互動設計是現代信息社會的一種主流設計發展方向，而寵物的需求是非語言的互動方式關注的重點。當今飼養寵物的環境越來越多樣化，生活節奏快、獨自在外工作缺乏安全感等原因，讓越來越多人萌生飼養養寵物之想法。每當飼主外出時，寵物需獨自留守屋內，這期間有大量時間是寵物獨自處於封閉的空間內度過。如若寵物沒有學習過獨處，過度依賴飼主，則容易患上「寵物分離焦慮症」。因此關注寵物心理給予寵物全方面的陪伴是照護寵物身心健康的必要途徑。經本研究調查，發現市面已有多種伴侶寵物互動照護裝置，本研究把伴侶寵物互動照護裝置分為互動型伴侶寵物產品與智能型伴侶寵物產品。智能型伴侶寵物產品具有互動光斑功能的案例皆為單一元素的紅外線圓點光斑，本創作旨在探索寵物與光斑互動方式的可變性。本研究籍由各類文獻內容探討何謂寵物，以及理解寵物對人的醫療體系之影響。亦探究互動設計相關文獻理論與應用。將諸多文獻資料整合發現人與產品、寵物與產品三者的互動媒介分為「知覺」和「管道」兩部分，寵物和人兩者間的互動裝置（產品或服務）的介面可分為「輸入面」和「輸出面」，在人與裝置的互動中納入寵物，形成人、裝置、寵物三者的互動模式。人與寵物透過裝置的互動模式為後續案例研究與構築設計創作建立理論支持。在研究方法上透過文獻分析法、個案研究法與無預設答案的開放式訪談法綜合應用，透過歸納得出伴侶寵物用品在互動裝置方面發展之設計趨勢。在創作設計方面透過文獻的整理與分析，十六個個案比較分析與五位飼主的訪談結果，以創作從飼主與寵物之雙面角度解讀寵物和飼主的不同需求，運用互動設計概念與寵物更偏愛之元素結合創作出全新的寵物照護陪伴之裝置。最後獲致結論如下：一、互動設計是現代信息社會的一種主流設計發展方向；二、互動過程中更需加以審視人與寵物的互動方式、裝置所採用的互動技術，而最終所呈現的互動表現之效果更需加以理解；三、寵物的需求是非語言的互動方式關注的重點。

Interactive design is a popular design trend in the modern information society. The pet’s needs are one of the major concerns of nonverbal interactions. Today the external environment of pet keeping activities is becoming more and more diversified. Due to the fast pace of life and the lack of security for those who work alone away from home, more and more people would like to keep pets. When the owner goes out, the pet needs to stay at home alone. During the time, it spends much time alone in a closed space. If it relies too much on the owner and has not learned to stay alone, it is likely to suffer from separation anxiety. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to pets’ mental state and give them comprehensive companionship to keep them healthy physically and mentally.
Through investigation, this study finds that there are various kinds of interactive care devices for companion pets in the market. In this study, the pet interactive care devices are divided into interactive pet products and intelligent pet companion products. In the cases of intelligent companion pet products with interactive laser function, the laser spots are all single-element infrared light spot. This study aims to explore the variability of the interaction pattern between pet and laser spot. Through the literature review, this study discusses the definition of pet and tries to understand the impact of pets on human's health care system. This study also explores the theories and applications of interactive design, and finds out that the human-product and pet-product interaction media can be divided into two types: perception and channel. The interactive device (including products and services)' interface between pets and humans can be divided into input and output, which makes pets involved in the human-product interaction and forms an interaction pattern among people, devices, and pets. The human-pet interaction pattern through devices provides theoretical support for the following case study and product design.
In terms of research methods, through a comprehensive application of literature analysis, case study, and open-ended interview without any preset answer, this study summarizes the development of the companion pet products design with an emphasis on interactive devices. In terms of product design, this study fulfills a comparative analysis of 16 cases and five owners’ interview results based on the literature analysis, interprets the different needs of pets and owners from the perspective of both owners and pets, then uses the concept of interactive design to create a new pet care and companion device combined with the elements pets prefer.
This thesis draws the following conclusions: 1. Interactive design is a mainstream design development trend in modern information society. 2. In the interaction process, the interaction pattern between people and pets and the interaction technology used by the device need to be further examined. The final effect of interaction performance requires further understanding. 3. The pets’ demand is a major concern of nonverbal interactions.

參考文獻

專書
Dan Saffer. (2010). Designing for Interaction: Creating Innovative Applications and Devices, Second Edition ISBN 978-7-111-30782-2.
Dix, A., Finlay J., Abowd, G.,& Beale, R. (1998). Human-Computer Interaction, second edition. New York: Prentice Hall.
Eysenck, H. J. (1968). Eisenach Personality Inventory. San Diego, Calif: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Gosling, S. D.,& John, O.P. (1999). Personality dimensions in dogs, cats, and hyenas. Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society. Washington, DC.

李世國、顧振宇（2012）。普通高等教育工業設計專業“十二五”規劃教材——交互設計。中國水利水電出版社。
張美惠（1994）。資訊焦慮。台北：時報出版。(譯自:R . Wurman, 1989 , Information anxiety.)
葉至誠（2000）。社會科學概論。台北市：揚智文化。
韓乾（2000）。論文寫作的邏輯思維—研究方法原理。台北市：南方叢書。

期刊與論文
Curb, L. A, Abramson, C. I, Grice, J. W, & Kennison, S. M. (2013). The relationship between personality match and pet satisfaction among dog owners. Anthrosoos, 263, 395-404.
Edelson, J., & Lester, D. (1983). Personality and pet owner reship-A preliminary study. Psychological Reports,53(3),990-990.
El-Alayli, A., Lystad, A.L., Webb, S.R., Hollingsworth, S. L., & Ciolli, J. L. (2006). Reigning cats and dogs: A pet-enhancement bias and its link to pet attachment pet-self similarity, self-enhancement, and well-being Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 131-143.
Fischer, H, Wik, G, & Fredrikson, M. (1996). Extraversion, neuroticism, and brain function: A pet study of personality. Psychophysiology, 23, 345-352.
Gold, K. C., & Maple, T.L. (1994). Pe Iconicity-assessment In the golly and its utility as a management tool. Zoo Biology, l3(5), 509-522.
Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 45-86.
Hollerer, T., Feiner, S., Terauchi, T., Rashid, G., and Hallaway, D., “Exploring MARS: Developing Indoor and Outdoor User Interfaces to a Mobile Augmented Reality System,” Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), Vol. 23, No. 6, 1999, pp. 779-785.
Kubinyi, E, Turcsan, B, & Miklosi, A. (2009). Dog and owner demographic characteristics and dog personality trait associations. Behavioural Processes, 81(3), 392-401.
Kuscu, H., &Akgun, B. T. (2005). A new approach to interactive performance systems. Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA’ 05, 578-581.
McConnell, A. R, Brown, C. M, Shoda, T.M., Stayton, L. E, & Martin, C. E (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1239-1252.
Merola, I, Prato- vide, E, Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012). Dogs' social referencing towards owners and strangers Plows One, 7(10), e47653.
Mullan, S. M., Main, D. C. J. (2007). Behavior and personality of pet rabbits and their interactions with their owners Veterinary Record, 160(15), 516-520.
Podberscek, A. L., & Serpell, J. A. (1997). Aggressive behavior in English cocker spaniels and the personality of their owners. Veterinary Record, 141(3), 73-76.
Rooney, N J., & Bradshaw, J. W. (2003). Links between play and dominance and attachment dimensions of dog-human relationships. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science,6(2),67-94.
Svartberg, K., & Forkman, B. (2002). Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canes familiars). Applied Animal Behavior Science, 79(2), 133-155.
Schenk, A. M, Ragatz, L. L., Fremouw, W. J. (2012). Vicious dogs part 2: Criminal thinking, callousness, and personality styles of their owners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(1), 152-159.
Wedl, M, Bauer, B, Gracey, D, Grabmayer, C, Spielauer, E, Day, J, & Kotrschal, K. (2011). Factors influencing the temporal patterns of dyadic behaviors and interactions between domestic cats and their owners. Behavioral Processes, 86(1), 58-67.
Wells, D. L., & Hepper, P. G. (2012). The personality of “aggressive” and “non-aggressive” dog owners. Person-natty and Individual Differences, 53(6), 770-773
王軍（2009）。美國男子自創小狗心理療法調教寵物犬。中國工作犬業，08，45-46。
王嘉琦（2005）。狗狗是孩子最好的朋友—從過敏免疫學的觀點。健康世界，231，89-89。
余康正、鄭建文（2019）。以穿戴式感應器控制之互動燈光表演系統設計與研究。管理資訊計算，8 -2，80-92。
吳俊宇（2016）。「精靈寶可夢GO」流行後的VR、AR、MR如何前行。通訊世界，21，56-57。
李世忠（1993）。多媒體教學互動性的探討。教育資料與圖書館學，4（30），337-383。
杜玉紅、侯守明（2016）。移動終端增強現實技術在教學中的實踐研究。電子技術與軟件工程，13，60。
周忠、週頤、肖江劍（2015）。虛擬現實增強技術綜述。中國科學：信息科學，02，157-180。
徐菊紅（2013）。混合現實虛擬智能教室的方案設計。武漢工程大學學報。03，83-86。
袁瓊琪（2018）。信息時代背景下的行為互動海報設計研究。未出版之碩士論文。深圳大學，深圳市。
張茂楊、彭小凡、胡朝兵、張興瑜（2015）。寵物與人類關係：心理學視角的探討。心理學進展，01，142-149.
陳瀟瀟（2016）。淺談混合現實技術的發展趨勢。大眾文藝，15，264。
陳寶權、秦學英（2016）.混合現實中的虛實融合與人機智能交融。中國科學：信息科學， 12，1737-1747。
湯卓慧、朱培毅（2016）。虛擬現實、增強現實和混合現實及其在軌道交通行業中的應用。鐵路通信號工程技術，05，79-82。
黃益（2019）。寵物貓陪伴智能產品的創新設計思路。藝術科技，05，131-132。
葉明理、廖華方及陳秀宜（2002）。「台灣狗醫生」--- 動物輔助治療簡介。台灣醫學，6(1)，102-106。
劉雯（2019）。淺談針對空巢青年群體需求的交互設計探索。未出版之碩士論文。中央美術學院，北京市。
歐世勛（2003）。互動美感運用於人際溝通產品之設計研究。出版之碩士論文。國立交通大學應用藝術所，新竹市。
鄭楊碩（2013）。信息交互設計的歷史演進研究。出版之博士論文。武漢理工大學藝術與設計學院，武漢市。
羅立宏、劉丹雲（2017）。互動投影交互中國畫藝術實踐。美術大觀，10，78-79。
羅雨葉（2018）。互動投影不同的表現形式。科學技術創新，32，80-81。
蘇彥捷、郭振宇、李潛、王登峰（2006）。人格結構的維度與主人對寵物個體差異描述維度之間的關係。西南大學學報人文社會科學版，32（3），12-20。
鐮田義史、山崎強志、角尾有輝等（2016）。大型多人互動投影映射控制系統負載抑制。第八屆智能網絡與協作系統國際會議，捷克IEEE出版社，143- 149。

網路資料
Wikipedia互動設計。上網時間：2019年10月4日。網址：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction_design