研究生: |
鄭雅娟 CHENG, YA-CHUAN |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
高中已婚女教師家庭壓力、支持系統與婚姻滿意度之關係-兩地雙生涯家庭與一般雙生涯家庭之比較 The Correlation of Family Stress, Supporting System, and Marital Satisfaction of Married Female High School Teachers--A Comparison Between Commuter Dual-career and Non-commuting Dual-career Families |
指導教授: | 周麗端 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人類發展與家庭學系 Department of Human Development and Family Studies |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 127 |
中文關鍵詞: | 高中已婚女教師 、家庭壓力 、支持系統 、婚姻滿意度 、一般雙生涯家庭 、兩地雙生涯家庭 |
英文關鍵詞: | married female high school teachers, family stress, supporting systems, marital satisfaction, non-commuting dual-career families, commuter dual-career families |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:273 下載:26 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
本研究旨在探討不同居住型態的雙生涯家庭(兩地雙生涯家庭與一般雙生涯家庭)中,高中已婚女教師的家庭壓力、支持系統與婚姻滿意度之差異及其影響因素。本研究對象為89學年度,高雄市各公私立高中職日間部各科之已婚女教師,分一般雙生涯家庭與兩地雙生涯家庭兩組,一般雙生涯家庭之樣本採叢集抽樣,回收有效問卷103份;兩地雙生涯家庭之樣本採立意抽樣,回收有效問卷110份。研究工具包括:「家庭壓力量表」、「支持系統量表」、「婚姻滿意度量表」及「個人基本資料調查表」。
本研究以t檢定、二因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及徑路分析進行統計考驗,研究結果如下:
一、一般雙生涯家庭與兩地雙生涯家庭女教師之婚齡、子女數、家庭生命週期、同住人數具有顯著差異。
二、一般雙生涯家庭女教師之家庭壓力較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師小。
(一)一般雙生涯家庭女教師之子女教養壓力較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師小。
(二)一般雙生涯家庭女教師之夫妻相處壓力較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師小。
(三)一般雙生涯家庭女教師之家人相處壓力較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師小。
三、一般雙生涯家庭女教師之支持數較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師多。
四、一般雙生涯家庭女教師之婚姻滿意度較兩地雙生涯家庭女教師高。
五、在有3位以上子女時,兩地雙生涯家庭女教師壓力大於一般雙生涯家庭女教師。
六、在教師兼導師時,兩地雙生涯家庭女教師之支持數大於一般雙生涯家庭女教師。
七、兩地雙生涯家庭女教師之支持數與婚姻滿意度呈正相關,但一般雙生涯家庭女教師沒有顯著相關。
八、在背景變項中,一般雙生涯家庭女教師之社經地位會直接影響婚姻滿意度;而兩地雙生涯家庭女教師的子女數乃透過家庭壓力而間接影響婚姻滿意度。
Abstract
This study is designed to examine the difference and the factors between the two types of dual-career families (commuter dual-career families and non-commuting dual-career families) in family stress, supporting systems, and marital satisfaction of married female high school teachers. The participants come from all high schools and vocational schools in Kaohsiung in 2000. They are divided into either dual career families or commuter dual-career families; the former is sampled with the return of 103 effective questionnaires, and the latter is sampled with the return of 110 effective questionnaires. The tools for study include: “family stress index”, “supporting system index”, “the scale of marital satisfaction”, and “demography”.
This study uses statistical methods of t-test, two-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation and path analysis.Following is the results:
A.There are significant differences between female teachers of non-commuting dual-career families and those of commuter dual-career families, in terms of duration of marriage, number of children, period of family life cycle, and number of persons living together.
B.The female teachers of commuter dual-career families experience less familial pressure than those of non-commuting dual career families.
(a)The female teachers of non-commuting dual-career families report less child rearing pressure than those of commuter dual-career families.
(b)Female teachers of non-commuting dual-career families experience less pressure than the ones of commuter dual-career families do in marital relationship.
(c)Female teachers of non-commuting dual-career families have also felt less pressure in familial relationship than the ones of commuter dual-career families.
C.Support for participants from non-commuting dual-career family is much more than those from commuter dual-career families.
D.Participants from non-commuting dual-career families report much more marital satisfaction than those from commuter dual-career families .
E.Female teachers of commuter dual-career families experience greater pressure than those from non-commuting dual-career families when the number of children is above three.
F.When working as a class adviser, there is more support for the teachers of commuter dual-career families than those of non-commuting dual-career families.
G.Supporting for the teachers of commuter dual-career families is positively correlated with marital satisfaction, but no obvious correlation is found in the ones of non-commuting dual-career families.
H.In terms of background variables, the socioeconomic status of the teachers of non-commuting dual-career families has direct influence upon marital satisfaction;however the number of children influences indirectly through familial pressure on commuter dual-career family teachers' marital satisfaction.
參考書目
一、中文部分
丁慧靜(民73)。 社會變遷中兩地夫妻婚姻生活調適之研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
井敏珠(民81)。 已婚職業婦女生活壓力與因應策略、社會支持之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
王 行(民86)。 台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究。東吳社會工作學報,3,47-78。
王以燕(民80)。 我國台灣地區社會環境與家庭結構變遷之探討:自台灣光復至今。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
王美惠(民76)。 已婚職業婦女之家務分工、性別角色態度和社會支援與婚姻滿意的研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
王慧桃(民70)。 已婚職業婦女的角色衝突及其生活滿足度。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
伊慶春(民80)。 台北地區婚姻調適的一些初步研究發現。Proceedings of the National Science Council(Part C),1(2),151-173。
李文英(民78)。 當前社會中離婚問題之探討。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
汪美偉(民78)。 雙生涯婦女壓力探討。今日生活,273,16-17。
周月清、李文玲、林碧惠譯(民83)。 家庭壓力管理,Pauline Boss著。台北市:桂冠出版社。
周麗端、吳明燁、唐先梅、李淑娟(民88)。 婚姻與家人關係。臺北縣蘆洲市 : 空中大學。
邱秀貞(民76)。 夫妻溝通與婚姻滿足之研究。私立東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文,未出版。
邱書璇(民82)。 已婚職業婦女之社會支持、內外控取向與壓力適應方式之研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
洪冬桂(民75)。 我國大學生適應問題、因應行為、求助偏好及其相關因素之研究。國立台灣大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
唐先梅(民80)。 台灣已婚職業婦女家庭與工作壓力之研究。台灣銀行季刊42(3),292-339。
唐先梅(民87)。 從家庭發展觀點探討雙薪家庭兩性工作家事及休閒時間之分配。社會文化學報6,75-112。
唐先梅(民88)。 雙新家庭家務工作、公平觀與夫妻關係滿意度之研究。中華家政學刊28,16-30。
高淑貴(民70)。變遷社會中母子關係調適之研究-職業婦女與家庭主婦之比較。行政院國科會研究計畫。
張苙雲(民74)。 社會變遷中各類社會支持系統功能的討論。行政院研討會編印,141-151頁。
張寶珠(民84)。 婦女自我肯定、婚姻滿意、父母非理性信念之關係研究。輔導季刊,31(1),21-30。
曹中瑋(民73)。 自我狀態、夫妻間溝通型態與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
莫藜藜(民86)。 已婚男性家庭分工態度之研究。東吳社會工作學報,3,117-156。
莊訓當(民85)。 國中已婚教師婚姻滿意度相關因素及其調適之研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
郭生玉(民83)。 影響教師工作心厭因素之分析研究。教育心理學報27,63-79。
陳志賢(民87)。 婚姻信念、婚姻溝通與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳明君(民80)。 家庭決策、夫妻溝通之自我開放程度與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。私立中國文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳明穗(民74)。 家庭型態、夫妻知覺一致性與婚姻滿足之關係研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳皎眉(民77)。 婦女的日常生活需求、支持系統與家庭及婚姻滿意度的關係。載於伊慶春、朱瑞玲主編:台灣社會現象的分析,153-179。台北市:中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊(25)。
傅瓊慧(民76)。 雙生涯及雙工作家庭妻子的生活幸福感及婚姻滿意度之相關因素研究。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
葉爾雯(民80)。 影響雙生涯夫妻家庭與職業衝突的有關背景、情境及心理因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
蔡淑昭譯(民71)。 雙重事業家庭之壓力與報酬。文藝復興月刊,134,30-37。
鄭忍嬌、陳皎眉(民80)。 已婚職業婦女生活壓力、自我狀態適應方式對身心健康之影響。家政教育,15(6),57-64。
戴智慧(民74)。 已婚職業婦女的生活壓力與休閒型態、婚姻滿意、生理健康、心理健康及工作滿意五者之關係。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝秀芬(民87)。 台灣女性的家庭角色觀與工作觀之研究。東吳社會工作學報,4,1-34。
謝銀沙(民81)。 已婚婦女個人特質、婚姻溝通與婚姻調適之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
簡春安(民80)。 國內婦女生活滿意度調查報告。當代社會工作,1,87-99。
藍采風(民71)。 雙生涯家庭。張老師,70(1),10-17。
藍采風(民85)。 婚姻與家庭。台北市:幼獅文化。
二、英文部分
Anderson, E. A., & Spruill, J. W. (1993). The dual-career commuter family: A lifestyle on the move. Marriage and Family Review, 19,131-147.
Arfken, D. E. (1985). Running at double pace: Women indaul-profession marriage. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Association women deans, administrators, and Counselors. ( ED260343).
Arkoff, A. (1968). Adjustment and mental health. N. Y.: Mc Graw-hill Book Co..
Attridge, M. D. (1995). Reactions of romantic parents to geographic separation: Anatural experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Minnesoda, USA.
Barnett, D. (1998). A qualitative study of children’s perceptions of commuter marriages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of South Carolina, USA.
Bunker, B. B., Vanderslice V. J., & Rice, R. W. (1992). Quality of tlife in dual-career families: Commuting versus single-residence couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family,54,399-407.
Calahan, C. A. (1996). Correlations of scores on the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Quality Marriage Index. Psycbological Report,78,530.
Calahan, C. A. (1997). Internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Quality Marriage Index. Psycbological Report,80,49-50.
Caplan, G. (1974). Support system and community mental health: Lecture on concept development. New York: Basic Books.
Cohen, S. & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin,98,310-357.
Crane, D. R. & Middleton, K. C. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy,28(1),53-61.
Dean, A., Lin, N. (1977). The stress-buffering role of social support: Problems and propects for systematic investigation. Journal of Nervous and Mental Dosease,165,403-417.
Dunkin, P. R. (1990). Ending the commuter: Communication strategies of couples during reintegration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The University of Oregon, USA.
Erwin, N. B. (1993). An interpretive case study of commuter marriage as a response to unemployment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Etzion, D. (1984). Moterating effect of social support on the stress-burn-out relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology,69,615-622.
Farris, A. (1978). Commuting. In R. Rappaport & R. Rappaport (Eds.),Working couples (pp. 100-107). New York: Harper and Row.
Ferk, D. J. (1998). Organizational commitment and work values among married daual-carreer employees: Traveling commuter versus single-residence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Saintlouis University, USA.
Garland, T. N.& Poloma, M. M. (1980). Two sides of the coin: An Investigation of Dual-career family in J. M. Henslin(Eds), (pp.298-313). Marriage and Family in a Changing Society. New York: Macmillan.
Gassel, J. (1974). An epidemiological perspective of psychosology facters in disease etiology. American Journal of Public Health,64,1040-1043.
Gerstel, N. (1977). The feasibility of commuter marriage.In J. Stein & N. Hannon (Eds.), The family:Functions and conflicts. Reading , Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Gerstel, N., & Gross, H. E. (1982). Commuter marriages: A review. Marriage and Family Review,5,71-93.
Gladding, S. T. (1995). Family therapy. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and the Family,52,818-831.
Govaerts, K. A. (1985). To work and to love:An examination of vocational and marital satisfaction in the dual-career commuter marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The University of Nebraska, USA.
Gowler, D., & Legge, K. (1982). Dual-worker families. In R.N. Rapoport (Ed.) , ( pp.138-158). Families in Britain.
Gross, H. E. (1980). Dual-career couples who live apart: Two types. Journal of Marriage and the Family,42,567-576.
Hall, D. T., & Hall, F. S. (1979). The two career couple. MA: Addison –Wesley.
Hawkins, J. L. (1968). Association between companionship hostility and marital satistication. Journal of Marriage and the Family,30,647-650.
Hollingshead, A. B., & Redlich, F. C. (1958). Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Jackson , & Brown, A. P. (2000). African Americans in dual-carreer commuter marriages: An investigation. Family Journal ,8,22-37.
Jeong, G. J., Bollman, S. R., & Schumn, W. R. (1992). Self-reported marital instability as correlated with the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale for a sample of midwestern wives. Psycbological Report,70,243-246.
Jesswein, I. (1984). The experience of the long distance marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The University of Toronto, USA.
Johnson, S. E. (1986). Commuter family relationships : Alive and thriving. Families Alive,7,10-12.
Johnson, J. & Sarason, I. G. (1978). Life stress, depression and anxiety: Internal-external control as a moterator variable. Journal of Phychosomatic Research,22,205-208.
Lin, N., Dean, A.,& Ensel W. (1986). Social support, life events,and depression.Orlando: Academic Press.
Marian, S. L. (1992). Dual career couples: New perspectives in counseling. ( ED 341940).
Pendleton, B. F., Poloma, M. M., & Garland, T. N. (1980). Scales for investigation of the dual-carrer family. Journal of Marriage and the Family,42,269-276.
Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (1969). The dual career family. Human Relations,22, 3-30.
Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (1976). Dual career families re-examined. New York: Harper & Row.
Rotter, J. C., Barnett, D. E., & Fawcett, M. L. (1998). On the road again: Daul-carreer commuter relationships. Family Journal ,6,46-49.
Rule, S. (1977). Long distance marriages on the rise. New York Times,1977 (Oct.) Section M:31.
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,44,127-139.
Schumn, W. R., Bollman, S. R.,& Jurich, A. P. (1997). Gender and marital satisfaction: A replication using a seven-point item response version of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psycbological Report,81,1004-1006.
Schumn, W. R., Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and Discriminant Validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale . Journal of Marriage and the Family,48,381-387.
Taylor, A. S. (1986). Dual carreer couples and geographic transter:Executives’ reactions to commuter marriage and attitude toward the move. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , The University of Tennessee, USA.
Vaillant, C. O.,& Vaillant, G. E. (1993). Is the U-curve of marital satisfaction an illusion? A 40-year study of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family,55,230-239.
White, M. B., Stahmann, R. F.,& Furrow, J. L. (1990). A Comparison of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the locke-wallace Martial Adjustment Test. (ED 333293)
Yamashita, M. (1991). Long distance Japanese marriage: Maintaining harmony during separation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation ,The University of Wisconsin, USA.