簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇瑤華
SU Yaohua
論文名稱: 從城市文化規劃角度對藝術村群聚發展之行動研究: 以台北藝術進駐為例
Action Research on the Cluster Development of Artist-in-Residence Taipei from the Perspective of Urban Cultural Planning
指導教授: 黃光男
Huang, Kuang-Nan
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 美術學系
Department of Fine Arts
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 183
中文關鍵詞: 藝術群聚默示性知識制度厚實創意氛圍文化規劃
英文關鍵詞: arts cluster, tacit knowledge, institutional thickness, creative milieu, cultural planning
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:237下載:35
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 藝術群聚類型多樣,需求資源、聚合因素及衍生效應各有不同面貌,不一定具備產業經濟特質,但顯著的外部效益,使得藝術群聚成為文化經濟時代城市發展、都市再生的萬靈丹。本研究以獨立創作者匯聚在藝術村的藝術群聚形式為標的,結合文化規劃的視野,運用自身經驗,透過行動研究法探究「台北藝術進駐」,從台北國際藝術村、草山國際藝術村而至寶藏巖國際藝術村一脈發展。從反思式螺旋循環中檢證出,混合使用正式、非正式的制度和空間,誘發默示性知識串流,累積「制度厚實」,有助於群聚內部意識凝聚,知識、訊息、情感交流,而群聚的創新能量據此發展,地理空間形成一股創意氛圍,地方魅力生成,空間活化目的方能具體落實。城市發展藝術群聚,需在各類別間取得平衡點,以旗艦型計畫帶動文化消費經濟,以獨立、個體、微型創作者的藝術村群聚計畫推動文化地底景的保留和文化多樣性的發展。文化創意產業發展法面對藝術群聚,必須進行更深刻的探究,後續才能制定有效的推動方案。

    Arts clusters, each with distinguish features, inquire various attitude in management. With its common effects on external economy, it has been taken as a panacea of urban regeneration. The research is focus on clusters of artist-in-residences program, and adopting action research method on the development of Arts-in-Residence Taipei(AIR Taipei). Taking the advantage of being the AIR Director of expanding, I have recalled, recollected my memories and experience on governance of the independent artists’ clusters, and concluded that in agglomerating the community, formal as well as informal mechanism are needed. Spaces to accommodate different mechanism are needed. In addition to studio, office, and meeting room, café, balcony, or even barbecue gathering are also facilitating disseminating of tacit knowledge as well as information. Successful communication channel will then ensure a creative milieu to be in existence. A city needs to balance between investment of flag-ship mega cultural park as well as independent artist-run clusters. The law and policy are inquired to understand thoroughly of the differences of arts clusters before launching efficient and progressive programs to encounter challenges of the creative economy.

    目錄 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………….1 第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………………………..1 第二節 研究內容與架構…………………………………………………………………………9 一、 研究問題與內容釐清………………………………………………………...9 二、 研究範疇與標的………………………………………………………….…….18 三、 研究架構……………………………………………………………………………20 第三節 研究視角與方法 …………………………………………………………………….21 一、 研究視角……………………………………………………………………………21 二、 研究方法……………………………………………………………………………23 三、 研究的信度、效度與研究倫理………………………………….……..30 四、 研究設計…………………………………………………………………….………31 五、 研究限制…………………………………………………………………………….32 第二章 探究藝術群聚…………………………………………………………………..34 第一節 產業群聚…………………………………………………………………………….……..34 一、 產業群聚理論演進之探究…………………………………………………34 二、 產業群聚組成與類型…………………………………………………………44 三、 產業群聚效應…………………………………………………………………….50 四、 小結………………………………………………………………………………..52 第二節 藝術群聚…………………………………………………………………………………54 一、 藝術群聚演進之探究……………………………………………………..55 二、 藝術群聚與都市文化經濟……………………………………………..61 三、 藝術群聚與空間使用的探究……………….…………………………65 第三節 藝術村促成的藝術群聚………………………………………………………….70 一、 藝術村概念演化之全球探究……………………………….…………70 二、 藝術群聚與產業網絡……………………………………………………..72 三、 獨立藝術創作者與藝術村類型的藝術群聚………………….74 第三章 城市文化規劃………………………………………………………………..77 第一節 文化規劃:城市藝術文化資源的概念與策略演化……………….79 一、 Perloff:文化規劃是運用藝術改善城市生活……………….79 二、 Bianchini:歐洲為主西方城市文化規劃仍傾向於環境美感經營 ……………………………………………………………………………….………81 三、 Landrey:文化規劃是城市規劃與城市政策的文化途徑 ……………………………………………………………………………….………81 四、 Evans:文化規劃是都市規畫的藝術,也是城市與社區發展對文化資源策略性的規劃運用………………………….……………..83 五、 Mills:文化規劃是政策不是策略工具………………….……...84 六、 Mercer :文化規劃城市的策略資產…………………………...85 七、 Montgomery:文化規劃是城市治理的整合性視野…..…87 第二節「文化規劃」中的「文化」意涵 ………………………………………....88 一、 符號經濟…………………………………………………………………..……88 二、 都市再生…………………………………………………………………………..90 三、 文化多樣性………………………………………………………….……………91 第三節 文化規劃的體系方法…………………………………………………….………….93 一、 社會目標…………………………………………………………….…………….94 二、 美學目標……………………………………………………………….………….96 三、 經濟目標……………………………………………………………….………….97 第四節 文化規劃的推動機制……………………………………………….………………101 第四章 獨立藝術家城市群聚的個案敘事:探究台北藝術進駐..105 第一節 台北藝術進駐計畫的發展與演化………………………………..…………..105 一、 藝術計畫進駐城市…………………………………………….……………..105 二、 獎助內容……………………………………………………………………………109 三、 進駐基地……………………………………………………………………………113 四、 治理與營運………………………………………………………………………..116 五、 駐地計畫內涵…………………………………………………………………….118 第二節 台北藝術進駐計畫群聚論述……………………………………………..………123 一、 第一層「人的群聚」…………………………………………………..…….123 二、 第二層「資本群聚」…………………………………….…………..………132 三、 第三層「事件群聚」…………………………………………………..…….134 第三節 行動研究議題螺旋循環過程分析………………………………………..…….135 一、 藝術群聚交流規劃:創新發展與「藝術家沙龍」……..……135 二、 藝術群聚的社區參與:私人派對還是公眾展演……..…..…..139 三、 尋找藝術創作與文化消費的均衡點:記憶、收藏品、還是扮手禮………………………………………………………………………………..………143 四、 藝術群聚體制與非體制的治理抉擇:規劃之外的「吧檯」論壇 ………………………………………………………………………………..……..146 五、 藝術村帶動都市再生的觀測…………………………………….……148 六、 藝術群聚與社群發展議題………………………………………………152 七、 行動研究參與人物表列………………………………………………….154 第四節 行動研究檢證………………………………………………………………………….155 第五章 結論………………………………………………………………………………..158 第一節 研究發現…………………………………………………………………………………158 第二節 研究建議…………………………………………………………………………………161 第三節 後續行動議題 ………………………………………………………………………..164 參考文獻 參考-1

    參考文獻
    外文部分
    AgambenGiorgio. (1993). The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Arts Council. (1993). A Creative Future: National Arts & Media Strategy. London: Arts Council of Great Britain.
    Arts Council. (1984). The Glory of the Garden: A strategy for the development of the arts in England. London: Arts Council of Great Britain.
    Bassett, K. 1993. Urban cultural strategies and urban regeneration: A case study and critique. Geoforum 25:1773-88.
    Bassett, K., R. Griffiths, and I. Smith. 2002. Cultural industries, cultural clusters and the city: The example of natural history film-making in Bristol. Geoforum 33:165-77.
    BasseyM. (1995). Creating Education through Research. Newark: Kirklington.
    BhabhaKHomi. (1997). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
    Bianchiniand Lia Ghilardi SantacatterinaFranco,. (1997). Culture and Neighbourhoods: A Comparative Report. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    Bianchini, F. 1993. Remaking European cities: The role of cultural policies. In Remaking European cities: The role of cultural policies, edited by F. Bianchini and M. Parkinson. 1-20. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press.
    Blau, J. R. 1989. The shape of culture: A study of contemporary cultural patterns in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
    BourdieuP. (1989). The forms of Capital. 於 HalseyA.H., LauderH, BrownP., &
    參考 - 2
    Stuart-WellsA., Education: Culture, Economy and Society (頁 46-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Brail, S. G., and M. S. Gertler. 1999. The digital regional economy. In Multimedia and regional economic restructuring, edited by H. J. Braczyk, G. Fuchs, and H. G. Wolf, 97-130. London: Routledge.
    British Department of Culture, Media and Sport. 2001. The creative industries mapping document. Retrieved from http://www.culture.gov.uk/creative/mapping.html.
    Brooks, A. C., and R. J. Kushner.2001. Cultural districts and urban development. International Journal of Arts Management 3:4-14.
    Bryan, J., S. Hill, M. Munday, and A. Roberts. 2000. Assessing the role of the arts and cultural industries in a local economy. Environment and Planning A 32:1391-408.
    CapaldiNick, & ChadbournDeborah(ed). (2001). Year of the Artist: Breaking the Barriers. Sheffield: Arts 2000.
    CastellsManuel. (1994(204)). European Cities, the Informational Society and the Global Economy. New Left Review, 頁 18-32.
    CastellsManuel. (1994). European Cities, the Informational Society and the Global Economy”. . New Left Review(204), 頁 18-32.
    Caves, R. E.2000. Creative industries: Contacts between art and commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Chamberlin, E. 1933. The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Christopherson, S. 2002. Project work in context: Regulatory change and the new geography of media. Environment and Planning A 34:2003-15.
    Cooke, P., and G. Hughes. 1999. Creating a multimedia cluster in Cardiff Bay. In
    參考 - 3
    Multimedia and regional economic restructuring, edited by H. J. Braczyk, G. Fuchs, and H. G. Wolf, 252-68. London: Routledge.
    CohenJ, & FortierL. (1988). Paris La Ville et Ses Projects(A City in the Making). Paris: Babylone.
    Crewe, L., and J. Beaverstock. 1998. Fashioning the city: Cultures of consumption in contemporary urban spaces. Geoforum 29:287-308.
    CzamanskiS., & AblasL.A. (1979). Identification of Industrial Cluster and Complexes: a comparison of methods and findings. Urban Studies(16), 頁 61-80.
    D. Jean ClandininMichael ConnellyF. (2000). Narrative Inquiry:Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc. a John Wiley & Sons, Inc. company.
    DavenportHThomas, & PrusakLaurence. (2000). Working Knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Busines School Press.
    DunleavyP. (1991). Democracy Bureaucracy & Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvest Wheatsheaf.
    EagletonTerry. (2000). The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
    ElliottJ. (1991). Action Research/ or Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    EvansGraeme. (2001). Cultural Planning:an urban renaissance? New York: Routledge.
    EvansGraeme. (2007). Measure for measure: evaluating the Evidence of Culture's Contribution to Regeneration. 於 PaddisonRonan, & MilesSteven, Culture-Led Urban Regeneration (頁 116-135).
    FeatherstoneM. (1995). Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Feser&Bergman. (1999). Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applicatiions. West Virginia: WVU Regional Research Institute Web
    參考 - 4
    Book(www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Bergman-Feser/contents.htm).
    FloridaRichard. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Routledge.
    Frost-KumpfAnne.Hillary. (1998). Cultural districts handbook: The arts as a strategy for revitalizing our cities. Washington: DC: Americans for the Arts.
    Garcia, M. I., Y. Fernandez, and J. L. Zofio. 2003. The economic dimension of the culture and leisure industry in Spain: National, sectoral and regional analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics 27:9-30.
    GhilardiLia. (2001). Cultural Planning and Cultural Diversity. 於 BennettTony(ed), in Differing Diversities: Cultural Policy and Cultural Diversity (頁 1-18). London: Noema Research and Planning Ltd, Council of Europe Publication.
    GoldnerLoren. (1989). Sharon Zukin. Loft Living Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Break Their Haughty Power.
    Gordan & McCannand P.I. (2000). Industrial Clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? (第 37(3) 冊). Urban Studies.
    GuppyM. (1997). Better Placee Richer Community. Sydney: Australia Council.
    HanniganJ. (1989). Fantacy City: Pleasure and profit in the postmodrn metropolis. Routledge.
    HowkinsJ. (2001). The Creative Economy. London: Penguin.
    Jean McNiffLomax, Jack WhiteheadPamela. (1996). You and Your Action Research Project. Routledge.
    KemmisMcTaggart, R.S.,. (1982). The Action Research Planner. Australia:Deakin Univeristy Press.
    KingA.Jean, & LonnquistPeg. (1992). A review of writing on action research. ED355664.
    KittoH.D.F. (1951). The Greeks. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    KongLily. (2009). Beyond Networks and Relations: Towards Rethinking Creative
    參考 - 5
    Cluster Theory. The GeoJournal Library, 頁 61-76.
    LandryCharles. (2000). Creative City: how to think, plan and act creatively in addressing urban issues. London: Comedia.
    LinJan, & MeleChristopher. (2005). The Urban Sociology Reader. New York: Routledge.
    Markusen. (1996). Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 頁 72(3).pp293-313.
    MarkusenAnn. (1999). Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigor and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies. Regional Studies, Vol. 33, No. 9, 頁 869-884.
    MarkusenAnn. (2006). Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class::Evidence from the Study of Artists. Minneapolis: Environment and Planning A(Vol. 38,).
    MarkusenAnn, & JohnsonAmanda. (2005). Artists' Centers: Evolution and Impact on Careers, Neighborhoods and Economies. Minneapolis, MN: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota, forthcoming.
    MarkusenAnn, & KingDavid. (2003). The Artistic Dividend: The Hidden Contributions of the Arts to the Regional Economy. Minneapolis, MN: Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, University of Minnesota.
    MarkusenAnn, & SchrockGreg. (2005). The Artistic Dividend: Urban Artistic Specialization and Economic Development Implications. Minneapolis, MN: Working Paper #263, Project on Regional and Industrial Economics, the Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota, February.
    McGuiganJim. (2001). Three Discourses of Cultural Policy. 於 Stevenson(eds)Nick, Culture & Citizenship (頁 124-137). London: Sage.
    MercerCollin. (2006). Partners for Livable Communities2004. 2011年7月6日 擷取
    參考 - 6
    自 Partners for Livable Communities: http://livable.org/about-us/what-is-livability
    MillsDeborah. (2003年May 月). Cultural Planning –Policy Task, not Tool. Artwork Magazine, 7-11.
    MommaasHans. (2009). Spaces of Culture and Economy:Mapping the Cultural-Creative Cluster Landscape. (KongLily, & O'ConnorJustin, 編輯) The GeoJournal Library, Vol.98, 頁 45-59.
    MontgomeryJohn. (2007). The New Wealth of Cities:City Dynamics and the Fifth Wealth. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    MumfordLewis. (1997). The Culture of Cities. London: Routledge.
    PerloffHarvey. (1979). Using the Arts to Improve Life in the City.
    PorterMichael. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
    PolkinghorneD.E. (1988). Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany: State Univeristy of New York Press.
    PRATT. (1997). Production values: from cultural industries to the governance of culture. Environment and Planning A, 29, 頁 1911-1917.
    RoseD. (1984). Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Society and Space 1, 頁 47-74.
    ScottAllen. (1988). New Industrial Spaces. London: Aldershot.
    ScottAllen. (2000). The Cultural Economy of Cities. Nottingham, UK: SAGE Publications.
    TaylorCharles. (1992.). Multiculturalism and The Politics of Recognition . Princeton: Princeton UP.
    TietzM. (1968). Toward a theory of urban public facility location. Reginal Science Association (21), 頁 35-51.
    參考 - 7
    YoungGreg. ( 2008). Reshaping planning with culture . Ashgate.
    ZukinSharon. (1989). Loft Living. Rutgers University Press.
    ZukinSharon. (1995). The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
    ZukinShraon. (2004). Space and Symbols in an Age of Decline. 於 MilesMalcolm, HallTim, & BordenLain, In the City Culture Reader. New York: Routledge.
    ZukinSharon. (2005). Whose Culture? Whose City? from the Cultures of Cities. 於 LinJan, & MeleChristopher, The Urban Sociology Reader (頁 281-289). New York: Routledge.
    參考 - 8
    中文部分
    文建會. (2009年12月10日). 文化藝術基金會入口網站. 2010年10月15日 擷取自 行政院文化建設委員會: http://caf.cca.gov.tw/knowledgecon.asp?id=17
    吳鄭重(譯). (2007). JacobsJane, 偉大城市的誕生與衰亡: 美國都市街道生活的啟發 (頁 11-41). 臺北市: 聯經.
    邱志杰. (2005.6). 798的回音. 於 李九菊, & 黃文業, 798藝術區實錄. 北京: 文化藝術出版社.
    段義孚. (1999). 經驗透視中的空間和地方. 臺北市: 國立編譯館.
    段義孚. (2010年5月10日). 人本主義地理學. 2011年7月22日 擷取自 豆瓣: www.douban.com/group/topic/11281030/
    何禮恩(譯), & 吳美枝(譯). (2002). McNiffJean, LomaxPamela, WhiteheadJack, 行動研究:生活實踐家的研究錦囊. 嘉義: 濤石文化.
    馮朝霖, & 蔣興儀. (民95年9月). 關於反思性與主體性弔詭的一些聯想. 應用心理研究(31), 頁 113-132.
    劉新圓. (2009年5月13日). 財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告. 2010年09月26日 擷取自 財團法人國家政策研究基金會: http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/5867
    辛晚教林政逸,. (2007). 創新、能力與文化產業群聚的演化:臺北市音樂產業個案研究. 地理學報第五十期:, 頁 23-45.
    張長義, & 梁炳珅. (2004). 地理學的文化經濟與地方再現. 地理學報, 頁 81-99.
    理查.佛羅里達. (2006). 創意新貴. 台北: 寶鼎.
    焦斌龍. (2004). 文化資源的產權屬性演變及其文化體制改革的啟示. 中國文化產業評論( 第二卷), 頁 244- 257.
    黃鶴. (2010). 文化規劃:基於文化資源的城市整體發展策略. 北京: 中國建築工業出版社.
    楊敏芝. (2002). 地方文化產業與地域活化互動模式研究. 台北, 台灣.
    參考 - 9
    趙碧華, & 朱美珍(譯). RubinAllen, BabbieEarl著 (1995). 研究方法. 台北市: 雙葉書廊
    劉維公. (民國93 年12 月). 創意台灣的前瞻規劃與對策研究. 台北市: 行政院經濟建設委員會.
    蔡建福. (民89年6月). 鄉村社區自證過程之行動研究. 鄉村社區自證過程之行動研究. 台北市, 台灣: 台灣大學農業推廣學研究所.
    鄭增財. (2006). 行動研究:原理與實務. 台北市: 五南.
    南條史生(Fumio Nanjo)著,潘廣宜、蔡青雯譯,「藝術與城市:獨立策展人十五年的軌跡」,臺北市:田園城市,2004。
    大衛.索羅斯比(Throsby, David)著,張維倫等譯,「文化經濟學」,臺北市:典藏,2003。
    王志弘(2003)〈台北市文化治理的性質與轉變,1967-2002〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》52:121-86。
    邁克爾波特 . 陳小悅譯 . 競爭優勢 [M]. 華夏出版社
    HeilbrunJames, & GrayCharles. (2008). 藝術。文化經濟學. 台北市: 典藏藝術家庭.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE