在二十一世紀的今天，大眾運輸的發展不僅僅是為了縮短通勤的時間，以及追求生活的便利而已，更能代表一個國家國力的象徵與進步，而國家經濟發展的成功，完善的大眾運輸系統是重要的原因之一，因此，各國不斷追求大眾運輸的革新，高速鐵路，即為目前各國交通發展的方向。
高速鐵路為新型的大眾運輸工具，最先是由日本發展，現在世界各國中已有法國、義大利、德國、西班牙、英國、比利時、荷蘭、美國、韓國、中國、土耳其、俄國斯，以及台灣擁有，高速鐵路為目前最快的陸運交通工具，其優點為快速、載客量高，在台灣已漸漸取代傳統的陸運，以及部份的航空運輸，成為西部台灣主要的城際運輸工具之一。
台灣高速鐵路在一開始是為了改善西部地區的交通問題，所以在一開始僅有規畫台北、板橋、桃園、新竹、台中、嘉義、台南以及左營車站，但後續為配合政府政策又增加了苗栗、彰化以及雲林車站，為了瞭解新設車站的建設成果，以新設車站為研究的主題，並以集群分析法將車站的績效指標做分群，檢測新設車站與其他高速鐵路車站的差別，再研究新設車站建設後，對於苗栗、彰化以及雲林縣人口以及觀光產業的影響。

In the 21st century, the public transportation systems not only shorten commute time and pursue for more convenience life, but become the symbol of national power and advanced. A good public transportation system is also one of reasons that bring country to become prosperous. Therefore, every countries is devote to innovation of public transportation. And high speed railway now is the way to develop.
High speed railway, the newest mass transit, now start to be built in many country. Japan was the first country that started to use high speed railway. Nowadays, there are many countries already have this transportation system including France, Italy, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherlands, United States, South Korea, China, Turkey, Russia and Taiwan. And high speed railway so far is the fastest land transportation. High speed railway is fast and can carry numerous passages. Now is one of the main public transportation in Taiwan.
At first, Taiwan high speed railway was to solve heavy traffic problem in west Taiwan. There were only Taipei, Banqiao, Taoyuan, Hsinchu, Taichung, Chiayi, Tainan and Zuoying stations in the beginning. After they added Miaoli, Changhua and Yunlin stations’ program because of the government policies. To understand the performance of the newest stations, Miaoli, Changhua and Yunlin stations are the research targets. Using cluster analysis to group the stations by performance indicators, and see what’s the different between three new stations and the others stations. Then the study continue to research the effect of Miaoli, Changhua and Yunlin County population, and the impact of tourism industry due to the new stations construction.

一、中文文獻
1.李莞霜 (2011)。「應用資料包絡法分析高鐵營運績效」。私立逢甲大學工業工程與系統管理
學研究所，碩士論文，台中市。
2.陳少騰 (2009)。「由日本新幹線促進觀光發展之經驗探討台灣高鐵之觀光發展-以台中車站為
例」。國立高雄第一科技大學，碩士論文，高雄市。
3.陳淑珍 (2013)。「高鐵設站與縣市經濟績效之研究」。國立政治大學，碩士論文，臺北市。
4.許佳如 (2013)。「高鐵車站特定區對鄰近地區發展影響之研究-以高鐵臺中車站特定區為例」。
國立台北科技大學，碩士論文，台北市。
5.馮正民、林禎家、姜渝生 (2003)。「高鐵通車後對國土空間結構之影響與發展策略研究」。
交通運輸研究所，國立交通大學，台北市：行政院經濟建設委員會。
6.森海國際工程顧問股份有限公司 (2000)。「以國土規劃觀點擬訂高速鐵路車站特定區整體發
展策略之研究」。行政院經濟建設委員會委託。
7.楊家欣 (2012)。「高速鐵路對臺灣交通可及性的影響」。國立交通大學，碩士論文，新竹市。
8.劉芳芳 (2015)。「高鐵旅運人數與客房住用數之關聯性研究-以高雄為例」。國立高雄應用科
技大學，碩士論文，高雄市。
9.賴玟霖 (2016)。「高鐵車站接駁公車營運前後服務水準之評估與高鐵車站接駁公車營運前後
服務水準之評估與比較-以苗栗高鐵站為例」。國立中央大學，碩士論文，桃園市。
10.謝慧婷 (2013)。「影響高鐵使用因素之分析」。國立交通大學，碩士論文，新竹市。
11.簡呈企 (2012)。「世界各主要國家高速鐵路營運績效評估」。國立臺北大學，碩士論文，新
北市。
12.羅婉瑞 (2010)。「以集群分析探討航空公司營運績效」。國立海洋大學，碩士論文，基隆
市。

二、英文文獻
1.Andrés Monzón., Emilio Ortega., & Elena López. (2011). Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of
high-speed rail extensions in urban areas. Cities, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002.
2.Bragdon, J. H., & J. A. T. Marlin. (1972). Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, 19 (4), 157-169.
3.Bryan, G. J., Collins, A. J., Stephenson, P., Orry, A., Smith, J. B., & Gale, M. D. (1997).
Isolation and characterisation of microsatellites from hexaploid bread wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94, 557-563.
4.Chabdra, A., & Thompson, E. (2000). Does public infrastructure affect economic activity? Evidence from the rural interstate highway system. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(4), 457-490.
5.Démurger, S. (2001). Infrastructure Development and Economic Growth: An Explanation
for Regional Disparities in China? Journal of Comparative Economics, 29:1, 95-117.
6.Färe, R., Groskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and
efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.
7.Golany, B., & Y. Roll. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. OMEGA, 17(3), 237-250.
8.Halkos, G. E., & N. G. Tzeremes, 2010, “Measuring Regional Economic Efficiency: The Case of
Greek Prefectures,”. The Annals of Regional Science, 45, 603-632.
9.Huang C.-F., & XIA, Y. (2011). Research on the role of urban rail transit in promoting
economic development. Procedia Engineering, 21, 520-525.
10.Jaggi, B., & M. Freedman. (1992). An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19 (5): 697-713.
11.Klaassen, L. H., & Scimemi, G. (1981) Theoretical issues in urban dynamics, in Klaassen, L. H.,
Molle W.T.M. and Paelinck, J.H.P. (Eds.) Dynamics of Urban Development, pp. 8-28.
Gower, Aldershot, UK.
12.King, A. A., & M. J. Lenox. (2001). Does it really pay to be green: An empirical study of
firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105-116.
13.Konar, S., & M. A. Cohen. (2001). Does the market value environmental performance.
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (2), 281-289.
14.Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecardmeasures that drive
performance. Harvard Business Review (January-February), pp.71-79
15.Li, G.-R, Ding Y-Y Ma., & M-N. (2011). Comparative study on economic efficiency of each region
in China, 2011 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (18 th),
September 13-15, 2011, Rome, Italy.
16.Loikkanen, H. A., & Susiluoto, I. (2002). An evaluation of economic efficiency of finnish regions
by DEA and Tobit models. ERSA conference papers ersa02p237, European Regional Science
Association.
17.Mejiers, E., Hoekstra, J., Leijten, M., Louw, E., & Spaans, M. (2012). Connecting the
periphery: distributive effect of new infrastructure. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 187-198.
18.Mejia-Dorantes, L., Paez, A., & Vassallo, J.M. (2011). Transportation infrastructure
impacts on firm location: the effect of a new metro line in the suburbs of Madrid. Journal of Transport Geography, Article In Press.
19.Percoco, M. (2004). A Statistical Model for the Identification of Key Sectors in I-O Models. ERSA
conference papers ersa04p90, European Regional Science Association.
20.Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Economie Appliqueé, 7: 307-320.
21.Venkatraman, N., & Vasudevan Ramanujam. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in
Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review,
Vol. 11, No. 4 (Oct., 1986), pp. 801-814.
22.Willigers, J., & van Wee, B. (2011). High-speed rail and office location choices. A stated
choice experiment for the Netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 19:4, 745–754.

三、網站資料
1.中華民國統計資訊網：http://statdb.dgbas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp
2.內政部統計處：https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.aspx
3.台灣高鐵：http://www.thsrc.com.tw/index.html
4.交通部統計查詢網：http://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100
5.交通部高速鐵路工程局：https://www.hsr.gov.tw/
6.交通部運輸研究所： http://w3.iot.gov.tw/
7..苗栗縣政府 (2014)。「變更高速鐵路苗栗車站特定區計畫(第一次通盤檢討)書」。取自：
http://urbanplanning.miaoli.gov.tw/upmiaoli/FileDownLoad.aspx?cfg=publishCaseFolder&file=303/%u82D7%u9AD8%u516C%u5C55%u4E3B%u8A08%u66F8.pdf
8.彰化縣政府 (2016)。「變更高速鐵路彰化車站特定區計畫(細部計畫)(土地使用分區管制要點
專案通盤檢討)書」。取自：http://urban.chcg.gov.tw/BookMapFile/494/cb894158-18f3-
4288-93e1-b66bb775fa4c.pdf
9.雲林縣政府 (2014)。「擬定高速鐵路雲林車站特定區計畫細部計畫案」。取自：
http://urbangis.yunlin.gov.tw/YLCITYGIS/InfoArea/PeopleView/FindPlanMapBook.aspx
10.維基百科：http://zh.wikipedia.org
11.觀光局行政資訊系統：http://admin.taiwan.net.tw/public/public.aspx?no=315