研究生: |
蕭世閔 Hsiao, Shih-Min |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
素養導向融入自然領域課程對學生心流經驗、學習動機及學習成效之研究 A Study of Applying Competency-Based Instruction to Science Learning for High School Students |
指導教授: |
周明
Jou, Min |
口試委員: |
周明
Jou, Min 郝永崴 Hao, Yung-Wei 蕭照焜 Shiau, Jaw-Kuen |
口試日期: | 2022/01/19 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 94 |
中文關鍵詞: | 素養導向 、心流經驗 、學習動機 、學習成效 |
英文關鍵詞: | competency-based, flow experience, learning motivation, learning effectiveness |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200682 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:272 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討將素養導向融入自然領域課程之教學法對高中一年級學生之影響,旨在瞭解透過素養導向融入課程的教學法其心流體驗、學習動機和學習成效前、後測是否有差異。
本研究採用準實驗研究法,以台北市某高中一年級之學生為對象,抽樣方式採便利取樣,隨意選擇六個一年級班級來進行實驗。樣本並經學習評量之結果分作為高分組、中分組和低分組,其中高分組有75人,中分組有59人,而低分組有63人,三組皆採素養導向融入課程之教學法,每周進行一次自然領域課程,實驗時間總計為二十四週。
經研究對象填寫完畢之「心流經驗量表」及「學習動機量表」和學習評量前、後測分數利用統計軟體SPSS進行統計量化分析,以相依樣本t檢定和單因子變異數分析後,得到以下結論:一、高中一年級學生、高分組學生、女學生在經過素養導向融入自然領域課程後,其心流經驗前後、測分數上達到顯著之差異;二、高分組、中分組和低分組學生在經過素養導向融入自然領域課程後,高分組和低分組學生在學習動機後測分數有顯著差異,高分組分數高於低分組;三、高分組、中分組和低分組學生在經過素養導向融入自然領域課程後,在學習成效前、後測分數上皆有達到顯著之差異。根據研究結果得知,實施素養導向之教學法能有效提升學生之心流體驗,應鼓勵現場教師在教學時能多運用素養導向之教學法;而對於學習成就較低之學生,教師可以鼓勵學生多閱讀科普文章,增進其閱讀能力。
The research was about combining competency-based instruction with science curriculum for high school students, and exploring the impact on the students. The research purpose was to know after competency-based instruction learning, was there any difference in flow experience, learning motivation, and learning effectiveness on students.
This research adopted a quasi-experimental method. The participants were 10th-grade students in the same high school in Taipei, and they were divided into high, middle, and low performance groups by class quizzes. There were 75 students in the high performance group, 59 students in the middle performance group, and 63 students in the low performance group. All groups experienced the same competency-based instruction once a week for 24 weeks. The data were analyzed with SPSS. Through the Paired Samples T-Test and ANOVA analysis, there were three conclusions as follows. First, there were significant differences between the pre-test and post-test in the Flow Experience for 10th-grade high performance group, and the girl students. Second, there were significant differences between the high performance group and the low performance group students in the Learning Motivation. Third, there were significant differences between the pre-test and post-test in the class quizzes for the high, middle, and low performance groups. According to the results, the findings can encourage teachers to apply competency-based instruction in teaching. As for the students in the low performance group, the teachers can encourage them to read more science articles to improve their reading ability.
壹、中文部分
王全興(2016)。十二年國民基本教育國民核心素養的內涵。臺灣教育評論月刊,700,34-38。
朱敬先(1997)。教育心理學:教學取向。臺北市:五南。
余欣鴻(2015)。整合情境學習與認知鷹架之歷史科戰略遊戲式測驗環境之發展與評估:接受度、心流、學習成效與歷程之分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
李咏吟、單文經(1997)。教學原理。臺北市:遠流。
林月梅(2021)。「數」「素」看—運用素養導向教學設計提升國小五年級學生因數倍數解題能力(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
林永豐(2017)。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊,275,4-17。
林義涵(2013)。國中資優學生數學學習心流經驗之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。
林慶隆(2016)。國小自然教科書之知識論與課程觀演變。新北市:國家教育研究院。
范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動,5,1-6。
邱美虹(2016)。科學教育之發展與反思─從萌芽期、蓬勃期、挑戰期談起。科學研習,55,8-16。
孫維新(2013)。2012 公民素養大未來─科學素養,創新的原動力,科學人雜誌,132,取自 http://sa.ylib.com/Catalog.aspx?id=158。
教育部(2021)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:教育部。
國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引。新北市:國家教育研究院。
國家教育研究院(2015)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱Q&A。新北市:國家教育研究院。
國家教育研究院(2018)。 十二年國民基本教育自然領域課程綱要。新北市:國家教育研究院。
張春興、林清山(1981)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華書局。
張春興(2012)。現代心理學(重修版)。臺北市:東華書局。
郭生玉(2004)。心理與教育測驗(重修版)。臺北市:精華書局。
陳文典(2005)。科學素養的內涵。取自 phy.ntnu.edu.tw/~wdchen/doc/book94.11/01.doc。
陳李綢(1991)。思考模式、學術經驗與認知策略訓練對大學生後設認知與智力的影響。教育心理學報,24,67-90
黃文鳳(2013)。知識信念影響學習動機與行為之研究-以臺北市高中職學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。玄奘大學,新竹市。
黃秀香(2019)。素養導向教學對學生創造力與學習成效影響之研究:以技術型高中語文領域為例(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學,桃園市。
黃茂在、吳敏而(2017)。探索十二年國民基本教育自然科學素養導向教學設計。教育研究月刊,3,84-96。
黃添丁(2015)。數位學習融入課程之學習動機及學習行為對學習成效的影響。慈濟科技大學學報,25,35-52。
葉炳煙(2013)。學習動機定義與相關理論之研究。屏東教大體育,16,285-293。
廖梧均(2018)。數位遊戲融入合作學習對國小學生數學學習成效與心流之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
蔡清田(2010)。課程改革中的「素養」(competence)與「能力」(ability)。教育研究月刊,200,93-104。
蔡清田(2011)。課程改革中的「素養」之本質。研習資訊,28(2),67-76。
蔡清田、陳延興(2013)。國民核心素養之課程轉化。課程與教學季刊,16 (3),59-78。
鄭采玉(2008)。國小學生社會領域學習動機與學習滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
劉玉玲(2016)。青少年發展與輔導 : 認知、情意與關懷。臺北市:高等教育。
劉靖國(2005)。成就動機理論及其在教學上的應用。中等教育,56(4), 96-109。
劉蔚之、彭森明(2008)。歐盟「關鍵能力」教育方案及其社會文化意涵之分析。課程與教學季刊,11(2),51-78。
貳、外文部分
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1 cognitive domain. Michigan, MI: David McKay.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of Web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 585–608.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow : the psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ellis, G. D., Voelkl, J.E., & Morris, C. (1994). Measurement and analysisissues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(4), 337-356.
Han, S. (2009). Competence: Commodification of human ability. In K. Illeris (Ed.) International perspectives on competence development: Developing skills and capabilities (pp. 56-68). New York, NY: Routledge.
Halász, G., & Michel, A. (2011). Key competences in Europe: Interpretation, policy formulation and implementation. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 289-306.
Jackson, S., & Marsh, H. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale Human Kinetics Publishers Inc., 18, 17-35.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow inconsciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press
McClelland, D. C., & Pilon, D. (1965). Toward a theory motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20, 321-333.
McCombs, B. L. (2000). Reducing the achievement gap. Society, 37(5), 29-39.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 274–310.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1996). Lifelong learning for all: Meeting of the education committee at ministerial level. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). Definition and selection of key competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations (DeSeCo), Summary of the fnal report “Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society”. In Rychen D.S. & Salganik, L.H. (Eds.). Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-Functioning Society. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
Privette, G. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361-1368.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85–113). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Tchibozo, G. (2010). Emergence and outlook of competence-based education in European education system: An overview. Education Knowledge & Economy, 4(3), 193-205.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphor, theories, and research. Newbury Park. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Winberg, T. M., & Hedman, L. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of pre-knowledge and instruction type in a computer-simulation: Effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 36, 269–287.
Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing Research: Fundamentals & Dynamics. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.