研究生: |
鄭小祺 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
圖書資訊人員之網路資源檢索技巧研究 |
指導教授: | 卜小蝶 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
圖書資訊學研究所 Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 183 |
中文關鍵詞: | 網路資源 、檢索策略 、檢索技巧 、熟手 、網路資訊尋求行為 |
英文關鍵詞: | Internet resources, Search strategy, Seach tactics, Expert, Web information seeking behavior |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:226 下載:56 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
現今網路十分普及,網路資訊已成為許多人的重要資訊來源。雖然網路資源豐富多元、取得便利,但網路資源龐雜,網路資訊檢索系統功能有限,以及網路使用者本身資訊素養不足,導致使用者搜尋網路資訊遭遇困難,因此有不少研究提出,運用檢索技巧將有助於快速有效查詢網路資訊。本研究希望分析歸納具圖書資訊領域背景的熟手使用之網路資源檢索技巧,並了解其檢索行為特性,以提供一般網路使用者參考,也可提供圖書館利用教育或資訊素養等課程內容設計時予以考量。
本研究採文獻分析法、實驗觀察法、問卷調查法、及訪談法進行,研究所得資料之分析採質量並重,並藉由立意抽樣方式及滾雪球法尋得受試者,有效樣本共計13名,包括5位參考館員及8位研究生。研究結果顯示,熟手使用之搜尋工具相當多元化,在進行檢索前熟手會先分析檢索問題的熟悉度、類型、主題、區域性、時效性、及難易度,選出合適之資訊來源或檢索工具;在發展檢索詞彙方面,除考量有關檢索問題的5W1H,出現於搜尋結果中的相關詞也是重要檢索詞彙來源;在過濾資訊方面,熟手經常利用站內或文內搜尋功能,迅速找到所需資訊出現之位置,且會依資訊之原創性、正確性、權威性、完整性、新穎性、熱門性、相關性進行過濾篩選。最後根據研究所得結果,針對網路資訊檢索技巧課程內容設計及網路資訊檢索系統設計兩個面向提出建議。
With the popularization of network, internet resources are important information resources for many users nowadays. Although internet resources are plentiful, various, and easy to access, the numerous information and poor quality bring users a great difficulty to search web information efficiently. In addition, the retrieval limitations of search engines and the shortage of users’ search knowledge also make the problem get worse. In order to alleviate this problem, many researchers investigate search tactics and claim that making good use of search tactics will be helpful to search web information. As a result, the goals of this study are to collect those search tactics employed by experts of Library and Information Science field and to analyze their web information search behavior.
The researcher used 4 research methods to gather data, including literature analysis, experimental observation, questionnaire, and interview. Subjects were 5 reference librarians and 8 graduate students who had to accomplish 4 search tasks. The search result showed that before choosing the information resource or search tool, experts would analyze the familiarity, type, subject, region, timeliness, and degree of difficulty of the search problem. In addition, experts would analyze the search problem based on 6 aspects (What, Who, Where, When, Why, How) to find out the proper search terms. Also, experts frequently used the relate terms showed in the search results as keywords. Furthermore, experts often used in-site search and find function to locate the search terms and filter the information quickly. To get better quality information, experts followed some criteria such as origin, accuracy, authority, completeness, novelty, popularity, and relevance to evaluate and filter web information. According to search result, the researcher provided suggestions for the design of web information literacy courses and web search system for improvement.
中文部分
Google(民94)。為什麼使用Google。民94年12月15日,取自:http://www.google.com/intl/zh-TW/why_use.html
卜小蝶(民85)。圖書資訊檢索技術。台北市:文華。
陳明君(民88)。光碟資料庫終端使用者檢索技巧之研究。大學圖書館,3(2),127-156。
陳秀慧(民90)。網路資源之引用分析:以國內圖書館學與資訊科學期刊及八十九年國科會獎助國內學術研究優良期刊為例。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學所,未出版,台北縣。
陳雪華(民84)。網路資源選擇與資訊評鑑。圖書館學刊,10,41-50。
黃慕萱(民85)。資訊檢索。台北市:臺灣學生。
黃鴻珠(民81年6月)。網路資源運用講授綱要。網路資源運用研習會,台北淡江大學。
顏龍源等(民90)。搜尋引擎大搜尋。資訊與教育雜誌特刊,293-301。
蘇諼(民92)。醫學網路資源的使用與評鑑。台北市:文華。
謝寶煖(民89)。網站搜尋e網打盡-當滑鼠遇上知更鳥。台北市:華文網。
英文部分
Alexa (2006). Top Sites Taiwan. Retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?cc=TW&ts_mode=country&lang=none
Aula, A., Jhaveri, N., & Kaki, M. (2005). Information search and re-access strategies of experienced Web users. Paper presented at the WWW 2005, Chiba, Japan.
Bates, M. J. (1979). Information Search Tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(4), 205-214.
Bates, M. J. (1987). How to Use Information Search Tactics Online. Online, 11(3), 47-54.
Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-425.
Bates, M. J. (1992). Tactics and Vocabularies in Online Searching. In White, H. D., Bates, M. J., & Wilson, P. (Eds.), For Information Specialists : Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work (pp.201-221). Norwood, N. J. : Ablex Publishing Co.
Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous state of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
Belkin, N.J., Marchetti, P.G., & Cool, C. (1993). BRAQUE: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, Special Issue on Hypertext, 29 (3), 325-344.
Berkman, R. (2000). Searching for the right search engine. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(20).
Bradley, P. (2004). The Advanced Internet Searcher’s Handbook. London: Facet Publishing.
Brin, S. & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Retrieved October 12, 2005 from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~yicn/cse591f05/anatomy.pdf
Case, D.O. (2002). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs& behavior. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (1999). Information seeking on the Web - An integrated model of browsing and searching. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS). Retrieved October 29, 2005, from http://choo.fis.utoronto.ca/fis/respub/aisis99/
Chowdhury, G. G. & Chowdhury, S. (2001). Information sources and searching on the World Wide Web. Lodon: Library Association Publishing.
ComScore Networks (2006). comScore Releases October U.S. Search Engine Rankings. Retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?id=1070
ComScore Networks (2004). More Than 40 Million Consumers in the U.K., France and Germany Used Search Engines in April, According to comScore Networks. Retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?id=464
Del.icio.us (2006). What is del.icou.us? Retrieved December 20, 2006 from http://del.icio.us/about/
Danny S. (1999). Search Engine Coverage Study Published. Search Engine Watch. Retrieved December 05, 2005 from http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/article.php/2167411
Delphi Group (2004). Information intelligence: Content classification and the enterprise taxonomy practice. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://stratify.com/infocenter/download/DelphiResearchReport2004.pdf
Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: concepts, methods, and results to date. Paper presented at International Communication Association Annual Meeting, Dallas
Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In Jack D. Glazier & Ronald R. Powell (Eds.) Qualitative research in information management. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited. (pp. 61-84).
Dumais, S., & Chen, H. (2000). Hierarchical classification of Web documents. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, 256-263.
Ellis, D. (1993). Modeling the information-seeking patterns of academic researchers: A Grounded Theory approach. Library Quarterly, 63(4), 469-486.
Ellis, D., Cox, D. & Hall, K. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 356-369.
Ellis, D., & Haugan, M. (1997). Modeling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384-403.
Ercegovac, Z. (1989). Augmented Assistance in Online Catalog Subject Searching. Reference Librarian, 23, 21-40.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
Fidel, R. (1984). Online searching styles: A case-study-based model of searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(4), 211-221.
Fidel, R. (1985). Moves in Online searching. Online Review, 9(1), 61-74.
Fortin, M. G. (2000). Faculty use of the World Wide Web: Modeling information seeking behavior in a digital environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.
Grover, R. (1993). A proposed model for diagnosing information needs. School Library Media Quarterly, 21(2). Retrieved December 10, 2005 from http://oldweb.ala.org/aasl/SLMR/slmr_resources/select_grover.html
Hargittai, E. (2004). Classifying and coding online actions. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 210-227.
Harris, R. (1997). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved December 05, 2005, from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
Harter, S. P. (1986). Online information retrieval:Concepts, principles, and techniques. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hölscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behaviour of Internet experts and newbies. Proceeding of the 9th conference on World Wide Web, 81-101.
Hsieh-Yee, I. (1998). Search tactics of Web users in searching for texts, graphics, known items and subjects: A search simulation study. Reference Librarian, 60, 61–85.
Hsieh-Yee, I. (2001). Research on Web search behavior. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 167-185.
Jansen, B.J., & Pooch, U. (2000). Web user studies: A review and framework for future work. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 235-246.
Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 361–371.
Lawrence, S., & Giles, L. (1998). Inquirus, the NECI meta search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 95-105.
Lynch, C.A. (1993). A framework for identifying, locating, and describing Networked information resources. (Preliminary draft).
Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Meho, L. I., & Haas, S.W.(2001). Information-seeking behavior and use of social science faculty studying stateless nations: A case study. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 5-25.
Meho, L. I., & Tibbo, H.R. (2003). Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis’s study revisited. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 570-587.
Mitra, A., & Cohen, E. (1999). Analyzing the Web: Directions and Challenges. In Jones, S. (ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net ( pp. 182-192). Thousand Oaks, C.A. and London: Sage.
Navarro-Prieto, R., Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Cognitive Strategies in Web Searching. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Retrieved December 10, 2005, from http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/proceedings/navarro-prieto/index.html
Netcraft. (2007). January 2007 Web Server Survey. Retrieved January 20, 2007 from http://news.netcraft.com/archives/web_server_survey.html
Pejtersen, A.M. & Fidel, R. (1998). A framework for work-centered evaluation and design:A case study of information retrieval on the web. Working paper for MIRA workshop. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mira/workshops/grenoble/fp.pdf
Pew Internet & American Life (2005). Search engine use shoots up in the past year and edges towards email as the primary internet application. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/press_release.asp?r=114
Pu, H. -T., Chuang, S. -L., & Yang, C. (2002). Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53(8), 617-630.
Radford, M. L., Barnes, S. B., & Barr, L. R. (2004). Web Researcher: Selecting, Evaluating, and Citing. Boston: A Person Education Co..
SantaVicca, E. F. (1994).The Internet as a reference and research Tool: A model for educators. The Reference Librarian, 41/42, 228.
Saracevic, T. (1997). The stratified model of information retrieval interaction: Extension and applications. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 313-327.
Savolainen, R., & Kari, J. (2006). Facing and bridging gaps in Web searching. Information Processing & Management, 42, 519-537.
Scirus (2006). About Scirus. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://www.scirus.com/srsapp/aboutus/
Sherman, C. (2006). Microsoft Launches Windows Live Academic Search. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3598376
Shute, S. J. & Smith, P. J. (1993). Knowledge-Based Search Tactics. Information Processing and Management, 29(1), 29-45.
Silverstein,C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., & Moricz, M. (1998). Analysis of a very large Alta Vista Query Log (SRC Technical Note 1998-014). Palo Alto, CA: Digital Systems Research Center.
Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B. J., and Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching the Web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 226-234.
Sutton, S.A. (1994). The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 186–200.
Tabatabai, D. & Shore, B. M. (2005). How experts and novices search the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 27, 222-248.
Technorati (2006). About Technorati. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://www.technorati.com/about/
Tonta, Y. (1996). Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources. IFLA Journal, 22(3), 240-245.
Wang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. (2000). Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources:An exploratory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing and Management, 36, 229-251.
Westbrook, L. (1995). The information seeking experiences of women’s studies faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Westbrook, L. (1999). Interdisciplinary information seeking in women’s studies. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.
White, M.D., & Iivonen, M. (1999). Factors influencing Web search strategies. In L. Woods (Ed.), Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Information Science (ASIS), 'Knowledge: creation, organization and use', Washington, D.C., 1999. (pp. 1-12). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
White, M. D., & Iivonen, M.(2001). Questions as a factor in Web search strategy. Information Processing & Management, 37, 721-740.
Wikipedia (2006). Twingine. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twingine
Wildemuth, B. M., Jacob, E. K., & Fullington, A. (1991). A detailed analysis of end-user search behaviors. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 302-312.
Wilson, T. D. (1997). Information behavior: An interdisciplinary perspective. Information Processing & Management, 33(4), 551-572.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249–270.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human Information Behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf
Wu, W. G. & Li, J. (1999). Comparing Web search engine performance in searching consumer health information: evaluation and recommendations. Buletinl of Medical Library Association, 87(4), 456-61.
Zhang, Y. (1998). The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science: A Citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 24(4), 241-254.
Zins, C. (2000). Success, a structured search strategy: rationale, principles, and implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(13), 1232-1247.