研究生: |
惠沁宜 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以行動研究瞭解國中引導式實驗之實施成效 To Examine Guided Experiments in Junior High Schools with Action Research |
指導教授: |
黃芳裕
Huang, Fang-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
化學系 Department of Chemistry |
論文出版年: | 2002 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 183 |
中文關鍵詞: | 引導式實驗 、後現代 、建構主義 、教師行動研究 |
英文關鍵詞: | guided experiments, post-modernism, constructivism, action research for teachers |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:194 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
鑒於九年一貫新課程的基本理念:「跨世紀新課程應該培養具備人本情懷、統整能力、民主素養、鄉土與國際意識,能進行終身學習之健全國民。」,以及課程綱要強調「培養學生基本能力的傾向將取代過去課程標準所偏重的學科知識傾向」,目前普遍應用的「食譜式實驗」及「教師為主的教學法」,如何培養學生「可以帶著走的基本能力」,值得科學教師反省。研究者以「主張相對理性、接納歧異矛盾、呈現有機典範」的後現代思考,深刻體認建構主義所主張探究取向教學模式的重要性,認為「知識由師生共同詮釋與建構」的觀點應該成為新世紀科學教師的基本教學理念,因而自2000年開始依知識建構論,進行相關教學設計。配合國中理化設計生活化的融入式教材-「認識酸與鹼」,經過試教、反省,覺察研究設計的缺失。重新釐清研究目的,再與專業研究社群研討,於2002年設計「由教師提供探索鷹架,讓學生進行主動探究」的引導式實驗,從簡單的生活實例開始觀察,分享學生的觀察記錄以擴大感官,分組選定變因予以探討,發表成果以引導學生對話,激盪腦力以凝聚共識…等,期望激發學生的探索興趣、增進實驗設計能力。透過行動研究將三年來的教學設計、研究歷程、反省與回饋進行詳實紀錄與呈現,期望提升自我教學成效,也供作關心教學改革者之參考。
This research is based on two concepts: the principle of the Nine-Year Integrated Curriculum, “To foster humanistic sentiments, integrating abilities, democratic attainments and native and international awareness, new education for the 21st century also aims to prepare our citizens for life-long learning.” and the emphasis of the curriculum design, “to train students to have the basic competences rather than merely academic knowledge.” The prevailing “recipe experiments” and “teacher-centered teaching”, as a result, should be re-examined, and science teachers should realize the importance of providing students with a “practical learning kit” for science study.
With the post-modernist thinking, “to question the subject existence, to uphold the idea of relativity, to accept diversity and contradiction”, the researcher acknowledges the significance of the innovation-oriented teaching model from constructionism and believes that the idea of “knowledge be interpreted and constructed by both students and teachers” should be the essential teaching conception as a science teacher in the future. Therefore, starting from the year 2000, the design for a new teaching module has been developed.
According to Science for Junior High School Students, the researcher has designed the experiment module, “an Introduction to Acid and Alkali”, with an approach closer to daily life. The project went through practice and evaluation, in order to resolve the flaws of the design and refine the purpose of research. Followed by support and debate with a professional research group, in 2002 it is transformed into a design for guided experiments, with which teachers offers the scaffold, but students are led to learn actively and independently.
Starting with observing a simple example from daily life, sharing the experiences from all the students to improve the senses for observation, dividing into groups to experiment under chosen conditions, presenting the results and brainstorming to join up common knowledge, etc., the purpose behind it is to encourage students’ learning interest and to improve experiment design abilities.
The researcher presents here the complete record of the design for teaching, research progression, reassessments and feedback during the past three years, hoping to advance in teaching and offer a reference for those who concern themselves in educational development.
中文部分:
中華民國課程與教學學會主編(2001)。《行動研究與課程教學革新》。台北:揚智。ISBN:957-818-285-6。
王紅宇 譯(1999)。William, E. D. 著(1993)。《後現代課程觀》。台北市:桂冠。ISBN:957-730-152-5。
王美芬 譯(2002)。〈科學教育的改革與創新:人本建構取向觀點〉。在黃台珠 等譯(2002)。Mintzes, J. J. 等著(1998)《促進理解之科學教育-人本建構取向觀點》,頁35-68。台北市:心理。ISBN:957-702-487-4。
王美芬 譯(1996)。〈建構論的科學學習觀〉。在熊召弟 等譯(1996)。Glynn, S. M.等著(1991)。《科學學習心理學》,頁1-28。台北市:心理。ISBN:957-702-165-4。
台東師院主編(2002)。《教育行動研究與教學創新上、下冊》。台北:揚智。ISBN:957-818-356-9、957-818-357-7。
李永吟(1998)。〈維考斯基的認知學說在教學的應用〉。《教師天地》,期93,頁17-22。台北市教師研習中心。ISSN:1019-2824。
李俊湖(?)。〈九年一貫課程與教師專業發展策略〉。國校教師研習會。http://content.edu.tw/primary/society/ks_ck/nine/n5.htm(2002年7月10日瀏覽)。
李錫津(2002)。〈教師—真正決定課程的人〉。《課程與教學通訊》,期10,頁1-4。臺北市立師範學院課程與教學研究中心。
李鴻亮(2000)。〈九年一貫課程中教學科技的新風貌〉。《九年一貫課程的教與學》。臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。http://www.iest.edu.tw/announce/9teach/chapper3.htm (2002年7月11日瀏覽)。
林清山譯(2000)。Richard E. Mayer著(1987)。《教育心理學:認知取向》。台北市:遠流。ISBN: 9573233258。
林陳涌(1996)。〈了解科學本質量表之發展與效化〉。《科學教育學刊》。期4(1),頁1-58。
周珮儀(1996)。〈後現代思潮衝擊下的教育研究〉。《研習資訊》,卷13,期5。http://www.iest.edu.tw/issue/j1/v13n5/42.htm。
邵家臻(1999)。〈解構二元對立思維〉。《社會政策及時事評論Critiques on Social Policy & Current Affairs》。http://swforum.socialnet.org.hk/article/990709.htm(2002年7月15日瀏覽)。
段曉林 譯(1996)。〈科學活動-過程技巧和思考〉。在熊召弟 等譯(1996)。Glynn, S. M.等著(1991)。《科學學習心理學》,頁301-320。台北市:心理。ISBN:957-702-165-4。
夏林清與中華民國基層教師協會譯(2001),Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B.合著(1993)。《行動研究方法導論:教師動手做研究》。台北:遠流。ISBN:957-32-3337-1。
夏林清譯(2000),Chris Argyris等著(1985)。《行動科學》。台北:遠流。ISBN:957-32-4177-3。
翁秀玉、段曉林(1997)。〈科學本質在科學教育上的啟示與作法〉。《科學教育月刊》,期201,頁2-15。彰化師大科學教育研究所。
陸奕身、陳美紀。〈建構主義理論與教學設計〉。彰師大商業教育系承辦中等學校教師在職進修網站 BeNet5 文書事務科教學資源網 http://be.ncue.edu.tw/content/project/benet5/index.html(2002年7月5日瀏覽)。
陳美玉(1998)。《教學法的省思與突破》。高雄市:麗文文化。ISBN:957-748-139-6。
陳泰然(2001)。〈九年一貫課程的精神、內涵和落實〉。《課程與教學通訊》,期7。
教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。
郭重吉(1996)。〈科學哲學的省思〉。《教育研究雙月刊》,期49,頁16-24。
郭重吉(1992)。〈從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進〉。《科學發展月刊》,卷20,期5,頁548-570。
張文軍(1998)。《後現代教育》。台北市:揚智文化。ISBN:957-8446-64-0。
張玉燕(1996)。〈建構導向的教學經營-以自然科為例〉。《國教月刊》,卷43,期1,頁7-17。
張靜嚳(1996)。〈建構教學:採用建構主義,如何教學?〉。《建構與教學》。期7。彰師大科學教育中心。
黃台珠 等譯(2002)。《促進理解之科學教育-人本建構取向觀點》。台北市:心理。ISBN:957-702-487-4。
黃芳裕(1996)。〈建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(二)—當今科學哲學對建構論的評析〉。《科學教育月刊》,期188,頁2-14。
楊龍立(2000)。《科學教導學》。台北市:文景。
詹志禹(2002)。《建構論:理論基礎與教育應用》。台北市:正中書局。ISBN: 9570914254。
蔡清田(2000)。《教育行動研究》。台北市:五南。
熊召弟 等譯(1996)。《科學學習心理學》。台北市:心理。ISBN:957-702-165-4。
趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(1995)。〈建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(一)—建構論的典範與評析〉。《科學教育月刊》,期180,頁2-16。
趙長寧(2001)。〈教師與行動研究〉。東海大學教育學程中心http://www.iest.edu.tw/issue/j1/v13n5/42.htm。
歐陽鍾仁(1988)。《科學教育概論》,版2。台北市:五南。ISBN: 9571102857。
錢俊 譯(1995)。Dreyfus, H. L.& Rabinow, P.(1992)《傅柯一超越結構主義與詮釋學》。台北市:桂冠。
鍾聖校(1992)。《認知心理學》。台北市:心理出版社。ISBN:957-11-1991-1。
英文部分:
Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of science Education. 16(4), 475-487.
American Association for the Advancement of science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington,D.C.: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literary. Washington,D.C.: AAAS.
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory:A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence and J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation:Advances in research and theory, vol 2. New York:Academic Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology:A cognitive view. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bruner, J. (1966). The growth of representational process in children . Paper presented at the 18th international congress of psychology. Mascoco.(Reprinted in Bruner, J.(1972). Beyond the information given, pp. 313-334), New York:Norton.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elliot, J. (1997). School-based curriculum development and action research in the United Kingdom. In S. Hollingsworth (ed.), International action research: A casebook for educational reform, pp. 17-29. London: Falmer Press.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes:Open University Press.
Gagne, R. (1963). The learning requirements for enquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1, 144-153.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, (75),121-133.
Gardner, H. (1987). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York:Basic Books.
Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K. (1991). The Psychology of Learning Science, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kelly, G. A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs. London & New York: Routledge.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1996). The nature of science: Instructional implications for a proecess more tentative than products. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Lous, MO.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.
Marble, S. T. (1992). Student descriptions of the nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
Matthews, M. R. (1996). What should be the goal in teaching about the nature of science?. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St.Lous,MO.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. M., & Novak, J. D. (1998). Teaching Science for Understanding: A Hunan Constructivist View, California: Academic Press.
Palmeri, A. B. (1996). The beliefs and science teaching practices of four quest teachers. Paper presented at National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Lous, MO.
Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York:Vintage Books.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in education. In T. Husen,& N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international in encyclopedia of education. Supplementary Vol. 1, pp.162-163. New York: Pergamon.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Translation newly revised & edited by Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. Cambridge,MA.:Harvard University Press.
William, E. D. (1993). A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. Columbia University: Teacher College.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17,89-100.