氣候變遷是一種跨領域的複雜現象，與經濟、社會、環境、文化均密切相關。因此，人們對於氣候變遷的理解也受到不同因素的影響，而有不同的識覺和相應的行動。為讓社會大眾更容易了解氣候變遷所帶來的負面影響，科學家、學者、傳播者等常以「氣候視覺化」的手段，利用豐富的影像增進人們對於氣候變遷的認識。在網路消費市場不斷成長的趨勢下，影片的影響力日益受到重視，並被證實有效促進民眾對氣候變遷的理解。然而氣候變遷影片常使用戲劇化或誇大的情境，以引起觀眾對氣候變遷議題的關注和重視，但這樣的做法可能對民眾採取因應氣候變遷行動產生反效果。為了增進氣候變遷傳播的實質影響力，了解受眾的特質，並使用有效的傳播策略是重要的。
本研究以受眾分層理論，探討提升傳播有效性的關鍵要素，歸納受眾分層的相關研究及近期應用，同時探討影片的訊息框架、情緒作用對個人的氣候行為意圖的影響。本研究以全國高中生作為研究對象，透過網路問卷蒐集研究資料，分析分為兩步驟，使用集群分析法將高中生進行分群，再透過資料分析，找出有效促進各子群體偏好的影片框架類型。預期結果為瞭解影片影響高中生行為意圖的效果、如何以氣候變遷知識及識覺將高中生分群，以及影片框架對於不同群體的效果差異。

Climate change is a complex interdisciplinary phenomenon closely related to economy, society, environment and culture. Therefore, people's understanding of climate change is also affected by different factors, and they have different perceptions and corresponding actions. In order to make it easier for the general public to understand the negative impacts of climate change, scientists, scholars, and communicators often use "climate visualization" to enhance people's understanding of climate change with rich images. With the growing trend of the online consumer market, the influence of videos has been increasingly valued, and has been proven to be effective in promoting public understanding of climate change. However, climate change films often use dramatic or exaggerated situations to arouse the audience's attention and attention to the issue of climate change, but such an approach may have a negative effect on the public's actions to address climate change. To increase the substantive impact of climate change communication, it is important to understand the characteristics of the audience and use effective communication strategies.

Based on the theory of audience segmentation, this study explores the key elements of improving the effectiveness of communication, summarizes the relevant research and recent applications of audience stratification, and discusses the impact of the film's message framework and emotional effects on individual climate behavior intentions. This study takes high school students across the country as the research object, and collects research data through online questionnaires. The analysis is divided into two steps. It is expected to use the cluster analysis method to group high school students, and then through data analysis, find out the videos that effectively promote the preferences of each subgroup frame type. The expected results are to understand the effect of the film on the behavioral intentions of high school students, how to group high school students with climate change knowledge and awareness, and the difference in the effect of film frames on different groups.

Aguilar, O. (2018). Toward a theoretical framework for community EE. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(3), 207-227.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Akerlof, K. L., Boules, C., Ban Rohring, E., Rohring, B., & Kappalman, S. (2020). Governmental communication of climate change risk and efficacy: moving audiences toward “danger control”. Environmental management, 65, 678-688.
Allgaier, J. (2019). Science and environmental communication on YouTube: strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering. Frontiers in Communication, 36.
Allgaier, J., & Svalastog, A. L. (2015). The communication aspects of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Western Africa–do we need to counter one, two, or many epidemics? Croatian medical journal, 56(5), 496.
Armbruster, S. T., Manchanda, R. V., & Vo, N. (2022). When Are Loss Frames More Effective in Climate Change Communication? An Application of Fear Appeal Theory. Sustainability, 14(12), 7411.
Atkin, C. K., & Freimuth, V. (1989). Formative evaluation research in campaign design. Public communication campaigns, 2, 131-150.
Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Truskauskaitė-Kunevičienė, I. (2020). Sustainability in youth: Environmental considerations in adolescence and their relationship to pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582920.
Barr, S., Gilg, A., & Shaw, G. (2011). ‘Helping People Make Better Choices’: Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Applied Geography, 31(2), 712-720.
Bayes, R., & Druckman, J. N. (2021). Motivated reasoning and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 27-35.
Bedford, D. (2016). Does climate literacy matter? A case study of US students’ level of concern about anthropogenic global warming. Journal of Geography, 115(5), 187-197.
Bennett, N. J. (2016). Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation biology, 30(3), 582-592
Bernauer, T., & McGrath, L. F. (2016). Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature climate change, 6(7), 680-683.
Bieniek-Tobasco, A., McCormick, S., Rimal, R. N., Harrington, C. B., Shafer, M., & Shaikh, H. (2019). Communicating climate change through documentary film: Imagery, emotion, and efficacy. Climatic change, 154, 1-18.
Botterill, L., & Mazur, N. (2004). Risk and risk perception: A literature review. Kingstrom, ACT: Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C. J., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Steg, L. (2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102061.
Bright, M. L., & Eames, C. (2022). From apathy through anxiety to action: Emotions as motivators for youth climate strike leaders. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 13-25.
Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: a review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15-21.
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic change, 114(2), 169-188.
Cameron, K., Mora, C., Leutscher, T., & Calarco, M. (2011). Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 266-308.
Cenaiko, A.-M. (2012). Advertising Democracy: Audience Segmentation and Targeted Emails in the 2012 Presidential Election.
Chadwick, A. E. (2017). Climate Change Communication. In: Oxford University Press.
Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature climate change, 7(12), 850-852.
Chen, N.-H. (2020). Exploring the cognitive and emotional impact of online climate change videos on viewers. Sustainability, 12(22), 9571.
Cho, H., & Salmon, C. T. (2006). Fear appeals for individuals in different stages of change: Intended and unintended effects and implications on public health campaigns. Health communication, 20(1), 91-99.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 10, 103-126.
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2019). Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change. Science Communication, 41(6), 761-789.
Clayton, S., & Manning, C. (2018). Psychology and climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses. Academic Press.
Cooper, K. E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2016). Green narratives: How affective responses to media messages influence risk perceptions and policy preferences about environmental hazards. Science Communication, 38(5), 626-654.
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534.
Cui, K., & Han, Z. (2019). Association between disaster experience and quality of life: The mediating role of disaster risk perception. Quality of life research, 28, 509-513.
Davis, J. J. (1995). The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 285-299.
De Lara, A., García Avilés, J. A., & Revuelta, G. (2017). Online video on climate change: a comparison between television and web formats. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication. 2017; 16 (1): A04-32.
De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128-138.
De Vries, G. (2020). Public communication as a tool to implement environmental policies. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 244-272.
De Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., Ellemers, N., & Daamen, D. D. (2015). Sustainability or profitability? How communicated motives for environmental policy affect public perceptions of corporate greenwashing. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 142-154.
Detenber, B. H., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Audience segmentation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore.
Doyle, J. (2009). Climate action and environmental activism: The role of environmental NGOs and grassroots movements in the global politics of climate change. In Climate change and the media (pp. 103-116). Peter Lang.
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature climate change, 9(2), 111-119.
Duggan, J., Haddaway, N. R., & Badullovich, N. (2021). Climate emotions: it is ok to feel the way you do. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e854-e855.
Eames, C., Barker, M., & Scarff, C. (2018). Priorities, identity and the environment: Negotiating the early teenage years. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(3), 189-206.
Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and emotion, 12(3), 271-302.
Ettinger, J., Walton, P., Painter, J., & DiBlasi, T. (2021). Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos. Climatic change, 164(1), 1-19.
Favero, P. (2014). Learning to look beyond the frame: reflections on the changing meaning of images in the age of digital media practices. Visual Studies, 29(2), 166-179.
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological science, 22(1), 34-38.
Feldman, L., & Hart, P. S. (2016). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38(1), 99-127.
Feldman, L., Hart, P. S., & Milosevic, T. (2017). Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading US newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public understanding of science, 26(4), 481-497.
Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135-142.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fishbein, M., & Manfredo, M. J. (1992). A theory of behavior change. Influencing human behavior, 24(1), 29-50.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(2), 212.
Geisler, G., & Burns, S. (2007). Tagging video: Conventions and strategies of the YouTube community. Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries,
Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301-1307.
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A., Gustafson, A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2019). The experience of consensus: Video as an effective medium to communicate scientific agreement on climate change. Science Communication, 41(5), 659-673.
Green, J. D., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Affect and self-focused attention revisited: The role of affect orientation. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 104-119.
Grunig, J. E. (1989). Publics, audiences and market segments: Segmentation principles for campaigns. Information campaigns: Balancing social values and social change, 199-228.
Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Cutler, M. J., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Personal stories can shift climate change beliefs and risk perceptions: the mediating role of emotion. Communication Reports, 33(3), 121-135.
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2016). Cumulative advantage in sustainability communication: Unintended implications of the knowledge deficit model. Science Communication, 38(6), 800-811.
Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2014). Threat without efficacy? Climate change on US network news. Science Communication, 36(3), 325-351.
Hart, P. S., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2009). Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow. Environmental Communication, 3(3), 355-366.
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701-723.
Haslam, K., Doucette, H., Hachey, S., MacCallum, T., Zwicker, D., Smith-Brilliant, M., & Gilbert, R. (2019). YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: an integrative review. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene, 53(1), 53.
Hickman, C. (2020). We need to (find a way to) talk about… Eco-anxiety. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(4), 411-424.
Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Morrison, M., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Cooksey, R. (2014). Audience segmentation and climate change communication: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(4), 441-459.
Hine, D. W., Reser, J. P., Phillips, W. J., Cooksey, R., Marks, A. D., Nunn, P., Watt, S. E., Bradley, G. L., & Glendon, A. I. (2013). Identifying climate change interpretive communities in a large Australian sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 229-239.
Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26-34.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature climate change, 6(6), 622-626.
Howell, R. A. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70-101.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press.
Jacobsen, G. D. (2011). The Al Gore effect: an inconvenient truth and voluntary carbon offsets. Journal of environmental economics and Management, 61(1), 67-78.
Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, culture & society, 27(2-3), 233-253.
Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate‐science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36, 1-43.
Kals, E., & Maes, J. (2002). Sustainable development and emotions. Psychology of sustainable development, 97-122.
Kirby, D. A. (2011). Lab coats in Hollywood: Science, scientists, and cinema. MIT Press.
Kobayashi, K. (2018). The impact of perceived scientific and social consensus on scientific beliefs. Science Communication, 40(1), 63-88.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 480.
Kuthe, A., Keller, L., Körfgen, A., Stötter, H., Oberrauch, A., & Höferl, K.-M. (2019). How many young generations are there?–A typology of teenagers’ climate change awareness in Germany and Austria. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 172-182.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991a). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American psychologist, 46(4), 352.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991b). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
León, B., & Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating science and technology through online video: Researching a new media phenomenon. Routledge.
León, B., Boykoff, M., Huda, J., & Rodrigo, C. (2018). 9 Framing in Climate Change Videos. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 377-410.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(2), 205.
Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Marlon, J., & Maibach, E. (2021). Global Warming’s Six Americas: a review and recommendations for climate change communication. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 97-103.
Leiserowitz, A., & Thaker, J. (2013). Global warming’s six Indias.
Leiserowitz, A. A. (2004). Day after tomorrow: study of climate change risk perception. Environment: Science and policy for sustainable development, 46(9), 22-39.
Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(6), 1433-1442.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & emotion, 14(4), 473-493.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(1), 146.
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual review of psychology, 66, 799-823.
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of consumer research, 15(3), 374-378.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149-188.
Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2013). Extending the explanatory utility of the EPPM beyond fear-based persuasion. Health communication, 28(1), 84-98.
Li, S.-C. S., Lo, S.-Y., Wu, T.-Y., & Chen, T.-L. (2022). Information seeking and processing during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Taiwan: examining the effects of emotions and informational subjective norms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9532.
Li, S.-C. S., Lu, P.-C., & Chen, S.-C. (2020). Emotions in fear appeals: Examining college students’ attitudes and behavioural intentions towards colorectal cancer prevention in Taiwan. Health Education Journal, 79(5), 569-582.
Linden, S. v. d., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2018). Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 2-3.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3-4), 445-459.
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 73-95.
Maibach, E., & Hornig Priest, S. (2009). No more “business as usual” addressing climate change through constructive engagement. In (Vol. 30, pp. 299-304): Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PloS one, 6(3), e17571.
Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206-219.
Manzo, K. (2017). The usefulness of climate change films. Geoforum, 84, 88-94.
Marlon, J. R., Bloodhart, B., Ballew, M. T., Rolfe-Redding, J., Roser-Renouf, C., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 20.
McDonald, R. I. (2016). Perceived temporal and geographic distance and public opinion about climate change. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.
Metag, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2018). Audience segments in environmental and science communication: Recent findings and future perspectives. In (Vol. 12, pp. 995-1004): Taylor & Francis.
Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(3), 500.
Morrison, M., Duncan, R., Sherley, C., & Parton, K. (2013). A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 20(2), 87-100.
Morton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 103-109.
Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31-53.
Moss, H. B., Kirby, S. D., & Donodeo, F. (2009). Characterizing and reaching high‐risk drinkers using audience segmentation. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(8), 1336-1345.
Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224-247.
Nabi, R. L. (2007). Determining dimensions of reality: A concept mapping of the reality TV landscape. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 51(2), 371-390.
Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442-468.
Nabi, R. L., Walter, N., Oshidary, N., Endacott, C. G., Love-Nichols, J., Lew, Z., & Aune, A. (2020). Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing effect? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 47(8), 1107-1130.
Neckel, S., & Hasenfratz, M. (2021). Climate emotions and emotional climates: the emotional map of ecological crises and the blind spots on our sociological landscapes. Social Science Information, 60(2), 253-271.
Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public understanding of science, 27(8), 985-1002.
Ngo, C. C., Poortvliet, P. M., & Feindt, P. H. (2020). Examining the effectiveness of climate change communication with adolescents in vietnam: The role of message congruency. Water, 12(11), 3016.
Ngo, C. C., Poortvliet, P. M., & Klerkx, L. (2022). The persuasiveness of gain vs. loss framed messages on farmers’ perceptions and decisions to climate change: A case study in coastal communities of Vietnam. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100409.
Nguyen, Q. A., Hens, L., Nguyen, N., MacAlister, C., & Lebel, L. (2020). Explaining intentions by vietnamese schoolchildren to adopt pro-environmental behaviors in response to climate change using theories of persuasive communication. Environmental management, 66(5), 845-857.
Niedenthal, P. M., Setterlund, J. B. H., & B, M. (1997). Being happy and seeing''happy'': Emotional state mediates visual word recognition. Cognition & emotion, 11(4), 403-432.
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and policy for sustainable development, 51(2), 12-23.
Nolan, J. M. (2010). “An inconvenient truth” increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 42(5), 643-658.
Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. mit Press.
O'neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won't do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355-379.
O’Neill, C. S., & Boykoff, M. (2012). The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. Engaging the public with climate change, 259-277.
Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L., Bhullar, N., Aquino, S. D., Marot, T., & Schermer, J. A. (2022). Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101887.
Ojala, M. (2012). Regulating Worry, Promoting Hope: How Do Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Cope with Climate Change? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 537-561.
Ojala, M. (2013). Emotional awareness: On the importance of including emotional aspects in education for sustainable development (ESD). Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 7(2), 167-182.
Ojala, M. (2016). Facing anxiety in climate change education: From therapeutic practice to hopeful transgressive learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 21, 41-56.
Ojala, M. (2023). Hope and climate-change engagement from a psychological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101514.
Ojala, M., & Lakew, Y. (2017). Young people and climate change communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
Ouariachi, T., Olvera-Lobo, M. D., & Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2017). Analyzing climate change communication through online games: Development and application of validated criteria. Science Communication, 39(1), 10-44.
Painter, J. (2016). Journalistic depictions of uncertainty about climate change. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
Painter, J., Erviti, M. C., Fletcher, R., Howarth, C., Kristiansen, S., Bienvenido, L., Oukrat, A., Russell, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2016). Something old, something new: Digital media and the coverage of climate change. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Palm, R., Lewis, G. B., & Feng, B. (2017). What causes people to change their opinion about climate change? Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 883-896.
Patterson, A. (2022). “Climate Catastrophe”: The Role of Fear Appeals in Climate Change Communication Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington].
Pera, A., & Aiello, L. M. (2024). Shifting Climates: Climate Change Communication from YouTube to TikTok. Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference,
Rees, J. H., Klug, S., & Bamberg, S. (2015). Guilty conscience: motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic change, 130, 439-452.
Ripberger, J. T., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., Carlson, D. E., Gupta, K., Carlson, N., & Dunlap, R. E. (2017). Bayesian versus politically motivated reasoning in human perception of climate anomalies. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), 114004.
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of personality & social psychology.
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., & Zhao, X. (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic change, 125, 163-178.
Roser-Renouf, C., Stenhouse, N., Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Engaging diverse audiences with climate change: Message strategies for global warming’s six Americas. In The Routledge handbook of environment and communication (pp. 388-406). Routledge.
Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of communication, 56(suppl_1), S202-S220.
Rothschild, Z. K., Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Keefer, L. A. (2012). A dual-motive model of scapegoating: displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(6), 1148.
Rudiak-Gould, P. (2013). “We have seen it with our own eyes”: why we disagree about climate change visibility. Weather, Climate, and Society, 5(2), 120-132.
Sakellari, M. (2015). Cinematic climate change, a promising perspective on climate change communication. Public understanding of science, 24(7), 827-841.
Salama, S., & Aboukoura, K. (2018). Role of emotions in climate change communication. Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 1: Theory of Climate Change Communication, 137-150.
Salvador, M., & Norton, T. (2011). The flood myth in the age of global climate change. Environmental Communication, 5(1), 45-61.
Sarrina Li, S.-C., & Huang, L.-M. S. (2020). Fear appeals, information processing, and behavioral intentions toward climate change. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(3-4), 242-260.
Schellnhuber, H. J. (2008). Global warming: Stop worrying, start panicking? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38), 14239-14240.
Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social science information, 44(4), 695-729.
Schäfer, M. S., & Painter, J. (2021). Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e675.
Simon, P. D., Pakingan, K. A., & Aruta, J. J. B. R. (2022). Measurement of climate change anxiety and its mediating effect between experience of climate change and mitigation actions of Filipino youth. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 39(1), 17-27.
Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of health communication, 1(3), 267-284.
Slater, M. D., & Flora, J. A. (1991). Health lifestyles: Audience segmentation analysis for public health interventions. Health education quarterly, 18(2), 221-233.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
Smith, C. A. (1989). Dimensions of appraisal and physiological response in emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(3), 339.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(4), 813.
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937-948.
Smith, R. A., Ferrara, M., & Witte, K. (2007). Social sides of health risks: Stigma and collective efficacy. Health communication, 21(1), 55-64
Smith, W. R. (1956). Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies'. Journal of marketing, 21, 3-8.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family.
So, J. (2013). A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health communication, 28(1), 72-83.
Soubry, B., Sherren, K., & Thornton, T. F. (2020). Are we taking farmers seriously? A review of the literature on farmer perceptions and climate change, 2007–2018. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 210-222.
Spears, N. E., Blankson, C., & Guzmán, F. (2012). Hope and fear in an advertisement context: Understanding how hope undoes fear. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 33(1), 79-93.
Stern, P. C. (2012). Fear and hope in climate messages. Nature climate change, 2(8), 572-573.
Svoboda, M. (2016). Cli‐fi on the screen (s): patterns in the representations of climate change in fictional films. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(1), 43-64.
Swim, J. K., & Bloodhart, B. (2015). Portraying the perils to polar bears: The role of empathic and objective perspective-taking toward animals in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 446-468.
Tandoc Jr, E. C., & Eng, N. (2017). Climate change communication on Facebook, Twitter, Sina Weibo, and other social media platforms. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 973.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: a tale of two facets. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 506.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
Van der Linden, S. (2014a). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 430-440.
Van der Linden, S. (2014b). Special issue article: The social psychology of climate change On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430-440.
Van der Linden, S. (2015a). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and individual differences, 87, 171-173.
Van der Linden, S. (2015b). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124.
Van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(6), 758-763.
Van Valkengoed, A., Steg, L., & Perlaviciute, G. (2021). Development and validation of a climate change perceptions scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 76, 101652.
Von Burg, R. (2012). Decades away or The Day After Tomorrow?: Rhetoric, film, and the global warming debate. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 29(1), 7-26.
Wang, S., Corner, A., Chapman, D., & Markowitz, E. (2018). Public engagement with climate imagery in a changing digital landscape. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(2), e509.
Wang, S., Leviston, Z., Hurlstone, M., Lawrence, C., & Walker, I. (2018). Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change. Global Environmental Change, 50, 25-40.
Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2022). Fear emotion reduces reported mitigation behavior in adolescents subject to climate change education. Climatic change, 174(1), 1.
Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic change, 77(1-2), 103-120.
Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342.
Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L., & Clawson, R. A. (2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198.
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.
Witte, K. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of health communication, 1(4), 317-342.
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health education & behavior, 27(5), 591-615.
Wolf, I., & Schröder, T. (2019). Connotative meanings of sustainable mobility: A segmentation approach using cultural sentiments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126, 259-280.
Wu, J. S., & Lee, J. J. (2015). Climate change games as tools for education and engagement. Nature climate change, 5(5), 413-418.
Xue, W., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D., Phillips, W. J., Nunn, P., & Zhao, S. (2016). Combining threat and efficacy messaging to increase public engagement with climate change in Beijing, China. Climatic change, 137, 43-55.
Yang, J. Z., Chu, H., & Kahlor, L. (2019). Fearful conservatives, angry liberals: Information processing related to the 2016 presidential election and climate change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 742-766.
Zhu, H., Yuen, K.-V., Mihaylova, L., & Leung, H. (2017). Overview of environment perception for intelligent vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(10), 2584-2601.
Arbuckle, M. B. (2017). The interaction of religion, political ideology, and concern about climate change in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 177-194.
Barr, S., Gilg, A., & Shaw, G. (2011). ‘Helping People Make Better Choices’: Exploring the behaviour change agenda for environmental sustainability. Applied Geography, 31(2), 712-720.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (2017). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Interpersonal development, 57-89.
Bolsen, T., Leeper, T. J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2014). Doing what others do: Norms, science, and collective action on global warming. American Politics Research, 42(1), 65-89.
Climate outreach. (2019) From photos to video – visually communicating climate change.
Communication strategies to mobilize the climate movement. In: Isham J, Waage S, eds. Ignition: What You Can Do to Fight Global Warming and Spark a Movement. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2007a, 73–93.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference.
Gerard J (2016) Leonardo DiCaprio’s ‘Before The Flood’ sampled by 30M+ worldwide for National Geographic. Retrieved from https://deadline.com/2016/11/before-the-flood-ratings-leonardo-dicaprio-national-geographic-1201847781/
Global Warming (2018) Retrieved August 20,2008,from https://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=globalwarming.htm
Hansen, A., & Cox, R. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887586
Ma, Y., Dixon, G., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2019). Psychological reactance from reading basic facts on climate change: The role of prior views and political identification. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 71-86.
Maibach, Edward. (2009). Global Warming's Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28922.90563.
Markowitz, E. M., & Guckian, M. L. (2018). Climate change communication: Challenges, insights, and opportunities. In Psychology and climate change (pp. 35-63). Elsevier.
Manzo K (2017) The usefulness of climate change films. Geoforum.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.006
Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2016). Perceptions of Climate Change Imagery: Evoked Salience and Self-Efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Science Communication, 38(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016635181
Skurka, C., Niederdeppe, J., Romero-Canyas, R., & Acup, D. (2018). Pathways of influence in emotional appeals: Benefits and tradeoffs of using fear or humor to promote climate change-related intentions and risk perceptions. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 169-193.
Skurka, C., Romero-Canyas, R., Joo, H. H., Acup, D., & Niederdeppe, J. (2022). Emotional appeals, climate change, and young adults: A direct replication of Skurka et al.(2018). Human Communication Research, 48(1), 147-156.
WMO. (2022). United in Science 2022.
Wonneberger, A., Meijers, M. H., & Schuck, A. R. (2020). Shifting public engagement: How media coverage of climate change conferences affects climate change audience segments. Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), 176-193.
Wolf, I., & Schröder, T. (2019). Connotative meanings of sustainable mobility: A segmentation approach using cultural sentiments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 126, 259-280.
Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7-19.
張春興（2007）。張氏心理學辭典 重訂版二刷。東華書局。
倪進誠（2000）。外在作用力形塑下觀光空間的遊客行為之研究---以澎湖離島為例。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hksyv8
郭實渝（2017）。從「不願面對的真相」談起－思考生態文化的永續教育。環境教育研究，7，41-53。
李佳蓉（2015）。提升教學成效－影片融入教學之探討與策略。科技與人力教育季刊，1(4)，1-13。https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.2015.1(4).1
葉欣誠（2019）。我們與北極熊的距離： 氣候變遷傳播的多重視角。人文與社會科學簡訊，20(4)，33-40。
張春炎、楊樺、葉欣誠（2019）。院線環境紀錄片作為環境教育影片的反思與分析：以《±2℃》、《看見台灣》為例。環境教育研究，15(2)，45-79。https://doi.org/10.6555/JEER.15.2.045
綠色和平（2020）。臺灣高中生的氣候變遷教育環境如何？ 1千多位老師告訴您。From https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/22433/%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E9%AB%98%E4%B8%AD%E7%94%9F%E7%9A%84%E6%B0%A3%E5%80%99%E8%AE%8A%E9%81%B7%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%92%B0%E5%A2%83%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%EF%BC%9F-1%E5%8D%83%E5%A4%9A%E4%BD%8D%E8%80%81%E5%B8%AB/
吳明隆（2021）。SPSS操作與應用：多變量分析實務（二版）。
邱浩政（2021）。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術（二版增修版）SPSS操作實務詳析。
曾鈺琪、林維捷、 洪鈴雅、石純齊、宋上仁、吳雅容、莊翰、呂冠佑 、楊舒帆、梁格寧、蔣志軒、黃悅筑、王齡（2019）。臺灣氣候變遷與森林生態之高中課程模組發展、評量與推廣計畫。
臺灣環境解說與自然教育協會（2022）。《我國氣候變遷素養認知調查計畫》。
金車文教基金會（2022）。《青少年減碳》小學生較環保 六成青少年自覺沒養成習慣。From https://kingcar.org.tw/survey/501526
金車文教基金會（2023）。《青少年媒體素養》影音平台當道 八成青少年最愛看YouTube From https://kingcar.org.tw/survey/501860
臺灣環境解說與自然教育協會（2023）。《我國氣候變遷與淨零排放素養調查》。