研究生: |
劉怡伶 LIU, Yi-Ling |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
體育師資生籃球術科學習策略之個案研究 A Case Study of Pre-service Physical Education Teachers' Learning Strategies in Basketball Courses |
指導教授: |
掌慶維
Chang, Ching-Wei |
口試委員: |
鐘敏華
Chung, Min-Hua 林靜萍 Lin, Ching-Ping 掌慶維 Chang, Ching-Wei |
口試日期: | 2022/06/16 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育與運動科學系 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 91 |
中文關鍵詞: | 學習策略 、師資培育 、運動術科 、體育師資生 |
英文關鍵詞: | Learning strategies, Teacher education, Sports courses, Pre-service physical education teachers |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201876 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:126 下載:16 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
體育與運動科學系的運動術科與中小學體育課程主要以運動項目為學習內容,體育師資生對運動術科的學習方式,對如何進行體育教學實踐的轉化具關鍵作用之一。目前,運動術科面臨學生背景多元,可能導致學習動機低落,加上當前亟待推動素養導向教學等問題,使得學習策略的運用受到重視,以促進學生的深度學習。因此,本研究目的:了解體育師資生在職前師資培育運動術科課所使用的學習策略,以供師資培育運動術科課程規劃與教學實踐的參考。方法:以參與某大學體育相關科系體育專業科目籃球術科課的23名體育師資生為對象,實行非參與式觀察法、兩次焦點團體訪談法,並蒐集運動術科學習策略學習單與其他課堂資料,將所蒐集資料以持續比較法與內容分析法進行分析。結果:一、體育師資生在學習歷程當中,遇到許多不同情境與困難,而師資生解決問題的策略仍較為淺層且少。二、體育師資生運用的學習策略包含淺層學習策略與深層學習策略,但深層學習策略的應用較為被動,不利學習發展。結論:一、體育師資生於面對不同情境時,會使用不同學習策略應對,但會遭遇不習慣上課方式、缺乏技術與經驗、被動等待教師給予答案、以及缺乏主動學習的經驗。二、體育師資生運用深層與淺層學習策略進行學習,但有些體育師資生運用的深層學習策略情形較為被動、消極,不利於素養之發展。建議:一、教學設計或課程實施時,宜考量學習者先備經驗。二、運用多元評量檢核師資生於課堂中的學習,了解師資生運用學習策略的情形。三、適時引導以幫助師資生發展、運用深層學習策略。
關鍵詞:學習策略、師資培育、運動術科、體育師資生
Sports courses in the department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences relate to the physical education course’s learning content in schools. Pre-service physical education teachers’ learning methods to sports courses are crucial to the transformation of the practice of physical education teaching. Currently, sports courses may encounter pre-service teachers’ low learning motivation due to the diversity of their background. Furthermore, the issues of advocating competency-based teaching leads to the use of learning strategies are being valued in order to promote pre-service teachers’ deep learning. The purpose of the study was to understand the pre-service physical education teachers’ learning strategies in the sports courses. Method: Participants were 23 pre-service physical education teachers that attended basketball courses in a university that provides physical education teacher education program. Data were collected from non-participant observation, two times of focus group and the learning sheet in sports courses about learning strategies and other course materials. The constant comparison method and content analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: (1) Pre-service physical education teachers’ learning process faced many different scenarios and difficulties and their strategies to solve the learning problems are still a few and remaining shallow level. (2) Pre-service physical education teachers’ learning strategies included shallow and deep learning strategies. However, the use of deep strategies was more passive which are at a disadvantage to develop their learning. Conclusions: (1) Pre-service physical education teachers used different learning strategies to face different scenarios. However, pre-service teachers still encountered some problems including not familiar with the way of taking classes, lack of techniques and experiences. Moreover, their learning is still passively waiting answers from the teacher. Pre-service teachers were still lack of active learning experiences. (2) Pre-service physical education teachers used deep learning strategies. But, some of them using deep and shallow learning strategies were more passive and negative which was in a disadvantage of developing competency.
Suggestions: (1) To take students’ prior knowledge into consideration in terms of curriculum design and teaching. (2) To using multiple assessment to examine pre-service teachers’ learning to understand their situations link to learning strategies. (3) To develop pre-service teachers’ competency, it is necessary to guide them apply deep learning strategies in a more active way.
Keyword: Learning strategies, Teacher education, Sports courses, Pre-service physical education teachers
王文吟 (2002)。性別與聽力程度於高中生應與聽力策略使用之影響—以台灣彰化地區為例。彰化師範大學英語學系研究所碩士論文。
何縕琪、張景媛 (2019)。素養導向師資培育教學:以慈濟大學為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(8),51-56。
吳芝儀 (2019)。因應新課綱素養導向之師資培育。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(12),19-23。
吳海助 (2002)。師院體育系學生如何充實現在、准備未來。大專體育,61,17-21。
吳淑真 (2016)。臺灣體育運動科學發展現況與未來趨勢。體育學報,49(1),1-14。
吳清山 (2011)。我國高等教育革新的重要課題與未來發展之分析。長庚人文社會學報,4(2),241-280。
吳清山 (2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),261-193。
吳碧純 (2017)。素養導向教學之學習評量。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),30-34。
吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀 (2017)。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。教育研究月刊,275,50-63。
李宏盈、掌慶維、吳采陵 (2020)。體育師資生與科技教學內容知識 (TPACK) 關係之探討。中華體育季刊,34(2),89-98。
李勇輝 (2017)。學習動機、學習策略與學習成效關係之研究-以數位學習為例。經營管理學刊,14,68-86。
周文祥 (1998)。大學體育教學之省思。大專體育,35,90-94。
林永豐 (2018)。延續或斷裂?從能力到素養的課程改革意涵。課程研究,13,1-20。
林玫君、蔡明學、范信賢、陳儷今 (2020)。從十二年國教核心素養探究中小學體育類科師資合流培育之可能。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),195-222。
林靜萍 (2018)。從技能到素養-三波教育改革中體育課程目標與教材的演變。學校體育,168。
洪詠善、范信賢 (2015)。同行~走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。新北市:國家教育研究院。
夏淑琴、劉員池 (2020)。學習策略融入體育教學模組素養導向教學設計之探究。學校體育,181,21-31。
張佑誠、陳子威、林如瀚 (2021)。翻轉教學融入不同類型體育課程之學習策略。大專體育學刊,156,1-9。
張新仁 (2006)。學習策略的知識管理。教育研究與發展,2(2),19-42。
張瓊友 (2002)。國小高年級學生多元智能與學習策略之研究。國立新竹師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
教育部 (2014年11月28日)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。取自 http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/at tach/87/pta_5320_2729842_56626.pdf
教育部 (2021)。中華民國教師專業素養指引-師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。教育部主管法規查詢系統。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL002069&KeyWord=課程基準
梁麗珍 (2001)。二專在職學生自我導向學習、學習動機、學習策略與自我概念相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系博士論文。
符碧真 (2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育:國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),59-87。
莊國良、黃姿榕、劉有德 (2015)。複雜系統與二語學習。華語文教學研究,12(4),77-109。
莊福泰 (2017)。莊福泰:什麼是素養導向教學?親子天下。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/4112
郭生玉 (2002)。如何落實多元評量。教育研究月刊,98,11-17。
陳仲殊、陳五洲 (2015)。後設認知在動作學習上的應用。大專體育,134,63-73。
陳美玉 (1999)。教師專業學習與發展。台北:師大書苑。
陳麗華 (1992)。國小實習教師的社會科教學推理之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學博士論文,未出版,台北市。
傅翌雯、陳美玉 (2008)。大學生學習策略及其運用之個案研究。國立屏東教育大學教育學系研究所碩士論文。
掌慶維 (2006)。國小五年級建構取向籃球遊戲學習之探討 (未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
掌慶維 (2021)。素養導向職前體育師資培育課程與教學-理念與實務。臺灣師大出版社。
曾陳密桃 (1990)。國民中小學生的後設認知及其與閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
游自達 (2019)。素養導向教學的實踐:深化學習的開展。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),6-12。
黃旭輝、陳五洲 (2003)。資訊科技融入體育教學之探討。大專體育,69,49-57。
黃若飴 (2007)。探討性別和不同性質體育課程下教導方式, 學習動機及學習策略與大學生桌球課學習滿意度之間的關係。臺灣運動心理學報,10,15-36。
黃嘉莉 (2017)。中小學教師核心能力國際趨勢之研究:兩層五力之建構。載於中華民國比較教育學會(主編),比較教育 200 週年紀念專書(pp. 107-148)。臺北市:學富。
黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進 (2020)。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),1-35。
楊俊鴻 (2018)。素養導向課程與教學:理論與實踐。高等教育出版社。
楊美蓉 (2002)。高齡學習者自我概念、對教師教學行為知覺與學習適應之關係研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文。
楊智穎 (2019)。回應新課程政策變革的師資培育課程發展。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(4),51-57。
楊寧 (2006)。從元認知到自我調節:學習策略研究的新進展。南京師大學報,4,101-105。
董燊、葉炳煙 (2014)。國小學童游泳課學習策略與學習成效之研究。國立金門大學學報,4,93-104。
廖智倩、闕月清 (2011)。國中學生對理解式籃球教學之知覺。大專體育學刊,13(3),223-231。doi:10.5297/ser.1303.001
歐雅萍 (2002)。國小學童設計實驗能力與後設認知能力之相關研究。台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡清田 (2015)。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA:核心素養。五南圖書出版。
蔡清田 (2020)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要研修的核心素養。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(1),08-12。
鄭漢吾 (2019)。「素養導向體育教材教法」教學實施與學習成效之行動研究。臺灣運動教育學報,14(2),14-42。
蕭明芳、林靜萍 (2009)。體育教學多元評量之探討。中華體育季刊,23(2), 119-126。
賴香如 (2004)。高高屏地區後期中等教育學生學習動機與學習策略之研究。屏東科技大學技術與職業教育研究所碩士論文。
謝宗諭、劉有德 (2017)。以非線性限制導向理論淺談理解式教學法。政大體育研究,24,41-58。
謝宛君 (2015)。體育教學新思維。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(11),170-174。
鍾芝憶 (2020)。體育課堂裡的「具身性」論述:Whitehead「身體素養」的核心哲學基礎。大專體育學刊,22(4),287-299。DOI:10.5297/ser.202012_22(4).0001
羅寶鳳 (2017)。因應時代改變的終身學習:素養導向的教學與評量。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(3),24-27。
Barry J.Zimmerman (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.
Barry J. Zimmerman (2002) Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview, Theory Into Practice, 41:2, 64-70, DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Blazar, D. (2016). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ academic performance, attitudes, and behaviors: Extensions of the literature (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Corno, L. (1982). The metacognitive control components of self-regulated. learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 333-346.
Carson, R. G., & Kelso, J. S. (2004). Governing coordination: Behavioral principles and neural correlates. Experimental Brain Research, 154(3), 267-274.
Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 1. Relating instruction to research (pp. 209–239). Erlbaum.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. doi:10.14507/epaa.v8nl.2000
Fong-Yee, D., & Normore, A. H. (2004, April). The impact of quality teachers on student achievement. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual South Florida Education Research Conference.
Haywood, K.M., & Getchell, N. (2005). Lifespan motor development (4th ed.). Human Kinetics.
McKeachie, W. J. (1988). The need for study strategy training. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp.3-9). Academic Press.
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
MacPhail, A., & Halbert, J., (2010). We had to do intelligent thinking during recent PE: Students’ and teachers’ experiences of assessment for learning in post-primary physical education. Assessment in Education, 17(1), 23-39.
Matanin, M., & Tannehill, D. (1994). Assessment and grading in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 13(4), 395-405.
Oni, J. O. (2014). Teacher quality and student academic achievement in basic technology in junior secondary schools in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(3), 397-402. doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p397
Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813.
Renshaw, I., Chow, J.Y., Davids, K., Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis?. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117-137.DOI: 10.1080/17408980902791586
Rink, J. E. (1993). Teaching physical education for learning (2nd ed.). Mosby.
Steve, H., Rhoda, C., & Suzanne, M. (2006). Karl Popper and Jean Piaget: A rationale for constructivism. The Educational Forum, 71, 41-48.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Human Kinetics.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Cognitive psychology. Thomson.
Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning kills—Relating instruction to research (pp. 241–258). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). Macmillan.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 284-290.