阿姆斯特丹同志文化自當地同志鄰里並於1930年代創生，並經由當地同志社群、文化創意、城市及國家再現後成為現今阿姆斯特丹同志文化地景。這些地景包括當地地下酒吧以及情慾流動空間、早期同志社會抗爭遊行到現今各式城市同志文化創意活動以及國際性城市大型節慶。其中現今與社會大眾參與性重疊部分較多的再現為國際城市大型節慶。國際性城市大型節慶也因為社會大眾以及國際觀光客的參與，成為城市另類創意觀光。
本研究試圖從文化研究、都市文化創意規劃及發展理論的角度探究一地區的文化主體空間如何發展並形塑旅遊目的地之原因、歷程及運作機制。本研究架構為依序以下三點：(一) 以歷史研究爬梳阿姆斯特丹同志鄰里的創生與發展，以作為後續探討再現政治之背景知識。(二) 以再現政治概念為主、都市文化創意規劃理論為輔，探究阿姆斯特丹文化主體如何經由當地文化創意以及城市形塑為現今城市同志文化創意活動。(三) 以再現政治的概念以及Pierre Bourdieu的文化資本與社會資本之概念，並以都市文化創意觀光理論為輔，探討阿姆斯特丹同志文化創意活動，如何形塑成為現今阿姆斯特丹國際性的城市文化節慶，成為知名觀光地景。
本研究方法採用多重研究方法，包括文獻分析法、質性訪問法、田野觀察法。為了蒐集相關第一手資料，筆者於2017年8月親自前往阿姆斯特丹造訪當地同志鄰里，以質性訪問法訪談鄰里內同志店家及同志組織，為期一個月。另外，期間筆者也親自參與當地知名城市同志文化活動之一：運河嘉年華，並以田野觀察及攝影蒐集相關資料。
綜合以上論述，本研究試圖藉由呈現阿姆斯特丹同志文化以及經由各方相關再現後的落差，以點出現今城市同志節慶中同志文化模糊之相關議題。

Amsterdam LGBTQI+ culture could date back to 1930s, and developed into a neighborhood. In several years, through the representaion of Amsterdam LGBTQI+ community, cultural creativity, city and state power, it has become so-called “Amsterdam gay cultural scene”. The early scene included underground gay bars, tearoom, early social gay protests and nowadays many kinds of queer city cultural creativity and international city festivals. From those scenes mentioned above, we can see the most public one –international city festivals. Because of the public and international tourist participation, international city festivals become part of amsterdam city creative tourism, but the alternative one.
The purpose of this study was to investigate how a cultural space developed into a city touist space, from the perspective of culture study and cultural creative tourism theory. The investigation are as follows. First, the study attempted to apply history study to examine the creation and development of Amsterdam gayborhood as well as first version of gay culture from 1930s to nowadays, as the background knowledge to investigate the politics of representation between Amsterdam LGBTQI+ culture and city . Second, the study also applied idea of politics of representation and city creative tourism theory, to examine how Amsterdam LGBTQI+ collaborates with city, and produces its own cultural creativity. Finally, the study applied the idea of politics of representation and Bourdieu’s idea of “cultural capital” and “social capital” and also applied city creative tourism theory, to investigate how Amsterdam LGBTQI+ culture was applied in international Amsterdam LGBTQI+ city festivals, and has become part of Amsterdam city tourism.
The research method of this study applied mutiple qualitative methods, including document analysis, interview method, and field observation. In order to collect relevent first-hand data, in 2017 August, I visited Amsterdam gayborhood and interviewed with the staffs of gay shops, gay bars, and LGBTQI+ organizations. Furthermore, I also participated to watch and observe Amsterdam Canal Pride with field observation method.
In summary, the study attempts to investigate the gap between authentic Amsterdam LGBTQI+ and its representation, to place its subjectivity in Amsterdam international city LGBTQI+ events nowadays.

中文文獻
卡維波 （1998）。 什麼是酷兒？性/別研究。 [酷兒: 理論與政治]專號第 3, (4), 32-46. 取自http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/members/Ning/publication/academic/papers/what-is-queer.pdf
吳文煜（2003）。河邊春夢：台灣高雄愛河畔男性間性慾地景的人文地理學研究（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，2003）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22091NTU00225008%22.&searchmode=basic
吳佳原（1998）。城市荒模中的綠洲臺北市男同志酒吧經驗分析（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，1998）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22086NTU00225027%22.&searchmode=basic
邱珍瑤（2004）。消費空間與同志身份之研究─以彩虹社區活動為例（碩士論文，國立東華大學，2004）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=Dothuo/search?s=id=%22092NDHU5577007%22.&openfull=1&setcurrent=0
許智淵（2005）。隱喻性地景之研究-----論述高雄同盟路同志情慾場域的身體實踐（碩士論文，南華大學，2005）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22093NHU05699002%22.&searchmode=basic
鄭瑋（2015）。英國Brick Lane創意觀光：從台灣觀光客看旅遊實踐（碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學，2015）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2unuy5
羅毓嘉（2010）。男柯一夢夢紅樓：西門紅樓南廣場的「同志市民空間」（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，2010）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。取自https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22098NTU05383018%22.&searchmode=basic
Landry, C. (2008)。創意城市: 打造城市創意生活圈的思考技術(楊幼蘭，譯)。台北: 馬可孛羅文化。(原著出版年：2000)。
Urry, J. (2013)。消費場所(江千綺，譯)。台北: 國家教育研究院。(原著出版年：1995)。
Urry, J. (2016)。觀光客的凝視3.0 (黃琬瑜，譯)。台北:書林。(原著出版年：2012)。
Shorto, R. (2017)。阿姆斯特丹：一座自由主義之都(吳緯疆，譯)。新北：八旗文化。(原著出版年：2013)。
 

外文文獻
AmsterdamInfo (2020). Red light district Amsterdam.
Retrieved June 22, 2020 from https://www.amsterdam.info/red-light-district/
Anderson, K., Domosh, M., Pile, S. & Thrift, N. (2003). Handbook of Cultural Geography. London: SAGE.
Belkin, A., & McNichol, J. (2002). Pink and blue: outcomes associated with the integration of open gay and lesbian personnel in the San Diego Police Department. Police Quarterly, 5(1), 63-95.
Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1994). Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities. London: Routledge.
Binnie, J. (1995). Trading places: consumption, sexuality and the production of queer space. Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities, 182-199. London: Routledge.
Boorstin, D. (1964). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America. New York: Harper.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
Browne, K., Lim, J., & Brown, G. (Eds.). (2009). Geographies of sexualities: Theory, practices and politics. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..
Brown, M. (2014). Gender and sexuality II: There goes the gayborhood? Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 457–465.
Butler, J. (2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Cale, L. (2019). Visit these 10 gayborhoods before they’re gone. Six-two.
Retrieved June 22, 2020 from https://www.contiki.com/six-two/gayborhoods/
City of Amsterdam(2020). Ambitions and implementation plan 2019. [official website]
Retrieved June 13, 2020 from https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/ambitions/
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1992). Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, Robert J. (2018). Advocacy beyond identity: A Dutch gay/lesbian organization’s embrace of a public policy strategy. Journal of Homosexuality.
Duncan, N. (Ed.). (1996). BodySpace: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. Psychology Press.
Dutch Center for Intangible Cultural Heritage (2020)[official website]
Retreived June 23, 2020 from https://www.immaterieelerfgoed.nl/en/prideamsterdam
Dockray, H.(2019). Gayborhoods aren't dead. In fact, there are more of them than you think. Mashable.
Retreived June 23, 2020 from https://mashable.com/article/gayborhoods-changing-amin-ghaziani/
Ghaziani, A. (2014). There goes the gayborhood? [electronic resource] (Course Book ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retreived June 23, 2020 from https://muse.jhu.edu/book/46444
Ghaziani, A. (2015). The queer metropolis. Handbook of the Sociology of Sexualities, edited by DeLamater, John, Plante, & Rebecca F..Springer International Publishing. Pp. 305-332.
Ghaziani, A. (2019). Cultural archipelagos: New directions in the study of sexuality and space. City & Community, 18(1), 4-22.
Edensor, Tim. (2011). Tourism and performance. Sage Handbook of Tourism Studies, edited by Tazim Jamal &Mike Robinson. London: Sage. Pp.543-557.
Faber, S. (1998). P. Koenders, Tussen christelijk réveil en seksuele revolutie. Bestrijding van zedeloosheid in Nederland, met nadruk op de repressie van homoseksualiteit. BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, 113(4), 589–590.
Levine, M. P. (1979). Gay ghetto. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(4), 363-377[electric resource]. Retrieved May 5, 2018 from http://www.williamapercy.com/wiki/images/Gay_ghetto.pdf
Forest, B. (1995). West Hollywood as symbol: the significance of place in the construction of a gay identity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(2), 133-157.
Floraida, R. (2002). The experiential life. The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books: Ch.8.
Gay News, (2017). Issue 312. Gay International Press.
Gay News, (2018). Issue 324. Gay International Press.
Castells, M. (1983). Cultural Identity, Sexual Liberation and Urban Structure: The Gay Community in San Francisco. The City and the Grassroots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gorman-Murray, A., & Nash, C. J. (2014). Mobile places, relational spaces: conceptualizing change in Sydney’s LGBTQ neighborhoods. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(4), 622–641.
Hassen, I., & Giovanardi, M. (2018). The difference of ‘being diverse’: city branding and multiculturalism in the ‘Leicester Model’. Cities, 80, 45-52.
Hekma, G. (2004). The demise of gay and lesbian radicalism in The Netherlands[conference papers].New Social Movements & Sexuality. Retrieved March 13, 2018 from https://bilitis.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/New-Social-Movements-and-Sexuality.pdf#page=129
Hekma, G. (2005a). The Netherland. glbtq Encyclopedia.
Retrieved March 13, 2018 from http://www.glbtqarchive.com/ssh/netherlands_S.pdf
Hekma, G. (2005b).Amsterdam Gay Bar Culture 1930-1970. Gay Studies University of Amsterdam. Retrieved March 13, 2018 from https://www.academia.edu/14426607/Amsterdam_Gay_Bar_Culture_1930-1970
I amsterdam (2020)[Official Website].
Retrieved July 13, 2020 from https://www.iamsterdam.com/en
IHLIA (2020)[Official Website].
Retrieved March 13, 2018 from https://www.ihlia.nl/?lang=en
Jaspal, R. (2017). Coping with ethnic prejudice on the gay scene: British South Asian gay men. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(2), 172-190
Johnston, L. (2007). Mobilizing pride/shame: lesbians, tourism and parades. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(1), 29-45.
Kellermann, B. (2011). Never too Naked: A Thrilling Tale of Love, Lust, Loss and Life. Zebra Press.
Koenders, P. (1996). Tussen Christelijk Réveil en seksuele revolutie. Bestrijding van zedeloosheid met denadruk op repressie van homoseksualiteit. Amsterdam University Press B.V.
Kooten-Niekerk, A. van. &Wijmer, S.(1985). Verkeerde vriendschap. Lesbisch leven in de jaren 1920-1960. Amsterdam: Sara.
Lady Galore (2020)[Official Website].
Retrieved June 13, 2020 from https://ladygalore.com/
Lauritsen, J., & Thorstad, D. (1974). The early homosexual rights movement (1864-1935). New York: Times Change Press. Pp. 36-37.
Leap, W. (Ed.). (1999). Public sex/gay space. Columbia University Press.
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Sociological Review, 79: 589-603.
MacCannell, D. (1976). The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Schocken Books.
Mepschen, P., Duyvendak, J. W., & Tonkens, E. H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5), 962-979.
Mommaas, H. (2009). Spaces of culture and economy: Mapping the cultural-creative cluster landscape. Creative economies, creative cities (pp. 45-59). Springer, Dordrecht.
Moylan, B. (2012). An Etiquette Guide for Straight People in Gay Bars. VICE.
Retrieved June 11, 2020 from https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ppqaj7/an-etiquette-guide-for-straight-people-in-gay-bars
Nicholls-Lee, D. (2018). Pride of Amsterdam: city's oldest gay bar celebrates survival. The Guardian. Retrieved June 12, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/jul/25/pride-of-amsterdam-citys-oldest-gay-bar-celebrates-survival-spijker
Noordam, D. J. (1995). Riskante relaties: vijf eeuwen homoseksualiteit in Nederland, 1233-1733. Uitgeverij Verloren.
Pride Amsterdam(2020)[official website]. Retrieved June 22, 2020 from https://pride.amsterdam/
Queer Nation Rose (2020). Retrieved June 22, 2020 from
https://www.fugues.com/239166-article-queer-nation-rose.html
Reguliers (2020)[Official Website]. Retrieved June 22, 2020 from
http://www.reguliers.net/english.php
Reuter, D. (2008). Greetings from the Gayborhood. New York: HNA Press.
Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (2006). Developing creativity in tourist experiences: A solution to the serial reproduction of culture? Tourism Management, 27,1408–1413.
Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and tourism: The state of the art. Annals of tourism research, 38(4), 1225-1253.
Roze Zaterdag (2020)[Official Website]. Retrieved June 22, 2020 from
https://www.rozezaterdagen.nl/
Sheller, M. (2003). Iconic islands: nature, landscape, and the tropical tourist gaze. Consuming the Caribbean: from Arawaks to zombies. London: Routledge.
Shields, R. (1991). Niagara Falls: Honeymoon capital of the world. Places on the Margin: Alternative geographies of modernity. London and New York: Routledge.
Stacey, J. (2012). Unhitched: Love, Marriage, and Family Values from West Hollywood to Western China. NYU Press.
Brouillard, K. (2017). The 10 best gay-friendly neighborhoods in America. Oyster.
Retrieved August 22, 2018 from https://www.oyster.com/articles/59874-5-best-gay-friendly-neighborhoods-in-america/
TravelGay (2020) [Official Website].
Retrieved June 22, 2020 from https://www.travelgay.com/
Turner, V. (1987). The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publication.
Turner, V(1977). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Van Naerssen, A. X. (1987). Gay life in Dutch Society. Harrington Park Press.
Waitt, G., & Markwell, K. (2006). Gay tourism: Culture and context. Routledge.
Warmerdam, Hans, and Pieter Koenders. Cultuur en ontspanning. Het COC 1946-1966. Utrecht: Homostudies, 1987.Homostudies, 1987.
Wirth, L. (Ed.). (1998). The ghetto (Vol. 7). Transaction Publishers.
Whittaker, E.T.,&Watson, G.N.(1996). Marketing gay tourism in Manchester: New market for urban tourism or destruction of ‘gay space’? A course of modern analysis. Cambridge university press.
Wittman, C. (1970). Refugees from Amerika: A Gay Manifesto. The Red Butterfly.