研究生: |
洪瑞禧 Hung, Jui-Hsi |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
分段自我控制回饋的動作表現與學習效應 Effects of Part Self-controlled Feedback on Motor Performance and Learning |
指導教授: |
卓俊伶
Jwo, Jun-Ling |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
體育學系 Department of Physical Education |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 48 |
中文關鍵詞: | 自我控制回饋 、獲得期分段 、結果獲知 、錯誤偵察 |
英文關鍵詞: | self-controlled feedback, part of acquisition phase, knowledge of results, error detection |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100356 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:154 下載:14 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討部分自我控制回饋在獲得期練習期間的分段對動作表現學習的影響。共招募72名實驗參與者 (平均年齡23.4 ± 4歲) 並隨機平均分派至前段自我控制回饋組、後段自我控制回饋組、全段自我控制回饋組、前段相應回饋對照組、後段相應回饋對照組及全段相應回饋對照組。以屈臂推物為實驗工作、且以絕對誤差 (absolute error, AE) 值、動作修正誤差值與錯誤估計 (error estimation, EE) 值分別檢驗學習者在獲得期及保留測驗中的動作準確能力、動作修正能力及錯誤偵察能力。結果發現在獲得期練習期間,六組間的準確性動作表現沒有差異,但各組的準確性動作表現皆隨著練習區間增加而提升;動作修正能力方面發現全段相應回饋對照組在獲得期的表現較部分組別差,六組的動作修正表現亦隨練習區間增加而提升。而在保留測驗中,六組之動作準確能力及錯誤偵察能力的學習效果皆沒有差異。因此本研究結論為,部分自我控制回饋在獲得期練習期間的分段對動作準確性的學習及錯誤偵察能力的發展沒有影響;而當學習者完全無法掌握回饋行程時動作修正表現較差。
This study was designed to examine the effects of part self-controlled feedback during acquisition phase on motor performance and learning. Seventy-two participants were recruited and randomly divided into Self-50% group, 50%-Self group, Self-Self group, Yoked-50% group, 50%-Yoked group, or Yoked-Yoked group. A puck-shuffling movement was adopted as experimental task. Absolute error (AE), correction error, and error estimation (EE) during acquisition phase and retention test were examined to infer motor performance and learning respectively. The results revealed that no significant difference of motor accuracy performance among six groups was found, but all groups of participants’ motor accuracy performance improved through the practice blocks. The motor correction performance of Yoked-Yoked group was worse than other groups in acquisition phase, and all groups of participants’ motor correction performance improved through the practice blocks. In the retention test, no significant difference in motor learning and error detection among six groups was found. Therefore, it was concluded that part self-controlled feedback did not affect the learning of motor accuracy nor the development of error detection; but the motor correction performance was worse when learner totally could not expect the feedback schedule.
李淑華、林靜兒 (2013)。自我控制回饋促進動作技能學習之因素。中華體育季刊,27(4),335-341。
張櫻玉、卓俊伶 (2003)。錯誤估計與結果獲知對空間移動懷動作表現與學習的影響。臺灣運動心理學報,2,77-92。
郭安婕、卓俊伶 (2013)。部分錯誤參照有助於動作表現與學習。體育學報,46(4),383-392。
林尚武、卓俊伶、楊梓楣、陳重佑、葉俊良 (2009)。自發錯誤估計促進自我控制回饋的動作學習效益。體育學報,42(2),15-28。
葉俊良、卓俊伶、林靜兒、陳重佑 (2007)。自我控制回饋對動作表現、學習及錯誤估計的效應,大專體育學刊,9(1),23-35。
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-149.
Bastos, F. H., Tani, G., Drews, R., Riek, S., & Marinovic, W. (2018). Do we know what we need? Preference for feedback about accurate performances does not benefit sensorimotor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1294-1302.
Carter, M. J., Carlsen, A. N., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2014). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1325.
Carter, M. J., & Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science, 31(6), 1459-1472.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(4), 408-415.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), 42-48.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(2), 40-47.
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 458.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coren, S. (1992). The left-hander syndrome: The causes and consequences of left-handedness, New York, NY: Free Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Fairbrother, J. T., Laughlin, D. D., & Nguyen, T. V. (2012). Self-controlled feedback facilitates motor learning in both high and low activity individuals. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 323.
Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Patterson, J. D. (2011) Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 113-119.
Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(2), 627-634.
Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A, Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.
Magill, R. A. (2011). Motor learning and control: Concept and applications (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McRae, M., Patterson, J. T., & Hansen, S. (2015). Examining the preferred self-controlled KR schedules of learners and peers during motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 47(6), 527-534.
Patterson, J. T., & Carter, M. (2010). Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science, 29(2), 214-227.
Patterson, J. T., Carter, M. J., & Hansen, S. (2013). Self-controlled KR schedules: Does repetition order matter?. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 567-579.
Patterson, J. T., Carter, M., & Sanli, E. (2011). Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(4), 624-633.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
Sanli, E. A., Patterson, J. T., Bray, S. R., & Lee, T. D. (2013). Understanding self-controlled motor learning protocols through the self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 611.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 21-53.
Tsai, M. J., & Jwo, H. (2015). Controlling absolute frequency of feedback in a self-controlled situation enhances motor learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(3), 746-758.