透過使用開放教育資源課程平台進行知識的取得，期能跨越時間、空間等限制，更自主且能有效率的學習，藉此快速獲取新知。本研究利用科技接受模式理論基礎作為研究架構，探討以知覺便利、嚴謹性與宜人性為外部變項，利用科技接受模式中知覺有用性、知覺易用性、使用態度以及行為意圖等各個構面，對於學習者使用開放教育資源後學習成效之影響，以及成長需求對於使用態度之調節作用。本研究透過立意抽樣方式，採問卷調查法，以曾經使用開放教育資源進行學習之學習者為研究對象，問卷共發放143份，有效問卷124份，並利用SPSS統計軟體進行背景變項分析，SmartPLS軟體進行結構方程模型分析， PROCESS之方式進行調節作用之分析。研究結果：(1)使用開放教育資源之「知覺便利」顯著影響「知覺有用性」與「知覺易用性」；(2)使用開放教育資源之「嚴謹性」不顯著影響「知覺有用性」與「知覺易用性」；(3)使用開放教育資源之「宜人性」不顯著影響「知覺有用性」與「知覺易用性」；(4)成長需求對「知覺有用性」和「知覺易用性」對於「使用態度」不具有調節作用。本研究依據結果提出結論與建議，應同時提升知覺便利、知覺有用性與知覺便利性，以有效提升學習者的使用意願，進而其提升學習者使用的行為意圖，讓開放教育資源的提供能有效幫助學習者達到學習之目的，此供開放教育資源之學校、平台與教師，以及後續研究者作為相關研究參考。

With using the Open Educational Resources to acquire knowledge, it is expected to cross the limits of time and space and learn new knowledge effectively and proactively. This research used Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the conceptual framework to discuss the influence of external variables (perceived convenience, conscientiousness and agreeableness) and TAM (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using and behavioral intention to use) will bring to the learner after using the Open Educational Resources and also the regulation of growth needs on attitude toward using. This research adopted purposive sampling, using the questionnaire survey procedure while the study object was the learners who used the Open Educational Resources. A sum of 143 questionnaires were issued with 124 valid questionnaire and data were analyzed through a statistical software SPSS.
SmartPLS was excuted on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) while PROGRESS was excuted on regulation effects. The results show that: (1) “perceived convenience” has positive effect on “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use” when using the Open Educational Resources. (2) “Conscientiousness” will not have positive effect on “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use” when using the Open Educational Resources. (3) “Agreeableness” will not have positive effect on “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use” when using the Open Educational Resources. (4) “Growth needs” will not have moderating effect on “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use” to “attitude toward using”. According to the results, the findings and suggestions should be proposed to enhance the perceived convenience, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. And then it improved the behavior intention of the learners. The provision of open education resources can help the learners to achieve the purpose of learning. The result of the study can be a reference for schools, platform management and teachers, as well as follow-up researchers.

一、中文部分
朱彩馨、彭虹綾（2009）。提昇科技中介學習成效—從個人內在認知因素探討合作學習的學習成效。資訊管理學報，16（1），135-162。
何榮桂（2016）。重視以學生為本位之高等教育品質。台灣教育評論月刊，702，2-9。
余鑑、于俊傑、余采芳（2011）。數位學習知覺與使用意圖間影響之研究。電子商務研究，9（3），323-351。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2009）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。
巫嘉惠、呂秉翰（2015）。空大學生使用數位學習平台意向之研究。管理與資訊學報，20，37-86。
周君倚、陸洛（2014）。以科技接受模式探討數位學習系統使用態度-以成長需求為調節變項。資訊管理學報，21（1），83-106。
林盈伶（2006）。人格特質、學習型態對學習成效的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學，台中市。
林美鳳（2005）。高中生的人格特質、成就動機與社會適應相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
林倩文、張慈玲（2017）。專題文章（一）開放式課程使用者滿意度調查分析：臺師大經驗分享。TOOC電子報。取自http://tocwc.blogspot.com/2017/04/tocc5.html
洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘（2005）。科技接受模式之彙總研究。資訊管理學報，12（4），211-234。
徐吉男（2017）。以知覺易用性、知覺有用性、知覺趣味性和知覺便利性探討中學生對均一教育平台使用意願-以岡山國中為例（未出版之碩士論文）。樹德科技大學，高雄市。
張永福（2008）。高中職實用技能學程學生人格特質、自我效能、學習動機與學習滿意度之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學: 現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北：東華。
張春興、林清山（1981）。教育心理學。臺北：東華。
張珮瑩、孫惠民（2012年5月）。從人格特質與使用者認知來分析線上遊戲玩家態度傾向。2012 國際資訊管理學術研討會，台灣高雄。
許成之（1998）。認識無線電波。科技博物，2（5），122-126。
許桓真、尹玫君、歐陽誾（2016）。國民中小學 MOOCs 課程設計自評規範建構之研究。教育學誌，36，99-137.
郭生玉（2004）。教育測驗與評量。臺北：精華。
陳李綢（1991）。思考模式、學術經驗與認知策略訓練對大學生後設認知與智力的影響。教育心理學報，24，67-90。
彭敬凱（2015）。開放式課程對於學生主動學習能力提昇之研究－以微積分網路課程為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學，台中市。
游朝舜（2012）。International English Big-Five Mini-Markers之繁體中文版量表發展（未出版之碩士論文）。長庚大學，新北市。
黃思華、劉遠楨、顏菀廷（2011）。互動式電子白板融入創新合作學習模式對國小數學科學習成效與動機之影響。課程與教學季刊，14（1），115-139。
黃婉貞（2011）。科技接受模式探討國中教師使用教學資源網站行為意願之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立義守大學，高雄市。
楊國樞（1982）。社會及行為科學研究的中國化。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。
詹喜琴（2011）。人格特質, 教師教學行為與學習態度之相關研究-以高雄市私立高職餐飲管理科學生為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄應用科技大學，高雄市。
廖佳慧（2013）。醫院護理人員之人格特質、工作價值觀、專業承諾、工作滿足與工作壓力之關聯研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中臺科技大學，台中市。
鄭如伶、陳贊仰（2016）。磨課師 (MOOCs) 的數位學習模式之教學對電腦繪圖設計課程學習成效之研究。紡織綜合研究期刊，26（3）， 34-42。
蕭克昌（2011）。國小陶藝校本課程發展與學童學習成效研究—以高雄市某國小為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
謝秀芬（2006）。以能力為導向之國小低年級看圖作文教材及教學設計研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。

二、外文部分
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 120-137.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Boston: Beacon Press.
Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psuchology, 41(1), 63-105.
Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157-164.
Bloom Benjamin, S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80(5), 307.
Brown, A. H. D. (1989). Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome, 31(2), 818-824.
Carson, S. (2009). The unwalled garden: Growth of the OpenCourseWare Consortium, 2001-2008. Open Learning, 24(1), 23-29.
Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw Hill.
Champoux, J. E. (1980). A three sample test of some extensions to the job characteristics model of work motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 466-478.
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
DeJong, R.D., Van der Velde, M.E.G. and Jansen, P.G.W. (2001). Openness to experience and growth need strength as moderators between job characteristics and satisfaction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(4), 350-356.
Dwight, S. A., Cummings, K. M., & Glenar, J. L. (1998). Comparison of criterion-related validity coefficients for the Mini-Markers and Goldberg's Markers of the Big Five Personality Factors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(3), 541-550.
Evans, M. G., Kiggundu, M. N., & House, R. J. (1979). A partial test and extension of the job characteristics model of motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24(3), 354-381.
Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-51.
Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 287-322.
Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human—computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-391.
Graen, G.B., Scandura, T.A., & Graen, M.R. (1986). Employee-motivation; job-analysis; performance-level; need-psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 484-491.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
Haffer, R., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Developing versus developed companies in business excellence initiatives. Total Quality Management, 19(7), 763-775.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariable data analysis. London, UK: Prentice-Hall
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper saddle River. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River.
Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2006). A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 763.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, Inc.
Henderson, R., & Divett, M. J. (2003). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(3), 383-395.
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares(PLS) in strategic management research: A reviwer of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20,195-204.
Kirkpatrick, I. (1959). The inner circle: memoirs. London, England: Macmillan.
Lawler, E. L. (1971). Pay and organization effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lee, M. K., Lim, S. J., Kim, C. K. (2007). Preparation, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded sterically stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 28(12), 2137–2146.
Lee, M. M., Lin, M. F. G., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(3), 1-21.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
Medina, M. Q., & Chaparro, J. P. (2007/2008). The impact of the human element in the information systems quality for decision making and user satisfaction. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(2), 44-53.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oldham, G. R., Hackman, J. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1976). Conditions under which employees respond positively to enriched work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 395.
Pai, F. Y., & Huang, K. I. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(4), 650-660.
Pervin, L. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psychological bulletin, 69(1), 56.
Pervin, L. A. (1993). Fifty years of personality psychology: Affect and personality. Springer, Boston, MA.
Pervin, L. A. (1994). A critical analysis of current trait theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 103-113.
Pierce, J. L., Dunham, R.B. and Blackburn, R. S. (1979). Social systems structure, job design, and growth need strength: A test of a congruency model. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 223-240.
Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., & Hackman, J. R. (1975). Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696.
Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632-1640.
Schneider, B. (1990). Organizational climate and culture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489-505.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 411-436.
Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.
Stansfeld, S. A., Fuhrer, R., Shipley, M. J., & Marmot, M. G. (1999). Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(5), 302-307.
Tough, A. (1982). Some major reasons for learning. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 033251).
Wager, W. (2003). Writing learning outcomes-communicating expectations. Journal of General Education, 10(3), 101-114.
Yoon, C., & Kim, S. (2007). Convenience and TAM in a ubiquitous computing environment: The case of wireless Lan. Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 6(1), 102-112.