簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 柯逸安
Cruz, Kevin Ian Noel
論文名稱: 21st Century Skills Analysis of Philippine Textbooks
21st Century Skills Analysis of Philippine Textbooks
指導教授: 王婷瑩
Wang, Ting-Ying
口試委員: 王婷瑩
Wang, Ting-Ying
陳建誠
Chen, Jian-Cheng
鄭英豪
Cheng, Ying-Hao
口試日期: 2023/07/03
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 數學系
Department of Mathematics
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 78
英文關鍵詞: 21st Century Skills, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Philippine Mathematics Textbooks, Textbook Analysis, Mathematics Curriculum Document Analysis, PISA 2022 Framework
研究方法: 比較研究內容分析法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300749
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:119下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • As the global workforce demands change due to rapid technological evolution, it is necessary to analyze and review the Philippine mathematics textbooks, curricula, and frameworks to understand how to produce competent Filipino graduates with the desired skills to thrive in the future. This study examines the integration of 21st Century Skills and Higher-Order Thinking Skills in mathematics textbooks in the Philippines, using the PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework as a basis for analysis. The research aims to assess the extent to which these skills are incorporated in comparison to the Mathematics Document Content Analysis (MCDA) participant textbooks. By analyzing the worked examples, problem sets, and narrative parts of the textbooks, various characteristics such as Content Type, Solution Type, Response Type, Application & Context Type, Mathematical Process, Problem Type, and 21st Century Skills are examined. The findings reveal that the Philippine textbooks exhibit limited opportunities for the development of 21st Century Skills and Higher-Order Thinking Skills, primarily due to questionable realness of Real-World exercises, discrepancies among contexts, and a lack of challenging mathematical processes and combinations. These findings align with the patterns observed in textbooks from other countries analyzed in the study. Therefore, it is recommended that publishers, policymakers, and educators prioritize the integration of 21st Century Skills and focus on the quality rather than the quantity of content, optimizing the opportunities for students to develop these essential skills.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Overview 1 History of Mathematics Frameworks in the Philippines 2 Globalization and Alignment with International Standards 7 21st Century Skills, Mathematics Literacy and PISA’s Mathematics Framework 8 Mathematics Curriculum Document Analysis (MCDA) 14 Purpose of the Study 16 Definition of Terms 17 Chapter 2 Literature Review 18 Increasing Demand in 21st Century Skills & Higher-Order Thinking Skills 18 Higher-Order Thinking Skills 18 21st Century Skills 19 Mathematics Textbook Analysis of 21st Century Skills 22 Chapter 3 Methodology 24 Research Framework 24 Materials 25 Analysis 29 Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 43 Characteristics of the Selected Philippine Textbooks 43 Comparison between the Philippine Textbooks 53 Comparison between Philippine Textbooks and the MCDA Study Textbooks 57 Chapter 5 Conclusion & Recommendations 60 References 63 Appendix 65

    Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P. et al (2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon
    Bloom, B. S. (1956). "Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain." New York: David McKay Co Inc.
    Briggs, M., & Davis, S. (2014). Creative Teaching: Mathematics in the Primary Classroom (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315752587
    Briones, L. (2019). Sulong EduKalidad: Addressing the Challenge of Quality in Basic Education. Department of Education. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/2019/12/04/sulong-edukalidad/
    Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education System Alignment for 21st Century Skills: Focus on Assessment. Center for Universal Education at The Brookings Institution.
    Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250-264.
    Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st Century Skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16.
    Comfort, K. B., & Timms, M. (2018). A Twenty-First Century Skills Lens on the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 131-144). Springer, Cham.
    Department of Education Philippines. (2016). K to 12 Mathematics Curriculum Guide.
    Department of Education Philippines (2022). Basic Education Plan 2030.
    Department of Science and Technology: Science Education Institute (2011). Mathematics Framework for Philippines Basic Education.
    Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
    Iamarino, D. L. (2014). The Benefits of Standards-Based Grading: A Critical Evaluation of Modern Grading Practices. Current Issues in Education, 17(2). Retrieved from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1234
    Joynes, C., Rossignoli, S., & Amonoo-Kuofi, E. F. (2019). 21st Century Skills: evidence of issues in definition, demand and delivery for development contexts.
    Kuechler, W. L., & Simkin, M. G. (2010). Why Is Performance on Multiple-Choice Tests and Constructed-Response Tests Not More Closely Related? Theory and an Empirical Test. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(1), 55–73. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00243.x
    OECD (2013), PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
    OECD (2019), Philippines – Country Note – PISA 2018 Results. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2022). Program for International Student Assessment 2022 Framework.
    Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Framework for 21st Century Learning. 2019. Available online: https://bit.ly/3FS9JBC
    Prakash, R., Litoriya, R. Pedagogical Transformation of Bloom Taxonomy's LOTs into HOTs: An Investigation in Context with IT Education. Wireless Pers Commun 122, 725–736 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08921-2

    Schmidt, W., et al. (2022), "When practice meets policy in mathematics education: A 19 country/jurisdiction case study", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 268, OECD Publishing, Paris
    Scriffiny, P. L. (2008). Standards-based grading. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 70-74.
    Septiani, S., Retnawati, H., & Arliani, E. (2022). Designing Closed-Ended Questions into Open-Ended Questions to Support Student’s Creative Thinking Skills and Mathematical Communication Skills. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(3), 616-628.
    TIMSS 2019 U.S. Highlights Web Report (NCES 2021-021). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Available at https://nces.ed.gov/timss/results19/index.asp.
    UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2017a). SEA-PLM 2019 Assessment framework (1st ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat.
    UNICEF & SEAMEO. (2021). SEA-PLM 2019 National Report of the Philippines. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization (SEAMEO) – SEA-PLM Secretariat.
    Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2010). 21st Century Skills discussion paper. University of Twente, 10.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE