、李景美(2001)。北市國中學生家長之預防子女藥物濫用措施與藥物教育需求。衛生教育學報,16,77-111。
    黃于真、林永豐(2017)。臺灣國民小學階段防制學生藥物濫用課程之探究與規劃。藥物濫用防制,2(1),29-46。
    游美惠(2000)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究,(8),5-42。
    楊士隆、戴伸峰、曾淑萍、顧以謙、朱日僑、李宗憲、賴文崧、劉子瑄、馮齡儀、藍郁青、李志恒、衛漢庭、陳亮妤、林鴻智、許俊龍、許華孚、吳吉裕、梁信、馬躍中、……、黃介良(2023)。青少年藥物濫用預防與輔導(2版)。臺北市:五南書局。
    楊士隆、曾淑萍、吳耘嫚、楊伃諠、曾致嘉(2021)。以施用者視角檢視藥物濫用預防宣導作為。藥物濫用防制,6(4),1-35。
    楊士隆、李思賢、朱日僑、林春秀、戴伸峰、曾淑萍、李宗憲、徐倩、蔡孟璋、石倩瑜、束連文、巫梓豪、顧以謙(2020)。藥物濫用、毒品與防制(3版)。臺北市:五南書局。
    楊士隆、顧以謙、鄭凱寶(2017)。藥物濫用監測與系統整合研究。刑事政策與犯罪防制研究專刊,(14),13-34。
    楊士隆、劉子瑄(2013)。藥物濫用預防模式與國際預防準則之探討。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,85-107。
    楊孟麗、謝水南(譯)(2013)。教育研究法研究設計實務(原作者:J.R. Fraenkel, N.E. Wallen, Helen H. Hyun)。台北:心理。
    楊雅茜(2011)。《音樂樹》鋼琴教本內容分析之研究。台南市:台南大學。
    楊開煌(1998)。中共研究中的內容分析法及其爭議與反省。東亞季刊,20(2),28。
    廖容瑜、黃久美、葉敏芳、姜智惠、郭鐘隆(2015)。Flash動畫融入國民中學藥物教育之成效。數位學習科技期刊,7(3),1-13。
    蔡政宏、李幸紋(2013)。以內容分析法探討產業特殊性對服務失誤與補救模式之影響。正修學報,(26),129-146。
    歐用生(2003)。內容分析法及其在教科書研究上的應用。教科書之旅,149-170。臺北縣:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
    歐用生(1994)。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。
    衛生福利部(2023)。111年12月藥物濫用案件暨檢驗統計資料。臺北市: 行政院衛生福利部。https://antidrug.moj.gov.tw/lp-89-2.html
    衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2020)。109年度藥物濫用防制指引。https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/sitelist.aspx?sid=10848
    劉又慈、許文娟(2019)。以學校系統觀探討現行高中校園藥物濫用處遇方式。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(3),233-240。
    劉忠陽(2014)。應用文字雲技術分析四大平面媒體與社群網站關注議題之差異-以洪仲丘事件為例〔未出版之博士論文,傳播管理學系碩士在職專班〕AiritiLibrary。
    劉以文(2012)。國小藥物教育課程模式之建構。教育研究論壇,4(1),399-415。
    羅文君(2003)。高中職校反毒宣導成效之評估〔未出版之碩士論文,高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所〕AiritiLibrary。
    Adelekan ML, Ogunlesi GO, Akindele OM. (1990). Secondary school teachers' knowledge and views about drug abuse in Ogun State, Nigeria-a pilot survey. Journal of drug education, 20(2), 163-74.
    Adhani, A., & Anshori, A. (2018). Persuation of Teacher Communication in Preventing the Danger of Drug Abuse on High School Students. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 153-159.
    Alba, I. D., Samet, J. H., & Saitz, R. (2004). Burden of medical illness in drug-and alcohol-dependent persons without primary care. American Journal on Addictions, 13(1), 33-45.
    Botvin, G. J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive behaviors, 25(6), 887-897.
    Ciptro, H., Jusoh, A. J., Choo, P. G. S., Rashid, N. A., & Saputra, E. (2021). Teachers’self-efficacy as a critical determinant of the quality of drug education among malaysian students. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, 10(3), 1-7.
    Cuijpers, P., Jonkers, R., De Weerdt, I., & De Jong, A. (2002). The effects of drug abuse prevention at school: the ‘Healthy School and Drugs’ project. Addiction, 97(1), 67-73.
    Dusenbury, L. and Falco, M. (1995) Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. Journal of School Health, 65, 420–425.
    European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. (2011b). European drug prevention quality standards.A manual for prevention professionals.
    Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health education research, 18(2), 237-256.
    Dusenbury, L., Falco, M., & Lake, A. (2007). A review of the evaluation of 47 drug abuse prevention curricula available nationally. Journal of School Health, 77(5), 248-256.
    Fuller, E. & Hawkins, V. (2019) Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people in England in 2018. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and- information/publications/statistical/smoking-drinking-and-drug-use-among- young-people-in-england/2018
    Germán, M., Gonzales, N. A., &Dumka, L. (2009). Familism values as a protective factor for Mexican-origin adolescents exposed to deviant peers. The Journal of early adolescence, 29(1), 16-42.
    Gizyatova, L. A. (2016). Teachers' training experience as a critical determinant of the quality of drug education among students. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 295-299.
    Grant, J. (2002). Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ, 324(7330), 156-159.
    Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., & Nichols, T. R. (2006). Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(6), 612-621.
    Griffin, K. W., & Botvin, G. J. (2010). Evidence-based interventions for preventing substance use disorders in adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 19(3), 505-526.
    Guhlin, M. (1996). Stage a Well-Designed Saturday Session and They Will Come!. Technology Connection, 3(3), 13-14.
    Hallfors, D., Vevea, J., & Bonita, I. (2022). Truancy,grade point average, and sexual activity: a meta-analysis of risk indicators for youth substance use. Journal of School Health, 72(5),205-211.
    Handrianto, C., Jusoh, A. J., Goh, P. S. C., Rashid, N. A., & Rahman, M. A. (2020). The role of teachers in drug abuse prevention in schools.
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(11), 708-716.
    Hawthorne, G. (1997). Preteenage drug use in Australia: the key predictors and school-based drug education. Journal of adolescent health, 20(5), 384-395.
    Johnston, L. D., Miech, R. A., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E.,& Patrick, M. E. (2022). Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2020: Overview, Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use.
    Lee, K. (2012). Augmented reality in education and training. Tech Trends, 56(2), 13.
    Lloyd, C., Joyce, R., Hurry, J., & Ashton, M. (2000). The Effectiveness of Primary School Drug Education. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7(2), 109‒126.
    Luborsky, L. and DeRubeis, R. J. (1984) The use of psychotherapy treatment manuals: a small revolution in psychotherapy research style. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 5–14.
    Maithya, R. W. (2009). Drug abuse in secondary schools in Kenya: Developing a programme for prevention and intervention (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).
    McLoughlin, N., Rucklidge, J. J., Grace, R. C., & McLean, A. P. (2010). Can callous-unemotional traits and aggression identify children at high-risk of anti-social behavior in a low socioeconomic group?. Journal of family violence, 25(8), 701- 712.
    Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
    Moreira, A., Vóvio, C. L., & Micheli, D. D. (2015). Drug abuse prevention in school: challenges and possibilities for the role of the educator. Educação e Pesquisa, 41, 119-135.
    Mukerjee, K. (2020). Training needs analysis and training effectiveness. Vinimaya, 40(1), 37-47
    National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK). (2020). Buku Maklumat Dadah. ADK. https://www.adk.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/Buku-Maklumat-Dadah-2020.pdf
    NCDAS. (2020). Drug Use Among Youth: Facts & Statistics. https://
    drugusestatistics.org/teen-drug-use/
    NADA. (2017). National Drug Policy Ministry of Home Affairs. Selangor: MHA Press.
    Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee Training and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2011). Fundamentals of human resource management. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill education.
    Payton, J. W., Graczyk, P. A., Wardlaw, D. M., Bloodworth, M., Tompsett, C. J. and Weissberg, R. P. (2000) Social and emotional learning: a framework for quality school-based prevention programs. Journal of School Health, 70, 179–185.
    Pereira, A. P. D., Paes, Â. T., & Sanchez, Z. M. (2016). Factors associated with the implementation of programs for drug abuse prevention in schools. Revista de saude publica, 50.
    Raven, B.H (1993). The bases of power: origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227-251.
    Ringwalt, C., Ennett, S., Johnson, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Simons-Rudolph, A., & Vincus, A. (2003). Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation's middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 30(3), 375-391.
    Springer, J. F., Sale, E., Hermann, J., Sambrano, S., & Nistler, M. (2004). Characteristics of Effective Substance Use Prevention Programs for High-Risk Youth. Journal of Primary Prevention 25(3), pp. 171–194.
    Stone, A. L., Becker, L. G., Huber, A. M., & Catalano, R. F. (2012). Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood. Addictive behaviors, 37(7), 747-775.
    Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Stacy, A. W. (2002). Project Towards No Drug Abuse: A review of the findings and future directions. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26(5), 354-365.
    Tappe, M. K., Galer-Unti, R. A. and Bailey, K. C. (1995) Long-term implementation of the Teenage Health Teaching Modules by trained teachers: a case study. Journal of School Health, 65, 411–415.
    Teesson, M., Newton, N. C., Slade, T., Chapman, C., Birrell, L., Mewton, L., ... & Andrews, G. (2020). Combined prevention for substance use, depression, and anxiety in adolescence: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a digital online intervention. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(2), e74-e84.
    Tupper, K. W. (2008). Teaching teachers to just say “know”: Reflections on drug education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 356-367.
    UNODC. (2022). World Drug Report 2022.https://www.unodc.org/res/wdr2022/MS/World_Drug_Report_2022_Exsum_and_Policy_implications_Chinese.pdf
    UNODC. (2018). International Standards on Drug Use Prevention.https://www.unodc.org/documents/prevention/UNODC-WHO_2018_prevention_standards_E.pdf
    Van Ryzin, M. J., Fosco, G. M., &Dishion, T. J. (2012). Family and peer predictors of substance use from early adolescence to early adulthood: An 11-year prospective analysis. Addictive behaviors, 37(12), 1314-1324.
    Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research. Cengage learning.
    World Health Organization. (‎2020)‎. Life skills education school handbook: prevention of noncommunicable diseases: approaches for schools. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331947

    下載圖示
    QR CODE