研究生: |
林明富 Lin, Ming-Fu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
馬背上的商機:馬術產業商業模式之研究 The Equine Industry as a Market: The Study of Equestrian Business Model |
指導教授: |
陳美燕
Chen, Mei-Yen |
口試委員: |
董益吾
Tung, I-Wu 陳昶旭 Chen, Chang-Hsu 陳美燕 Chen, Mei-Yen |
口試日期: | 2022/06/11 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
運動休閒與餐旅管理研究所運動休閒與餐旅管理碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management_Continuing Education Master's Program of Sport, Leisure and Hospitality Management |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 58 |
中文關鍵詞: | 運動產業 、策略管理 、休閒遊憩 、馬場 |
英文關鍵詞: | Sport Industry, Strategic Management, Leisure Activities, Equestrian Arena |
研究方法: | 次級資料分析 、 內容分析法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201009 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:151 下載:19 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
馬術起源於英國的驅車,是歷史相當悠久的一項傳統運動,亦是奧運會中唯一由運動員與有生命的動物相互配合的比賽項目,運動員與馬各自的表現與配合度,都會影響比賽成績。其次,以美國為例,馬術表演業的產值約為288億美元和賽馬業的產值約為261億美元,且逐年上升。英國和日本的賽馬會組織和馬術運動的推廣發展,相輔相成,是將運動、博弈和遊戲 (休閒) 三者一體化。在臺灣馬術運動除了可以當作休閒遊憩活動外,也會以馬術進行治療,尤其是針對身心障礙者。本研究從策略管理的觀點,探究馬術運動之商業模式。本研究以半結構訪談方式進行,針對國內馬場經營相關人員進行訪談及國內外相關文獻和次級資料分析馬術運動和馬術產業的關聯性。本研究設計訪談大網,以半結構式訪談法之資料蒐集,訪談的錄音檔經由研究者轉為逐字稿,調整其中字句及標點符號,讓內容更為通順,再予以各個受訪者檢視是否如實呈現,其表達觀點,校對後再摘錄至本研究結果與討論進行闡述,進而提出研究結論與建議。本研究建議包括:(1) 制定健全的「馬術運動場登記及管理規範」,不但可以引導我國馬術運動供需市場機制的正常化運作,而且政府機關為倡導社會大眾正當多元的休閒運動。(2) 應用體育署之運動產業關聯表,據以建立馬術運動產業投入產出模型,即可用以評估馬術活動的相關投入與支出數據資料的彙整收集與分析處理,進而評估活動所創造的關聯效益,作為推廣馬術產業的依據。(3) 強化公私協力,活化馬術場域與活動,創造消費者對於馬術運動所產生的娛樂性與體驗感,建立創新應用場域與營運模式,建構馬場智慧運動科技示範教學場域,提供課程模組教學演習及學校專題實作支援,並培育馬術產業人才。
As a traditional sport with a rich history, equestrian has its roots in the Driving of United Kingdom. Equestrian is the only discipline in Olympics that requires human athletes to cooperate with another living creature. Both their presentation and the bond they demonstrate will affect the overall result. In the US, the economy of equestrian shows is about $28.8 billion, and horse racing has a $26.1 billion value, the amounts grow every year. In the United Kingdom and Japan, the horse racing associations coordinate with equestrian, contribute to stronger development and progress. In that model, sports, gambling, and leisure are integrated. In Taiwan, equestrian serves not just as a leisure activity, it is also a therapy, targeting the disabled in particular.
From a strategic management perspective, the study aims to understand the business model of equestrian. Semi-structured interview was conducted on domestic equestrian club management teams. In order to understand the relations between the equestrian sport and industry, literatures at home and abroad were collected to undergo secondary data analysis. The study set out an interview outline to conduct semi-structured interview. The record was then typed into transcript with words and punctuations adjusted to sound coherent. The interviewees then review the transcript to see if their points were conveyed. After proof reading, the sentences were extracted in the study for further discussion and suggestion.
The suggestion of this study includes, a) formulate a robust “regulation on equestrian arena registration and management”, this could not only helps normalize the operation of domestic equestrian market mechanism, but serves as an instruction for government to advocate the diversity of leisure activities; b) utilize the sport industry association table made by the Sports Administration, to build a input and output model of equestrian sport industry. These data can be used to evaluate the associated benefits, and form a solid foundation for promoting equestrian industry; c) create a solid bond between public and private sectors, activate the equestrian related spheres, so that consumers can experience the entertainment that horse riding brings about. An innovative management model should be built to form an intellectual sports technology demonstration arena. On this base, teaching model and project-based practical course can be provided, and further cultivate equestrian talents.
尤傳莉 (譯)(2012)。獲利世代。臺北市:早安財經文化有限公司。(Alexander Osterwalder, 2010)。
王文科、王智弘(2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29-50。
台灣趨勢研究股份有限公司 (2019)。107年度國民眾運動消費支出調查。取自 https://www.sa.gov.tw/PageContent?n=3846
司徒達賢 (2016)。策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法。臺北市:元大。
江徽 (2005)。馬術運動中心不同馬齡會員參與動機與行為之個案研究 (未出版之碩士論文) 。國立台灣體育學院,臺中市。
吳思華 (2000)。知識經濟的定義與內涵。北縣教育,37,86-95。
李素馨 (1994)。典型相關分析專業程度、遊憩動機和基地屬性認知關係之探討。戶外遊憩研究,7(3),39-62。
狄懋昌 (2020)。台灣運動觀光產業推動新思維策略探討-以三階商業模式之分析實證。運動健康休閒學報,11,19-35。
林佩璇 (2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法,(頁39-262)。高雄市:麗文。
邱憶惠(1999)。個案研究:質化取向。國立高雄師範大學教育系教育研究,7,113-127。
財團法人中華經濟研究院 (2020)。推估試算我國106及107年度運動產業產值及就業人數等研究案。取自 https://www.sa.gov.tw/PageContent?n=160
高立文(2002)。半邊天-女生領導人成功經驗之探索 (未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
葉連祺(2007)。國小SWOT分析項目、權重體系及影響因素之研究。師大學報教育類,52(2),23-48。
國立金門大學休閒運動研究所 (2014)。馬術場設置可行性及相關管理規範研究。取自 https://www.sa.gov.tw/PageContent?n=783
張慧士 (2002)。馬與馬術。中華傳統獸醫學會會刊,6 (1),11-14。
許建民 (1999)。以休閒活動類型及形式規劃休閒活動之探討。大專體育,42,158-164。
黃蕙娟 (2014)。臺灣地區運動觀光發展之策略性分析。中華體育季刊,28(1),1-10。
賈若宸 (2017)。台灣健身器材零售市場經營策略之研究-以J公司為例 (未出版之碩士論文)。臺中科技大學,臺中市。
蔡正鳴、蔡佳良 (2008)。休閒性馬術治療對腦性麻痹效益之探討。大專體育,94,180-185。
簡全亮、駱碧蓮、周宇輝、鄭詩縈 (2014)。公有運動場館冠名權釋出議題之探討-以我國職棒競賽使用棒球場為例。臺大體育。59。79-91。
顏家芝、薛雅丹、黃文卿 (2006)。從深度休閒理論探討太魯閣國家公園解說志工對解說服務之投入程度與其深度休閒特質之關係。戶外遊憩研究,19(1),51-75。
教育部體育署(2019)。108年運動現況調查報告。臺北市:教育部體育署。
Afuah, A.,& Tucci, C. (2001). Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Cases. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.
Al-Debei, M. M.,& Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359-376.
Amit, R.,& Zott, C. (2001). "Value creation in e-business", Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493-520.
Anfara, V. A. Jr., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002).Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
Baden-Fuller, C.,& Haefliger, S. (2013). Business Models and Technological Innovation. Long Range Planning, 46, 419-426.
Barni, J. (1980). Sports participation vs. sport spectatorship. Journal of Leisure Research, 16(1) , 9-12.
Bernard, H. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brown, D. O., (2003). ‘Perception differences among visitor groups: The case of horseattraction versus other-attraction tourist markets in Lexington, Kentucky’, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 9(2), 174-187.
Buckley, P., Dunn, T., & More, S.J. (2004). Owners' perceptions of the health and performance of Pony Club horses in Australia. Prev Vet Med. 63(1-2):121-33.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and pro-ting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
D, Unruh (1980). "The Nature of Social Worlds" The Pacific Sociological Review, 23(3), 271-296.
DaSilva, C. M.,& Trkman, P., 2014. Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not, Long Range Planning, 47(6), 379-389.
Deloitte. (2020). Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on the sports industry. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/understanding-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-sports-industry.html
Elgåker, H., Pinzke, S., Nilsson, C.,& Lindholm, G. (2012) Horse riding posing challenges to the Swedish Right of Public Access. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 274-293.
Gary Hamel, (2000). Leading the Revolution. Harvard Business School Press. Brighton, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75-91.
Hackbert, P. H., & Lin, X. (2009). Equestrian Trail Riding: An Emerging Economic Contributor To The Local Rural Appalachian Economy. Journal of Business Case. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS): 5(6), 47-58.
Hautbois, C., Durand, C., (2004). Sport and local economic development: The case of sport tourism. Proposition of local productive system. Journal of Sport Tourism, 9(2),185-214. doi:10.1080/14775080410001732596.
Helgadóttir G (2006). The culture of horsemanship and horse-based tourism in Iceland. Current Issues in Tourism 9(6), 535–548.
K. L. Sidali, Mattia E. L. Hartmann, O. Filaretova, A. C. Dörr (2013). Success factors of equestrian tourism: evidence from Germany. Turistica Gen-Giu, 2013, 73-83.
Konczal, E. F. (1975). “Models are for managers, not mathematicians,” Journal of Systems Management, 26(1), 12-14.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86-92.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Morris, M., Schindehutte, M.,& Allen, J., 2005. The Entrepreneur's Business Model: Toward a Unified Perspective, Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726-735.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Hoboken, N J : Wiley.
Rappa, M. (2002). Business Models on the Web. Retrieved from http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html
Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43–61.
Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Teece, D. J., 2010. Business Model, Business Strategy and Innovation, Long Range Planning, 43(2-3),172-194.
Timmers, P. (1998) Business Models for Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets, 8, 3-8.
Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10196789800000016
Wicker, P., Breuer, C. & Pawlowski, T. (2010). Are sports club members big spenders: Findings from sport specific analyses in Germany. Sport Management Review, Elsevier, 13(3), 214-224.