研究生: |
楊智能 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
影像回饋及其時宜對太極拳動作模仿學習的影響 The effects of video-feedback and timing on learning a Tai Chi Motor task |
指導教授: |
卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2000 |
畢業學年度: | 88 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 73 |
中文關鍵詞: | 影像回饋時宜 、模仿 、空間準確性 、太極拳 |
英文關鍵詞: | video-feedback timing, modeling, spatial accuracy, Tai Chi |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:245 下載:80 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討影像回饋及其實施時宜,對動作模仿學習的動作型式空間準確性的影響。以30名在參與本實驗前從未學習過太極拳的女性大學生為實驗參加者,並隨機分派至:(1)立即影像回饋組,(2)延遲影像回饋組,以及(3)控制組等三組。實驗的保留期分成10分鐘的立即保留測驗、隔天保留測驗及隔週的保留測驗。實驗操弄的變項為不同的影像回饋時宜,依變項為太極拳起勢動作的肢體空間準確性得分,並增加自我效能問卷、回饋策略的有效性及配合度問卷。依變項肢體動作空間準確性分數的資料,是以二因子混合設計變異數做統計分析,以及杜凱式HSD法進行事後比較;在手部、足部以及協調成分的空間準確性得分,則是以獨立樣本單因子變異數分析身體各肢段的平均數。本研究的結果發現:(一)初學者在模仿太極拳起勢動作的空間準確性,有提供影像回饋顯著優於沒有提供影像回饋;(二)初學者在模仿太極拳起勢動作的空間準確性,提供延遲影像回饋顯著的優於提供立即影像回饋;(三)提供延遲的影像回饋時宜在初學者模仿太極拳起勢動作的手部、足部,以及肢體間協調動作的學習上,發現部分肢段的空間準確性優於立即影像回饋時宜。
關鍵詞:影像回饋時宜、模仿、空間準確性、太極拳
The purpose of this study was, for space accuracy of movement style in movement-imitating, to investigate the effects of video-feedback and its timing on learning a Tai Chi motor task. Thirty college male students who were naive in Tai Chi were randomly assigned into one of the following three groups: (1) instantaneous video-feedback group, (2) delayed video-feedback group, and (3) control group. Ten- minutes, one-day and one-week retention tests were administered after experimental treatments. The independent variable was the video-feedback timing while the dependent variable was the score of limbs' space accuracy in the start posture of Tai Chi. Questionnaires on the self-efficacy and the effectiveness of feedback strategies, and cooperation were also used. The independent variable data were analyzed by the mixed two-way ANOVA. The Tukey's HSD method was selected to run the posterior comparisons. Furthermore, one way ANOVA was used in analyzing the score of space accuracy in different limbs. The findings showed that: (1) Spatial accuracy of novice modeling Tai Chi motor task was significantly greater than those without video-feedback, (2) Spatial accuracy of novice modeling Tai Chi motor task was also significantly better in delayed video-feedback than those in instantaneous video-feedback, (3) In the space accuracy of limbs coordination, the delayed video-feedback was higher than the instantaneous video-feedback.
Key words: video-feedback timing, modeling, spatial accuracy, Tai Chi
中文部份:
中華民國太極拳協會 (1984)。太極拳圖解 (第四版)。臺北市:教育部體育司。
李芳素 (1998)。兒童動作模仿和口語策略的年齡差異研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育研究所碩士學位論文,臺北市。(未出版)
張春興 (1995)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華書局。
陳新燕與卓俊伶 (1999)。示範者結果獲知的相對頻率對觀察者動作學習的影響。大專體育學刊,第一卷,第一期,頁131-138。
內政部統計處 (1998)。中華民國八十六年內政統計年報。臺北市: 內政部統計處。
林清山 (1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華書局。
英文部份:
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
Adams, J. A., Gopher, D., & Lintern, G. (1977). Effects of visual and proprioceptive feedback on motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 11-22.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bernstein, N. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movement. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 153-167.
Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 269-281.
Darden, G. F. (1999). Videotape feedback for student learning and performance : A learning-stages approach. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 70, 40-45.
Emmen, H. H., Wesseling, L. G., Bootsma, R. J., Whiting, H. T. A., & van Wieringwn, P. C. W. (1985). The effect of video-modeling and video-feedback on the tennis serve by novices. Journal of Sport Sciences, 3, 127-138.
Ferrari, M. (1996). Observing the observer: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skill. Developmental Review, 16, 203-240.
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Gentile, G. A. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, Monograph 17, 3-23.
Kernodle, M. W., & Carlton, L. G. (1992). Information feedback and the learning of multiple-degree of freedom activities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 187-196.
Liu, Y. T. (1992). Characteristics of motor reproduction from observational learning. Unpublished master thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
Magill, R. A. (1998). Motor learning: Concepts and application (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McCullagh, P. (1993). Modeling: learning, developmental, and social psychological considerations. In P. McCullagh (Ed.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 106-126). New York: Macmillan.
McCullagh, P., Burch, C. D., & Siegel, D. I. (1990). Correct and self-modeling and the role of feedback in motor skill acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Houston, TX.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Norman, D. A. (1982). Learning and memory. New York: Freeman.
Rikli, R., & Smith, G. (1980). Videotape feedback effects on tennis serving form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 895-901.
Pollock, B. J., & Lee, T. D. (1992). Effect of the model’s skill level on observational motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 25-29.
Rose, D. J. (1997). A multilevel approach to the study of motor control and learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2000). Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Swinnen, S., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 16, 706-706.
Tzetzis, G., Mantis, K., Zachopoulou, E., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (1999). The effect of modeling and verbal feedback on skill learning. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 36, 137-151.
Weinberg, R., Gould, D., & Jackson, A. (1979). Expectations and performance: An empirical test of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 11, 320-340.
Weinberg, R., Gould, D., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A. (1981). The effect of preexisting and manipulated self efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 345-354.
Wickstrom, R. L. (1983). Fundamental motor patterns (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
附 錄